Opinion

Editorials

Editorial: Political Parties Aren’t for Everyone at Cal

By Becky O’Malley
Friday October 20, 2006

Someone called us this week to complain that the depiction of mayoral candidate Zelda Bronstein in Tuesday’s cartoon was, to put it kindly, very unflattering. The caller opined that she and two (female) friends thought that the cartoonist must be a misogynist at heart, since he always seems to draw Bronstein harshly. Well, probably that’s not the explanation. -more-


Editorial: Deconstructing the Campaign Mailers

By Becky O’Malley
Tuesday October 17, 2006

In the mail this week, a flood of glossy brochures, soliciting votes for the upcoming election. If you’re confused by them, you’re not alone. -more-


Public Comment

Letters to the Editor

Friday October 20, 2006

GOLDEN GATE FIELDS -more-


Berkeley Mayoral Candidate Statements: Tom Bates

Tom Bates
Friday October 20, 2006

Four years ago I entered the race for mayor with a simple promise—that we would turn a new page in Berkeley’s political history by setting aside the old political divisions and working together to make Berkeley the very best it can be. We have been remarkably successful—governing with civility, supporting our kids and schools, making Berkeley an environmental leader again, and creating affordable housing. -more-


Berkeley Mayoral Candidate Statements: Zelda Bronstein

Zelda Bronstein
Friday October 20, 2006

Since June, I’ve been going door-to-door talking to Berkeley voters all over town. I’ve now visited thousands of households, and everywhere I’ve gone, I’ve encountered dissatisfaction with the current mayor and his administration. The details vary, but one theme is constant: In Berkeley, of all places, people feel that they have lost control of their local government. My campaign is about reclaiming City Hall for the community. -more-


Berkeley Mayoral Candidate Statements: Christian Pecaut

Christian Pecaut
Friday October 20, 2006

Landlords: Remorseless, lying, blood-sucking parasites. More property, more vicious. Give back every dollar stolen from the tenants, immediately, in cash. Rent is Theft. -more-


Berkeley Mayoral Candidate Statements: Zachary RunningWolf

Zachary RunningWolf
Friday October 20, 2006

Come Run with the Running Wolf -more-


UPCOMING CANDIDATE STATEMENTS

Friday October 20, 2006

THE DAILY PLANET

Friday October 20, 2006

Mayor: Zelda Bronstein -more-


Commentary: Milo Foundation Poses Health Risks for Neighbors

By Jane Tierney
Friday October 20, 2006

The City of Berkeley, by casually, sans permit, allowing Milo Foundation to introduce, in a deliberate and concerted effort, unknown and diseased animals to our neighborhood, has exhibited gross negligence in the administration of their duties to protect and serve the residents of our community. This community includes neighbors, volunteers and visiting public to the locations surrounding the 1575 Solano and 1572 Capistrano Ave. addresses. The cavalier and uninformed lack of control over these conditions puts the City of Berkeley at great risk for potential lawsuits from individual and groups most at risk for these diseases, that is, the entire public. -more-


Commentary: The Swiftboating of Measure J

By Judith Epstein
Friday October 20, 2006

Until recently, I held the naïve belief that only objective language would be used in official voters’ materials. But I was wrong. Unlike the state attorney general, our city attorney is not legally required to use impartial language to explain ballot measures to the public. As a result, Berkeley voters do not have an absolute right to unbiased presentations of municipal measures. -more-


Commentary: Myopia, Not Vision, in North Shattuck Plan

By Art Goldberg
Friday October 20, 2006

Twice during the past few months, the Planet has published articles proclaiming a “new vision” for Shattuck Avenue north of Vine Street, where the Farmers’ Market is located. The promoters of this “vision,” almost exclusively realtors, developers, architects and merchants, would like you to believe they will be creating a pedestrian plaza with lots of greenspace and trees. -more-


Commentary: How State Bond Measures are Paid and Used

By Roy Nakadegawa
Friday October 20, 2006

If all four bond measures, Propositions 1B to 1E, pass, the State’s bond debt would almost double. With constant economic growth, we might afford it, but in a downturn or even if State’s revenue is flat, we will have to increase taxes, cut services, or borrow even more money to pay for the Bonds. Worse, some of the bond funds would be used in a socially inequitable manner, failing to produce long-term benefits or improve our quality of life, environment and economy. Measures 1C and 1D seem worthwhile, but 1B and 1E do not. -more-


Letters to the Editor

Tuesday October 17, 2006

IN SUPPORT OF MAYOR BATES -more-


Commentary: What’s the Matter With Berkeley?

By Sharon Hudson
Tuesday October 17, 2006

Over the summer I read What’s the Matter with Kansas? by Thomas Frank. Kansas voters regularly vote to humiliate and destroy their state, enriching and empowering the privileged class, and weakening and impoverishing regular folk. We Berkeleyans are too smart to fall into that trap. Or are we? -more-


Commentary: NEBA President Explains Stand on Measure A

By Eleanor Pepples
Tuesday October 17, 2006

Lately there has been much discussion about how to help the Berkeley public schools thrive. -more-


Commentary: Not a NIMBY

By Robert Clear
Tuesday October 17, 2006

The administration is in denial. The “dumb” growth advocates are into defeatism: “... nothing we do in Berkeley’s land use will have any noticeable impact on climate change.” (Sharon Hudson, Daily Planet, Aug. 8). It is an easy type of excuse that is too sweeping in its scope. Why protest the war, when nothing you personally can do will stop it? Why not cheat on your taxes? Lots of people do it and your taxes are probably insignificant in the total budget. -more-


Commentary: Do Benefits of Drug War Outweigh the Costs?

By Travis C. Ash
Tuesday October 17, 2006

Since the war on drugs began some $47 billion a year is reserved from federal, state, and local treasuries to combat the so-called menace that encompasses the trafficking, sales, and use of drugs directly affecting the citizens of the United States of America. This obviously reflects the government’s view on the subject of drug abuse and related activities as very grave indeed. It is apparently serious enough to lawmakers who deem it necessary to spend that insane amount of tax money, and commit entire agencies of human resources annually in an attempt to try and bring the problem to a halt. The trouble is that through all the searches and seizures, television campaign ads, and mandatory minimum sentencing there is no end in sight and it seems to have fueled a kind of evolution in the world of mind altering substances. -more-