Extra

Knowing what works

Carol Denney
Tuesday June 06, 2017 - 11:07:00 AM

The chair of the Community Environmental Advisory Commission (CEAC), Michael Goldhaber, seemed annoyed recently when I halted the plan to place cigarette butt receptacles in the smokefree area downtown after its first reading. "Have you seen cigarette butts downtown?" he asked me sternly when I visited the commission. I thought his combination of ignorance and rudeness would have been too humiliating for him to bear if accurately reported, so I wrote a humorous piece instead for the satirical Pepper Spray Times now in its twenty-sixth year of continuous publication. He is now threatening to sue me, claiming among other things that the piece is "not particularly funny." He's right about one thing - his threat is much funnier than the original piece. -more-


Updated: Berkeley CEAC Chair stung by Pepper Spray

formerly by Michael H. Goldhaber, Chair, CEAC
Monday June 05, 2017 - 03:41:00 PM

Editor’s note:

We received a copy of the letter which was originally printed below, which was addressed to the author of the Pepper Spray Times, and it was followed by a series of ever more urgent requests for a retraction. The writer has now informed us that the letter was not intended for publication, so it has been deleted.

The Berkeley Daily Planet does not exercise editorial control over the Pepper Spray Times, which is produced by a freelance writer who is not paid for her work. It is stored in .pdf form and we cannot alter it—we simply link to the .pdf file. Therefore we are not in a position to retract its specific contents.

It is not clear to us exactly how a publication could retract satire, anyway.

We do know that it’s satire, and knowing that we certainly accept Mr. Goldhaber’s contention that he didn’t actually use the foolish words attributed to him under Grace Underpressure’s byline. (Let’s hope not!) We also believe that he doesn’t swear in public, if he says so. -more-



Page One

California leaders react to pullout from Paris Accord

Dave Brooksher (BCN)
Friday June 02, 2017 - 05:00:00 PM

Leaders from around the Bay Area and California have condemned President Donald Trump's announcement today that the U.S. will withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions on a global scale. -more-



Public Comment

The time for postal banking is now!

Harry Brill
Friday June 02, 2017 - 05:18:00 PM

The conservative leaning Postmaster General, Patrick Donahoe, in his farewell press conference claimed that postal banking was a bad idea because "We don't know anything about banking". Is historical memory that short? For 55 years, from 1911 to 1966, United States Postal Service (USPS) provided traditional banking services. Ironically, postal banking was initiated and strongly advocated by a conservative Republican, President Taft. But without any public discussion, postal banking was abolished by President Johnson, a Democrat who was liberal on domestic issues. -more-


President Donald Trump’s decision to remove the United States from the Paris Accord on Climate Action

Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguin
Friday June 02, 2017 - 10:42:00 AM

Climate change is real and will have a real and devastating effect on our local communities. Trump's disastrous decision to back out of the Paris Accord will have devastating impacts to green jobs, climate change, and our country's standing as a world leader. While we had hoped that the federal government would show leadership in the face of this crisis, it now turns to us, local and state governments to take the lead. -more-


White Extremists

Tejinder Uberoi
Friday June 02, 2017 - 04:15:00 PM

Did Trump’s campaign rhetoric of anti-immigrant rantings of Muslims precipitate the recent death of two “good Samaritans,” on a Portland train? Three men tried to rescue two teenage girls by a knife wielding white terrorist who was spewing anti-Muslim racial slurs. The attack came attack came just six days after 23-year-old Richard Collins III, an African-American student at Bowie State University was fatally stabbed by a white supremacist Facebook group called "Alt-Reich: Nation."Heidi Beirich, the Intelligence Project director of the Southern Poverty Law Center, accuses Trump and his supporters of unleashing a barrage of neo-Nazi, anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim hatred during the presidential campaign. This tragic event comes on the heels of discussions by top Republicans who are considering using militia groups as security for public events. Multnomah County GOP Chair, James Buchal, told The Guardian that Republicans would likely make their own security arrangements rather than relying on city or state police, including groups like the “Oath Keepers” and the “Three Percenters”. A video has recently surfaced of Buchal lamenting what he called "open borders." He has expressed his intense hatred of people from Third World countries who “would destroy everything that is special about America.” Clearly he is no shining example of what is so special about America. -more-


June Pepper Spray Times

By Grace Underpressure
Friday June 02, 2017 - 05:55:00 PM

Editor's Note: The latest issue of the Pepper Spray Times is now available.

You can view it absolutely free of charge by clicking here . You can print it out to give to your friends.

Grace Underpressure has been producing it for many years now, even before the Berkeley Daily Planet started distributing it, most of the time without being paid, and now we'd like you to show your appreciation by using the button below to send her money.

This is a Very Good Deal. Go for it! -more-


Editorial

Round up the usual suspects--a mini-symposium on market-based land use planning

Becky O'Malley
Friday June 02, 2017 - 02:56:00 PM

First, let’s take a quick look at this cheery emailed message from the Institute for Policy Studies:

“Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Accord this week. This is a colossal foreign policy mistake and reveals how little this administration cares about the gravest existential threat humanity has faced. But, our climate policy expert Basav Sen points out, there might be a silver lining in all of this: If the U.S. doesn’t stay in the agreement, this administration can’t use that arena to fulfill its desire to undermine global climate talks and advance the fossil fuel industry’s agenda.”

If you click on the link, you can read the supporting article, which makes a good case for why it’s better that the Trumpers are leaving the table for now.

And while we’re talking about the reading list for this weekend, take a look at Between Victoria and Vauxhall, byJohn Lanchester, in the June 1 issue of the London Review of Books.

He writes about London’s problems with overbuilding of luxury housing combined with serious underbuilding of affordable housing:

“Who should you vote for … at this general election, if you want to stop what’s obviously going to happen: the creation of a huge number of the very last things the city needs, new luxury flats under absentee foreign ownership? In the case of housing, the solution to this problem is obvious and has been known for years. It is to build more housing. … We have persuaded ourselves into a corner where governments believe they have no tools to address the shortfall in housing construction, especially social and low-cost housing. The best that successive governments have been able to do is to ‘leave it to the market’, even though the market has manifestly failed, and carries on failing, to build enough new homes.

“The housing crisis is partly a question of misaligned incentives: big property companies’ main asset is land, and if an inadequate supply of houses is being built, the value of the land goes up, creating a perverse, but highly effective, incentive not to build more housing. As a demonstration of the law of supply and demand, it could not be more perfect: supply is artificially restricted, so demand surges. In plain English, there aren’t enough houses being built, so houses are too expensive for most people. This fact is well understood, but the liberal ideology of market solutions makes it impossible to adopt an alternative.

“A system which allows total primacy to economics finds it impossible to address this basic economic fact. The charity Shelter defines truly affordable housing as absorbing no more than 35 per cent of income, but the average rental cost is 47 per cent. So the average is already unaffordable. The best that can be done in the current framework is for the public sector in effect to borrow or beg for crumbs off the market’s table in the form of social and affordable housing. The legal definition of the latter is defined not in relation to pay, but as 80 per cent of the current market rate. So even the alternative to the market defers to the market. The market is very good at building luxury flats, and completely useless when it comes to solving this problem.”
Sound familiar? This excellent article analyses the problem as if it’s the product of the British way of making local planning decisions, but in fact the same thing is happening all over the world, caused in large part by the migration of international flight capital to buying urban real estate in the glam cities: London, New York, Paris, San Francisco and the rest--and even Berkeley. In India, China and other developing countries the housing gap between the very rich and the very poor continues to grow as well. Professor K.P. Bhattacharjee, in his 2015 book Vision for a New India, observed that while India’s economic growth has been substantial since 1991, it “has not trickled down to those below the poverty line.”

Even in smaller and less glamorous Berkeley, international capital is busily engaged in devouring the prime opportunity sites near mass transit, which instead should be made available to house working people who need to be able to rely on affordable car-free access to jobs. And just as in London, the public sector is forced “to borrow or beg for crumbs off the market’s table in the form of social and affordable housing.” As Lanchester says about his English choice, who can you vote for to correct this situation?

Around here, the November elections yielded a new crop of legislators at the city and state level, and now it’s “Who Can You Trust?” time: will they put their votes where their progressive mouths went?

Don’t bet on it. -more-


The Editor's Back Fence

Take back the House with Ossoff

Becky O'Malley
Friday June 02, 2017 - 04:42:00 PM

Tomorrow afternoon (Saturday, June 3) we're co-hosting a fundraising party from 2-4 for Jon Ossoff, who's running in Georgia for the seat vacated by a Trumpite cabinet appointee. If you want to go, let me know by promptly emailing bomalley@berkeleydailyplanet.com and I'll send you the address and more information. -more-


Columns

ON MENTAL ILLNESS: When is Medication Not the Answer?

Jack Bragen
Friday June 02, 2017 - 10:54:00 AM

In my recovery from psychiatric illness, doctors have commented that I responded well to medication. To me, this is an indication that my illness is biologically based. -more-


Arts & Events

Around & About--Total Immersion Entertainment: 'The Soiled Dove,' Circus Dinner Theater with a Barbary Coast Theme Under the Tortona Big Top at Alameda Point

Ken Bullock
Friday June 02, 2017 - 10:39:00 AM

"Soiled Doves" was the monicker for ladies of the evening during the Gilded Age on the Barbary Coast in old San Francisco--and the name of the "immersive, circus-infused culinary exravaganza" dinner theater The Soiled Dove, put on by the Vau de Vire Society, creators of the Edwardian Ball, returning to the Tortona Big Top at The Point in Alameda Friday and Saturday nights, June 9th through July 1st. -more-


MUSIC REVIEW: Berkeley Community Chorus & Orchestra Perform Dvorák’s Stabat Mater

Reviewed by James Roy MacBean
Friday June 09, 2017 - 12:21:00 PM

In spite of its many musical virtues, if Antonín Dvorák’s Stabat Mater were just another setting of the grief experienced by Mary, the mother of Christ, as she watched her son die on the cross, I’m not sure this work would be nearly as moving as it is once one is informed about the circumstances in Dvorák’s own life which gave rise to this composition. In 1875, the recently married Dvorák and his wife had a daughter, Josefa, who died at just two days old. Overcome with grief, Dvorák began work on a Stabat Mater. He didn’t get very far, perhaps only eight bars, when he put aside this work to fulfill commissions for other music. Two years later, his 11-month old daughter, Ruenza, died, and less than a month later, his son, Otakar, also died. The Dvorák family was suddenly childless, having experienced the deaths of three children in two years. Dvorák threw himself into composing his Stabat Mater, which he completed in 1877. In this work, one senses that Dvorák took the grief of Mary, mother of Christ, as a paradigm of his wife’s grief as well as his own at the death of their three children. The Dvorák Stabat Mater thus became both an intimately personal work and, at the same time, a universal work embodying the grief of any mother who sees her child die. -more-