Full Text

"Somewhere over the rainbow," Friday at Sequoia, as water sprayed by worker in white, center mixes with warm air. That rainbow, center, must be for real, because Haste and Telegraph is drug free!
Ted Friedman
"Somewhere over the rainbow," Friday at Sequoia, as water sprayed by worker in white, center mixes with warm air. That rainbow, center, must be for real, because Haste and Telegraph is drug free!
 

News

Berkeley Moves Fast To Resume Sequoia Demolition After Permit Beef Quells Jawzilla

By Ted Friedman
Friday December 02, 2011 - 03:28:00 PM
"Somewhere over the rainbow," Friday at Sequoia, as water sprayed by worker in white, center mixes with warm air. That rainbow, center, must be for real, because Haste and Telegraph is drug free!
Ted Friedman
"Somewhere over the rainbow," Friday at Sequoia, as water sprayed by worker in white, center mixes with warm air. That rainbow, center, must be for real, because Haste and Telegraph is drug free!
"Jawzilla," at right, takes the day off while permit battles wage at city hall.
Ted Friedman
"Jawzilla," at right, takes the day off while permit battles wage at city hall.
Mr. nice guy. This gentle pick-on-a lift (pick is hiding), will remove bricks carefully to save Thai Noodle, shown, and Tibetan Treasures, immediately North, and Annapurna.
Ted Friedman
Mr. nice guy. This gentle pick-on-a lift (pick is hiding), will remove bricks carefully to save Thai Noodle, shown, and Tibetan Treasures, immediately North, and Annapurna.
Now that Jawzilla's "cousin-scoops" are doing the heavy lifting is Jawzilla finished?
Ted Friedman
Now that Jawzilla's "cousin-scoops" are doing the heavy lifting is Jawzilla finished?
Gawkers Friday. Gawking at Sequoia has become popular at Telegraph and Haste.
Ted Friedman
Gawkers Friday. Gawking at Sequoia has become popular at Telegraph and Haste.

Jawzilla, the monster jaws-on-a-crane was quiescent Thursday, as city hall convened an impromptu permits meeting to clear the way for returning Telegraph Avenue to "normal," after demolition of the fire-gutted Sequoia Apartments rained bricks that closed North-South foot traffic.


Had the removal of the Sequoia been shut down more than briefly, killer disruptions to the Ave, could have de-toured the 28th Telegraph Ave Holiday Street Dec. 16-18, and 22-24. The fair is a chance this year for Berzerkers to support Telegraph in its moment of travail.

Jaws, and scoops of re-construction, began their end-stage savagery Friday morning, much to the relief of everyone who wants to see the avenue cleared. "Freddy" Pena, demolition crew-chief, said Friday that resumption of demolition puts clearing plans back on schedule. 

Pena added that his estimated completion date (3-5 days) for restoring Telegraph foot-traffic, would be met. He rotated his hand, gesturing maybe. 

You could hear a collective sigh of relief from Teley businessmen, some of whose businesses have either been shuttered or remain open--devoid of customers. 

As the usual gawkers gathered for the grim spectacle of destruction,Thursday, it soon became apparent that demolition had shut down.  

Meanwhile, the structural engineers for the Sequoia owners met at 11 a.m. with various department personnel within the city manager's office to craft a solution to a permit violation, which occurred when mortar overheated Wednesday, causing the Sequoia to sink beneath the twenty-nine and one-half foot limit of the demolition permit. 

By late afternoon, additional departments met to go over new engineering plans which had been submitted earlier by Sequoia engineers. 

Friday morning, Jawzilla, seemingly rested, and now joined by his cousins, a couple of scoops on a crane, looked on approvingly as removal of rubble proceeded. 

 

As debris removal approaches ground floor cornices, slamming, bashing, and battering will give way to more gentle methods to protect the ground floor and adjoining businesses. According to Pena, demolition will now be "brick-by-brick. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

Ted Friedman, a 30 year South sider, is rooting for Jawzilla, so Teley can rise from ashes once more, as it did after the Berkeley Inn fire.


Sequoia Fire: Death Blow to Our lungs and Other Street Talk

By Ted Friedman
Sunday December 04, 2011 - 09:22:00 AM
Goodbye to all that. Greg Ent, left, owner of Sequoia, with his father, Ken, discusses final demolition plans with construction foreman, "Freddy" Pena Saturday.
Ted Friedman
Goodbye to all that. Greg Ent, left, owner of Sequoia, with his father, Ken, discusses final demolition plans with construction foreman, "Freddy" Pena Saturday.
Get used to it. Minus the remnants of North east first-floor, which will be removed brick-by-brick Monday, this is what you will pass by on your way between Haste and Channing. That's right, a stage-set facade of Raleigh's and InterMezzo. There is nothing behind the facade. The two businesses, which survived the fire, intact, had bricks too hot to handle and their interiors were demolished, according to the construction foreman.
Ted Friedman
Get used to it. Minus the remnants of North east first-floor, which will be removed brick-by-brick Monday, this is what you will pass by on your way between Haste and Channing. That's right, a stage-set facade of Raleigh's and InterMezzo. There is nothing behind the facade. The two businesses, which survived the fire, intact, had bricks too hot to handle and their interiors were demolished, according to the construction foreman.

When I wrote that the Sequoia Apartments fire was a death-blow to Telegraph businesses (Planet: Nov. 20), I never considered that all of us had received the death blow. 

While reporting on the effect of the fire to the intersection of Haste and Telegraph, I had missed the story of a lifetime—that we had all been murdered, as in the famous film noir, D.O.A. (dead on arrival), 1950. 

But especially high winds Saturday, and the usual congregation of Sequoia demolition-gawkers, squawkers, and rumor-mongers, brought home the death point, and a few others. 

A messenger of doom descended on us Saturday, gesticulating, screaming, and just freaking out—warning everyone we would all die in thirty years from breathing asbestos. I had witnessed less dramatic warnings near the demolition site last week, including a few gawkers wearing dust-masks. 

None of them matched the vehemence of the asbestos prophet-of-doom. 

I'm not saying we won't all die someday. 

Workers at the demolition site wore industrial-strength gas masks, even as dust from falling walls and bricks were continuously water-hosed throughout the later stages of the demolition. 

Still, the high winds and a stink, like burning rubber filled the air. It was my longest day on the scene, as I refused to leave for fear of missing a photo of the last crumbling apartment house wall. 

I don't want to make light of the asbestos danger to people who actually have thirty years to live. 

I don't have that long. 

And I don't want to alarm anyone either, especially people who live and work in the immediate vicinity—which includes me, because I practically live at the notorious Cafe Mediterraneum, almost across the street from the Sequoia. 

I'm just raising the asbestos issue so that my fellow demolition-gawkers, last week, can consult their doctors. 

Let's call the asbestos alert "street supervisor's" hearsay at this stage. Rumors ran wild among gawkers all week. It gets boring during waits between raining bricks and thunderous thuds. 

Some of the street supervisor's observations follow: 

"Why didn't they just blow it up, or use a wrecking ball? Why didn't they plastic wrap it, like the building on Haste (Edith Head apartments, presently wrapped in plastic). Why can't they let us walk through to Channing on the West side of Telegraph? When will Raleigh's and Intermezzo re-open?" (That last one was me, and I foolishly clung to such hopes even though I was recently asked to leave Raleigh's for not ordering food at the bar during a football game, and wouldn't eat a—Intermezzo's—salad, a salad taller than me. 

At Sequoia, there's little left to gawk at , as all but a corner section of the first floor—which endangers an adjacent building, is picked apart brick by brick. Only the lone remnant of the Sequoia stood Sunday, awaiting more precision brick extractions Monday. 

Monday, the Sequoia will be gone, a pale footnote in the history of Berkeley fires, which includes a 1923 fire that consumed some 640 structures, including 584 homes in the densely-built neighborhoods north of the university. 

Monday, the city will meet with the Sequoia's owners, and the demolition team, to map out plans for debris removal and restoring foot-traffic between Channing and Haste, now requiring a three block detour by foot that has reportedly kept shoppers from nearby stores. 

Representatives of the city met at cafe Mediterraneum Friday afternoon with Telegraph property owners to brief them on demolition progress. City representatives are trying to open the block between Haste and Channing in time to avoid re-locating the 28th annual Telegraph Holiday Fair, Dec. 16-18, and 22-24. 

But Janet Klein, organizer of the popular event says that the walks will have to be ready no later than three days before the event to avoid re-routing. 

 


Ted Friedman, who has covered some aspects of the Sequoia fire here, had a sore throat and sinus problems Sunday. TMI?


Press Release: Neighbors and Students to Participate in Seismic Compliance Day of Action in Berkeley

From Igor Tregub
Friday December 02, 2011 - 01:12:00 PM

Recent seismic activity in the East Bay has been the latest series of events to highlight the importance of retrofitting Berkeley's apartment buildings. Unfortunately, 86 of the 269 apartment buildings surveyed in March 2011 are not even in compliance with the first, basic step (Phase I) of Berkeley’s Soft-Story Ordinance (passed in 2005), which requires landlords of soft-story buildings to notify their tenants of the buildings’ inherent seismic instability and to commission an engineering study. Soft-story buildings refer to construction that has a garage, commercial space, or other space in an area where a solid supporting wall would otherwise be built. 

More than 75% of the buildings surveyed earlier in 2011 are not seismically retrofitted, and would be susceptible to partial or total collapse in a Richter magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake, such as one that is predicted to happen over the next 30 years according to a 2008 U.S. Geological Survey study. Efforts to mandate seismic retrofitting of soft-story residential or mixed-use properties by the City of Berkeley (Phase II) and to enforce the existing Phase I have been stymied over a lack of funding, staffing, and prioritization. 

This Saturday, a coalition of concerned neighbors and tenants takes matters into their own hands by informing tenants of soft-story buildings of the fact that their landlord is not yet in compliance with Berkeley’s Soft-Story Ordinance, and of the tenants’ rights under the municipal code. In addition, tips about points of contact in the City and disaster preparedness suggestions will be provided. 

A press conference featuring elected officials and concerned community members will take place on the Steps of Sproul at noon on Saturday, December 3. Immediately following the conference, these community members will walk to buildings in the vicinity of the UC Berkeley campus to inform their tenants of the high stakes.


Berkeley Earthquake Late Wednesday Was 2.3 Magnitude

By Sasha Lekach (BCN)
Thursday December 01, 2011 - 10:46:00 AM

A 2.3-magnitude earthquake struck just outside Berkeley late Wednesday night, followed by a 1.8-magnitude aftershock this morning, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

The earthquake shook the area 1-mile east-northeast of Berkeley at 11:10 p.m., according to the USGS.  

The quake had about a 6-mile depth.  

The aftershock was recorded at 12:52 a.m., according to the USGS.  

Many Berkeley residents said they did not feel the temblor, unlike when a series of earthquakes in October shook the East Bay from a Berkeley epicenter.


Flash: Berkeley Firefighters Believe Sequoia Fire Started in Elevator Room, Was "Accidental", Not Intentionally Set

From Mary Kay Clunies-Ross
Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 03:53:00 PM

On Friday, November 18, 2011, at 8:48 p.m., Berkeley Firefighters responded to a reported structure fire at 2441 Haste Street in Berkeley. The fire eventually went to five alarms to control the incident. This fire resulted in total destruction of the 39-unit, four-story apartment building.

Berkeley Fire Department Fire Investigators are in the process of concluding their investigation and believe all indicators point towards the fire starting in the elevator machine room in the basement. At this time, they believe this fire originated in and around the elevator machinery. They believe this fire is accidental in nature and was not intentionally set. 

The onsite investigation phase is complete, and a final report will be completed and available within the next several weeks.


New: Curbing Corporate Power: The Next Step for the Movement to Slow Climate Change

By Carol Polsgrove
Thursday December 01, 2011 - 04:32:00 PM
Demonstrators in Asheville, NC, protest the Royal Bank of Canada's investments in tar sands and the Keystone XL pipeline. Six of the demonstrators were arrested at the Bank of America, one of the targets of the demonstration.
Carol Polsgrove
Demonstrators in Asheville, NC, protest the Royal Bank of Canada's investments in tar sands and the Keystone XL pipeline. Six of the demonstrators were arrested at the Bank of America, one of the targets of the demonstration.
The day after Bill McKibben spoke in Asheville, demonstrators gather downtown to call on banks to invest in solar and wind power instead of fossil fuels.
Carol Polsgrove
The day after Bill McKibben spoke in Asheville, demonstrators gather downtown to call on banks to invest in solar and wind power instead of fossil fuels.
A man dressed like a banker gets to carry the banker-snowman prop.
Carol Polsgrove
A man dressed like a banker gets to carry the banker-snowman prop.
A call for offshore wind turbines instead of coal from mountaintop removal.
Carol Polsgrove
A call for offshore wind turbines instead of coal from mountaintop removal.

Following up on the White House demonstrations to stop the Keystone XL pipeline, Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org , is already hard at work on the next stage of the movement to rein in reliance on fossil fuels.

On a three-state speaking tour, he is calling for a constitutional amendment to undo the damage the Supreme Court did when it declared corporations as persons and campaign contributions as speech. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce spent more money last election cycle than the Democratic and Republican national committees combined—and 97 per cent of that went to climate deniers, he told an audience in Asheville, N.C., on Nov. 30. The climate change movement has to figure out how to break “the corporate power dominating our political lives.” 

Energy companies with huge reserves in fossil fuels have a long-term financial incentive to keep the current system in place. “Exxon made more money last quarter than any company in the history of money.” That, he said, is because Exxon and the other fossil fuel companies don’t have to account for the waste they pour into the atmosphere. What we have to do is curb the “power of the fossil fuel industry to prevent change.” 

Taking a page from Occupy Wall Street’s strategy book, proponents of an amendment to strip corporations of personhood will occupy federal courts across the country on January 20, 2012. Courts in San Francisco and San Jose are on the list. 

The idea of pushing through a constitutional amendment in time to make difference is daunting. Time is running out on the effort to slow climate change. People across the globe are already suffering devastating floods, storms, fire, and drought. 

The world’s people know the urgency of action, as is spelled out by a new digest of polling data featured in a Council of Foreign Relations blog on the same day McKibben spoke in Asheville. 

In his rundown of what the numbers mean, Stewart M. Patrick, senior fellow and director of the Council’s Program on International Institutions and Global Governance, said, “Publics around the world—including in the United States—believe that global warming is an urgent problem and want their governments to make it a higher priority, by taking vigorous national and multilateral actions to confront it.” 

The problem now, worldwide, is how to make governments responsive to the will of the people. 


Carol Polsgrove is author of Divided Minds: Intellectuals and the Civil Rights Movement and professor emerita, Indiana University School of Journalism.


"Killer Crane" Killing Our Past or Building Our Future? (News Analysis)

By Ted Friedman
Tuesday November 29, 2011 - 10:13:00 PM
Taking a bite out of time. "Jawzilla"--first bite. Tuesday morning at Sequoia, Telegraph and Haste.
Ted Friedman
Taking a bite out of time. "Jawzilla"--first bite. Tuesday morning at Sequoia, Telegraph and Haste.
Take another piece of our hearts. "Jawzilla's" jaw. Tuesday at the Sequoia Apartments.
Ted Friedman
Take another piece of our hearts. "Jawzilla's" jaw. Tuesday at the Sequoia Apartments.
Making way for our futures? Jawzilla--big gulp.
Ted Friedman
Making way for our futures? Jawzilla--big gulp.
Desolation row?  Tuesday sunset at Sequoia apartments. "Jawzilla" is hibernating before another day of destruction. Vacant lot is Berkeley Inn site.
Ted Friedman
Desolation row? Tuesday sunset at Sequoia apartments. "Jawzilla" is hibernating before another day of destruction. Vacant lot is Berkeley Inn site.

The Killer Crane that is chomping our heritage at the nearly century-old Sequoia Apartments, which burned last Friday, is owned by a demolition company that bills itself, "clearing the way to the future." 

It now remains unclear what the future will hold for Haste at Telegraph, which is seen by many as a Berkeley landmark itself—Berkeley's center. Indeed we so named the area in a Planet Piece ("Finding Berkeley's Center," Dec 23, 2008). 

The Sequoia had an eleventh-hour stay, Monday, while City fire and Insurance investigators poured over the remains for cause of the fire, but early Tuesday, the crane began its reign of destruction. 

A shivering crowd showed up at 8 a.m. Tuesday and watched in horror as the killer crane swung into position to destroy the Sequoia, using its jaws to grasp pivotal sections of the building and tear them down. 

As we huddled in a dark, foggy, cold morning mist, the combination of crane and "jaw" formed a veritable Jawzilla, a punitive weapon of mass destruction. 

Using its camera eyes, and manipulated from a cab by the crane's operator, who seemed, at times, to be playing with a giant toy, Jawzilla took its toll, all the while spitting water to quell the dust it stirred up. 

There were ahs and ohs from the crowd as Jawzilla seemed to falter at first, having trouble realizing its potential for ruination; but once a slow, killing rhythm was established, the conquering contraption began its systematic course of mayhem. 

Have no doubt, this was a heartbreaking scene, as the beautiful old landmark was scarred beyond recognition. And when large chunks of the building were dislodged, plunging to the ground with the clamor of falling bricks, swirling dust, and gushing water, the scene turned scary. 

Rubble built up on the sidewalk below, protected by plywood, like the ruins of Nazi Germany. 

The scene was so dispiriting it was difficult to see any upside to the downside. 

But there is an upside. 

Often criticized for allowing the Berkeley Inn (burned to the ground, 1985) site to go undeveloped for 26 years, the city of Berkeley has been quick to respond, to the plight of the already struggling lower Telegraph business area. Pleas to save the Sequoia by the Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association, which made an 11th hour appeal to the city on the Sequoia's behalf, gave way to "public safety." 

The city's quick action has made it possible (at the Sequoia's expense) for a walkway connecting Haste to Channing, presently blocked, to be restored in no more than two weeks (perhaps less), in time for the Telegraph Ave. Holiday Street Fair, Dec. 16-24, which always increases foot traffic in local businesses. 

Moreover, there are signs that things could improve at the Cody site, which has been undergoing a lengthy, if routine, retrofit. 

Across the street at the Berkeley Inn site, its owner has reportedly commissioned yet another round of architect plans for a building at the site. 

According to reliable sources, the owners of Intermezzo, and Raleigh's intend to restore the left-standing businesses, as soon as possible. 

Nothing to get worked up over, just the glimmer of hope. And possibly the ghost of a chance that Telegraph and Haste can stem its decline and once more be Berkeley's center. 

It was erroneously reported here that the first floor of the Sequoia would be spared. 

All that will remain of the building according to Fredo Pena, the demolition crew-chief, is a "wall," at ground level. 

The wall is the facades of the popular Raleigh's pub and the Intermezzo cafe and coffee shop, which were not destroyed by the fire. 

According to Pena, the demolition crew chief , it will take three to five more days to knock down the Sequoia. A walkway connecting Haste to Channing, which has been blocked since the fire, will be complete when the sequoia site is safe to passersby, according to Pena. 

That will take two weeks maximum, said Pena Tuesday. 

The Killer Crane will be back to deal out more mass destruction Wednesday. 

 


Don't expect Ted Friedman, a 40 year resident of the South side, only three blocks from Teley and Haste, to have anything but hate for "Jawzilla."


Suit Says Police Used Excessive Force at UC Berkeley Protest

By Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Tuesday November 29, 2011 - 09:58:00 PM

Students and community members filed a lawsuit in federal court today alleging that police used excessive force against them during an "Occupy Cal" protest at the University of California at Berkeley on Nov. 9. 

Attorney Ronald Cruz of the group By Any Means Necessary said 24 plaintiffs are named in the suit but he expects that number to increase because he believes many people suffered at the hands of police during the protest, which involved hundreds of people. 

Cruz said the suit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, seeks unspecified general and punitive damages for the physical and emotional injuries the protesters suffered. 

Named as defendants are UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau, other senior university administrators, UC Berkeley Police Chief Mitchell Celaya, Alameda County Sheriff Chief Gregory Ahern, Oakland Police Chief Howard Jordan and several police officers. 

Cruz said the 41-page complaint includes detailed accounts of peaceful protesters being clubbed in the face, yanked by their hair, forcefully jabbed in their chests, stomachs, and groins, and beaten while lying on the ground. 

Cruz said police continued to beat protesters even after they destroyed the protesters' tents. 

UC Berkeley spokeswoman Janet Gilmore said university officials can't comment on the lawsuit's allegations because they haven't yet seen the suit. 

Gilmore said there are several investigations into police officers' actions during the protest and university officials "are looking forward to the outcome" of those probes.


Protesters Return to Frank Ogawa Plaza--Former Berkeley Mayoral Candidate Sets Up His Teepee.

By Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 09:37:00 AM

Occupy Oakland protesters returned to Frank Ogawa Plaza in front of Oakland City Hall today, but on a smaller scale than before. 

About 30 protesters rallied at the plaza at noon today and at 2 p.m. they erected a teepee on the side of the plaza while a small group of Oakland police officers and security guards watched. 

Assistant to the city administrator Arturo Sanchez said the city has granted the protesters a permit to set up the teepee but they must take it down at 10 p.m. every night. The protesters can then erect it again at 6 a.m. every morning, he said. 

J. Kirk Boyd, a University of California at Berkeley law professor who's a legal adviser for Occupy Wall Street protesters throughout the Bay Area, said the protesters plan to hold a vigil at Frank Ogawa Plaza around the clock 24 hours a day, seven days a week. 

Asked if the protesters will take down the teepee every night, Boyd said, "For the time being." 

He said the protesters plan to take down the teepee tonight but declined to say if they will take it down every night. 

The vigil is on a much smaller scale than the encampment that previously was set up in the plaza. That encampment reached a peak of about 200 tents before Oakland police closed it down two weeks ago. 

Boyd said the teepee is "symbolic" and the vigil shows that the protesters "will be here for people who worry every night if their kids will be able to go to college or whether they will have health care." 

He said, "We will have people here around the clock." 

Phil Horne of Occupy Oakland said, "This is a demonstration that doesn't involve sleeping out or dwellings." 

He said protesters are "building coalitions and reaching out to people." 

Horne said protesters will fight home foreclosures and will occupy banks. 

Among the protesters today was former Berkeley mayoral candidate Zachary Running Wolf, who recently spent seven consecutive days perched in a tree in Frank Ogawa Plaza. 

Running Wolf said he now takes turns with seven other protesters so that one person is in the tree at all times. 

"We've been in the tree for 17 days," he said. 

Running Wolf previously participated in a long-running tree-sitting protest in a grove of oak trees near the football stadium at the University of California at Berkeley. That protest attempted to stop the building of a student recreation center but the construction work eventually went forward and is now nearly complete. 

 

 


New: We Came to See it Fall, But Sequoia OutStood Us: The Games We All Played While Gawkiing

By Ted Friedman
Monday November 28, 2011 - 10:30:00 PM
These two behemoths will dismantle the Sequoia Tuesday. In the foreground is the crane; in the background, the jaw.
Ted Friedman
These two behemoths will dismantle the Sequoia Tuesday. In the foreground is the crane; in the background, the jaw.
Sequoia-gawkers Monday alongside Amoeba. "Brick-entrepeneur," hoping to earn $1,000 for Sequoia's bricks is extreme right.
Ted Friedman
Sequoia-gawkers Monday alongside Amoeba. "Brick-entrepeneur," hoping to earn $1,000 for Sequoia's bricks is extreme right.
Machine abuse? This demolition man is about to jam "jaw" with a serious-looking weapon
Ted Friedman
Machine abuse? This demolition man is about to jam "jaw" with a serious-looking weapon

We came to see it fall, but stayed to see it outlast us.
City Officials reported the Sequoia would be "demolished" Monday morning, but a few things interfered on the way to demolishment.

The Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association, in a tautly-written letter to Berkeley's new city manager, Christine Daniel, argued that the Sequoia has a unique heritage that must be preserved.

But preservation apparently gave way to the city's argument favoring "public safety." 

So we all showed up to see the corpse collapse. We is reporters and videographers from KGO AM, Ch.4 TV, Ch.2 TV, the Daily Cal, a gaggle of gawkers from nowhere in particular, and last, but not least, this Planet reporter. 

A small but spirited group of on-lookers and media, hovered over the scene, just for the sight of the Sequoia coming down. 

But the reality of the situation was more important than expectations. For one thing, only part of the Sequoia is being (surgically) removed. Floors, four and three will go, according to a source in the city manager's office, but floor one, and the ground floor will stand. Officials at the site confirm this. 

Although this is small solace for the Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association, there will at least be something left of the Sequoia. 

Still, there we were for the show, until after several interviews with the demolition crew-chief, and anyone else who would talk to us, it became obvious by noon that dismantlement (my term) was on hold until Tuesday at 8a.m. 

We could hardly complain because while "Waiting for Godot," we had learned all about tearing down an historic Berkeley building (1916) brick-by-brick. Blowing something up--that, we could understand--but lopping off its head without having the lower floors collapse, that was difficult to understand. 

First, we learned (on-lookers were also quite interested in all this), you had to transport the "jaw," a contraption with a jaw that apparently snapped, around the block where it would be somehow, perhaps beaten, (there was outright bea

As the morning wore on, and we resorted to interviewing each other (I was interviewed twice), I interviewed a homeless man with a pickup truck, who said he had swung a deal with the city for the Sequoia bricks. He said he expected to make $1,000 on some of the bricks, but that he didn't need to sell more than some. 

"So the re-cycled bricks would be a re-birth of the Sequoia," I said. 

"You could say that," he said. 

Back on the planet, part of the Sequoia is coming down tomorrow and I wouldn't miss it for anything. 

Who knows, maybe the brick entrepreneur will prevail and the Sequoia's better half will be re-cycled. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

When not on the disaster scene, Ted Friedman, reports from the Southside on crime, homelessness, and drug abuse.


Flash: U.C. Berkeley Faculty Senate Registers 10-1 Vote Condemning Administration Response to Occupy Berkeley Protesters

Monday November 28, 2011 - 05:27:00 PM

The Berkeley Division of the University of California Faculty Senate endorsed, by a 10-1 margin (336-34), a group of four resolutions expressing, with varying degrees of specificity, their lack of confidence in the way Berkeley administrators have handled student protests.

Three U.C. Berkeley executives, Chancellor Robert Birgenau and two of his subordinates, attempted an explanation of their actions on November 9, when students and faculty were clubbed by police. They were greeted with stony silence by the faculty members in the front of the International House auditorium where the meeting was held, and with audible snickers from the students in the back of the room.

Professor Judith Butler, one of the sponsors of the original no-confidence resolution, moved the acceptance of her motion plus three more which had been submitted by other faculty members.


Updated: U.C. Regents Finish Meeting Interrupted by Protesters

By Dan McMenamin (BCN)
Monday November 28, 2011 - 06:49:00 PM

A University of California Board of Regents meeting held via teleconference at four UC campuses wrapped up this afternoon after being briefly interrupted by protesters who criticized recent police actions in Davis and Berkeley and rising tuition costs. 

The meeting, which had originally been scheduled earlier for this month, was postponed until today because of "credible intelligence" that violence was possible at the meeting, which was to take place in San Francisco, university officials said. 

The perceived threat followed criticism that UC Berkeley police were overly aggressive and beat protesters with batons when responding to "Occupy Cal" protests on Nov. 9. The outrage over police tactics grew when several students were pepper sprayed while peacefully protesting at UC Davis on Nov. 18. 

Today's meeting was held via teleconference, with UC staff and students speaking at the Davis, Los Angeles, Merced and San Francisco Mission Bay campuses. 

No proposed tuition hikes were on the agenda, but some regents addressed the recent incidents at Davis and Berkeley and student concerns about rising costs. 

Board of Regents chair Sherry Lansing said she was "personally shocked and appalled" at the police actions and said the meeting was held jointly at the four campuses "to give the UC community an even greater opportunity to be heard." 

But Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is on the board, said before the meeting started that holding it by phone was "awkward at best" and "not ideal." 

UC President Mark Yudof said at the start of the meeting that he is calling for the partial restoration of funding for the system in the state Legislature's next budget negotiations, saying the state has reduced its contribution to the UC system by nearly a billion dollars in the past few years. 

About 150 people at the four campuses signed up to speak during the public comment period, many of whom criticized university police, tuition hikes, and the corporate backgrounds of some of the regents. 

Charlie Eaton, financial secretary for United Auto Workers Local 2865, which represents about 12,000 UC teaching assistants and other staff, was one of about two dozen speakers at the San Francisco meeting, telling the regents "The buck stops with you ... and it's time for you to pay." 

Lansing said at the end of the two-hour public comment period that she "would like to continue this dialogue" with students with a tour of various UC campuses with some of the regents. 

However, that sentiment did not satisfy the protesters at the San Francisco meeting, who started prolonged chants, prompting the regents to take a recess at 11:40 a.m. 

While most of the regents left, Newsom stayed and joined protesters who then held a "People's Regents Meeting" in the room, during which they called on Yudof to resign, as well as the chancellors at Berkeley and Davis, and proposed new ways of appointing regents. 

Newsom said the protesters "restored my faith and confidence in this state and country" since "there were not a lot of people showing up at these meetings" until the Occupy movements started spreading across the country in recent months. 

Newsom eventually joined the rest of the regents in a separate room this afternoon to finish the meeting, which included a discussion of alternative funding sources beyond tuition from students and taxpayer support and approval of an expenditure plan for the upcoming budgetary year.


Press Release:

An Open Letter to UC Berkeley Students, Faculty, Administration & Regents from the UC Berkeley Police Officers’ Association

From Mary Jo Rossi
Monday November 28, 2011 - 05:48:00 PM

It is our hope that this letter will help open the door to a better understanding between UC Berkeley police and the University community. 

The UC Berkeley Police Officers’ Association, representing approximately 64 campus police officers, understands your frustration over massive tuition hikes and budget cuts, and we fully support your right to peacefully protest to bring about change.  

It was not our decision to engage campus protesters on November 9th. We are now faced with “managing” the results of years of poor budget planning. Please know we are not your enemy. 

A video clip gone viral does not depict the full story or the facts leading up to an actual incident. Multiple dispersal requests were given in the days and hours before the tent removal operation. Not caught on most videos were scenes of protesters hitting, pushing, grabbing officers’ batons, fighting back with backpacks and skateboards. 

The UC Berkeley Police Officers’ Association supports a full investigation of the events that took place on November 9th, as well as a full review of University policing policies. That being said, we do not abrogate responsibility for the events on November 9th.  

UC Berkeley police officers want to better serve students and faculty members and we welcome ideas for how we can have a better discourse to avoid future confrontations. We are open to all suggestions on ways we can improve our ability to better protect and serve the UC Berkeley community. 

As your campus police, we also have safety concerns that we ask you to consider. 

Society has changed significantly since 1964 when peaceful UC Berkeley student protesters organized a 10-hour sit-in in Sproul Hall and 10,000 students held a police car at bay – spawning change and the birth of our nation’s Free Speech Movement. 

However proud we can all be of UC Berkeley’s contribution to free speech in America, no one can deny this: Our society in 2011 has become an extremely more violent place to live and to protect. No one understands the effects of this violence more than those of us in law enforcement. 

Disgruntled citizens in this day and age express their frustrations in far more violent ways – with knives, with guns and sometimes by killing innocent bystanders. Peaceful protests can, in an instant, turn into violent rioting, ending in destruction of property or worse – the loss of lives. Police officers and innocent citizens everywhere are being injured, and in some instances, killed. 

In the back of every police officer’s mind is this: How can I control this incident so it does not escalate into a seriously violent, potentially life-threatening event for all involved? 

While students were calling the protest “non-violent,” the events on November 9th were anything but nonviolent. In previous student Occupy protests, protesters hit police officers with chairs, bricks, spitting, and using homemade plywood shields as weapons – with documented injuries to officers.  

At a moment’s notice, the November 9th protest at UC Berkeley could have turned even more violent than it did, much like the Occupy protests in neighboring Oakland. 

Please understand that by no means are we interested in making excuses. We are only hoping that you will understand and consider the frustrations we experience daily as public safety officers sworn to uphold the law. It is our job to keep protests from escalating into violent events where lives could be endangered.  

We sincerely ask for your help in doing this. 

Like you, we have been victims to budget cuts that affect our children and our families in real ways. We, too, hold on to the dream of being able to afford to send our children and grandchildren to a four-year university. Like you, we understand and fully support the need for change and a redirection of priorities. 

To students and faculty: As 10,000 students surrounded a police car on campus in 1964, protesters passed the hat to help pay for repairs to the police car as a show of respect. Please peacefully respect the rules we are required to enforce – for all our safety and protection. Please respect the requests of our officers as we try to do our jobs. 

To the University Administration and Regents: Please don’t ask us to enforce your policies then refuse to stand by us when we do. Your students, your faculty and your police – we need you to provide real leadership. 

We openly and honestly ask the UC Berkeley community for the opportunity to move forward together, peacefully and without further incident – in better understanding of one another. Thank you for listening.


Demolition at Fire-Damaged Berkeley Building Starts Today

By Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Monday November 28, 2011 - 05:48:00 PM

Demolition work is expected to begin today on the top two floors of a four-story apartment building near the University of California at Berkeley that was badly damaged in a five-alarm fire earlier this month, the head of a local merchants' group said. 

Roland Peterson, president of the Telegraph Property and Business Management Corp., said cranes are in place to begin work at the 39-unit Sequoia Apartments building at the corner of Telegraph Avenue and Haste Street. 

City of Berkeley spokeswoman Mary Kay Clunies-Ross confirmed that the city issued a demolition permit to the building's owners late Wednesday. The owners couldn't immediately be reached for comment today. 

Peterson said the demolition work is expected to be completed by next Monday. 

Clunies-Ross said that after the top two floors are demolished, the bottom two floors will be braced while a decision is made on what to do with them. 

The fire was reported at 8:48 p.m. on Nov. 18 and wasn't contained until after 3 a.m. the next day. It wasn't completely extinguished until Nov. 21. 

No one was injured in the blaze, which Berkeley Deputy Fire Chief Gil Dong said caused more than $2 million in structural damage and the loss of more than $500,000 in contents. All 68 of the building's residents have been accounted for, Clunies-Ross said. 

In addition to the apartment units, the building, which was red-tagged by city officials, housed Cafe Intermezzo and Raleigh's Bar and Grill, which remain closed. 

The restaurant Thai Noodle II, which is located next door, is also closed because of concerns that customers and pedestrians could be injured by falling bricks. 

Peterson said his understanding is that pedestrians will be able to return to that block once the building is deemed safe again. 

He said, "The quicker the demolition work is done, the better." 

Peterson said the decision to demolish the top two floors of the building "is a very good move and a very necessary move." 

JeffShuttleworth0226p11/28/11


Dozens Speak Out at U.C. Regents' Meeting

By Dan McMenamin (Bay City News Service}
Monday November 28, 2011 - 05:20:00 PM

Dozens of University of California students, employees and others spoke at a Board of Regents meeting held via teleconference at four UC campuses today, sharply criticizing recent police actions in Davis and Berkeley, as well as rising tuition costs. 

The meeting, which had initially been scheduled for earlier this month, was postponed until today because of "credible intelligence" that violence was possible at the previous meeting, which was to take place in San Francisco, university officials said. 

The perceived threat followed criticism that UC Berkeley police were overly aggressive in responding to "Occupy Cal" protests on Nov. 9. The outrage over police tactics grew when several students were pepper-sprayed while peacefully protesting at UC Davis on Nov. 18. 

Today's meeting was held via teleconference, with UC staff and students speaking at four campuses -- Davis, Los Angeles, Merced and UC San Francisco's Mission Bay campus. 

Board of Regents chair Sherry Lansing said she was "personally shocked and appalled" at the police actions and said the meeting was held jointly at the four campuses "to give the UC community an even greater opportunity to be heard." 

But Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is on the board, said before the meeting started that holding it by phone was "awkward at best" and "not ideal." 

UC President Mark Yudof said at the start of the meeting that he is calling for the partial restoration of funding for the system in the state Legislature's next budget negotiations. 

"State disinvestment has placed a tremendous strain on the university," reducing the state's contribution to the UC system from $3.2 billion to $2.3 billion over the past few years, Yudof said. 

Newsom said state cuts have led to the doubling of tuition at UC campuses since 2008-09. 

About 150 people at the four campuses signed up to speak during a nearly two-hour public comment period, many of whom criticized university police, tuition hikes and the corporate backgrounds of some of the regents. 

Charlie Eaton, financial secretary for United Auto Workers Local 2865, which represents about 12,000 UC teaching assistants, tutors and other staff, was one of about two dozen people to speak at the San Francisco campus. 

Eaton criticized what he called "the actions of the financial and corporate elite on the board" to raise tuition costs. 

He said police then responded to protesters at universities by "having us beaten, having us pepper sprayed and having us arrested." 

"The buck stops with you ... and it's time for you to pay," Eaton said. 

Other speakers criticized an independent commission proposed by the regents to look into the Davis incident that would be led by former Los Angeles and New York police Chief William Bratton, who is already contracted to work with the UC administration. 

Yudof said, "I don't see any conflict problem" and said "we will get to the bottom of the difficulties at Davis." 

Lansing said at the end of the public comment period that she "would like to continue this dialogue" with a tour of various UC campuses by some of the regents. 

"We hear you, and we share your concerns," she said. 

The crowd at the San Francisco meeting tried to prolong the public comment period with chants, and the regents took a recess at 11:40 a.m. 

Today's agenda also includes a discussion on alternate funding sources beyond tuition from students and taxpayer support. 

 

Copyright © 2011 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited. 

/www/bcn/general/11/newsclip.11.11.28.11.58.23.75.txt


CUCFA Letter to President Yudof Opposing Decision to Hire Bratton

From Robert Meister, President, Council of UC Faculty Associations
Sunday November 27, 2011 - 09:39:00 PM

This evening, The Council of UC Faculty Associations (CUCFA) sent the following letter to President Yudof in response to his decision to hire the Kroll Security Group, and its Chairman William Bratton, to to conduct an investigation of police violence at UC Davis.

Dear President Yudof,

The Council of University of California Faculty Associations (CUCFA) protests your decision to hire the Kroll Security Group, and its Chairman William Bratton, to conduct what you call an independent investigation of police violence at UC Davis. We take no position here on Mr. Bratton’s personal qualifications; our objection is to the conflicts of interest of Kroll Security itself, which is already a major contractor with UC on security matters. According to its website, Kroll’s services are not confined to securing databases and facilities from attacks by criminals and terrorists. It also protects many global financial institutions and other multinationals against threats to “operations” that may come from public criticism and direct political action.

By deepening UC’s links to Kroll, you would be illustrating the kinds of connection between public higher education and Wall Street that the Occupy UC movement is protesting. Kroll’s parent company, Altegrity, provides data-mining, intelligence and on-the-ground security to financial institutions and governments seeking to head off and defeat both private sabotage and public protest. In addition, Altegrity’s parent company, Providence Private Equity, is a major global investor in for-profit higher education companies that benefit from the decline of publicly funded higher education. 

We already know that Kroll has provided security services to at least three UC campuses for the past several years. This in itself would disqualify Mr. Bratton from participating in the investigation you propose, even if the role of Kroll and its affiliated companies in defending the financial sector against OWS did not raise further questions about its pro-Wall Street and pro-privatization bias. 

A truly independent investigation that would allow UC to provide a credible response to the events at Davis (and the other campuses) needs to address several questions that would not be seriously considered if you hire Kroll. 

• What was your role and that of UC General Counsel in the events at Davis? Did you, as a distinguished first amendment scholar, tell chancellors and campus police chiefs that protests (especially protests against UC’s own policies) are “part of the DNA of this University” that should not be addressed using the same techniques that UC has developed (likely with the help of Kroll) to deal with terrorists, shooters, and cyber-saboteurs? (Even if you have been a zealous defender of the rising student movement to restore public higher education, such a conclusion would not be credible coming from an investigation tainted by Kroll’s conflicts of interest outlined above.) 

• What was and is the role of Kroll in helping banks and public institutions (including UC) investigate and defeat movements such as OWS and their campus counterparts? Is Kroll now acting as a liaison between universities, city governments and the Department of Homeland Security in defending the financial sector against protests occurring on what used to be considered public spaces? Are protests against Wall Street in such spaces now considered a threat to the security of the nation, the city and the public university? (The growing securitization of public space has been a major obstacle to first amendment activity since 9-11.) 

• How much money has UC and its individual campuses paid to Kroll for security services? Were these contracts issued as sole source contracts or was there open bidding? Were Kroll’s services confined to protecting, for example, the privacy and integrity of data systems and faculty and staff conducting animal research or did they extended to what Kroll’s website calls “organizational threats” arising from “the dynamic and sometimes conflicting needs of the entire campus population”? (This could be a description of the student protests that you rightly regard as “central to our history” as a university.) 

• What led to the issuance of false and misleading statements by University of California officials (Chancellors and their assistants, spokespeople, and police chiefs) in the aftermath of police violence at Berkeley and Davis? Did you encourage these efforts at spin control? (Dishonest statements seriously damage the university as an institution devoted to truth and protect only the individuals whose decisions are in question.) 

The broader issue is how protest can be part of what you characterized as “our university’s DNA” when the right to protest is not formally recognized within the university’s own codes of student and faculty conduct. It could be and should be. The CSU student code states explicitly that “[n]othing in this Code may conflict with Education Code Section 66301 that prohibits disciplinary action against students based on behavior protected by the first amendment.” If such language were included in the UC code of conduct, students would have a clear first amendment defense against disciplinary action arising from peaceful political protest—and there would be strong grounds for questioning the legality of a police order to disperse a peaceful protest from a public site on a public university campus. The explicit incorporation of constitutional limits on UC’s power to break up demonstrations that threaten its march toward privatization would go a long way toward recovering UC as a public, rather than a private, space. We urge you to see that the UC codes of conduct are amended to parallel those in place at CSU. 

Events at Davis and the other campuses have shown the University of California in a negative light, and we agree strongly with the need for an independent investigation. We believe, however, that your appointment of Kroll to investigate the university’s response to last week’s protest could itself become a basis for new protests, and that you should ask Speaker Pérez (or someone unaffiliated with the University) to appoint a genuinely independent committee with representatives from student, faculty, staff and civil liberties groups. Such a committee should be given a specific charge to investigate and report on all of the questions set forth above. 

Robert Meister, President, Council of UC Faculty Associations


New: Ford Mustang Flips-Out After Bizarre Collision With Beemer at Channing Way and Telegraph

By Ted Friedman
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 04:59:00 PM
Saturday, 11a.m. moments after Mustang (center) flips out after grazing maroon car (right) which was reportedly emerging from parking space at Channing and Telegraph. Man in wheel chair, center comes to aid of Mustang Driver.
Ted Friedman
Saturday, 11a.m. moments after Mustang (center) flips out after grazing maroon car (right) which was reportedly emerging from parking space at Channing and Telegraph. Man in wheel chair, center comes to aid of Mustang Driver.
Damage to both cars. Rory, out of the shot, is out of the mustang and on walk on Channing in front of Dollar Chinese
Ted Friedman
Damage to both cars. Rory, out of the shot, is out of the mustang and on walk on Channing in front of Dollar Chinese
Inside the Mustang, after Rory was pulled out.
Ted Friedman
Inside the Mustang, after Rory was pulled out.

Writing a new chapter in physics, a Ford Mustang convertible, traveling under 30mph hit a BMW leaving the curb, and then launched into the air and landed, upside-down, on its rag-roof. It happened Saturday, just before noon at Channing Way and Telegraph.

Although both drivers were taken to the hospital, they were not seriously injured, according to rescue workers at the scene.

The driver of the Mustang was wrenched from under his steering wheel by a good-samaritan street vendor, who rushed over from his Teley street stand. 

This was the second time the good samaritan had been involved with flipped Mustangs, he said. Known as "Doc," because he fixes things, he tinkered just right with a jammed steering wheel releasing it so the Mustang driver could squeeze out of the car, Doc said. 

In 2004, Doc saw another Mustang flip, only this time he was involved in the accident, he said. "I sat in the car with the other guy and watched his broken leg bleed," Doc said. "We both should have died." 

The driver of the BMW was hauled off on a gurney, but only because, a paramedic wanted to protect the man's vertebrae, he said, "like in the NFL." 

The driver of the Mustang walked away from his steed on his own. He was offered a chair from Chinese Express, formerly a dollar-restaurant--now $1.85. The restaurant also donated napkins, which did a pretty good job of mopping the blood from the Mustang driver's knees. 

On-lookers, including eight Berkeley policeman, marveled at the scene. What caused the horse to flip, the crowd wondered.? At least one of the on-lookers claimed to have seen a flipped Mustang before. "Even at twenty miles per hour, a car can flip," he said. 

That on-looker was a cop, who said that, with a previous police department, he had flipped his squad car when he rear-ended a perp. "I was only doing 20mph," he said. 

A Medhead, with a Phd. in Physics offered an explanation, which involved, gross vehicle weight, car body composition, velocity, and a twist of fate. But he wrapped it all up into the "ramp effect," theory. Medheads can be found at the notorious Caffe Mediterraneum on Telegraph. 

According to this typical Med-style coffee-house jive, the wheel of the Tang churned a trail through the front left fender of the Beemer, which served as a "ramp."--launching the horse. An accompanying photo from the point of view of the Beemer's fender, seems to support the ramp effect theory. 

Now that the mystery of the flip is explained, we can move on to assigning guilt, even though the real culprit was fate. According to "Patchman," a patch vendor at Teley and Channing, with a spot-on view of the crash, the Beemer pulled into traffic from a parked position without signaling or checking its rear mirror. 

"People may not realize that you have to signal when leaving a parking space," Patchman said. 

A Telegraph Avenue business owner called the car accident, "insult to injury," after the recent Sequoia Apartments fire closed sections of Telegraph and clobbered Teley businesses. A block of Channing was closed Saturday for nearly two hours and Telegraph was flooded with squad cars, a paramedic's unit, and an ambulance.  

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

Ted Friedman neither passed nor failed physics. He avoided it. Now he's back on his South side beat, where he relies on the kindness of physicists and other intellectuals.


Flash: U.C. Berkeley Faculty Scheduled to Vote on UCPD Violence on Monday Afternoon--But They've Lost Their Email Access

By Richard Brenneman
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 11:10:00 AM

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate is scheduled to vote Monday on a resolution condemning the use of violence against students exercising their First Amendment rights.

From the meeting announcement:

Monday, November 28, 2011 – 3:00pm – 5:00pm
A special meeting of the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate will be held in the Chevron Auditorium of the International House (2299 Piedmont Avenue). The Notice of Meeting and the resolution to be presented can be downloaded by clicking here.

We will be meeting to deliberate and reach conclusions upon a specific topic: The role of protest at Berkeley, the protests of November 2011 and events surrounding them including police and administration responses, and related policies.
In addition to the initial resolution, three others have since been introduced, and we’ll reprint them all.

But UC Berkeley’s email system suddenly shuts down

But before we do, we’ll like to call your attention to an email we’ve just received revealing that a critical mode of discussion used by the faculty members has conveniently broken down over the weekend.

Here’s what one faculty member reports:


The Berkeley email is disabled this weekend, at a critical time of organization and discussion leading to a special meeting of the Academic Senate on Monday. Those using berkeley.edu addresses are out of email from the morning after their Thanksgiving dinners (Friday morning) until the Monday when the Academic Senate meeting takes place. The meeting is intended “to deliberate and reach conclusions upon a specific topic: The role of protest at Berkeley, the protests of November 2011 and events surrounding them including police and administration responses, and related policies.” Some see this meeting as potentially leading to a vote of no-confidence in the Chancellor, Robert Birgeneau. In my personal experience, this kind of outage is not accidental.  

 

And here’s the notice faculty members receive when they try to log onto the campus email system: 

 

 

 

 

Posted by Technisource ~ ee
On 11/25/2011 at 4:00 pm PST
Modified on 11/25/2011 at 4:06 pm PST
Modified by IST Service Desk ~br
Posted in Unscheduled Outage
Outage Type: UNSCHEDULED OUTAGE
Date Submitted: Friday, November 25th, 2011
Outage Start/End Time: 0953
Groups Impacted: All CalMail users
Equipment: CalMail  

Description: A key component of the CalMail system has experienced a serious hardware failure that will prevent all account holders from logging in. Email messages within mailboxes are protected and incoming mail is being deferred. The database that maintains account holder information has been corrupted and must be rebuilt. That process is lengthy and will require extended downtime. Calmail expected to be available Monday morning, November 28. Please check back to the system status page for the latest information as updates become available.
CMR: TBD 

 

 

If nothing else, an email outage at a time when many faculty members are out of town for the holidays on the long weekend before a crucial vote by the Academic Senate is curious indeed. If nothing else, it makes organizing much more difficult before a vote in which the administration has a great deal at stake. 

 

 

Now for the resolutions. . . 

 

 

The first resolution, and a note from the authors

(Revised) Resolution proposed by: Wendy Brown, Professor, Political Science; Barrie Thorne, Professor, Gender and Women’s Studies/Sociology; Judith Butler, Professor, Rhetoric.  

Whereas, Non-violent political protest engages fundamental rights of free assembly and free speech, and 

Whereas, November 9th efforts by protestors to set up and remain in a temporary encampment near Sproul Hall constitutes non-violent political protest, and Whereas, These non-violent actions were met with a brutal and dangerous police response (see, e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buovLQ9qyWQ&feature=share), a response authorized in advance as well as retroactively justified by Chancellor Birgeneau, Executive Vice Chancellor Breslauer and Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs LeGrande, and 

Whereas, This is the third time in two years that such police violence has been unleashed upon protesters at Berkeley, with resulting bodily injuries to protestors, student and faculty outrage, a series of expensive lawsuits against the university, a tarnished university image, and a severely compromised climate for free expression on campus; 

Therefore be it resolved that the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate: 

1. Opposes all violent police responses to non-violent protest, whether that protest is lawful or not. 

2. Condemns the UC Berkeley administration’s authorization of violent responses to nonviolent protests over the past two years. 

3. Demands that Chancellor Birgeneau, Executive Vice Chancellor Breslauer, and Vice Chancellor LeGrande take responsibility for and repudiate such policing as it occurred over the past two years. 

4. Demands that these administrators develop, follow and enforce university policy to respond non-violently to non-violent protests, to secure student welfare amidst these protests, and to minimize the deployment of force and foster free expression and assembly on campus. 

 

 

And here’s the note sent by the authors after the original resolution was first posted: 

 

 

 

 

Dear Academic Senate Colleagues,  

We write as authors of the “Senate Resolution on Administrative Authorization and Justification of Police Violence Against Non-Violent Campus Protestors” that triggered the call for a special meeting of the Academic Senate on Monday, November 28, 2011. 

We formulated this resolution in the immediate aftermath of police violence against UC protestors on November 9th. Since that time, we have learned that our resolution is being misconstrued in two important ways. First, some have misread the resolution as unqualifiedly defending the Occupy Cal encampment and as arguing that students have the right to pitch tents on campus whenever and wherever they like. Second, some have misread the resolution as proposing a blanket “no-confidence” vote on three administrators, effectively soliciting their resignations. 

Neither of these positions or effects was our intention. Rather, we are concerned about a pattern of violent police responses to non-violent protests (three instances in two years) on our campus, and we are calling on the Senate to bring such responses to an immediate end. 

On the first matter, let us simply clarify: The resolution has no position on when and whether tents and encampments may be permitted on campus but does maintain that tents are non-violent. 

On the second matter, we have chosen to exercise our authorial prerogative to amend the proposed resolution. The “Whereas” clauses remain unchanged but we have revised the “Resolved” clause as follows: 

Therefore be it resolved that the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate: 

1. Opposes all violent police responses to non-violent protest, whether that protest is lawful or not. 

2. Condemns the UC Berkeley administration’s authorization of violent responses to nonviolent protests over the past two years. 

3. Demands that Chancellor Birgeneau, Executive Vice Chancellor Breslauer, and Vice Chancellor LeGrande take responsibility for and repudiate such policing as it occurred over the past two years. 

4. Demands that these administrators develop, follow and enforce university policy to respond non-violently to non-violent protests, to secure student welfare amidst these protests, and to minimize the deployment of force and foster free expression and assembly on campus. 

 

 

The second resolution

Resolution proposed by: Brian A. Barsky, Professor, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, and Jonathan Simon, Professor, Law.  

Whereas, The “right of the people peaceably to assemble” is enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; 

Whereas, Section 9(a) of Article 9 of the California Constitution establishes that“the University of California constitutes a public trust”; 

Whereas, Demonstrations consisting of both explicit and symbolic speech are a fundamental part of the public discourse in modern democracies and have been an important part of many social movements both nationally and internationally; 

Whereas, Police violence has been repeatedly perpetrated against peaceful demonstrators on the Berkeley campus;[For example, at and around Wheeler Hall (on November 20, 2009, December 11, 2009, and March 3, 2011), Tolman Hall (on September 22, 2011), and Sproul Hall (on November 9, 2011).] 

Whereas, The repeated incidents of police violence suggest that the Administration and the UCPD and may have adopted a policy of preemptive use of force against peaceful demonstrators whom they anticipate may engage in acts of civil disobedience; and 

Whereas, The Administration and UCPD appear to have not followed the recommendation of the June 14, 2010 Report of the Police Review Board (“Brazil report”) to clarify the proper lines of authority and approach to non-violent civil disobedience on the Berkeley campus despite this confusion having been identified in the Report as a possible source of unnecessary violence; 

Be it therefore RESOLVED, that: 

1. It is the sense of the faculty that the physical safety of campus community members (including police officers), and respect for their rights of political expression, dictate that police should not be deployed preemptively with riot weapons and tactics in response to non-violent demonstrations. 

2. The faculty calls upon the Administration to implement the recommendations of the June 14, 2010 Report of the Police Review Board (“Brazil report”). 

3. The faculty calls upon the Administration to immediately clarify the division of civilian and police authority over response to campus demonstrations including requests for mutual aid to outside police forces. 

4. The faculty calls upon the Administration to make public the specific conditions under which it is prepared to authorize UCPD (as well as other forces operating under mutual aid) to use weapons and forceful tactics, including but not limited to batons, pepper spray, and pressure point grips, against demonstrators engaged in non-violent actions including linking arms and other forms of passive resistance to arrest. 

5. The faculty calls upon the Administration to announce that it will not authorize the use of such forceful tactics to prevent or preempt the formation of any “unlawful assembly” that is composed in substantial part of students, faculty, or staff, and remains peaceful and non-violent. 

6. The faculty recommends that if a demonstration turns into an unlawful assembly (for example, an occupation of a building) then the Administration should engage in dialogue, communication, and negotiation as the primary and preferred approach. 

7. The faculty recommends that if and when arrests are deemed necessary to restore core university functions, the Administration not authorize the routine use of batons, pepper spray or other weapons and forceful tactics without specific need to respond to violence by arrestees. 

8. The faculty recommends that following any incident in which forcible methods were used that the Chancellor should convene a public meeting with a minimum of delay to explain the rationale of the decision to employ them. 

9. The Academic Senate shall establish a Senate Committee on Demonstrations and Student Actions composed solely of faculty members to consult with the Administration, UCPD and students. 

 

 

The third resolution

Resolution proposed by: David Hollinger, Professor, History, and Thomas Laqueur, Professor, History.  

The Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate of the University of Californiahereby condemns the over-reaction of police to demonstrations on our campus on November 9; formally alerts the Chancellor and those who report to him that this incident has greatly diminished confidence in the Campus’s leadership; calls upon the Chancellor to institute special training for police forces employed on campus to deal with acts of political expression and civil disobedience in the University and, more generally, to immediately implement the recommendations of the Police Review Board (The Brazil Report) as issued on June 14, 2010. 

 

 

The fourth resolution

Resolution proposed by: Kurt C. Organista, Professor, Social Welfare  

Whereas, nonviolent political protest engages fundamental rights of free assembly and free speech, and Whereas, the campus has established time, place, and manner guidelines by which it encourages such activities, and Whereas, protesters may sometimes engage in political noncooperation which includes acts of civil disobedience – including the deliberate, open and peaceful violation of particular laws, decrees, regulations, and 

Whereas, there is a clear chain of command ending with the Chancellor, which implements training and deployment of police to respond appropriately to protests, and Whereas, campuses should exercise restraint in responding to peaceful protests and seek to resolve the situation through dialogue, and 

Whereas, we are outraged by the brutal and dangerous police responses against members of the University community at UC Berkeley and other campuses, Therefore be it Resolved that the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate 

1) calls upon the Chancellor, EVCP, and Chief of Police to officially apologize to the campus community for the behavior of the UCPD on Nov.9, 2011 

2) calls for immediate revision of policies and practices to minimize the danger of excessive use of force by the police, and to better train the police to employ nonviolent law enforcement that respects the rights of nonviolent protesters 

3) affirms its support for the right of free speech and peaceful protest by all members of the University community 

4) affirms its strong opposition to the State’s disinvestment in higher education, which is at the root of the student protests. 

 

 

All of the documents are posted online here as PDFs. 

 


"Knit-In" at Occupy Berkeley Site to Make Warm Clothing for Protesters

By Erika Heidecker (BCN)
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 09:15:00 AM

Some crafty Occupy Berkeley members are showing solidarity with their Occupy brethren in cold-weather areas by holding a "knit-in at the sit-in" today.

Organizers are inviting the public to join them as they knit and crochet hats, mittens and scarves to send to cold-weather encampments that are facing dropping temperatures and snow as winter approaches.

The knit-in will be held at noon, rain or shine, at Civic Center Park at Martin Luther King Jr. Way and Center Street. 

Participants are asked to bring their own yarn and needles, however local stores, including Piedmont Yarn and Apparel, have donated some supplies for those who need them. 

The knit-in's organizer, Maxina Ventura, was busy occupying Berkeley this evening but her son, Andy Pollyak, 15, who will be joining his mother at the knit-in, said they expect a large turnout.  

Interested knitters who are unable to attend the knit-in are invited to drop off handmade items along with a photo, name or note, at Occupy Berkeley in a bag marked "Max". 

Participants can also send their hand-knitted goods directly to Occupy Berkeley c/o Maxina Ventura at 2399 E. 14th St. No. 24, San Leandro, CA 94577. 


Andronico's Telegraph Berkeley Store Is Closing

By Bay City News
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 09:11:00 AM

Andronico's, the supermarket chain that opened its first store in Berkeley in the 1920s, announced today that it will close its Telegraph Avenue store in Berkeley.

The store was called "Park and Shop" when it opened, but the name was later changed to reflect family ownership.

The closure is related to the chain's restructuring after it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy this August, according to a representative for the markets.

Five stores will remain open and "will receive the company's full attention" as part of a capital improvement plan expected to begin early next year, according to a statement released on behalf of the company. 

"The closing of the Telegraph Avenue store became necessary because the property would have been too difficult to bring up to the standards that our customers expect and deserve," said Bill Andronico, a third-generation member of the market's founding family. 

Andronico said that the chain is now financially stable following the sale of the company to Renovo Capital. 

"We have completed a difficult restructuring process, and I am pleased that we have been able to save the business and in the process preserve 375 jobs," he said. 

Andronico's will continue to operate its two stores in Berkeley on Shattuck Avenue and Solano Avenue, and stores in San Francisco, San Anselmo and Los Altos. 

"We have embarked on an ambitious program of significantly improving merchandising and stock conditions now that we are healthy again," Chief Operating Officer Justin Jackson said. 

Over the next year, capital improvements will be made at the remaining locations, Jackson said, to "greatly enhance the categories and shopping experience our customers expect in this unique marketplace."


Opinion

Editorials

Assigning Liability in Recent Berkeley "Accidents"

By Becky O'Malley
Friday December 02, 2011 - 01:02:00 PM

Accidents will happen.

That’s the truism that links the reports on the biggest Berkeley happenings in the last month, the police break-up of the Occupy Cal demonstration and the big fire which destroyed the Sequoia apartments. Something unpleasant takes place, and the people in charge report that they are shocked and surprised by the outcome—which, however, could have been predicted. 

Let’s take the Sequoia disaster first. It’s a great graphic story, amply reported complete with photos on this local site and others, in the corporate press and by the many eager young folks who report for the Daily Cal. If you’ve missed anything, take a look at two recent stories which will bring you more or less up to date on the details: Carolyn Jones’ story in today’s Chronicle and Doug Oakley’s story in the Bay Area News Group papers

The gist of it is that the building, close to a hundred years old, has been deteriorating for a long time. The tenants knew about it and complained—one even won a Small Claims lawsuit when an electrical malfunction destroyed his computer. The elevator—reported in the Chron to be an old-fashioned bird-cage of the type now found mostly in Paris apartments—hasn’t worked right for a long time. There’s some question about where the complaints ended up. Perhaps they only reached the landlord, not the city of Berkeley. 

So the Berkeley fire department checked things out this week and concluded that the fire was just “accidental in nature and was not intentionally set.” But there’s a lot of grey area between the two black-and-white poles of accident and arson, under the general heading of negligence. It’s wrong to conclude that no one’s at fault in this situation, 

If someone had died in the fire authorities might have been looking at a charge of negligent homicide. Thank goodness that didn’t happen. But under the circumstances the students who’ve been literally left out in the cold might have to sue the owner of the building in order to be reimbursed for their destroyed property. 

And they’ve suffered other kinds of injuries too. Probably many of the displaced students won’t be able to complete their school work in this grading period, and even if instructors are lenient it will cost them more time (and more tuition) to progress toward their degrees. Lawsuits, however, are expensive to pursue, even if you might eventually win. 

Besides the apparent liability of the building’s owners, what’s the responsibility of the city of Berkeley for what happened? 

From the BANG story: 

“Berkeley Deputy Fire Chief Gil Dong said he didn't know anything about the fire escape problem, but the department is researching its records to find out if there were any problems with previous yearly fire inspections.”I don't recall this building being a problem property," Dong said. "But it doesn't mean there were not previous inspection problems." 

Dong said there may well have been electrical and other problems in the building that the landlords did not pay attention to, but if tenants did not report it to city officials, there's nothing the city could have done. 

"You can't fix a problem if nobody in the city knows about it," Dong said.” 

What’s the point of city inspections if they don’t identify obvious sources of potential problems? Didn’t anyone notice that the elevator where the fire started was close to 100 years old? 

It’s time to take a hard look at the city of Berkeley’s policies for inspecting and regulating rental properties, not only in the fire department but also in the building department. It appears that city policy is that enforcement of safety regulations is almost all complaint-driven. This is obviously inadequate, especially where student rentals are concerned, since tenants turn over fast and are often young, with little experience dealing with bureaucracy. 

Rent Board Commissioner Igor Tregub and Councilmembers Worthington, Arreguin and Maio are launching a program to inform renters of their exposure to dangers from "soft-story" buildings, which are in danger of collapse in an earthquake. They say that "efforts to mandate seismic retrofitting of soft-story residential or mixed-use properties by the City of Berkeley (Phase II) and to enforce the existing Phase I have been stymied over a lack of funding, staffing, and prioritization." 

Now on to the other “accident” in the news this week, the assault by the U.C. Berkeley police on Occupy Cal protesters and their faculty supporters. By implication, this also includes the Davis pepper-spray assault as well. 

The Berkeley faculty, bless their hearts, rallied round and staged a lively discussion on Monday of what went wrong. Many of them made eloquent impassioned speeches invoking time-honored principles of freedom of speech and assembly, and at the end they passed a variety of critical resolutions by a 10-1 margin. 

But the most interesting part of the program was when three administrators explained what happened from their perspective. From our story: 

“Three U.C. Berkeley executives, Chancellor Robert Birgeneau and two of his subordinates, attempted an explanation of their actions on November 9, when students and faculty were clubbed by police. They were greeted with stony silence by the faculty members in the front of the International House auditorium where the meeting was held, and with audible snickers from the students in the back of the room.” 

Birgenau’s apology was nothing short of pathetic: he was out of town, he’d said no pepper-spray or tear gas but forgot to mention batons, it would never happen again in just the same way and even that ”there’s a level of confusion even among ourselves about what actually happened.” 

But Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost George Breslauer, whose speech was captured on audio by the redoubtable Daily Cal reporters, had a pretty clear version of what happened. 

He spoke of a “sense of urgency to remove the tents as early as possible, as soon as they went up” because of apprehension about what had happened with the tree-sitters, at Occupy Oakland, and elsewhere. He said that “tactically it would have been better to wait until the middle of the night to minimize the encounters between police and protesters and observers.” 

Say what? If you’re doing the wrong thing, it’s better to do it in the dead of night when there are no witnesses? 

He’s not mistaken about that. Various half-remembered Shakespeare quotes come to mind here, Lady Macbeth perhaps. Coming from an academic background, he tried to attribute the outcome to a poor choice of analogies in his take on the situation—but that’s much too easy. 

While we’re on the subject of academic jargon, we note with regret that Breslauer spoke of his desire to produce “additional actionable ideas for how to address the underlying socio-economic issues”. The word “actionable” has traditionally been a legal term, defined in the online Merriam-Webster dictionary as subject to or affording ground for an action or suit at law”. Unfortunately, social scientists and other careless speakers seem to be converting it into what M-W now lists as a secondary meaning: “capable of being acted on”, which is what we assume Breslauer meant. 

But in both of these cases, the Sequoia fire and the assault on Occupy Cal protesters and observers, the first meaning of “actionable” seems to apply. It’s not enough to disclaim responsibility, as both the Sequoia landlords and the city of Berkeley seem to be doing in the fire situation. It’s not enough to apologize, as Birgeneau has done. 

It seems clear that some degree of negligence is involved in both cases, and it’s likely that the legal system will be required to evaluate it. Some of the Occupy protesters who claim injuries have already filed suit against the University of California. It’s quite possible that the displaced Sequoia tenants will have to take the same route to be compensated for their losses unless the landlord or his insurance company offers them a prompt and just financial settlement. 

Accidents do happen, but more often than not bad choices by responsible humans cause predictably bad outcomes. The courts are there to decide about liability. 

 

 

 


The Editor's Back Fence

Best City Council Story Ever

Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 08:40:00 AM

Thanks to Richard Brenneman for this terrific link! We think we live in Bezerkeley, but we'll never top this one.


Cartoons

Odd Bodkins: Dodo

By Dan O'Neill
Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 09:34:00 AM

 

Dan O'Neill

 


Public Comment

Miami "Condo King" Wants Berkeley's Public Housing

By Lynda Carson
Friday December 02, 2011 - 01:53:00 PM

Berkeley's low-income public housing residents are waiting to learn if their long-time public housing units will be sold to some out of state billionaires, and their billion dollar for-profit housing development corporation. 

Billionaires Jorge M. Perez and Stephen M. Ross of The Related Companies, have set their sights on buying Berkeley's 75 occupied public housing units in a complicated deal that edged out local nonprofit housing developers recently. Many of Berkeley's low-income families may be displaced and placed at risk of homelessness, if the billionaires get their hands on Berkeley's public housing. 

Jorge M. Perez, is known as the "Condo King" of Miami, Florida, because he has developed and owns so many condominiums in that region, through The Related Companies/Related Group. He is also known as a billionaire Cuban American real estate developer. 

Perez is also the majority owner of The Related Companies, which is also the parent company of The Related Companies of California, LLC, another wealthy housing development corporation. 

In recent years, Related suffered over $1 billion in losses, but remained so wealthy that it has managed to survive the unstable housing market. 

After setting their sights on buying Berkeley's 75 public housing town-homes, as recent as September, 2011, the Berkeley Housing Authority (BHA) announced that it has entered into an exclusive negotiating rights agreement with The Related Companies of California, LLC, that will last 90 days, with a possible 30 day extension to negotiate the full terms of the deal. 

With political connections directly to the White House, Perez a co-founder of The Related Companies has been a major political fundraiser for President Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and was an advisor to ex-President Bill Clinton during his term in office. 

In 2010, it was reported that Perez owned 75% of The Related Companies, and that billionaire Stephen M. Ross a 95% owner of the Miami Dolphins football franchise, owned 25% of the billion dollar development company. 

During the past week, Berkeley's public housing tenants expressed concern about losing their long-time public housing units to some out of state billionaires. 

Anne Marie Dent is disabled and resides in Berkeley's public housing. "I do not like what I am hearing about the takeover of our public housing. I am afraid of being displaced. I believe that it should remain as public housing. I do not think that billionaires should be allowed to grab our public housing. It is not fair. There are too many poor people in need currently, and public housing was never meant to be for billionaires." 

When asked if she thought it was a good idea for a billionaire to get his hands on Berkeley's public housing units, Mary Lightfoot said no. 

Public housing resident Anna Smith said, "All I know is that the rumors are going around, that the building I reside in is being sold to a billionaire that owns a football team. I heard that I would learn more details from the BHA sometime in March. I have lived here in public housing since 1992, and I was told that this was my home to raise a family in. Now I am being told that I will have to move. I have grandchildren living with me that are teenagers in school, and I do not know where I am going to go. I keep hearing about affordable housing projects. But what does that mean? Many people, including myself, cannot afford to reside in affordable housing projects, and there is no place left to go for poor people once all of our public housing is gone." 

When asked what is planned next if the negotiations fail, the BHA's Project Manager, Kathleen Sims, said, "The BHA is in negotiation with The Related Companies of California, and until those negotiations are over I cannot say more about the next step the BHA will pursue with its public housing units." 

In the news, as recently as December 1, 2011, it was reported in the Miami Herald that Perez has agreed to donate $35 million in cash and art to the Miami Art Museum, resulting in a deal to have the museum renamed the Jorge M. Perez Art Museum of Miami-Dade County. Some of the board members of the museum objected to the deal and renaming of the museum, and three of the board members resigned in protest. 

The Related Group's current portfolio has assets under development totaling more than $10.7 billion, and the company is best known for its many luxury high-rise developments, according to their web site. 

While billionaires, and the rich and powerful all across the nation are refusing to pay their fair share of taxes, it is ironic to many that the rich and powerful are standing in line to get their hands on our nations 1.2 million public housing units. 

Meanwhile, Berkeley's public housing residents are waiting in anticipation to find out if their long-time public housing units will end up in the hands of the out of state billionaires. 


Whistling in the Dark: Berkeley Budget Woes

By David M. Wilson
Friday December 02, 2011 - 01:22:00 PM

A couple of years ago, the City of Vallejo went bankrupt, blaming unsustainable costs of wage and benefit packages negotiated with employee unions. Two months ago, Pleasant Hill, despairing of a negotiated settlement with the unions, imposed a salary freeze on its workers, and dramatically reduced pension benefits for future hires.[1] 

Then, just last week, San Francisco voters approved an initiative requiring city workers to contribute 7.5% or more of the money needed to fund pension promises made to legions of past employees. This was the progressive solution to a nationwide dilemma. In Wisconsin the result was reactionary: employee unions lost their right to collectively bargain on nearly al meaningful issues. 

What’s happening? All across the nation, the costs of salary and benefit packages far exceed available revenues. 

What of Berkeley, where our Mayor brags about the City’s high credit ratings? Unhappily, His Honor is whistling in the dark. The numbers in fact reveal structural problems that began long before the current recession. If it continues on its present course, Berkeley will be bankrupt in a few years, and its workforce will be on the streets. 

1. Over the last twenty years, wages and benefits have gone up by nearly twice the rate of inflation.[2] 

 

FY  

 

Actual Budget  

 

%  

Increase 

 

Wages/Bens  

 

%,  

Total 

Budget 

 

Cap. Imps./Infra-  

structure maintenance 

 

%,  

Total 

Budget 

 

CPI  

Increase[3] 

1991-2110 

 

1991  

 

$139,380,776  

 

+226%  

 

$90,643,816  

 

64%  

 

$13,563,971  

 

10%  

 

 

 

2010  

 

315,000,553  

 

252,571,909 (+279%)  

 

80%  

 

12, 967,999  

 

4%  

 

+166%  

 

 

Clearly, wage and benefit costs have eaten up money that used to go to maintain critical infrastructure. There is an obvious reason why there are holes in our streets, clogged storm drains in low-lying areas, and failing sewer lines nearly everywhere. There is also a reason why the City’s expenditures on social safety net programs for youth, seniors and the disadvantaged have declined by more than one third over the past few years. 

Phil Kamlarz is Berkeley’s long time City Manager, and nobody’s fool. He is now retiring with a $300,000 annual pension plus a $150,000 immediate cash payout. After years of reassuring us that all was well with the City budget, Kamlarz recently reported that "years of limited funding and deferred maintenance have resulted in an aging city infrastructure that needs repair and improvement. We have been taking away from capital improvements in a way which is not sustainable." [4] 2012-13 Biennial Budget. 

 

2 .When compared to everywhere else, Berkeley has more employees, pays higher salaries, and gives more benefits to Its employees.[5] 

City vs Average

Population

Employees

Residents

Per Employee

Gross Salaries Per

Resident

Add’l Benefit Costs

Per Resident

Berkeley

112,580

1529

73.63

$1161

$524

Regional Average

99,416

939

113.47

$610

$210

Difference

+113%

+163%

-35%

+190%

+250%

 

On November 16, 2010, the City Auditor reported that most of the City’s pension obligations were unfunded and that drastic salary/benefit reductions are in the works: 

“In FY 2010 a City Employee earned an average $.54 in benefits per every $1 in salary....To offset [these] costs the City will need to make significant compensation reductions to future and/or current employees. With such high pension rates, in fiscal 2016, salary reductions would have to range from 9% for police and 11.5% for fire to 7% for all other employees just to absorb the CALPERS increases.” Anne Marie Hogan, Employee Benefits: Tough Decisions Ahead (Nov. 16, 2010). 

 

We are on a collision course. Unlike other jurisdictions Berkeley continues to yield to its unions, for example by funding 100% of the cost of plush pension and health care packages. For this we cannot blame the unions: their job after all is to get whatever they can for their current members. We can only blame the politicians. Their job is to bargain seriously to get the best deal for the voters. Their job is also to tell us the truth, even when it is hard to digest. 

To date, they have failed miserably. 

 

 



[1] Mercury News, 9/19/11  

 

[2] Sources are Biennial Budget Books submitted by the City Manager for 1992-93, 2010-11, and 2012-13. Note that these official budget figures differ from figures from some other sources.  

 

[3] Measured in 2010 dollars, 1991 capital expenditures were $30,654,574, or 236% higher than 2010 expenditures of $12,967,999. CPI information is available on-line at inflationdata.com/inflation/consumer_price_index/historicalcpi.aspx  

 

[4] Biennial Budget, 2012-13, available at the City’s website (City Council Agenda June 28, 2011).  

 

[5] Source is the Public Employee Database at http://www.mercurynews.com/salaries/bay-area, as analyses by Berkeley Budget SOS, a Citizens Group whose latest report was submitted to the Mayor and council on September 27, 2011.  

 


Letters to the Editor

Saturday November 26, 2011 - 09:43:00 AM

Eids; Why the Super Committee Was Doomed; U.C. Berkeley Police;Resignation Vs. Moratorium;The Super Commitee's Failure; A Thought about Needed Change 

Eids
In the 'decline of Telegraph' article, Eids electronics was listed as closed. I haven't been to Tele in months, but find no obits for the store online. It also just occurred to me that the magnet stores for Telegraph were Blake's, Cody's and Moe's. With 2 out of 3 down, Tele's decline isn't surprising. The demise of the book business + crime levels did Tele.
Fred Albrecht
***
Why the Super Committee Was Doomed
The deficit-cutting super committee was merely a charade to show the public that Congress was doing something about the deficit. It was doomed to fail. The October 2011 Rasmussen survey found that just nine percent of likely U.S. voters rate the job Congress is doing as good or excellent. Sixty-three percent view Congress’ job performance as poor. To the public, the failure of the super committee to compromise is just another symbol of a failed government. Its failure may result in another downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, possible double-dip recession, increased market instability, a lost decade of economic growth, and a 10 percent cut in defense and non-defense spending. Who is at fault? The voters will let us know at the next election.
Ralph E. Stone 

 

*** 

U.C. Berkeley Police 

 

U.C. Berkeley campus police procedures are vetted by UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau.
UCPD reports to and takes direction from UC Berkeley office of the Chancellor.
Words come cheap: apologies and excuses.
Deeds count.
Sack, fire, oust UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau

Milan Moravec 

 

*** 

Resignation Vs. Moratorium 

If all the University of California chancellors resigned simultaneously, that would still leave pepper (OC) spray, carotid holds, hog-tying, and blunt-end baton strikes available for the next bored police officer who loses patience with student protests.

If 75,000 petitioners have called for the resignation of Chancellor Linda Katehi, then surely 75,000 would sign a petition for a moratorium on the use of pepper spray on non-violent student protesters, a more effective course.

Special Agent Thomas W. W. Ward, the head of the FBI's Less-Than-Lethal Weapons Program at the time of the 1991 study authorizing pepper spray's FBI use was fired for taking bribes from a peppergas manufacturer. Even the compromised 1991 study concluded that pepper spray can cause "[m]utagenic effects, carcinogenic effects, sensitization, cardiovascular and pulmonary toxicity, neurotoxicity, as well as possible human fatalities. There is a risk in using this product on a large and varied population".

Apologies and resignations are not the point. The point would seem to be to get toxic materials out of the hands of those who would use them for sport.

Carol Denney 

*** 

The Super Commitee's Failure 

The Congressional Supercommittee failed to reach an agreement last week,but the deficit that George Bush gave us has to be put under control to save our social security net!

We are lucky to have three strong Federal advocates who have Berkeley within their spheres.

Although as a retired scholar and a journalist whose concerns include reasonable threats from the Third World, (Note: The word "reasonable" comes into my vocabulary here.) the United States is over-armed for the threat out there externally, but, at the same time, the political stance found in our community itself is askew.

Definitely the Defense Department should be on the negotiation table in order to preserve our governmental entitlements.

Geoffrey Cook 

*** 

A Thought about Needed Change 

Can we have a Thanksgiving for the nation as a whole where all who have means will give their best day's earnings to those who have nothing? How strong our indifference must be when our unfortunate neighbor goes hungry and we look the other way! How can we enjoy ten main dishes topped with five varieties of pies and cakes while our neighbor eats beans and white bread? We are born with empathy, but we can be trained by our political party or by our ideology not to follow our heart. On the other hand, when we share without expectation of return a light goes on in our spirit.

We are all travelers upon the earth, passing through. Let us use opportunities like Thanksgiving Day to make the lot of less fortunate travelers a little easier. 


Romila khanna 

***


New: What Occupy is About: An Opinion

By Thomas Lord
Monday November 28, 2011 - 05:47:00 PM

Occupy is about mass organizing to directly address big, structural problems that create intolerable inequities and injustices.

Occupy focuses on a malevolent concentration of political and economic power in a relatively small elite who seem to exercise their power so as to increase those inequities and injustices.

Occupy attempts to organize resistance under a "big tent", improvising and using techniques of Real Democracy. 

An encampment is sometimes a symbolic and practical hub for mass organization. It can help mass organization as for example on November 2, 2011, Oakland CA. 

On the other hand, a camp may be forced by necessity and common decency to spend nearly all or even "more than all" of its energy on the immediate survival and wellness needs of its members. 

When a camp does that -- turns inward that way -- it doesn't have anything left over to work on mass organizing against a defective concentration of power. It's too busy keeping its members alive and mostly civil. It's not really doing the "Occupy thing", at that point. 

A camp that is turned inward, working on the survival of its campers, also tends to punish non-camper supporters. Every gift from a supporter goes towards the immediate survival and wellness needs of the campers and, even more ... if there is anything left over then the number of needy campers is likely to grow. The reward for trying to help solve the problem is a bigger problem. 

So, not only can't an inwardly turned camp directly help the Occupy movement, it also eventually alienates its outside supporters and collapses under the weight of its own unmet needs. 

The tensions arise from that conflict between the inward humanitarian mission of camp and the outward political mission. 

-t 


Berkeley, There Will Be No Santa Claus.

From Jacquelyn McCormick, Coordinator, Berkeley Budget SOS
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 04:55:00 PM

While citizens of Berkeley are nestled snug in their beds, City Councilmembers are dreaming, not of sugar plums, but of ways to fund the City’s failing infrastructure.

At several recent Council workshops, the demise and needs of our parks, marina, pools, storm drains, sewers and streets were discussed in detail. To date there has been no mention of City buildings (except that Old City Hall is a death trap if there is a significant earthquake, so Council is pondering a new location) – although rebuilding the solid waste transfer station and recycling center was briefly mentioned last spring.

Mid-December should reveal the “total” capital project dollars that are needed for all the necessary improvements but it is looking as though that number is close to $600million. That works out to approximately $5,300 per resident, including students. Couple that with the $253 million debt for employee benefits related liabilities – most owed to CALPERS and you end up with close to $850million in unfunded liabilities, or a whopping $7,500 per resident. And we call it unfunded because, sadly, it is. Unless significant budgetary changes are made, there is no money to fund any of this and Berkeley taxpayers and the City treasury are tapped out. 


So in practicality what does this mean? Capital improvement investment has decreased from 10% of our budget to 4% over the past 20 years while salaries and benefits have increased from 64% of the budget to 80%. Where is the money going to come from to fix the stuff that is broken or, more accurately, what are we going to do without?  

Streets: Our streets are given a rating of 58 in the Metropolitan Transportation Commission report. This places Berkeley in the lowest quartile – out of 98 Bay Area cities, 80 ranked higher. The city is making an effort of prioritizing repairs of the city arterials and their feeders, but it would cost $43million to get all our streets to a rating of 80. Have you driven down the newly repaved four block section of Milvia, by the high school and city hall? What a pleasure! However, if you happen to live and drive through our residential streets, especially the smaller outliers, get accustomed to dodging those potholes or rumbling over the patchwork – if you happen to travel by bike, should you lose your focus, you’re doomed. 

Parks and Waterfront: We love our parks, so much so that in 1986 Measure L was passed which requires that these amenities be funded to maintain their condition and services. Then in 1991, we voted to approve a dedicated park tax but, it did not have an escalator, so the money that it provided is now inadequate. Simply, our parks have been neglected to the point where there are safety issues and some areas may be closed. The $78million of capital required bring them “up to snuff” is due, primarily, to the fact that they have not been maintained and there were pictures provided in the meetings that prove it. Some say it is demolition by neglect. 

Pools: The pool issue has been ongoing for years and it will take $22.5 million to improve and/or rebuild what is currently open for use. Willard Pool was closed and buried in dirt because the city would not spend $78,000 to keep it open for the summer, and many residents considered this in retaliation for the defeat of the pools Bond Measure C. All those kids who relied and looked forward to a long-standing summer tradition are now hosed. Literally. The only water they will get in their neighborhood is that which comes from their own personal garden hose – if they are lucky enough to have one. 

Storm drains aka “Watershed Management”: South Berkeley consistently floods, culverts are collapsing, creeks are overflowing and the city has earmarked only $700,000 during this fiscal year for “emergency repairs”. The Watershed Plan that was put forth in October is one, quite frankly, that most Berkelyans would embrace – it truly reflects Berkeley values. It is based on new scientific methods of capturing and slowly releasing overflow, creating permeable surfaces to capture and slow runoff and goes far to ensure that what Berkeley releases does not end up in the Bay. A good thing! The problem – it will cost $250million to get it done and this will compete with all the other infrastructure needs. 

Berkeley’s Social Safety Net Services. Last, but certainly not least. We are talking about services for seniors, the blind, youth, jobs, employment training, housings, homeless, addiction, and health – services for Berkeleyans who are in need, services that reflect our Berkeley values. From a high of almost $10million three years ago, social service contribution has decreased to approximately $7.5million – a level below 2006. In the current budget cycle, senior services were decreased by 57%, housing development and rehab by 27% and employment training decreased by 21%. 

So what do we do?  

The easiest, but unacceptable, course for Council would be: package the infrastructure needs in a nice box covered with flowery speak, (something like: Do you as Berkeleyans want to save the Bay?) tie it all up with a big bow, stick it on the ballot and hope that it passes. Or if recent tax measure failure in San Francisco is any indication of the mood of the voter – good luck getting any new revenue! 

The hardest but most responsible way, is to look at the underlying reasons for Berkeley’s neglect of its infrastructure and its failure to plan wisely. We need to figure out why and make the necessary changes or, quite soon, all we can expect from our city in services and infrastructure is a lump of coal. And it isn’t because Berkeley’s citizens have misbehaved.


Why, Why Occupy?

By Kevin Gorman
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 10:39:00 AM

I’m a student at UC Berkeley - and lately, an Occupier. In the last month, I have seen hundreds of people from many different backgrounds sitting down in the public sphere and talking about what they think is going wrong in our country right now. It has been inspiring to see such a diverse group of people coming together hoping to make the world a better place.

I’ve also found myself on the wrong side of police barricades more times than I ever imagined happening. I've seen peaceful protesters in Oakland tear-gassed and shot with 'non-lethal' weapons. I've seen peaceful students on Sproul Plaza beaten viciously. The scenes I have seen – both the good and the bad – are not unique to the bay area, they've been repeated in dozens of other cities across the country. 

Why occupy? 

I have been frequently asked by friends what the Occupy movement is about, or what we want. These questions are not easily answerable and I’m not sure that it is actually possible to answer them. The movement is decentralized - everyone is present for their own reasons. The most universal feeling I have found among Occupiers is a deep-rooted sense that there is something dreadfully wrong in our country today. I share this feeling and I am sure that many of you do too - even those of you who are currently ambivalent about the Occupy movement. 

I do not think that a lack of focus or goals is a major problem for the movement at this point - and I definitely don’t think it’s a valid reason to not support the movement right now. I am always hesitant to just directly quote someone else to explain my own ideas, but I think Robert Reich’s recent speech on Sproul Plaza brought this point home incredibly well - “Every social movement in the last half-century or more, it started with moral outrage…and the actual lessons, the specific demands for specific changes, came later.” 

Occupy is a very very young movement. Occupy Wall Street began less than two months ago. We are gaining astounding momentum. This is the very beginning of something, not the end. A few hundred students were attacked by the UCPD a couple weeks ago - and a week later 10,000 angry people came out. I do not believe that it would be possible for any movement this young with this explosive growth to have an explicit set of goals in the absence of top down direction - and I do not believe that a movement with top down direction is what America needs right now. 

Well, why do you occupy? 

I think that a lot of the issues brought up in the public discussion around Occupy are critically important. Many of them are issues I’ve been concerned with for a long time. That said, even though I’ve been concerned with them for a long time, they’ve never previously motivated me to take to the streets. 

So why am I doing so now? 

On the morning of the 25th, Occupy Oakland’s camp in Frank Ogawa Plaza was violently attacked by a coalition of eighteen law enforcement agencies. Tear gas, batons, and stun grenades were used against nonviolent and nonresistant protesters. 

I read about the morning raid that afternoon, but I had problems believing it. I did not understand how the events as described could have happened in the United states, let alone in the bay area. In retrospect the stories seem entirely believable, but at the time I just could not wrap my head the idea that a peaceful protest in the United States in 2011 could be attacked in such a fashion. I decided that I wanted to go to future events, and began trying to figure out what I should bring to future events to minimize the chance I would experience serious harm (and to increase the chance I could help out other people present.) 

While I was in the process of planning out what I would bring to future events, I began to see news and social media reports that the Oakland Police Department was teargassing protesters again. I also got in touch with a friend who was present who confirmed that tear gas had already been used despite the protest being almost entirely peaceful. Reading about something in the media is very different from having it described to you by someone you know and trust. 

While I was talking with my friend, I began to get angry - almost unbelievably angry, angrier than I had ever been before. I had no idea what I could do or what I should do, but I felt like I absolutely had to do something. I do not mean that I had an abstract desire to do something, I mean that I am literally unsure if I would have been capable of staying home that night. 

I ended up running half the way to Oakland before remembering that the buses would still be going. When I got there it quickly became apparent that the descriptions I had read at home were accurate: a peaceful protest in downtown Oakland had been attacked with gas, flashbangs, and rubber bullets by police officers. The actions of the police that night were unjustifiable by any conceivable standard, and I am still shocked by them. 

My friends and I all came out of that night without experiencing permanent physical harm. This is not true of everyone who was present. This is not true of everyone who was present. Scott Olsen, a former marine, was shot in the head with a tear gas canister from very short range. His skull fractured and he spent weeks in the ICU. He will probably experience significant permanent disability. If I saw Scott Olsen that night I wasn’t aware of it at the time, but I definitely saw some of the other people from the group he was with. One of my most lasting memories of the night was a Navy veteran in uniform standing completely calmly holding a flag just a few feet from the barricades. Although I didn’t see it in person (I was running away) he continued to stand his ground after he was tear gassed - you can see a video of it here:  

A couple weeks later, there was a protest on Sproul Plaza, the historic center of the free speech movement. During the protest, students erected a handful of tents. That night, around 220 police officers in full riot gear showed up to dismantle the miniature tent city, and proceeded to beat with incredible force many students and professors, hospitalizing several people. There was no violence against the police that night, and no illegal action except for the erection of tents. I was present that night, and I will stand with every ounce of integrity and credibility I have and say that there was no hidden off-video justification for the police attacks that day. There is no missing context that will make them intelligible. I saw in person the full context to the attacks, and it makes them more horrifying, not less. (There’s a video of one of the daytime incidents here: 

The police response I have consistently seen to Occupy protests has been one of the most disgusting things I have seen in my life but it has a very comforting flip side: Occupy is growing. In the face of brutal and unjustified violence, more and more people are coming out to support us. For every person sidelined by injury or arrest five step forward. 

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. You and I both know this. You and I have both known this for a long time. Occupy is the first populist movement fighting against these problems in many, many decades. I honestly believe that the current movement is the best chance we have had to create meaningful change in at least forty years. We have the support of the people and we’re growing, even in the face of outrageous violence. The time to strike is now. 

I hate to draw on the emotion captured by previous movements, but Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young summed up well why I go to Occupy events: 

What if you knew her 

And found her dead on the ground 

How can you run when you know? 


I don’t know how to run anymore. 

Please, stand with me. 


Columns

ECLECTIC RANT: Is the American Psychiatric Association in Bed with Big Pharma?

By Ralph E. Stone
Friday December 02, 2011 - 04:26:00 PM

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is published by the American Psychiatric Association. The DSM provides a common language and standard criteria for the classification of mental disorders, which is used in the United States and to some extent internationally, by clinicians, researchers, psychiatric drug regulation agencies, health insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and policy makers. The DSM is produced by a panel of psychiatrists, many of whom have financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. It is considered the "bible" of American psychiatry. The latest edition— DSM-IV— was published in 1994. 

In 1952, the DSM was a small, spiral-bound handbook (DSM-I), but the latest edition (DSM-IV), is a 943-page magnum opus. Over time, psychiatric diagnoses have increased in the American population and in turn, drugs that affect mental states are then used to treat them. The theory that psychiatric conditions are caused by a biochemical imbalance is often used as a justification for their widespread use, even though the theory in unproven. Since there are no objective tests for mental illness and what is normal and abnormal is often unclear, psychiatry is a particularly fertile field for creating new diagnoses or broadening old ones. 

Medications are widely used to treat the symptoms of mental disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Sometimes medications are used with other treatments such as psychotherapy. 

While I am sure research in mental disorders account for some of this increase, I cannot help but believe that there is a certain amount of disease-peddling going on. That is, instead of promoting drugs to treat diseases, diseases are promoted to fit the drugs. For example, shyness as a psychiatric illness made its debut as "social phobia" in DSM-III in 1980, but was said to be rare. By 1994, when DSM-IV was published, it had become "social anxiety disorder," now said to be extremely common, thus, boosting sales of antidepressants. Now, social anxiety disorder is "a severe medical condition." In 1999, the FDA approved a drug for social anxiety disorder. After a successful marketing campaign, the sales of Paxil soared 

Presently, a revised version of the DSM is set for publication in 2013. The proposed revision has proven quite controversial. A group of psychologists with the Society for Humanistic Psychology, for example, has filed a petition objecting to many of the revisions, arguing that they broaden the definition of mental health disorders, which, in turn, could lead to over treatment with drugs. Some but not all, of the objections of tthe Society — along with the British Psychological Society and the American Counseling Association — to the proposed DSM-V include:  

* The proposed DSM "fails to explicitly state that deviant behavior and primary conflicts between the individual and society are not mental disorders." "Given lack of consensus as to the “primary” causes of mental distress, this proposed change may result in the labeling of sociopolitical deviance as mental disorder." 

* "Several new proposals with little empirical basis also warrant hesitation: For example, “Apathy Syndrome,” “Internet Addiction Disorder,” and “Parental Alienation Syndrome” have virtually no basis in the empirical literature." 

* “…clients and the general public are negatively affected by the continued and continuous medicalization of their natural and normal responses to their experiences; responses which undoubtedly have distressing consequences which demand helping responses, but which do not reflect illnesses so much as normal individual variation.” 

Do we really need more mental disorder diagnoses creating the need for more drugs in a society that some would say is already over-medicated? Let's look at some statistics. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) the percentage of Americans who took at least one prescription drug in the past month increased from 44 percent to 48 percent over the past ten years. The use of two or more drugs increased from 25 percent to 31 percent. The use of five or more drugs increased from 6 percent to 11 percent. And in 2007-2008, 1 out of every 5 children and 9 out of 10 older Americans reported using at least one prescription drug in the past month. 

And Americans are spending more on drugs. According to the CDC, spending for prescription drugs in the U.S. was $234.1 billion in 2008, which was more than double what was spent in 1999. 

And the pharmaceutical industry is profiting. According to Fortune 500 (May 3, 2010 issue date), the profits for the twelve largest pharmaceutical companies was almost $64 billion in 2010. Clearly, Pharma has a financial interest in a DSM with more mental disorders because it will mean a demand for more drugs to treat them. 

The critics — and the public too — have a stake in the proposed DSM-V. More mental disorders may mean just more drugs in our over-medicated society. 

Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once quipped, "If all the drugs were thrown in the ocean, everyone would be better-off . . . except for the fish." While this is a an overstatement, it does contain a grain of truth.


DISPATCHES FROM THE EDGE: Pakistan: Anatomy Of A Crisis

By Conn Hallinan
Friday December 02, 2011 - 03:27:00 PM

In the aftermath of the Nov. 26 NATO attack on two border posts that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, the question being asked is whether the assault was a “fog of war” incident or a calculated hit aimed at torpedoing peace talks in Afghanistan? Given that the incident has plunged relations between Washington and Islamabad to a new low at a critical juncture in the 10-year war, the answer is vitally important 

According to NATO, U.S. and Afghan troops came under fire from the Pakistani side of the border and retaliated in self-defense. American officials have suggested that the Taliban engineered the incident in order to poison U.S.-Pakistani relations. But there are some facts suggesting that the encounter may have been more than a “friendly fire” encounter brought on by a clever foe, an ill-defined border, and the normal chaos of the battlefield. 

Afghan Taliban commander Mullah Samiullah Rahmani denies they were even in the area—and the insurgent group is never shy about taking credit for military engagements (of course, if deception was involved that is what the Taliban would say). However, this particular region is one that the Pakistani army has occupied for several years and is considered fairly “cleansed” of insurgents. 

The incident was not the case of a drone attack or bombing gone awry, a common enough event. For all the talk of “precision weapons” and “surgical strikes,” drones have inflicted hundreds of civilian deaths and 500 lb bombs have very little in common with operating rooms. Instead, the NATO instruments were Apache attack helicopters and, according to Associated Press, an A-130 gunship. In short, the assault was led by live pilots presumingly indentifying targets to their superiors. 

Those targets were two border forts, architecture that has never been associated with the Taliban. It is true the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is porous and not always clearly defined, but the Afghan insurgents don’t build concrete posts. A “fort” is duck soup for a drone or a fighter-bomber, which is why the Taliban favor caves and hidden bunkers. 

Naturally enough, both sides disagree on what happened. The Americans say they took fire from the Pakistani border, engaged in a three-hour running fight, and called in the choppers at the end of the battle. 

But, according to the Pakistanis, there was no fire from their side of the border, and helicopters started the battle, which went on for a little less than two hours. Pakistan also says there were two Apache attacks. The first struck outpost Volcano, and when the fort’s nearby companion, outpost Boulder, fired on the helicopters, it also came under assault. Pakistan claims that its military contacted NATO to warn them they were attacking Pakistani troops, but the firing continued. The helicopters finally withdrew, only to reappear and renew the attack when the Pakistanis tried to reinforce the besieged forts. 

Might it have been a matter of bad intelligence? 

According to the Pakistanis, Islamabad has been careful to identify its posts to NATO in order to avoid incidents exactly like this. Pakistan Gen. Ashfaq Nadeem said, “it is not possible” that the “NATO forces did not know of the location of the Pakistani posts.” Pakistan Gen. Ashram Nader called the attack a “deliberate act of aggression.” 

Could it have been “deliberate”? Mistakes happen in war, but the timing of this engagement is deeply suspicious. 

It comes at a delicate moment, when some 50 countries were preparing to gather in Bonn, Germany for talks aimed at a settling the Afghan War. Central to that meeting is Pakistan, the only country in the region with extensive contacts among the various insurgent groups. If the U.S. plans to really withdraw troops by 2014, it will need close cooperation with Pakistan. 

“This could be a watershed in Pakistan’s relations with the U.S.,” Islamabad’s high commissioner to Britain, Wajid Shamsul Hasan, told the Guardian (UK). “It could wreck the time table for the American troop withdrawal.” 

Pakistan has now withdrawn from the Bonn talks, and relations between Washington and Islamabad are as bad as they have ever been. The Pakistanis have shut down two major land routes into Afghanistan, routes over which some 50 percent of supplies for the war move. Islamabad has also demanded that the CIA close down its drone base at Shamsi in Pakistan’s Balochistan Province. 

Who would benefit from all this fallout? 

It is no secret that many in the U.S. military are unhappy about the prospect of negotiations with the Taliban, in particular the organization’s most lethal ally, the Haqqani Group. There is an unspoken but generally acknowledged split between the Defense Department and the State Department, with the former wanting to pound the insurgents before sitting down to talk, while the latter is not sure that tactic will work. Could someone on the uniformed side of the division have decided to derail, or at least damage, the Bonn meeting? 

It is also no secret that not everyone in Afghanistan wants peace, particularly if it involves a settlement with the Taliban. The Northern Alliance, made up of mostly Tajiks and Uzbeks, want nothing to do with the Pashtun-based Taliban that is mainly grouped in the south and east, and in the tribal regions of Pakistan. The Afghan Army is mostly Tajik, who not only make up the bulk of the soldiers, but 70 percent of the command staff. President Hamid Karzi is a Pashtun, but he is largely window dressing in the Northern Alliance-dominated Kabul government. 

There are broader regional issues at stake as well. 

It was no surprise that China immediately came to Pakistan’s defense, with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechu expressing “deep shock and strong concern” over the incident. China is not happy about the NATO deployment in Afghanistan and less so about the possibility of permanent U.S. bases in that country. At a Nov. 2 meeting in Istanbul, China, along with Pakistan, Iran and Russia, opposed a long-term American deployment in the area. 

Iran is worried about the threat of U.S. military power on its border, Islamabad is concerned that prolonging the war will further destabilize Pakistan, and Beijing and Moscow are suspicious that the Americans have their sights set on Central Asia gas and oil resources. Both Russia and China rely on Central Asia hydrocarbons, the former for export to Europe, and the latter to run its burgeoning industries. 

China is also anxious about the Obama administration’s recent strategic shift toward Asia. The U.S. has openly intervened in disputes between China and its Southeast Asian neighbors in the South China Sea, and recently signed an agreement to deploy 2,500 Marines in Australia. Washington has also tightened its ties with Indonesia and warmed up to Myanmar. To China, all this looks like a campaign to surround Beijing with U.S. allies and to keep its finger on the Chinese energy jugular vein. Some 80 percent of China’s oil moves through the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. 

A key ingredient in any formula to offset Beijing’s growing power and influence in Asia is the role of India. New Delhi has traditionally been neutral in foreign policy, but, starting with the Bush administration, it has grown increasingly close to Washington. China and India have a prickly relationship dating back to the 1962 border war between the two countries and China’s support for India’s traditional enemy, Pakistan. China claims on part of India’s border area have not improved matters. 

India would also like a Taliban-free government in Kabul, and anything that discomforts Islamabad is just fine with New Delhi. There are elements in the American military and diplomatic community that would like to see Washington dump its alliance with Pakistan and pull India into a closer relationship. A fair number of Indians feel the same way. 

So far, the White House has refused to apologize, instead leaking a story that showing any softness vis-à-vis Pakistan during an election year is impossible. 

In the end, the border fight may turn out to be an accident, although we are unlikely to know that for certain. Military investigations are not known for accuracy, and much of what happened will remain classified. 

But with all these crosscurrents coming together in the night skies over Pakistan, maybe somebody saw an opportunity and took it. In a sense, it is irrelevant whether the attack was deliberate or dumb: the consequences are going to be with us for a long time, and the ripples are likely to spread from a rocky hillside in Pakistan to the far edges of the Indian Ocean and beyond. 

Conn Hallinan can be read at dispatchesfromtheedgeblog.wordpress.com and middleempireseries.wordpress.com 

---30---


SENIOR POWER … piqued

By Helen Rippier Wheeler
Friday December 02, 2011 - 01:40:00 PM

My curiosity was piqued by people and media references to “TCM.” Aha. Traditional Chinese Medicine. 

I ran it by a Chinese friend, discovered that she too has a conventional, primary care M.D. physician. She says she is part of the system now. 

I ran it by an M.D., who suggested trying Osher Center for Integrative Medicine. “We don’t have geriatrics here,” they respond, although they “accept Medicare for psychiatrics” and something else.  

I ran it by a retired R.N. neighbor, who urged “try acupuncture!!” 

Time to dig deeper. This may be on the final. I discover myriad overlapping, possibly-related terms! 

xxxx 

Alternative medicine refers to treatments used in place of conventional medicine. Complementary medicine involves alternative practices used together with conventional medicine.  

Alternative therapies include acupuncture, massage, meditation, herbs and nutrition. 

Holistic medicine, the art and science that addresses the whole person, body, mind and spirit, is regulated by the American Board of Holistic Medicine, incorporated in 1996. It evaluates the candidacy of applicants desiring certification as specialists in Holistic Medicine and has available a roster of Board certified diplomats. 

The theory and practice of acupuncture is based on Asian medicine (also known as traditional Chinese or Oriental medicine), a comprehensive natural health care system that has been used in Asian countries for thousands of years to preserve health and diagnose, treat, and prevent illness. Acupuncture treats health conditions by stimulating “acu-points” found at specific locations on the surface of the body. Acupuncturists stimulate the acu-points by inserting very thin needles through the skin to produce physiological effects. Other methods, such as heat or finger pressure, are also used to stimulate acu-points.  

The general theory of acupuncture is that proper physiological function and health depend on the circulation of nutrients, substances, and energy called Qi (pronounced “chee”) through a network of channels or meridians. This network connects every organ and part of the body, providing balance, regulation, and coordination of physiological processes. Pain and ill health result when the flow of Qi through the body is disrupted or blocked. This can be caused by many things, including disease, pathogens, trauma/ injuries, and medication side effects, as well as such lifestyle factors as overwork, poor diet, emotions, lack of rest, and stress. 

Acupuncture is considered a major alternative therapy. In 1975, Miriam Lee (1926–2009), one of the pioneering acupuncturists in the United States, was tried in a California court for practicing medicine without a license. Her patients filled the courtrooms to testify on her behalf. The following year, Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation legalizing acupuncture in California. 

In the 1970s and early 1980s, Lee was the acupuncture teacher of many practitioners working in Northern California. She popularized a 10-point protocol in her book, Insights of a Senior Acupuncturist: One Combination of Points Can Treat Many Diseases as well as Master Tung Ching Chang's Magic Points, a nontraditional point system. 

The Acupuncture Association of America was founded in 1980 and run by Lee until 1998, when she retired. Its purpose is promotion of public acupuncture education, provision of continuing education for licensed practitioners, legislative advocacy, and acupuncture research. Her students who are teaching classes today include Esther Su (San Jose), Susan Johnson (Soquel), and Frank He (Sunnyvale). 

Chinese Americans’ double identity affords them alternative perspectives on health issues that might not be mainstream. Tom Su, 45, a student of Chinese medicine at Alhambra Medical University, is quoted by journalist Mei Zhou, “From what I observe, unlike the Americans, the average Chinese would not readily go see a doctor when they are sick. They will either purchase packaged Chinese herbs or simply ask their families to send pills from China or Taiwan.” ["Elders Seek Chinese Healers Despite U.S. Malpractice Threat." (New America Media, Oct. 31, 2011)] 

A Consumer’s Guide to Acupuncture and Asian Medicine is available from the California Acupuncture Board, part of the Department of Consumer Affairs, at www.acupuncture.ca.gov. The Board’s mission includes protection of the public through regulation of licensure; development of education standards; provision of consumer information; and enforcement of the Acupuncture Licensure Act.  

Self-help has been a deep-seated tradition in Chinese culture. Because Chinese herbs are available over the counter, many Chinese immigrants to the United States prefer them to pharmaceutical drugs. Chinese seniors may be wary of Western medicine because drugs sold here may include toxic components, e.g. acetaminophen, which, although safe and effective when taken in approved doses, can cause liver damage, according to Shanghai-born physician Dennis Lee, in an article for WebMD’s MedicineNet.com. Dietary supplements and herbs typically labeled as “food” to avoid U.S. requirements that drugs go through extensive clinical tests, fuel an alternative health market rooted in oriental philosophy, oriental medicinal theory and practice, and self-cultivation regimens. There is a close connection between traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Chinese philosophy, yin/yang theory in particular.  

I’ll conclude this column with an anecdote that meets both definitions [1. A short account of an interesting or humorous incident. 2. Secret or hitherto undivulged particulars of history or biography]: 

Following major surgery, I was dispatched by ambulance from the nursing-rehabilitation center, with no “support system” in place, i.e. no arrangements for a temporary in-home caregiver. The social worker provided an IHSS [in-home supportive services] application form and a brochure advertising an alerting device-- the kind advertised by “I fell down and can’t get up.” I tried phoning the Visiting Nurse Association, etc. etc. Then I chanced upon a reference to the Asian Network. They didn’t ask whether I was Asian (no) with an HMO (no). Instead, they sent an R.N. to evaluate the situation and a physical therapist, each for several visits over the next two weeks. 

xxxx 

NEWS 

New York City senior centers’ participants have sent a message to New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo – Don’t cut Title XX funding, protect our senior centers. For the past two years, first under Governor Paterson and then during Governor Cuomo’s first term, a threatened cut of about $25 million would have closed 105 New York City senior centers, depriving upwards of 10,000 older New Yorkers of their local senior center. The 15,000 letters – in English, Spanish and Chinese - ask Governor Cuomo not to propose the cut again as he prepares his FY2013 budget.  

A bill to establish universal healthcare through publicly financed administration was authored by former California Senator Sheila Kuehl as Senate Bill (SB) 840. This was the first single payer bill that a state legislature ever sent to a governor in our nation's history. In fact, SB 840 was passed by the California Senate and Assembly twice, in 2006 and in 2008. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the bill both times. Senator Kuehl was termed out in 2008. In 2009, Senator Mark Leno introduced the same bill, re-numbered and recently reintroduced as SB 810. January 2012 is a crucial month for the bill because it needs to pass the Assembly and the Senate by January 31 or it will be dead for the year. Watch California Alliance for Retired Americans (CARA) and the Older Women’s League (OWL) website www.californiaalliance.org for further information. 

On Nov 30, 2011 the Census Bureau released data that show there are more age 65+ people than ever before in the United States. According to the 2010 numbers, there are 40.3 million people age 65+, an increase of over 5 million since the 2000 Census. The older population grew at a faster rate than the population as a whole. Males show more rapid growth in the older population than females over the decade, while females continue to outnumber males in the older ages. 

The nation’s largest for-profit nursing homes deliver significantly lower quality of care because they typically have fewer staff nurses than non-profit and government-owned nursing homes. This is the finding of a new UCSF-led analysis of quality of care at nursing homes around the country. It is the first-ever study focusing solely on staffing and quality at the 10 largest for-profit chains. The 10 largest for-profit chains operate about 2,000 nursing homes in the United States, controlling approximately 13 percent of the country’s nursing home beds. “Poor quality of care is endemic in many nursing homes, but we found that the most serious problems occur in the largest for-profit chains,” reported first author Charlene Harrington, RN, PhD, professor emeritus of sociology and nursing at the UCSF School of Nursing.  

xxxx 

MARK YOUR CALENDAR: Be sure to confirm. Share by email news of future events that may interest boomers, elders and seniors. Daytime, free or senior-discounted, and Bay Area events preferred. pen136@dslextreme.com.  

Saturday, December 3, 12-1 P.M. UC, B Hertz Concert Hall, free admission. UNIVERSITY CHAMBER ORCHESTRA. Mozart "Overture to Don Giovanni" - Miriam Anderson, conductor. Stravinsky "Pulcinella Suite" - Garrett Wellenstein, conductor. Schubert Symphony No. 5 - Melissa Panlasigui, conductor. 510-642-4864.  

Monday, Dec. 5. 6 P.M. Evening Computer class. Central Berkeley Library, 2090 Kittredge. 981-6100. Also Dec. 12 and 19. 

Monday, Dec. 5. 6:30 P.M. "Castoffs" Knitting Group. Kensington Library, 

61 Arlington Ave. Free. 510-524-3043. An evening of knitting, show and tell and yarn exchange. All levels welcome. Some help will be provided.  

Tuesday, Dec. 6. 10 -11:30 A.M. Health & Happiness Workshop Join Helen Calhoun, M.Ed., Certified Acupressurist. Learn techniques and practices that actually work to promote better fitness for body, mind and spirit. Participants will engage in Tai Chi, Qi Gong, Self-Acupressure, and Chakra healing exercise. $10 per person fee. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda. 510-747-7510 

Tuesday, Dec. 6. 1 P.M. Holiday Concert. The Oakland Community Orchestra will perform traditional Jewish and Christmas holiday songs in the Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. Free. 510-747-7510. 

Tuesday, Dec. 6. 1 P.M. Jean Johnson-Fields will provide an overview of the Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) offered by the Center for Elders’ Independence. This health plan for seniors age 55+ makes it possible to stay at home with the help of caregivers. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda Social Hall. Free. 510-747-7510. 

Tuesday, Dec. 6. 6 – 8 P.M. Sign-up for lottery at 5:45 P.M. Lawyers in the library. Oakland Public Library Temescal Branch, 5205 Telegraph Av. Free legal information and referral presented with the Alameda County Bar Association. Call in advance to confirm on the day of the program. 510-597-5049. 

Wednesday, Dec. 7. 12 Noon. Playreaders at Central Berkeley Library, 2090 Kittredge. 510-981-6100. Also Dec. 14. 

Wednesday, Dec. 7. 12:15-1 P.M. Holiday Choral Music. UC, B Music Department Noon concert. Hertz Concert Hall. University Chorus and Chamber Chorus
Matthew Oltman, guest director. Hugo Distler: Variations on "Lo, How a Rose E'er Blooming" from Die. Weihnachtsgeschichte, Op. 10. Francis Poulenc: Quatre motets pour le temps de Noel. Michael Praetorious: Variations on Martin Luther's Vom Himmel Hoch. Free. 510-642-4864.  

Wednesday, Dec. 7. 6-8 P.M. Lawyer in the Library. Albany Library, 1247 Marin Av. Free. 510-526-3720.  

Thursday, Dec. 8. 10 A.M.-12 noon. Literacy Reading Club. Albany Library. 1247 Marin Av. Practice English conversation. Meet other adults, build confidence in your speaking and discuss a good book. Free. 510-526-3720. Also Dec. 15. 

Thursday, Dec. 8. 10 A.M. Computers for Beginners, Central Berkeley Library, 2090 Kittredge. 510-981-6100. Also Dec. 15, 22 and 29. 

Thursday, Dec. 8. 10:30 A.M. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. Free. The New Member Orientation is a must if you are new to Alameda, recently retired, or expecting your parents for an extended visit! This Orientation offers a guided-tour to introduce you to the Center, an information packet outlining the various activities, programs and services, and a coupon to enjoy a complimentary lunch provided by Bay Area Community Services (BACS). Make a reservation by visiting the Mastick Office or calling 510-747-7506.  

Thursday, Dec. 8. 6 P.M. Lawyers in the Library. Berkeley Public Library South branch, 1901 Russell. 510-981-6100. 

Saturday, Dec. 10. 2-5 PM. PEN Oakland 21st Annual Literary Awards. The ceremony will be followed by a reception and book signings. Free. Rockridge Library, 5366 College Ave., Oakland. 510-597-5017 

Monday, Dec. 12. 12 Noon. Senior Center Lecture - J-Sei Center Center - 1710 Carleton Street, Berkeley "Fall Prevention" Speaker: Andrew Teran - Bay Area Vital Link. To place a reservation for the lecture and/or lunch at 11:30 A.M., call 510-883-1106. 

Monday, Dec. 12. 7:00 P.M. Swedish Folk Music with Mark and Jennie Walstrom. Their instruments include the Swedish Säckpipa (bagpipe) and Nyckelharpa (key fiddle). Tonight’s music will center on the Swedish winter holidays. Kensington Library, 61Arlington Avenue Free. 510-524-3043. 

Tuesday, Dec. 13. 1 P.M. Mastick Book Club members will share a book of their choice. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. Free. 510-747-7510. See also January 3.  

Wednesday, Dec. 14 6:30-8 P.M. Drop-In Poetry Writing Workshop. Albany Library 1247 Marin Av. Free. 510-526-3720.  

Wednesday, Dec. 14. 6:30 P.M. Berkeley Commission on Disability. Meets at North Berkeley Senior Center, 1901 Hearst Avenue. Check the City online community calendar to verify or call the Center, 510-981-5190. 

Thursday, Dec. 15. 10 A.M. Mastick Senior Center’s Annual Holiday Sing-Along. 

Join Jim Franz and Friends for the Annual Holiday Sing-Along. Enjoy a visit from Santa, refreshments, and the spirit of the season! 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. Free. 510-747-7506.  

Thursday, Dec. 15. AARP members invite you to join them for their Annual Holiday Luncheon after the Annual Holiday Sing-Along. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. Enjoy a catered lunch including turkey and all the trimmings. Per person cost is $15. Reservations are required and can be made by contacting Corky Hastings at 510-653-7678 or Marge Ryan at 523-4148. Consider bringing a small wrapped gift and participate in the gift exchange.  

Thursday, Dec. 15. 6-8 P.M. Lawyers in the Library. Berkeley Public Library West Branch, 1125 University. 510-981-6270. Also Dec. 22. 

Saturday, Dec. 17. 11 A.M. Landlord/Tenant Counseling. Central Berkeley Library, 2090 Kittredge. 510-981-6100. 

Saturday, Dec. 17. 12:30 P.M. San Francisco Gray Panthers Holiday Party. 1182 Market, Room 203. 415-552-8800. 

Saturday, Dec. 17. 3:30 P.M. The Knitting Hour. Berkeley Public Library West Branch, 1125 University. 510-981-6270. 

Monday, Dec. 19. 12:30 – 1:30 P.M. Albany YMCA/Albany Library brown Bag Lunch Speaker’s Forum: Matt Johanson discusses Yosemite Epics: Tales of Adventure from America’s Greatest Playground. At the Albany Library, 1247 Marin Av. Free. 510-526-3720. 

Monday, Dec. 19. 7 P.M. Book Club. Josephine Tey’s Daughter of Time. Tey is known as the mystery writer for those who don’t like mysteries! Kensington Library, 61 Arlington Ave. Free event. 510-524-3043. Each meeting starts with a poem selected and read by a member with a brief discussion following the reading. New members are always welcome. 

Wednesday, Dec. 21. 1:30 P.M. Berkeley Commission on Aging. Meets at South Berkeley Senior Center, 2939 Ellis Street. Check the City online community calendar to verify or call the Center, 510-981-5170. 

Wednesday, Dec. 21. 7 – 8 P.M. The Adult Evening Book Group will read Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen. Facilitated discussion. Come to one meeting, or all meetings. Albany branch of the Alameda County library, 1247 Marin Av. Books are available at the Library. 510-526-3720 x 16. 

Thursday, Dec. 22. 12:30 P.M. Mastick Senior Center. Birthday Party Celebration All members celebrating a birthday in December are invited to join us in Dining Room 2 for cake, music, balloons, and good cheer. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. 510-747-7510. 

Tuesday, Dec. 22. 3 P.M. Tea and Cookies. Central Berkeley Public Library. 2090 Kittredge. 510-981-6100.  

Wednesday, Dec. 28. 1:30 P.M. East Bay Gray Panthers. 510-548-9696. Meets at North Berkeley Senior Center, 1901 Hearst.  

 

Wednesday, Dec. 28. 1:30 – 2:30 P.M. Great Books Discussion Group. Albany Library, 1247 Marin Av. Holiday lunch and selection discussion. 510-526-3720 x 16. 

xxxx 

Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012. Book Club members will read French Lessons by Ellen Sussman. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. Free. 510-747-7510. 

 

Wednesday, Jan. 4. 9 A.M. – 1:30 P.M. AARP Driver Safety Refresher Course specifically designed for motorists age 50+. Taught in one-day. To qualify, you must have taken the standard course within the last 4 years. Preregistration is a must. There is a $12 per person fee for AARP members (AARP membership number required) and $14 per person fee for non-AARP members. Registration is payable by check ONLY made payable to AARP. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. 510-747-7510. 

Tuesday, Jan. 10. 1 P.M. Sugar Blues or What? Come be inspired, find ways to beat cravings, find specific tools to make healthier choices with Neta O’Leary Sundberg, Certified Health coach-Yoga teacher. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. 510-747-7510. 

 

Friday, Jan. 13. 9:30 – 11:30 A.M. Creating Your Personal Learning Network. Learn to use the Internet and tools like Twitter and YouTube Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. 510-747-7510. Also Feb. 17. 

 

Monday, Jan. 23. 10:30 – 11:30 A.M. Learn to Create a YouTube Video Jeff Cambra, Alameda Currents producer, will share the basics of shooting a good video and how to get it uploaded to YouTube. No equipment or experience needed. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. 510-747-7510. 

 

Tueday, Jan. 24. 1 P.M. Doggie Communication 101. Does your dog pull you down the street? Not get enough exercise because you have mobility challenges? Growl or snap? Bark too much? Other annoying or worrisome behaviors? Bring your questions and join dog trainer Ruth Smiler. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. 510-747-7510. 

 

Thursday, Jan. 25. 1:30 P.M. Music Appreciation Class. Join William Sturm, Volunteer Instructor. Piano recital and discussion about “The Classical Romantic: Johannes Brahms.” Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Ave., Alameda. 510-747-7510. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


THE PUBLIC EYE: Occupy Wall Street: the Enthusiasm Gap

By Bob Burnett
Friday December 02, 2011 - 01:15:00 PM

The latest polls indicate that roughly 75 percent of Americans agree with the goals of Occupy Wall Street. Nonetheless, only 29 percent consider themselves supporters of OWS. What accounts for this enthusiasm gap? 

The October Time magazine poll asked respondents if they agreed with the positions advocated by Occupy Wall Street and there was extraordinary concurrence. 86 percent agreed that, "Wall Street and its lobbyists have too much influence in Washington." 79 percent agreed that, "The gap between rich and poor in the United States has grown too large." 71 percent agreed with “"Executives of financial institutions responsible for the financial meltdown in 2008 should be prosecuted.” And 68 percent agreed that, “The rich should pay more taxes.” 

Yet there is a 45-50 percent enthusiasm gap, because the same voters who express these strong sentiments say they don’t support OWS. Why? 

Perhaps these voters don’t know enough about OWS. A recent USA Today/Gallup poll found that 59 percent of respondents felt they didn’t know enough to approve or disapprove of the movement’s goals. 

Nonetheless, the current enthusiasm gap isn’t a singular occurrence. If we look back over the past decade we can find many examples where average Americans should have been shocked into action but weren’t. In 2000, there was a controversial election, where George W. Bush stole the presidency; many voters were outraged but few of them took to the streets in protest. On September 11, 2001, the US was attacked by terrorists; there were legitimate concerns that the Bush Administration had been asleep at the wheel yet once again Americans were passive observers. The terrorists were traced to Afghanistan and the US launched an attack; in December of 2001 most of the terrorists escaped from Afghanistan into Pakistan – it was a glaring example of White House ineptitude but most citizens were quiet. Faced with failure in Afghanistan, the Bush Administration turned its attention to Iraq and, on March 20, 2003, launched an invasion; this time there were more protestors but the bulk of Americans stayed at home. Over the next several years there were glaring example of Presidential incompetence – for example, the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina – but for the most part voters were quiet. Then the housing bubble burst and, in late September 2008, came close to melting down; Americans were stunned and depressed, but few took to the streets. Since the turn of the century, American voters, the 99 percent, have had a lot to be angry about, but been passive. 

Historians contrast this last lost decade with World War II era America when average citizens, the 99 percent rose up, built the weapons, and fought the fights that defeated the Axis powers. What’s happened to us? 

Perhaps American workers don’t have the time. It’s a tough economy and many work two jobs. For the 99 percent it’s a grueling daily chore making ends meet, if they do. Perhaps they don’t have the energy to get involved with OWS

Perhaps they don’t get it. Many pundits believe we no longer invest in our children and, as a result, many have poor schools, teachers, and study habits. We’ve raised several generations of “non intellectuals.” The average American spends 2.7 hours per day watching TV and only a few minutes reading. Perhaps they don’t understand what all the fuss is about. 

Perhaps they’ve checked out. The Pew Survey of Religious Affiliation found that 26.3 percent of respondents were evangelical Protestants; this does not include Black and Catholic evangelicals and many observers believe the true number is closer to 40 percent. A recent Pew Research Poll found that 41 percent of respondents believe that Jesus Christ will return to earth by 2050 – when the rapture will occur. Perhaps they’re not involved because they are preparing to shuffle off this mortal coil. 

Perhaps they’re severely damaged. The official US rate for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is 7.8 percent – with a higher incidence among veterans. However this discounts violence against women and children. The American Psychological Association reports, “Nearly one in every three adult women experiences at least one physical assault by a partner during adulthood” – four million US women are assaulted each year. Approximately one third of US children under 18 experience abuse during their childhood – in 2009 6 million children were reported as abused. And then there are the adults that have been economically abused – laid off because their job was moved overseas or fired and rehired as a temp with no benefits. It’s reasonable to assume that a majority of Americans – a huge segment of the 99 percent – suffer from PTSD; they are depressed, hopeless, and numb. Perhaps these American agree with OWS but can’t get it together to participate. 

The enthusiasm gap is a result of a combination of these circumstances. The challenge for Occupy Wall Street is to engage the members of the 99 percent who agree with OWS objectives, but are too tired or numb to participate. 

 


Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. He can be reached at bburnett@sonic.net 

 

 


WILD NEIGHBORS: Rock, Paper, Scissors, Lizard

By Joe Eaton
Friday December 02, 2011 - 01:43:00 PM
Orange-throated male side-blotched lizard: the usurper.
"Davefoc" (Wikimedia Commons.)
Orange-throated male side-blotched lizard: the usurper.
Yellow-throated male side-blotched lizard: the sneaker.
"Davefoc" (Wikimedia Commons.)
Yellow-throated male side-blotched lizard: the sneaker.

Back to the odd assortment of animal species in which some males gain a reproductive advantage from their resemblance, temporary or permanent, to the females of their species. Giant cuttlefish alter their color patterns and shapes to mimic females; red-sided garden snakes do it with pheromones. In a number of fish, including our own plainfin midshipman, smaller males exploit their deceptive appearance to gain acesss to spawning sites guarded by larger territorial males. (Some commentators on this phenomenon have evoked the movie Some Like it Hot. Bear in mind, however, that Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon were on the run from the mob when they joined the all-girl orchestra. Proximity to Marilyn Monroe was an unexpected benefit. Call it an exaptation.) 

As if two male morphs weren’t enough, a handful of creatures have evolved a three-morph system. About the last place you would expect to find a complex polymorphism would be among the isopods, mostly small marine crustaceans. Meet Paracerceis sculpta, an inhabitant of the intertidal zone from Southern California to Mexico. (At this point, visualize David Attenborough turning over a rock in a tide pool.) As described in 1987 by Stephen Schuster, then at UC Berkeley and now at Northern Arizona University, P. sculpta has alpha, beta, and gamma males. Alphas guard harems of females in the cavities of sponges, where they lay their eggs. Betas are the size and shape of females; like Type II midshipman fish, they sneak past the alphas and mate with his females. Gammas, which mimic juvenile isopods, also follow a sneaker strategy. It’s interesting that gammas invest the most energy in sperm production, followed by betas then alphas. (The testes of Type II midshipmen are much larger in proportion than those of the territorial Type I. This seems to be a pattern among polymorphic males.) 

Bony fish, which appear to have tried everything at least once during their evolutionary history, have also developed three-morph variations. Bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), native to the eastern North America, have been stocked in California lakes and reservoirs as sport fish. I remember them fondly, dredged in cornmeal and deep fried, with a side of hushpuppies and maybe some coleslaw. Anyway, parental bluegills, like Type I midshipmen, hold territories where females lay eggs. Satellite males mimic females in size, color, and behavior, swimming under the parental’s radar. There is also a smaller sneaker morph, analogous to salmon jacks. Satellites and sneakers spawn at younger ages than parentals, but don’t live as long. 

Then we have the side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana), common in western scrublands. UC Santa Cruz biologist Barry Sinervo has studied this species since 1989. Male lizards, he reports, are color-coded, with either orange, blue, or yellow throats, and each color morph has a different reproductive strategy. Orange-throats defend large territories which are home to several females and are prone to usurp the territories of other males. Blue-throats have smaller territories and are often mongamous. They team up with fellow blue-throats against the more aggressive orange-throats. Sinervo calls them “the sensitive male lizards of the new millennium.” Yellow-throats, which resemble (some) females, are sneakers. 

Depending on the circumstances, each type can outcompete one of the others, in a kind of rock-scissors-paper game, and the numbers of each cycle over time. (I note that someone has elaborated the game into rock-scissors-paper-Spock-lizard, for which I can think of no analogues in the natural world.) Orange-throats dominate blue-throats, blue-throats deter yellow-throats, yellow-throats cuckold orange-throats. The frequency of each morph in a local population cycles from year to year, depending on the success of each of the three strategies. 

Female side-blotched lizards, it turns out, are playing a game of their own. Orange-throated females are more aggressive and lay large clutches of small eggs. Yellow-throated females produce smaller clutches of larger eggs. In the language of population biology, orange-throats are “r strategists,” as are codfish, spiders, and lemmings; yellow-throats are “K strategists,” like condors, elephants, and humans. Blue-throats are apparently rare among females, and orange-throats and yellow-throats exhibit a two-year cycle. 

I’ll save another well-known case of alternative male reproductive strategies, the bizarre shorebird called the ruff, for next week. Before that, though, a response to a reader’s comment that male polymorphism might be a relatively recent artifact of environmental pollutants. All the varieties of sneaker males among fish, reptiles, and birds appear to be anatomically normal and fully functional males. Typically fish exposed to hormone mimics show intersex traits, with both male and female reproductive organs. It seems clear that polymorphisms in the isopods, salmon, sunfish, lizards, harriers, and ruffs represent genetically-determined evolutionarily stable strategies, not aberrant responses to exotic chemicals.


On Mental Illness: It Takes Courage

By Jack Bragen
Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 09:57:00 AM

People with mental illnesses are often very brave and courageous people because we have to be. We are up against the “package deal” of mental illness which includes a number of elements that are altogether frightening. And to face these elements requires fortitude. 


It takes a courageous person to deal with the mere fact of mental illness and to not be in denial about it, or about its repercussions. 

People with mental illness may have to face a lifetime of being medicated; this fact by itself is daunting—additionally there are the side effects of medications. It would be nice to look forward to a day when I don’t have to deal with the physical side effects of medications, which can be very uncomfortable, but that day may never come. We must look forward to an old age in which the medication may no longer work to keep us functioning, in which some of the long-term side effects of medication have happened to us, and an old age in which we may have to live in an institution. 


It takes courage to try medications that haven’t been tested enough and that have awful side effects and in the process of this to become a human guinea pig. Clozaril is a favorite of many psychiatrists when other medications don’t work well enough. It has a one percent rate of causing agranulocytosis, which is a depletion of the white blood cells. Biweekly blood tests are required because of this potentially fatal side effect. Another medication can cause an extremely severe rash which causes the skin to come off, also potentially fatal. 


Many of us must face life without having the insulation of a good income. We may be up against some harsh facts of life when older, one of them being not having enough money to live independently. Not being able to afford good medical care is another daunting reality that must be faced. 


The fear of relapsing and going back into the hospital is for real and must be faced. To wake up in a psychiatric ward and realize that you’re back at square one, and must recover all over again from a psychotic episode, is a hard fact. To be subject to the supervision of treatment professionals in the mental health system, some of whom are flunkies, can be upsetting. 


Being forced through lack of income to live in a bad neighborhood can demand bravery on a long term basis. However, it can take courage to move out of a bad neighborhood, because it could be more comfortable to do nothing about one’s plight. In the same vein, it can take courage to invite successes into one’s life after past failures. 


I’ve been laughed at many times in my life. Yet, that doesn’t stop me from continuing to try. People judge others based on assumptions without bothering to gather facts. It hurts to be the butt of people’s jokes; I endure that without being discouraged, and without lashing out. Some of the time, this ridicule is merely imagined, but some of the time very real. 


It takes courage to acknowledge inconvenient or unflattering truths. The alternative is to have realities that aren’t dealt with and to suffer consequences. I once knew a woman who believed that the best way to deter an intruder was by having an open door. Men in her apartment complex just walked in to her apartment at will. I believe she was afraid to displease people by locking them out. 


If someone has a mental illness, they are up against some difficult realities. Dealing with these realities and possibly surmounting them as problems requires a brave person and it requires effort. The alternative is to live in denial of these realities, and in the process allow the whims of others and the randomness of unconscious fate to control one’s destiny.

* * *
Just to let you know, a year’s worth of these columns in the form of an e-book is available to those with a Kindle device and to those who have downloaded free software that allows reading Kindle format items on your PC. The title of the e-book is “Jack Bragen’s Essays on Mental Illness,” and I have provided below a link to the purchase page. It costs 7.50 and it is about36,000 words long.

Here’s the link to the book:


(My Commonplace Book (a diary of excerpts copied from printed books, with comments added by the reader.)

By Dorothy Bryant
Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 09:21:00 AM

He was one of those idealists who, struck by some compelling idea, immediately become entirely obsessed by it forever. They are quite incapable of mastering it, but believe in it passionately, and so their whole life passes afterwards, as it were, in the last agonies under the weight of a heavy stone which has fallen upon them and half-crushed them —from “The Devils”, by Fyodor Dostoevsky 

I actually read “The Devils” first around 1970, when it seemed as though the nation had tipped, and characters from Dostoevsky were sliding, by the thousands, to the Bay Area, mostly into Berkeley. At political meetings, anti-war meetings, bookstore readings (remember when there seemed to be one every night in our one of our then-many bookstores?) the speaker would be interrupted by some young or not so young, passionate, sincere, only slightly-scruffy idealist, demanding or offering “real” answers to—something. Occasionally, at talks by very well known writers or politicians, a passionate questioner who became a long-winded orator had to be escorted out. I grew to dread the question period whenever I did a reading. Spotting one of those all too familiar faces, I learned to be blind to their wagging hands, call on someone with a less urgent expression, then quickly “run out of time” for questions. 

By the early 1980s these conspicuous “idealists” were gradually disappearing, giving up on Berkeley as the answer to their questions. Maybe like Dostoevsky characters, they passed rest of their lives “in the last agonies under the weight of a heavy stone” of the ideas that had possessed them. But not all of them. One of them, I remember, came back to claim some property he’d left in the south Berkeley house next door to ours, where he’d rented a room from the previous owner. We didn’t recognize him, with his double-breasted suit, clean-shaven rosy cheeks, and short hair. “What are you doing now?” we asked. He shrugged. “I’ve taken over my father’s bank.” 

(Send the Berkeley Daily Planet a page from your own Commonplace Book)


Wild Neighbors: Los Machos Furtivos

By Joe Eaton
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 09:18:00 AM
Red-sided garter snake: deceptive pheromones.
Zooplan (Wikimedia Commons)
Red-sided garter snake: deceptive pheromones.
Typical male western marsh harrier: not in drag.
Boldings (Wikimedia Commons)
Typical male western marsh harrier: not in drag.

Hot news from Europe: in a population of western marsh harriers (Circus aeruginosus) in France, 40 percent of the males are crossdressers . Typical males of this hawk species, a close relative of our northern harrier, have overall streaky-brown plumage. Females have whitish heads and shoulders, and so do female-mimicking males. Typical males don’t seem to recognize the mimics as rivals. Audrey Sternalski, Francois Mougeot, and Vincent Bretagnolle report in Biology Letters that typical males attack decoys with their own kind of plumage at a higher rate than those with female-mimic plumage. What the mimics get out of it is access to the mates—up to three, depending on available resources—of territory-holding typical males. 

Welcome to the club, Circus aeruginosus. There’s a lot of this kind of thing going on. In animals as disparate as cuttlefish, toadfish, lizards, and sandpipers, some males use their resemblance to females to outcompete other males for mating opportunities. With some, the deception is opportunistic and temporary; for others, a lifelong commitment. They’ve been variously called jacks, she-males, sneakers, streakers, scroungers, satellite males, cuckolders, parasitic spawners, and machos furtivos. 

In his groundbreaking Descent of Man, Charles Darwin identified two evolutionary paths for male reproductive success. One involves size, brute force, and/or weaponry: males that can physically dominate or damage rivals mate with more females and bequeath more of their genes to future generations. That’s the trajectory leading to the bull elephant seal and the silverback gorilla. The other path invokes female preference for good-looking males, selecting for brilliant plumage or elaborate courtship displays as signals of robust health. 

The evolution and persistence of female-mimicking males and other sneaker variations suggests a third way for sexual selection: alternative reproductive strategies that coexist with male reliance on brawn or beauty. To paraphrase Ecclesiastes, the battle is not always to the strong, but the race is sometimes to the swift (and sneaky). 

One creature is able to switch its resemblance to the opposite sex on and off. Giant cuttlefish (Sepia apama), relatives of the octopus and squid, gather in breeding swarms off the coast of South Australia, where large males attempt to monopolize the attentions of females. All cuttlefish can vary their appearance by expanding and contracting specialized skin cells called photophores. According to Mark D. Norman, Julian Finn, and Tom Tregenza, small males assuming typical female patterns and body shapes shadowed mating pairs. If the mate-guarding male was distracted, the interloper resumed a male-distinctive pattern and attempted to mate with the female, often successfully. The authors speculate that this kind of “dynamic sexual mimicry” may have driven the cephalopods’ remarkable ability to change their shapes and colors. 

Red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) may be a borderline case. These snakes spend the winter in mass hibernacula in Manitoba. When they emerge in the spring, males seek out females, recognizing them by their pheromones. Up to a hundred males may surround a single female in a “mating ball.” Back in the 1980s, Robert T. Mason and David Crews of the University of Texas discovered that some of the males were producing female-like pheromones. These she-males, as the authors dubbed them, had higher testosterone levels than other males but were not otherwise physically distinctive. Mason and Crews speculated that the female mimics were able to work their way into a better position in the mating ball by confusing other males. Later research suggests that pheromonal mimicry in the garter snake, like the deceptive visual patterns of the cuttlefish, may be a transitory phase rather than a lifelong trait. 

More than any other group of animals, the bony fish have gone in for alternative reproductive strategies in a big way. Parasitic spawning has been documented in 13 fish families. It’s most common among salmonids (salmon and trout), wrasses (tropical reef fish), and cichlids (freshwater fish of African and South American lakes and rivers), but also occurs in blennies, bluegill sunfish, and desert pupfish. 

One of our local piscine celebrities, the plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus), perhaps better known as the humming toadfish of Sausalito, has two types of males. Type I males defend territories, vocalize to attract females, fertilize their eggs and defend the clutch until hatching. Type IIs are smaller and non-territorial; their only vocalization is a grunt similar to the female’s. A Type II male hangs around the nest of a Type I until a female enters, then either sneaks in for a quick fertilization or broadcasts his sperm from the nest entrance. Any eggs the Type II manages to fertilize are cared for by the Type I as if they were his own progeny, which makes the Type II a cuckoo-like reproductive parasite. Type II’s invest more than Type I’s in sperm production: a Type II’s testes make up 8.3 percent of its body weight, as opposed to 1.2 percent in Type I’s. 

In coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), parasitic-spawning males are called jacks. They’re smaller than typical males and spend less time in the ocean before returning to their natal streams. Unlike Type I midshipmen, typical (“hooknose”) male coho will attack these small competitors. At Lagunitas Creek in Marin County, UC Davis fish biologist Peter Moyle watched as a hooknose male “grabbed a jack between its jaws and lifted it out of the water with a shaking motion.” But enough jacks fertilize enough eggs to perpetuate the phenotype. 

Complicated enough for you? A few creatures—crustaceans, fish, reptiles, birds—feature three types of male, each with its own reproductive strategy. More on that next week. 


Senior Power … “Age insists that I be dull as a further disability.” [Florida Scott-Maxwell at 83. The Measure of My Days.]

By Helen Rippier Wheeler
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 09:27:00 AM

Disability, impairment, handicap. They’re different. While old age is not a disability, the weakening of the body’s resources exacerbates the impact of debilitating trauma or chronic disease that is likely to accompany old age. 

One third of disabled Americans are age 65 or older. The most common definition of disability is the inability to participate in socially expected activities. Disability among older people is measured by the ability for self-care. It represents any restriction on performance of or lack of ability (resulting from an impairment) to perform an activity in the manner or within the range considered normal for a person of the same age, culture, and education. Older people with disabilities also include those who acquired an impairment at birth, in childhood, or in middle age. 

Impairment is any loss or abnormality of anatomic structure of physiological function at the organ level. When the degree of functional limitation is sufficient, the difficulty or inability to perform daily living activities leads to disability. 

Handicap occurs at the societal level when conditions are imposed upon the person through disadvantageous social norms and policy that limit the individual’s fulfillment of expected social tasks.  

National surveys report varying numbers of people with disabilities because the surveys have measured disability differently. Laws differ on whether a disability should be defined in terms of an impairment, limitation, or handicap. They reflect the objectives of the program rather than any general or coherent concept of disability. Among people age 64+, disability is often measured by limitations in such activities of daily living as eating, dressing, going outdoors, or shopping. For people of “working age” (18-64), disability is measured by the ability to work for pay and or keep house.  

Legislation may provide opportunities for people with disabilities, e.g. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which requires access and freedom from discrimination. 

Others compensate for the inability of people with disabilities to compete with able-bodied people in the market place by providing alternative financial support, e.g. the Social Security Act. Another group provides care for those unable to care for themselves, e.g. Developmental Disabilities Assistance and the Older Americans Act (OAA). Two laws compensate for injuries, regardless of the abilities of individuals to work for pay or to care for themselves, e.g. workers’ compensation and veterans’ service-related pensions. 

xxxx 

From middle age onwards, women are more likely than men in the same age group to experience disabilities, a particular concern for women because, as they grow older, they are more likely to have a disability and less likely to have family resources to help them cope. But why, then, do women have higher rates of morbidity and disability but lower mortality than men? Those higher morbidity rates reflect not only physical differences between men and women but also social and psychological factors. 

Women are more susceptible to chronic debilitating diseases than are men but are protected from acute lethal diseases by hormonal differences. It also appears that women are more likely to admit disability and to allow their behavior to be affected by health problems. The leading causes of disability among middle-aged and older women are arthritis, osteoporosis, and hypertension. Senility and vision and hearing impairments are also major causes of disability among older women.  

The U.S. Census Bureau collects data for the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Estimates of the prevalence of disability among older people range from 1.3 million to 2.2 million. (NHIS) data indicate that twenty million Americans have an impairment that limits their activities. 56% are women. 15% of women over age 84 experience two or more limitations of daily activity.  

xxxx 

Assumptions abound. The older the person with a disability is, the lower the service provider’s expectations for adaptation, decision-making, learning, rehabilitation, or an improved quality of life. Rehabilitation services for older persons are limited. Few mental health practitioners serve older people. “Care planners,” case managers and social workers may assume dependency on the part of their clients and that “family members” are somewhere in the picture.  

Housing, transportation and personal care services are major issues for disabled persons. Paratransit is much more important to them than accessible public transportation. The assurance that they can remain in their homes, despite their disabilities or with increasing disabilities, removes many of the uncertainties of old age. Integration of services and housing can provide this assurance. Senior citizen housing complexes provide a ready market for efficient delivery of such services as in-home aides, physical therapy, congregate meals, case management, counseling, and transportation. Railings on both sides of every floor in senior housing, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, etc. are essential elements that may be ignored by planners. 

Housing managers and social service providers should work together. As needs change, the level of service provided through the residence should change so that people do not have to change their residence to receive care.  

As the number of older people increases, the need for in-home aides/care-givers will also increase. Steps should be taken (1) to upgrade this occupation (it is not a profession) and (2) to assure respect for clients’ rights. Training, job security and adequate pay are needed for the aides; client empowerment is needed by the service recipients. The disability rights movement has pioneered models for recipient control over the personal care provided by aides.  

Until lately, the mostly-women who are expected to provide care have been uncertified and unorganized. A national movement is growing with the purpose of developing standards of care. Professional organizations are forming throughout the country to lobby on behalf of personal care providers, e.g. the Direct Care Alliance. A current and significant issue with which they are concerned is the need to maintain and improve Social Security for workers.  

The disability rights movement and the aging network should recognize their common interests in behalf of people with disabilities. Mutual goals include consumer empowerment, an end to ageism, accessible services and housing, respect for the individuality and independence of people with disabilities. As the population of people with disabilities ages, even greater convergence is needed.  

xxxx  

“Local Groups Serving People with Disabilities” is the title of a free handout available from the Berkeley Public Library. The two-page annotated list consists of information derived from the Library’s BIN. (Berkeley Information Network.) If you rely on the branch van for your library needs, request the persons staffing the van to bring you a copy next visit.  

The responsibilities of the City of Berkeley's Disability Compliance Program are to oversee the City’s efforts to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and to ensure that people with disabilities have access to City programs and services. It is based in the Department of Public Works. Berkeley’s Disability Compliance Program and the Commission on Disability (COD) can be reached at: TEL: 510-981-6342; TTY: 981-6345; FAX: 981-6340. Email: pchurch@ci.berkeley.ca.us 

There is some mutuality in the concerns and memberships of the COD and the Commission on Aging (COA). Berkeley’s nine-member COD is “Charged with actively promoting the total integration and participation of persons with disabilities into all areas of economic, political, and community life. Membership shall be made up primarily of persons who have disabilities.” At present, there are two COD vacancies, appointments of Councilmembers Capitelli (District 5) and Wozniak (District 8). The COD meets on the second Wednesday at 6:30 P.M. at the North Berkeley Senior Center, 1901 Hearst Avenue. It is, however, essential that one check the City online community calendar to verify. 

Occasionally one hears or sees an inadvertent reference to the disabled commission or to the aging commission, e.g. a Planet article titled “Appointee removed from disabled commission.” (Karen Craig, a disabled senior citizen-member of the Berkeley Commission on Disability, who had served as chair, vice chair, and outreach subcommittee chair, had been removed from the Commission by District 1 Councilmember Maio, who had appointed her to it!)  

The COA is charged with identifying the needs of the aging, creating awareness of these needs, and encouraging improved standards of services to the aging. Council shall appoint one of its members as liaison; I was unable to learn her/his name. At present, there is one COA vacancy, appointment of District 2 Councilmember Moore. The COA meets on the third Wednesday at 1:30 P.M. at the South Berkeley Senior Center, 2939 Ellis Street. It is, however, essential that one check the City online community calendar to verify. 

xxxx 

NEWS 

On November 22, 2011 the Justice Department announced an agreement with Upshur County, Texas to improve access to all aspects of civic life for people with disabilities. The agreement was reached under Project Civic Access (PCA), the Department’s initiative to ensure that cities, towns and counties throughout the country comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 

Older people who go to an emergency room in pain are less likely to get medication for it than younger people with similar levels of distress, a new analysis has found. A seven-year, nationwide study that included data on more than 88,000 emergency room found that 49 percent of patients age 75+ were given pain medication, compared with slightly more than 65 percent of those under age 75. Elderly people who were cognitively impaired or otherwise unable to report pain were not included in the analysis, so that does not explain the finding. [Annals of Emergency Medicine, Oct. 2011.] 

The 12 members of the Congressional "supercommittee" could not find common ground to reduce the federal deficit. This means that $1.2 trillion in automatic cuts over 9 years will begin in 2013. Medicare cuts are included, but are limited to 2% reductions in the rate of increase in provider payment rates. Social Security and Medicaid are not affected. Cuts in such discretionary programs as the Older Americans Act, Senior Corps, Section 202 housing, and energy assistance could have a major impact on seniors in need. 

Sixty-five year old Donald Berwick, M.D., Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the first Medicare chief eligible to be enrolled in the program, has resigned effective December second. A pediatrician before becoming a Harvard professor, Berwick will be replaced by his principal deputy, sixty-year old Marilyn Tavenner, formerly Virginia’s top health care official, a nurse by training who has been at Medicare since early 2010. Forty-two GOP senators asked President Obama to withdraw his nomination of Berwick, whose three-part aim for the health care system includes providing a better overall experience for individual patients, improving the health of such population groups as seniors and African-Americans, and lowering costs through efficiency.  

In a June 2011 Bellevue, Washington religious summit about end-of-life choice, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops gathered to affirm its uncompromising opposition to aid in dying for the terminally ill. Their five-page document, To Live Each Day with Dignity, was a statement on physician-assisted suicide. Compassion & Choices released a statement, Dogma vs. Dignity; An Open Letter to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, to the media. 

xxxx 

MARK YOUR CALENDAR: Be sure to confirm. Readers are welcome to share by email news of future events that may interest boomers, elders and seniors (define these any way you like!) Daytime, free, and Bay Area events preferred. pen136@dslextreme.com.  

Monday, Nov. 28, 2011. 2 – 3:30 P.M. “Vigee-LeBrun: Woman Artist in an Age of Revolution” presentation by Brigit Urmson. Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Av., Alameda. 510-747-7506. 

Monday, Nov. 28. 7 P.M. Book Club. Silas Marner by George Eliot. Kensington Library, 61 Arlington Ave. Free event. 510-524-3043. Each meeting starts with a poem selected and read by a member with a brief discussion following the reading. New members are always welcome. 

Wednesday, Nov. 30. 12:15-1 P.M. Gamelan Music of Java and Bali. Performed by classes directed by Midiyanto and I Dewa Putu Berata, with Ben Brinner and Lisa Gold. UC,B Hertz Concert Hall. Free. 510-642-4864. 

xxxx 

Friday, Dec. 2. 4:30 P.M. UCB COLLOQUIA IN THE MUSICOLOGIES. Morrison Hall. Holley Replogle-Wong (UC Berkeley) "Tempering the Singing Diva: Hollywood Film Sopranos and the 'Middlebrow Voice'". Free 

Saturday, Dec. 3. Noon-1 P.M. UC,B University Chamber Orchestra. Hertz Concert Hall. Mozart "Overture to Don Giovanni" - Miriam Anderson, conductor. Stravinsky "Pulcinella Suite" - Garrett Wellenstein, conductor. Schubert "Symphony No. 5" - Melissa Panlasigui, conductor. Free. Event email contact: m.panlasigui@gmail.com 

Monday, Dec. 5. 6:30 P.M. "Castoffs" Knitting Group. Kensington Library, 

61 Arlington Ave. Free. 510-524-3043. An evening of knitting, show and tell and yarn exchange. All levels welcome. Some help will be provided.  

Wednesday, Dec. 7. 12:15-1 P.M. Music for the holiday season. UC,B Music Department Noon concert. Hertz Concert Hall. University Chorus and Chamber Chorus
Matthew Oltman, guest director. Free. 510-642-4864.  

Wednesday, Dec. 7. 6-8 P.M. Lawyer in the Library. Albany Library, 1247 Marin Av. Free. 510-526-3720.  

Monday, Dec. 12. 12 Noon. Senior Center Lecture - J-Sei Center Center - 1710 Carleton Street, Berkeley "Fall Prevention" Speaker: Andrew Teran - Bay Area Vital Link. To place a reservation for the lecture and/or lunch at 11:30 A.M., call 510-883-1106. 

Monday, Dec. 12. 7:00 P.M. Swedish Folk Music with Mark and Jennie Walstrom. Their instruments include the Swedish Säckpipa (bagpipe) and Nyckelharpa (key fiddle). Tonight’s music will center on the Swedish winter holidays. Kensington Library, 61Arlington Avenue Free. 510-524-3043. 

Wednesday, Dec. 14 6:30-8 P.M. Drop-In Poetry Writing Workshop. Albany Library 1247 Marin Av. Free. 510-526-3720.  

Wednesday, Dec. 14. 6:30 P.M. Berkeley Commission on Disability. Meets at North Berkeley Senior Center, 1901 Hearst Avenue. Check the City online community calendar to verify or call the Center, 510-981-5190. 

Monday, Dec. 19. 7 P.M. Book Club. Josephine Tey’s Daughter of Time. Tey is known as the mystery writer for those who don’t like mysteries! Kensington Library, 61 Arlington Ave. Free event. 510-524-3043. Each meeting starts with a poem selected and read by a member with a brief discussion following the reading. New members are always welcome. 

Wednesday, Dec. 21. 1:30 P.M. Berkeley Commission on Aging. Meets at South Berkeley Senior Center, 2939 Ellis Street. Check the City online community calendar to verify or call the Center, 510-981-5170. 

Wednesday, Dec. 21. 7 – 8 P.M. The Adult Evening Book Group will read Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen. In his old age, Jacob Janowski reflects on the tragedy that forced him from his projected life as a veterinarian and his subsequent adventures with a circus traveling through Depression-era America. Rosalie Gonzales facilitates the discussion. Come to one meeting, or all meetings. Albany branch of the Alameda County library, 1247 Marin Av. Books are available at the Library. 510-526-3720 x 16. 

Wednesday, Dec. 28. Great Books Discussion Group. Albany Library, 1247 Marin Av. Holiday lunch and selection discussion. 510-526-3720 x 16. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Arts & Events

Don't Miss This in the Holidays

By Dorothy Snodgrass
Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 09:30:00 AM

With Thanksgiving and Black Friday fading into oblivion— the Lord be praised — life may now return to normal so that we can give full attention to the many seasonal events lined up for our holiday pleasure: 

What better way than to celebrate our very own Frederica von Stade, Alameda's beloved opera star, who will be honored at a special performance at Herbst Theatre, 401 Van Ness St., S.F. this Sat., Dec. 3rd at 7:30 p.m. Tickets are $50 - $100, but well worth such a happy occasion.

"The Great Charles Dicken's Christmas Fair" with playhouses and winding lanes of Victorian London — through Dec. 18. Cow Palace Exhibition Hall. (800) 510-1558.

Berkeley Artisans Holiday Open Studios (more than 100 artists and galleries will be open to the public through Dec. 18). berkeleyartisans.com for information.

"The Christmas Ballet" This Smuin Ballet Extravaganza draws from holiday traditions around the world. Through Dec. 24. Lesher Center for the Arts, 1601 Civic Center for the Arts, 1601 Civic Center Drive, Walnut Creek. (925) 943-7469.

"The Soldier's Tale," based on Igor Stravinsky's 1918 musical. Through Dec. 18. Aurora Theatre, Berkeley. (510) 843-4822.

"A Christmas Carol", by Charles Dickens (the best Christmas Carol Ever). A.C.T., S. F., (415) 749-2228.

"On the Air" (broadcasting from Pier 29), starring Geoff Hoyle and Duffy Bishop. Teatro Zinzanni. (415 ) 438-2668.

"Dazzling Holiday Lights", Free events, near Peet's Coffee, Fourth Street. Through Dec. 18, 12 - 4 p.m. Live music.

Handel's Messiah, Philharmonic Baroque Orchestra, Sat. 10, 7 p.m. Zellerbach Hall (510) 642-9988.

"Let Us Break Bread Together", Oakland Symphony, Michael Morgan, Director and guest appearance by Joan Baez. Sun. Dec. 11, 4 p.m. Paramount Theatre.
(800) 745-3000,

Pacific BoyChoirs, "Annual Harmonies of the Season", featuring Benjamin Britten's glorious ceremony of choirs. Sat. Dec. 10. First Congregational Church in Berkeley.
www. pacificboy.org.

America's Children's Holiday Parade, Sat. Dec. 3., 2 p.m. Downtown Oakland. www.kblx.com.

"Jack London Square Lights Up for the Holidays." Dec. 2nd, 5 - 7 p.m.

"The Wild Bride", presented by Kneehigh Theatre, Berkeley Rep. (510) 647-2949.

"Holiday Jazz & Wine Stroll," Dec. 9, 5 - 9 p.m. rockridgedistrict.com.

Eduardo Fernandez, guitar. Sat. Dec. 10th, 8 p.m; Marine's Memorial Theatre, S.F., (415) 392-2545.

"The Glass Menagerie", Tennessee William's Centennial Year. Marin Theatre Company, Mill Valley. Through Dec. 18. (415) 388-5208.

Christian Zacharias, piano. Friday, Dec. 9, 8 p.m. Herbst Theatre, S.F. (415) 392-2545.

Temescal Holiday Labyrinth, Telegraph Avenue at 49th St., Dec. 4, noon to 9 p.m Rain date Dec. 18th.

"Kwanzaa," Oakland City Center, Dec. 14, Noon - 1 p.m.

O.k., friends — surely you'll find one or two of the above events a good way to start off the holidays!


Farnaz Shandravan's Art Gallery Opens in Uptown Oakland

By Ken Bullock
Wednesday November 30, 2011 - 09:15:00 AM

A prominent feature of the art of the past century has been the juxtaposition of unlike objects, radically different motifs, stylistic elements, materials ... Dada and Russian Formalism (with its "Defamiliarization") brought this to the fore; Surrealism canonized it. 

An artist's studio in Uptown Oakland, opening as a gallery this Friday, will be showing works that display this kind of juxtaposition, not so much a relic of the old avant-garde as with an intensely personal feeling and meaning. 

Farnaz Shadravan, who has exhibited around the Bay Area and in Tehran, where she grew up, will be displaying her unusual pieces in different media, work that subjects banal, everyday objects to intensive workmanship in order to release a profound spiritual element, in the most personal sense—"spiritual" not being a codeword or substitute for religious feeling, so much as a reaction to its loss, and to the fate of human beings, sometimes their fate in mass, that such profound sentiment once bore witness to in the greatest works of art. 

There're four bathtubs, "almost for self-baptism! but I'm going to run it dry this time ..."—each engraved with one of the four Angels of the Apocalypse from Albrecht Durer's great woodcut. "I make some works low, so people can kneel to see them. I've put cushion before my light boxes." The light boxes illuminate photographs; in the case of one, x-ray film showing a human bone and a row of bullets facing it. 

The theme of prayer or meditation runs throughout ... There are bones intricately carved with prayers. "When Iraq invaded Iran, I had a dream—and when I woke up knew I had to carve prayers in human bone. I started looking for bones, found them—and carved them." 

The prayers are both Islamic and Christian—the Lord's Prayer and Psalm 23. 

Shadravan talks about a struggle over losing her faith: "I used to pray three times a day. Somehow, I lost that practice." The American custom of putting things to remember on refrigerator doors with magnets was strange to her. "I put magnets with prayers onto my own refrigerator door. Then one day I found a [detached] refrigerator door and drilled a prayer on it" She has a series of nine of these doors, some of which will be on display. 

"It all became something religious; I wanted to remember religion. My work became my prayer, making these these doors almost like meditation to a Gregorian chant." 

Another unusual, common element, something unique to her art-making: the carving and engraving comes from her profession. Shadravan uses dental drills to work bone like scrimshaw, cut shapes and words into refrigerator doors. "I majored in art, minored in chemistry, then went to dental school ... I keep going back and forth between two different worlds. I do a lot of root canals, and do my best so people won't feel anything. Then I do my art so people feel something!" 

The beginnings of her artwork go back to early school memories. "When I was about 10, the principal of my school called me to her office and asked if she could buy something I made. I gave it to her. That went on at art school, with the teachers approaching me, too, including the San Francisco Art Institute. After a year there, an instructor came to me and said, 'We have nothing here left to teach you; you know what you're doing.' " 

Her father's street light factory was an inspiration, too. "After school—elementary school—I'd get picked up and taken to my father's factory. I was bored in school but came alive when I went there. It was my heaven! Everything was done there, the casting ... I had a dream of having a place like the factory, to make things ... " 

(About 30 years ago, her father left his factory, also to become a visual artist.) 

Shadravan sold her house, at one point, so she could work just one day a week as a dentist during the 18 months she carved the "Durer-Shadravan tubs." She also previously opened a gallery, in the Mission District in San Francisco. "For the same length of time, a year and a half; maybe that's my tolerance level." 

Her earliest works on display will be oil paintings dating from 1999, one with her grandmother's marriage contract. 

Shadravan's next project will be dedicated to the ancient Iranian city of Isfahan—and to Walt Whitman. 


Shadravan's Art Gallery, 2515 Telegraph Avenue (near 25th Street), Uptown Oakland ("In the Art Murmur district"). Opening Friday, December 2, 6-10; Saturday, 1-6. (Facebook page under "Shadravan's".)


Theater: Another Slew of Reviews:'Shoot O'Malley Twice' (Virago); 'Annie' (Berkeley Playhouse); 'The Soldier's Tale' (Aurora); 'Rumi x 7' (Golden Thread).

By Ken Bullock
Saturday November 26, 2011 - 10:47:00 AM

—'Shoot O'Malley Twice' (Virago Theatre Company) Since this review is running in the Planet, a note of disclosure—and reassurance—is in order at the start. The title of Jon Brooks' (who has written for the Mime Troupe) amusing play, about betting on "shooting fingers" while the Giants and Dodgers are betraying New York and Brooklyn by moving to the West Coast, refers to Walter O'Malley, owner of the Dodgers, object of such distain by the Brooklyn Faithful that—the saying goes—if you had Hitler, Stalin and Walter O'Malley together in a room and your gun had only two bullets, what would you do? "Shoot O'Malley Twice!" 

That exposition finished, it's a pleasure to state further that Virago, based in Alameda, has done their usual, thorough job of mounting this premiere of an engaging evocation of late 50s NYC, where Billy Future awaits his challengers in "shooting fingers," the slightly mysterious Association overseeing that the contestants follow the rules of the old children's game—no staring, squinting, just flash the fingers, scored odd or even ... Issues of Second Sight, psychic vision and Predestination are tossed around a lot—even some of the too-common vague speculation on Relativity, Quantum and String Theories, as well as a few anachronistic "predictions," mercifully brief here. What's good is the set-up, the crew and their tart talk, the offbeat comedy of their seriousness at betting and adjudicating such a street corner kids' sport ... 

It gets more interesting and even more cockeyed when the out-of-town wonder, The Savannah Kid, comes to challenge Billy, a rather different figure than expected, overwrought with confidence over a strange sense of mission. Clever use of very simple, well-crafted lighting and sound effects—and a burlesque/stage magic gimmick—add a great deal to the slightly outre'—slightly goofy—atmosphere. Angela Dant has directed her cast of nine very well, with particularly good performances from Christy Crowley and Dorian Lockett. 

Last performances this Friday and Saturday at 8, StageWerx 446, 446 Valencia Street (the former location of Intersection For the Arts), San Francisco. Wine and cheese reception after Saturday's closing show. $15-$25. (510) 865-6237; viragotheatre.org 

* * * * * 

—"I think I'm going to like it here!" An orphan girl, taken up by a billionaire for a two-week stay at his mansion, and the search for herlong-errant parents ... Pure nostalgia from the comics of one Depression for the audiences today, watching Occupy encampments busted up. 

'Annie,' the musical, has seldom been done so well as Berkeley Playhouse manages onstage at their Julia Morgan Center home. Everyone in the cast of 30 or so performs well—and that includes the choruses, both youth and adult, as the girls in the orphans' home, servants at Daddy Warbucks' estate, passersby on the streets of Midtown or down-and-outers at a riverside Hooverville ... All are liable to burst into song, step out in dance, flip with acrobatics. 

The ensemble is the driving force of the show's tempo and tone; the featured players stand out against this moving backdrop. Nandi Drayton (in alternation with Samantha Anne Martin) as Annie is a shrewd little optimist, who knows how to say things and get them done; Joe Kady eschews Daddy Warbucks' usual skinhead look, presenting him as a gruff businessman with a heart of precious metal; Melinda Meeng plays Daddy's secretary Grace Farrell with the same charisma she's displayed in 'Once On This Island' for the Playhouse and as the Tooth Fairy in Shotgun's 'God's Ear.' Rana Weber cuts a slatternly swath as Miss Hannigan of the Girls Home. Reggie D. White as Rooster sings and dances up as storm, as does Sophia Rose Morris as the Star-To-Be. Paul Loper and Pauli N. Amornkul are two more—among others—adding tone to foreground and back in this sparkling cast. 

The designers—Martin Flynn (scenic), Wes Crain (costumes), Molly-Stewart-Cohen (lights), Brendan Aanes (sound) and Megan Lush (props) deserve credit, too, for this family pleaser—some gags eliciting laughter from the kids, a few references catching the adults attention, much else appealing to both. Director Mina Morita has put it all together with music director Jonathan Fadner and Dane Paul Andres' exceptional choreography. 

Weekends (including matinees) through December 4 at Julia Morgan Center, 2640 College Avenue. $17-$35. 845-8542; berkeleyplayhouse.org 

* * * * * 

—On my desk is a print of Jean Cocteau's color drawing of the opening scene of Stravinsky and Ramuz's 'The Soldier's Tale,' showing the strange lepidopterist with his net, talking the soldier out of his fiddle. 

The Aurora's unusual production of this stage piece from 1918—which was intended from the start "to be read, played and danced"—plays the Russian folk parable out as a fairytale ... A fairytale starring a puppet, manipulated by a dancer, who performs the part of the sick princess cured by the soldier-puppet, wordlessly, by dancing. 

Peter Callendar narrates the Tale excellently, speaking dialogue for the soldier, while Joan Mankin—first seen at the back of the stage off to the side of the violinist and clarinetist, with a horned goat mask turned around on her head like a backwards baseball cap—essays the part of the Devil—and all the roles the Devil plays, starting with the lepidopterist conning the soldier, returning home on leave, out of his fiddle, in exchange for a book that foretells the stock market ... and "with two weeks' pay ... Somehow or other, lost the way." 

Muriel Maffre, former principal with the San Francisco Ballet—who pitched the staging idea to Aurora artistic director Tom Ross (the two co-directed)—both handily manipulates the four foot tall soldier puppet as his (almost) constant companion, and beautifully dances the role of the princess. 

Also collaborating are Mary Chun of Earplay as pianist and music director, percussionist Kevin Neuhoff (principal timpanist with Berkeley Symphony), alternating violinists Terrie Baune and Gloria Justin, and alternating clarinetists Jeff Anderle (of Redshift and the Paul Dresher Ensemble) and Peter Josheff (also of the Dresher Ensemble and an Earplay original). Jonathan Khuner of Berkeley Opera arranged the score, using concert suite material Stravinsky scored for a chamber quartet (down from a septet), and Donald pippin of Pocket Opera supplied the translation, which has Pippin's signature wit and anachronistic flourishes all over it. 

Benjamin Pierce's set design, using a translucent curtain with outlines of buildings, a village in the distance, lit by Jim Cave's light design, Fumiko Bielefeldt's costumes and props by Mia Baxter and Seren Helday all add immensely to the atmospherics of this at times feather-light creation ... 

Perhaps it's a bit too light, missing something that would ground it a little more, what with a puppet at the center and a tale for a narrative, in a theater where the audience is used to seeing—theater. 'The Soldier's Tale' is highly enjoyable, though in this form a bit too indirect, which slows the dynamics—both musical and storytelling—down. Maybe there's not quite enough contrast between the different elements of the production. 

The cast and the musicians perform well; high points are the dancing—both Maffre's loose-limbed movements as the princess and a very different, grotesquely funny capering by Mankin when the fiddler does to the Devil what many new and amateur violinists do to their unwitting listeners when they practice. The dancing also brings out the multi-disciplinary contrasts of the piece, like in an opera or a masque. 

It's a departure for the Aurora—and one that's a perfect alternative to the usual—no need naming names!—holiday shows reworked every year by so many companies. 

Wednesdays through Sundays at different times; 2081 Addison (near Shattuck); $10-$55. 843-4822; auroratheatre.org 

* * * * * 

—There's the fortune cookie Rumi, the New Age version of "Confucius Say," spouting vague cliches that could be from anywhere, anytime—and then there's the great Persian lyric poet—and the Rumi of the tales in The Masnavi, "the Quran in Persian" (as poet Jami called it), his magnum opus, a kind of verse epic in all moods of the diversity, inner and outer, of medieval Islam. 

Hafiz Karmali, who staged the medieval parable 'Island of Animals' for Golden Thread and the Afghan Coalition a few years back, put on his adaptation of seven stories from The Masnavi last weekend as 'Rumi x 7,' theater-in-the-round, a one-ring circus of delights, at the Islamic Cultural Center of Northern California in downtown Oakland, inaugurating Golden Thread's project, Islam 101, performances over the next three years at different locations to educate about and explore the legacy of Islam as a worldwide cultural and spiritual movement, "as an Abrahamic religion, the third dimension ... in what's been heretofore called the Judeo-Christian tradition." 

His ensemble included practitioners of the circus arts, musicians, dancers—often all three in one performer—pitching their wares from Rumi in a variety of styles, from slapstick (and just plain shtick) to a little Commedia Del'Arte, silent movie comedy to whirling dervish dance (the observance Rumi introduced to his Sufi order), acrobatics to—the stunner—a New Orleans funeral march to celebrate Rumi's wake, which the poet declared in advance to be a joyous occasion. 

The exuberant cast included Jamie Coventry, Aylin Guvenc, Rachel L. Jacobs, Mahsa Matin, Aliah Najmabadi, Maruf Noyoft and Wiley Naman Strasser. The production team was Jim Cave, Taylor Gonzalez, Jamayla Kiswani, Wan-Yin Tang, Junelle-Johannah Taguas, Ninva Warda and Daniel Yelen. 

(In fact, Golden Thread hopes to reprise 'Rumi x 7' on and/or around December 17—the anniversary of the poet's death in Anatolia, 1273, the day he's traditionally celebrated, in San Francisco. Check goldenthread.org for updates on showtimes and location.) 

Ralph Waldo Emerson adapted from a German translation the opening of The Masnavi, "The Song of the Reed" (performed in 'Rumi x 7'), which he called "The Flute" (and mistakenly attributed to a later Persian poet, Hilali): 

"Hark what, now loud, now low, the pining flute complains,/Without tongue, yellow-cheeked, full of winds that wail and sigh;/Saying, Sweetheart! the old mystery remains,—/If I am I; thou, thou; or thou art I?"