Page One

In a resolution that was, perhaps, the first like it in the nation, the Berkeley City Council passed a resolution Tuesday, mourning the loss of those who died in the Sept. 11 attacks, condemning the attackers and calling on elected representatives to minimize the risk to American military personnel while avoiding actions that could endanger the lives of innocent people in Afghanistan. 

A divided council debated the issue before a packed council chambers, with most of the audience in support of the resolution and some 20 apparently opposed. 

Councilmember Polly Armstrong tried to counter the motion, authored by Councilmember Dona Spring, and put forward a resolution to support the president and honor his bringing together a coalition of 60 countries to fight terrorism. This resolution was defeated. 

Comments from the public mostly reflected support for the main council motion. Ann Fagen Ginger from the Meiklejohn Institute made a point that the fight against terrorists should be confined to international law. Barbara Lubin from the Middle East Children’s Alliance called on the council to support a cessation of the bombing.  

“I have seen the result of American bombing on starving Iraqi children,” she said. 

Eric Skidmore was one of those supporting the attacks on Afghanistan. He is part of United Students for America, a group formed on the UC Berkeley campus soon after Sept. 11 to provide a counter voice to the anti-war sentiment on campus.  

“To approve this recommendation will not only make Berkeley a laughing stock, but will misrepresent most Berkeley citizens,” he said. “There are many people (in Berkeley) who support America.”  

While Councilmember Betty Olds, a member of the moderate council faction, talked about the difficulty of responding to the terrorists “who do not value human lives.”  

Councilmember Polly Armstrong, also a moderate, said those supporting the resolution cause the city to appear out of step.  

“Instead of a thoughtful city, we come across as a bunch of nuts,” she said, condemning the progressives. 

Speaking in favor of the resolution, Councilmember Kriss Worthington pointed to the “damage and destruction (the United States) has caused in Afghanistan” and said he would not give in to the pressure to “sit down and shut up” on the question. 

“The loss of lives is horrifying,” said Councilmember Linda Maio, arguing that terrorism can be overcome by changing policies that cause others in the world to hate the United States. “We can overcome terror by making it irrelevant,” she said. 

The main motion, which was approved, was broken up into various parts: 

• Dean and the five progressives – councilmembers Worthington, Spring, Margaret Breland, and Linda Maio and Vice Mayor Maudelle Shirek voted in favor of expressing grief at the atrocities and honoring “the valiant firefighter and police...and our military personnel now engaged in Afghanistan.” 

• Dean also supported the progressives in calling for a national campaign to lessen dependence on oil from the Middle East and to commit to using renewable energy sources. 

• The council split 5-4 – progressives voting in favor and moderates abstaining – on calling for an quick conclusion to the bombing and avoiding actions that could endanger civilian lives in Afghanistan and U.S. military lives; on calling for an international body to bring the terrorists to justice; and on “addressing and overcoming those conditions such as poverty, malnutrition, disease, oppression and subjugation that tend to drive desperate people to acts of terrorism.”