Opinion

As we had feared, Molly Ivins died on Wednesday. The anti-war war columns that we’d requested on Tuesday as a way of carrying on her last campaign have been coming in, and we’ll be printing one in every issue for a while as a tribute to her. We’ve also gotten, unsolicited, a good number of letters just expressing the writer’s appreciation for Molly herself, which we’ll add to our letters pages, some in print and all on the web. The Texas Observer, where she worked for many years and continued raising money for after she moved on, has put together an affecting memorial at texasobserver.org, another good place for readers to send their comments on Molly herself. -more-

The news over the weekend was not good. Molly Ivins, everyone’s favorite smart-mouth columnist, was back in the hospital for the third time, dealing with her raging cancer, which started in her breasts but now has spread throughout her body. Last fall, she was in San Francisco on a panel at a conference of journalism educators, and she didn’t look well then, wan, thin, wearing a bold hat to cover up the loss of most of her hair. Her tongue was as sharp as ever, of course, causing a roomful of ordinarily sincere and cautious academics to shriek with laughter before giving her a standing ovation. -more-

CENTER STREET -more-

EDITOR’S NOTE: This letter was sent to the mayor, City Council and the Downtown Area Plan Advisory Committee, as well as other city officials and local newspapers. -more-

I previously served on the Hotel Convention Center Museum Task Force of which Downtown Business Association (DBA), the Convention and Visitors’ Bureau and the Chamber of Commerce were all members. After presentations by all sides, the task force recommended the closure of Center Street to through vehicle traffic. The council adopted the recommendations of that task force. I now serve on the Downtown Area Plan Advisory Committee (DAPAC). More than any other interest group, over this last year downtown businesses have had the opportunity to and made presentations to the entire DAPAC and to its Center Street Subcommittee. Even at the subcommittee’s last meeting, most of the time was taken with presentations of DBA-solicited models & drawings and the one environmental presentation was severely restricted. DAPAC made no final determination but decided on a preferred study option—determine if a pedestrianized plaza will work on this street. This is the same decision that was previously made by the task force and by council. That’s what DAPAC (nearly two-thirds majority) decided last week. -more-

Mark McLeod has written a letter to the City Council, local papers and others which attacks the Downtown Area Plan Advisory Committee’s vote to support pedestrianization as the preferred option for Center Street between Shattuck and Oxford streets downtown where the new hotel and UC art museum are planned. -more-

It is heartening to learn that many readers of the Daily Planet understand the reality of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Others say they plan to approach Jimmy Carter’s new book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, with an open and inquisitive mind. Below, I respond to Dan Spitzer’s and Rachel Neuwirth’s criticisms of my Jan. 9th op-ed on the subject. -more-

Mr. Spitzer’s latest misunderstanding of the Israel-Palestine disputes, and of President Carter’s recent book, deserves answers. -more-

Is Dan Spitzer fooling anyone when he calls himself a progressive? One aspect of Spitzer’s Jan. 30 letter to the Berkeley Planet is the use of disingenuous “facts” to create insupportable assumptions in the public mind. Thus the statements about what was offered by Israel to the Palestinians at the Clinton Camp David meetings are riddled with falsehood, but his letter attacking Joseph Lifschutz isn’t really about what Arafat allegedly rejected. (If anyone needs to know what Israel actually offered the Palestinians at camp David—there was no formal proposal--I suggest Israeli Professor Tanya Reinhart’s excellent and well documented book, Israel/Palestine: How to End the War of 1948. It’s all there). -more-

NANCY PELOSI -more-

Of all our hang-ups, American folly over spectator sport is one of the more pernicious. It is the lingua franca of social encounter, the club handshake. Along with the few who share the same celebrative awe and commingling techniques through opera, you have only to select some proper names from the rosters of football, past and present, basket or baseball—preferably accompanied by scores, injuries, and titles, to qualify for the brother-sisterhood of the “elect,” or at least “admitted.” -more-

EDITOR’S NOTE:This commentary was originally submitted to the Daily Californian in response to an editorial in that paper. The Daily Cal has not published it. -more-

SEEN ONE OAK... -more-

By Dan Knapp -more-