Features

Smart students! Nobel prizes! Touchdowns! Is this what the “blue and gold” means to you? If so, you may not realize that along with the good comes a dark side that dominates the lives of those who live near UC. If gold reflects the prestige and glamor of UC Berkeley, then blue represents the bruised and distressed Berkeleyans who underwrite that glamor. 

It is UCB’s immediate neighbors who bear its major burdens: traffic, parking problems, congestion, noise, litter, almost continuous construction impacts, and other problems caused by some misbehaving students. Meanwhile, taxpayers citywide subsidize UCB with over $11 million per year. The damages will increase if the UCB adds 2.2 million square feet of new construction and more than 5,000 new campus users.  

Berkeleyans for a Livable University Environment (BLUE) is an organization formed about two years ago by residents of neighborhoods near UCB, in response to increasing damage to Berkeley’s quality of life caused by the university. BLUE believes that the university and the citizens of Berkeley must have a relationship of equity and mutual respect. BLUE acknowledges the many positive ways in which the university contributes to the community, but BLUE does not accept the status quo, in which the costs of university activities are disproportionately borne by the city and the surrounding community.  

Now UCB and LBNL are poised to expand and increase their “take.” The City of Berkeley should do everything in its power to protect the city’s residents from the increasing physical and financial burdens of these two institutions. Reducing the damage done to Berkeley residents by the university, and achieving a fair relationship between the city and the university, is vital to the future livability of our city.  

BLUE is committed to creating a livable environment for everyone. Sadly, to the disbelief of informed observers, the city recently signed an agreement with UCB that permits all existing damage to continue, that does nothing to prevent further damage, and which even reduces Berkeleyans’ ability to create and protect our own downtown. This is why four members of BLUE are suing to stop the agreement. 

For those who are not familiar with the “blue” that accompanies UC’s “gold,” BLUE highlights the following major areas of community damage:  

Transfer of the commons 

The “commons” are the shared resources of our urban environment that belong to us all. Over the decades, the university has expropriated more and more of Berkeley’s commons. These include roadways, where over-intensity of UCB use increases traffic, municipal costs, and emergency access hazards; on-street parking spaces, which are removed from the city’s commercial and residential use and transferred to UCB; sidewalks, which are unnecessarily taken from public use during UCB construction; historic resources, which have been compromised and destroyed by UCB projects; open space, a limited resource that insofar as possible should be maintained for the pleasure of all Berkeleyans; aesthetic resources, including views, mature trees, and freedom from noise pollution—all damaged by UCB; and natural resources such as groundwater and creeks, which UCB activities have diminished and contaminated.  

Financial impacts 

Intensely used, tax-exempt properties owned or leased by the university create a large hidden fiscal impact on Berkeley taxpayers. Services provided to UCB cost Berkeley taxpayers over $11 million annually, and other universities similar to UCB pay their host cities up to $14 million per year. Imagine the more beautiful and livable city we might have today if we had received $11 million per year for the past 30 years to improve downtown, Southside, and our poorer areas of town. With our limited resources and many vital civic projects going unfunded, Berkeleyans cannot continue to support this large and wealthy institution. The city should use all available means to garner substantial (not token) reimbursement; this is the ethical arrangement. Instead, UCB reimburses the city for about 10 percent of its cost burden.  

Parking 

Parking is a scarce resource around the core campus, where UCB monopolizes the parking commons for its own use, and local residents pay the price in increased hardship, traffic, pollution, noise, time, and money. All day neighborhood streets near the campus function as UCB parking lots. In addition, several times per week thousands of visitors flock to venues such as Memorial Stadium, the Greek Theater, Zellerbach Hall, and Haas Pavilion, filling up neighborhood parking spaces. UCB should take steps to minimize and mitigate the parking problems it causes its neighbors. 

Traffic  

The continuing increase in the number of commuters to both UCB and LBNL has greatly increased city traffic congestion. Access to both requires crossing the city, often through residential neighborhoods. Major special event traffic can bring many streets to a standstill. Significant changes are needed in UCB’s and LBNL’s transportation policies to remove UC traffic from neighborhoods throughout Berkeley.  

Walkability 

Fortunately, many UCB students, staff, and professors live near and walk to campus—which is one reason maintaining the livability of near-campus neighborhoods is vital. As UCB grows, we must protect and enhance pedestrian pleasure, safety, and access to the campus. Increased walkability will improve the neighborhood character of residential streets near campus (through trees, pedestrian lighting, “eyes on the street,” and crime reduction), and the economic vitality of commercial areas (through more local shopping, street seating, etc.). This will help increase property and sales taxes. Additionally, good walkability can help reduce auto use and ownership. 

Construction impacts 

The city currently allows UCB to commandeer neighborhood streets, sidewalks, and parking spaces, rather than requiring UCB to use its own available resources. UCB projects last several years, and parking and traffic problems, noise, dust, and other unpleasantness are not the only problem: UCB construction has caused long-term residents to move out of the neighborhoods where they are most needed. When proposed university construction begins downtown, businesses will die without adequate parking, vehicle and pedestrian access, and a pleasant shopping environment.  

Memorial Stadium 

Memorial Stadium is a beloved structure, but its location creates substantial adverse impacts. These include city-wide traffic problems; parking problems that extend over a mile from the stadium; event noise that permeates local neighborhoods; and patron behavior problems (noise, litter, public drunkenness, and petty delinquency) far beyond the stadium’s surrounding neighborhoods. Straddling the Hayward Fault and attracting crowds of more than 70,000 into a crowded area with narrow streets, the stadium poses a danger to spectators and neighbors alike in the event of a major earthquake, fire, or evacuation. UCB’s determination to “modernize” the stadium and intensify use around it is wrong-headed, but if it goes forward, the university and the city must take extraordinary measures to reduce its damages and dangers. 

Strawberry Canyon 

Berkeleyans depend on Strawberry Canyon for open space, recreation, and its aesthetic contribution to our urban setting. Leaving aside any new university construction, ongoing UCB and LBNL activities in the canyon contaminate the soil and groundwater, which then moves downhill to pollute more of the city, including Strawberry Creek. Again, the university transfers its damages to city residents. 

So when Cal goes for the gold, let’s not forget who’s paying for it. We are. 

To support BLUE’s efforts to maintain quality of life in Berkeley, write to blue@igc.org. To support the lawsuit, make checks payable to “Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker” and mail them to 1 Hazel Rd., Berkeley, 94705. 

David Baker is a Cal alum, a 43-year resident of Berkeley, and a founding member of BLUE.