Features

FDA says cloned animals ok to eat, but not transgenic ones

By PAUL ELIAS The Associated Press
Monday August 26, 2002

SAN FRANCISCO — Juicier chops, thicker steaks and other food produced by cloned animals could be in grocery stores by next year. Atlantic salmon fattened with genes spliced from other fish, though, remain years away from the American dinner table. 

A long-awaited report to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released this week made an important distinction between cloned animals and transgenic beasts — those altered with genes from other species: Cloned animals are probably safe to raise and eat while genetically engineered ones may not be. 

The distinction means that dozens of biotechnology companies attempting to create all sorts of transgenic animals are still years away from bringing their products to market. 

The report was good news, however, for the companies that simply clone animals without tinkering with their genes. 

At least two U.S. companies are now cloning prized livestock that are the healthiest, fattest and fastest growing of their herds. By cloning the animals with the best genes, the companies aim to help beef, pork and egg producers trim costs and bolster profits. 

The companies employ nuclear transfer techniques, which replaces the nucleus of an egg with that of an adult cell such as a skin cell. The resulting offspring are the exact genetic replica of the adult cell donor. Unlike transgenic animals, no foreign DNA is introduced during the process. 

One big goal of the companies is to harvest and sell the semen collected from the cloned animals, keeping prized livestock lines producing for generations. 

“This will revolutionize the cattle industry,” proclaimed Ron Gillespie of Cyagra Inc. of Worcester, Mass., which clones cows and pigs. Cyagra is a subsidiary of Advanced Cell Technology, which announced last year that it was attempting to clone a human embryo. 

Still, cloning has met with protest from animal rights groups, who complain the new technology constitutes cruelty to animals because only a small percentage of cloning attempts lead to live births. 

Some studies have shown that cloned animals suffer more than naturally bred animals from arthritis, obesity and other health problems. Also, biologists say there’s another danger in the lack of genetic variety — certain diseases could wipe out entire herds of genetic duplicates.