Full Text

 

News

Open Letter to Berkeley Mayor Arreguin and Council Regarding Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance

George Porter
Thursday July 08, 2021 - 01:27:00 PM

As regards the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance coming before Council on 7/13 (item#14) - Amend or postpone:

I fully appreciate the fact that the state is in crisis as regards affordable housing. I also appreciate that, despite this troubling situation, Berkeley’s Planning Dept. has proposed limiting the ‘by right” development of ADUs in Berkeley to 850 sq.ft. for a studio or one bedroom and 1000 sq. ft. for a two bedroom. In addition, though I believe stronger, more specifics protections are in order, I nonetheless appreciate that - out of public safety concern - ADU development in our Fire Zones is proposed to be limited to 800 sq. ft.

That said, I find the “by right” stipulations in the ordinance that are more lenient than the State's regulations to be detrimental to Berkeley’s public safety and its general health. It is very important to note here that the absence of these lenient stipulations in no way forbids such development. The development simply will not be “by right”, a variance can be applied for and an ancillary, discretionary process employed if there are no substantive objections. If there are objections, more often than not some compromise can be reached. Again, this modicum of local control is necessary to insure both public safety and the general health of the Berkeley community. 

 

The lenient “by right” stipulations that need to be removed are the following:

1) The 18 foot height limit for detached new construction to encourage two-story ADUs - out of public safety, privacy and natural light concerns, it should remain at the State's allowed 16 feet and an ancillary, discretionary process required for anything above that height. 

2) Allowing for rooftop decks - the State is silent and these too should require an ancillary, discretionary process out of public safety and privacy concerns. 

3) Allowing “Projections, Architectural Features” to encroach into the required setback - the State is silent and adequate access is of concern throughout Berkeley, particularly in our Fire Zones. An ancillary, discretionary process should be required. 

4) Allowing for a 3ft. separation between a detached ADU and the main building - the State is silent and, for safety’s sake, anything under 4ft. should (at the very least) be subject to review by fire and other public safety officials and an ancillary, discretionary process required. 

In addition to these changes, the fact that ADUs larger than 800 sq. ft. simply will not be allowed in our fire zones should be clearly stated in the ordinance. (The supporting State Code can be mentioned afterwards.) 

NOTE: None of the changes suggested here are set in stone. If at some future date the municipality wishes to reduce or simply eliminate these strictures throughout Berkeley or in certain areas, it is clearly within the power of Council to make these refinements to the ordinance. 

 

Amend or postpone:

Mr. Mayor and Council, a few months back you promised not to rush important changes to our ordinances through Council before the the community was able to reflect on these and make comment. The proposed ADU ordinance was only made public by Planning on Wednesday, 6/30, and this left less than two weeks before it was scheduled to be brought before Council as an action item. Clearly this is not enough time to allow a large part of our citizenry to become aware that this proposal even exists, much less to consider its ramifications and comment accordingly. 

I strongly believe that in order to fulfill your promise you have two choices: 

1) Accept these amendments (no law requires that Berkeley acts otherwise), urge all Councilmembers to do the same, then bring the item to vote. 

2) Simply postpone the public hearing on the item to a later date. 

Personally, I’d prefer the former - let’s get this done now and move on. The City has many other issues on its plate.


Press Release: UC studies: Contrary to popular belief, residents are not fleeing California

UC Office of the President
Wednesday July 07, 2021 - 04:32:00 PM

Despite California losing a congressional seat for the first time in history due to slow population growth and some high-profile technology companies and billionaires leaving the state, there is no evidence of an abnormal increase in residents planning to move out of the state, according to the results of a new survey released today (July 7) by the University of California. This research is part of a larger, multi-institution research project led by UC to assess whether there is in fact a “Cal exodus.” 

Key findings include: 

The majority of Californians still believe in the “California Dream.” Residents are moving out of state, but not at unusual rates. There is no evidence of “millionaire flight” from California. California’s economy attracts as much venture capital as all other states combined. Formed in fall 2020, the UC-led project is a research consortium designed to bring a fact-based, empirical approach to California’s population patterns, helping to inform state policy and public knowledge. The project includes studies conducted by scholars at UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC San Diego, as well as Cornell University and Stanford University. The research draws on many data sources to investigate the so-called exodus: public opinion data, the U.S. Census, consumer credit histories, home ownership rates, venture capital investments, and information from the Franchise Tax Board.  

“From housing affordability to post-pandemic recovery, California is faced with solving a daunting number of existential challenges. To help inform those important public discussions, UC assembled many of the state’s top researchers to provide a data-driven understanding of California’s population trends,” said UC Regent John A. Pérez. “Sliced and diced by geography, race, income and other demographic factors, our efforts have produced a clearer picture of who perceives California as the Golden State versus a failed state. The empirical data will be, at once, disappointing to those who want to write California’s obituary, as well as a call to action for policymakers to address the challenges that have caused some to lose faith in the California Dream.” 

No big changes on residents’ plans to leave the state UC San Diego recently conducted a survey that found the percentage of Californians who plan to leave the state has remained static over the past two years. Twenty-three percent of California’s voters reported that they were seriously considering leaving California, which is slightly lower than the 24 percent found in a 2019 survey conducted by UC Berkeley. This finding is consistent with research that UC San Diego did on Google search trends, which found no increase over the course of the pandemic in how frequently Californians searched terms such as “moving company” or “U-Haul.” 

Other findings in the UC San Diego survey of more than 3,000 respondents include: 

By nearly a 2-to-1 margin, Californians respond that they still believe in the “California Dream” (that it’s a great place to live and raise a family) but belief in that dream depends on demographics, economic status and partisan affiliation. Spanish speakers, Latinos, African Americans, Asian Americans and younger Californians are more optimistic, while middle-class Californians, white respondents, older residents and Republicans are more pessimistic. Those living in parts of the state that have not been part of recent economic expansions, including the Central Valley and northern counties outside of the Bay Area, are most likely to contemplate moving. Middle-class Californians making incomes between $50,000 and $100,000 are the most concerned about the state of California today as well as its future. In these polarized times, there is a surprisingly small gap between the percentage of Democrats (21 percent) and Republicans (30 percent) seriously considering moving. Growth is not a goal for most Californians: Asked to look ahead 10 years, 35 percent of respondents believe it would be better if the population decreases significantly and 46 percent want it to stay about the same. Only 19 percent of those surveyed said that the state would be better if its population increases. The survey also revealed an 8 percent decrease in the percentage of Californians who opined California is one of the best places to live, down from 50 percent in the 2019 UC Berkeley poll to 42 percent in the 2021 UC San Diego poll. “Despite the popular notion of unhappy Californians leaving the state en masse, our robust research shows there is actually no exodus,” said Thad Kousser, chair of the political science department at UC San Diego and the lead researcher of the most recent survey. “Most residents say that they still believe in the ‘California Dream.’ Policymakers, including those trying to prevent an exodus, should focus more on those who are not as optimistic about the state’s direction, including many in the middle class facing steep housing costs and people from areas of the state facing the greatest economic challenges.” 

Claims of “millionaire flight” are unsupported by numerous data sets The 2021 UC San Diego poll also found that affluent Californians are the group most satisfied with the direction of the state and very likely to believe that it will be a better place when today’s children grow up. This aligns with research into migration patterns of California’s millionaires conducted by project partners at Stanford University and Cornell University. The analysis of nearly two decades of Franchise Tax Board data by Charles Varner and Cristobal Young demonstrated there has been no flight of millionaires away from California despite multiple tax increases levied on higher earners in recent years. 

Younger Americans are more mobile, foreign-born immigrants stay The UC-led project also includes an analysis from researchers at UCLA on domestic immigration and migration (people moving into and out of California from other U.S. states) based on the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) database by finance professor Stuart Gabriel and sociology and statistics professor Jennie Brand. Their research found that the number of those moving out of California to other states has trended up since 2012, but that is not uncommon and is similar to levels last seen in the mid-2000s. During that period, those moving into California — both from other states and other countries — has seen few changes.  

The UCLA research shows: 

Young Americans (25-39) are moving around at roughly double that of middle-age or older people. While moving into California remains elevated for younger people through 2019, the combination of some decline coupled with those moving out of state has driven down the number of younger people moving into California overall. The number of older Americans (60+) moving into California has fallen since 2014 and has recently become negative due to more elderly Californians moving out of state. The number of younger (25-39) and older residents moving out of California has also trended up since 2014. Among U.S. destinations, Texas and Washington were at the top of the list among younger people, whereas low-cost and proximate areas of Nevada and Arizona dominated destinations among older Californians. Less than 5 percent of foreign-born immigrants who arrived in the U.S. during the prior two years left California. This finding suggests that California is not simply a gateway to other U.S. destinations among recent foreign-born immigrants arriving in the state. Some migrating out of San Francisco, but staying in state Using 16 years of credit history data to track residential moves through the end of 2020, a UC California Policy Lab report found “no evidence of a pronounced exodus from the state” and “little evidence that wealthy Californians are leaving en masse” because of the pandemic. The report did, however, reveal net migration away from San Francisco during the pandemic along with a decline in the number of people moving to the state. The report, led by Natalie Holmes, research fellow at the California Policy Lab, found: 

The share of movers that leave the state has grown slightly since 2015, from 16 percent to 18 percent, a trend that continued in 2020 with no marked increase. There is no evidence that wealthy households are leaving the state in large numbers. Approximately two-thirds of people who moved out of San Francisco remained within the 11-county Bay Area economic region, and 80 percent remained in California which is consistent with trends in prior years. Counties in the Sierra Nevada mountains and other parts of northern California saw huge increases in former Bay Area residents, with 50 percent and in some cases double that in 2020 as compared to 2019. California draws half of all venture capital investments in the U.S. Lastly, the UC-led project features analysis from Cornell University sociology professor Cristobal Young on which states are getting the most venture capital investment, and it demonstrates two major trends: 

California’s share of venture capital dollars rose from one-third in 1995 to more than half throughout the 2010s. In the first quarter of 2021, the state’s share of VC funding stood at 48 percent, slightly below trend but consistent with normal year-to-year fluctuations. 

Between 1995 and 2005, New York and Texas each received about 6 percent of all VC funding in the U.S. By 2020, New York’s share had doubled to 12 percent, while Texas’s share had fallen to 3 percent. In the first quarter of 2021, the shares were 15 percent and 2 percent respectively. Florida, another oft-mentioned competitor with California, also received 2 percent of VC funding in Q1 2021. Together, Florida and Texas represent less than a quarter of the VC investment in New York, and a 15th of that in California.


The Sound of Al Remembered

Jack Foley
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 03:08:00 PM

In April of 1965 I enjoyed the first of a remarkable and continuing series of (non-drug-induced) mystical experiences that I consider, thus far, to be the high points of my life. I no longer feel compelled, as I once did, to speak of these experiences directly. I have learned quite painfully that most people are not especially eager to hear of such things, and many, in fact, feel threatened or frightened by them. ...

For me the writing of poetry is a spiritual activity. Poetry should be the music of love: song, a dance, the joyously heartbreaking flight of the human spirit through inner and outer space in search of itself.

--Al Young


The many expressions of grief at the death of poet Al Young are a testimony to the considerable extent that he was an important and much-loved West Coast figure. His friend Ishmael Reed has called him "one of the most underrated writers in the country." "He lived on the West Coast," Reed went on. "The people who receive a lot of publicity live in the New York-Washington, D.C. shuttle area. It's difficult for a writer like Al to achieve prominence with critics who see Northern California as a stepchild of Manhattan."

The musical quality of Al's poetry has been noted--"He wedded poetry and music together,” said Sharon Coleman, a poet and instructor at Berkeley City College: “He brought music to poetry in a very integral way”--but, even in the midst of the many encomia he has received, the complex quality of his music or of Al's poetry in general has not been discussed.

Al Young and I were longtime friends--telephone-talking friends--and the man I knew was brilliant, open, ironic, endlessly curious, scholarly, funny, satirical, complicated: multiple. These qualities are all on display in his poetry, but as far as I know they have not been discussed; nor--despite the fact that Al was Poet Laureate of California from 2005 to 2008--has his poetry been recognized as the extraordinary achievement that it is.

What follows is a restructuring of a review I wrote approximately twenty years ago. In it I tried to touch on something of the richness of Al's work. I realized at the time I wrote it that more could have and should have been said, but I felt that this was at least a start.


AL YOUNG, THE SOUND OF DREAMS REMEMBERED: POEMS 1990-2000 (CREATIVE ARTS BOOK COMPANY, 2001) 

Al Young’s Heaven: Collected Poems 1956-1990 appeared in 1992. The Sound of Dreams Remembered brings us more or less up to date. Young’s title is a deliberate play on a famous phrase which runs throughout Langston Hughes’ 1951 sequence, “Montage of a Dream Deferred.” Towards the end of The Sound of Dreams Remembered--published fifty years after Hughes’ poem--Young writes of 

 

 

dreams so long deferred  

that laser-lined Thought Police 100 years from now 

still can’t decrypt the meaning of their blood; 

their blues. 

 


 

At the conclusion he adds, hauntingly and enigmatically, “light is hard.” 

 

The terms dream, sound, blue, and light--particularly light--appear throughout The Sound of Dreams Remembered in various combinations and give Young’s work density and resonance, as if, whatever else it may be, the book is particularly a meditation on those terms and all they might mean. “Remembering” itself is a problematical issue here--and not merely because the dream has been deferred. Young admits that memory is “fickle as a feather” (“Memory Meanders, and Sometimes Meows”) and asserts that certain poems which appear to be autobiographical are fictional. Identity is primarily the product of memory, and the copy on the back of the book insists that “Rare among contemporary poets, [Young] almost never uses the pronoun ‘I’ to refer to himself. His contempt for the unremitting arrogance of the confessional mode is hardly a secret.” Yet many of the poems depend for their effect on our sense of the intense particularity of this poet--i.e., of his identity. Worse, Young closes his book with two poems which purport to be the work of “the gifted language poet P.C. Mack”--a suspicious name if ever there was one and, indeed, a yoking together of a pair of opposites or at least of competitors. “As a concluding gesture,” he writes, 

 

I have selected two poems from the gifted language poet P.C. Mack's curious underground sensation, The Purina Elegies. And, to restructure credit where credit is due, I must also acknowledge the poet O.O. Gabugah, that African American maverick, who first alerted me to Ms. Mack's poetry. 

 

Anyone who has experienced Tarzan movies of the 40s and 50s is familiar with the term oogabugah: it is Hollywood's version of the "sounds" "native Africans" make. Though O.O. 

Gabugah rates a section of Young's African American Literature: A Brief Introduction and Anthology--as Young does not--Gabugah, like P.C. Mack, is a totally fictional character. He first makes his appearance in Young's 1976 novel, Sitting Pretty, and Young has used him in various guises since. (Gabugah is the "author" of the introduction to Heaven: Collected Poems 1956-1990, for instance.) 

 

Of course, as O.O. Gabugah, Young can say things he cannot say as “Al Young.” Gabugah’s most popular work is called Slaughter the Pig & Git Yo’self Some Chit’lins; other works include N----rs with Knives, Black on Back, Love Is a White Man’s Snot-Rag and Takin Names and Kickin Asses. Here is a sample of his verse: 

 

 


Well, honkyphiles, yall’s day done come,  

I mean we gon clean house 

and rid the earth of Oreo scum 

that put down Fats for Faust 

 

This here’s one for-real revolution.... 

 


 

Both O.O. Gabugah and P.C. Mack allow Young to explore aspects of selfhood which could not easily be expressed if he were to say “I.” In a way, we might look to this writer not for a sense of “sincerity”--which might easily turn out to be bogus--but for an illuminating dissembling, 

even play. (P.C. Mack allows Young to function to some degree as a "gifted language poet" and one of Gabugah’s poems is “A Poem for Players.” It ends somewhat indignantly, “Theyll let you play anybody but you, / that’s pretty much what they will do.”) What Young is doing--and what we experience as we read his work--is close to what he calls in African American Literature “the masked or dual aspect of African American culture”: 

 

 


W.E.B. Du Bois, the eminent sociologist and political strategist, called it “double-consciousness” in his eloquent classic, The Souls of Black Folk: “An American, a Negro, two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder.”  

 

Even though these now-classic Negro spirituals spoke at one level of Jesus and heaven and chariots and angels, they also told other stories and expressed other sentiments beyond the surface meaning of their texts. 

 


 

It is towards such “other stories” and “sentiments beyond the surface meaning of their texts” that Young’s frequently enigmatic poetry--particularly this new poetry--is always reaching. Al was acutely aware that in poetry language is what it is but at the same time, like the spirituals he cites, it leaps beyond itself into an otherness that is less "clear," perhaps even less specific than what appears initially but is nevertheless the great power source of what is written. The ability to "hear" that otherness--that music--is what we mean by "the appreciation of poetry." 

 

One of the most spectacular examples of the fluidity of identity--and of the language that expresses identity--is Young’s poem, “W.H. Auden & Mantan Moreland.” Appearing in Heaven: Collected Poems 1956-1990, the poem takes place in Heaven and is “in memory of the Anglo-American poet & the Afro-American comic actor (famed for his role as Birmingham Brown, chauffeur in those ancient Charlie Chan movies) who died on the same day, September 28, 1973”: 

 

Consider them both in paradise, 

discussing one another— 

the one a poet, the other an actor; 

interchangeable performers 

who finally slipped backstage 

of a play whose cast favored lovers. 

 

“You executed some brilliant lines, 

Mr. Auden, & doubtless engaged our 

innermost emotions & informed imagination, 

for I pondered your Age of Anxiety 

diligently over a juicy order of ribs.” 

 

“No shit!” groans Auden, mopping his brow. 

“I checked out all your Charlie Chan 

flicks & flipped when you turned up again 

in Watermelon Man & that gas commercial 

over TV. Like, where was you all that 

time in between? I thought you’d done 

died & gone back to England or somethin.” 

 

“Wystan, pray tell, why did you ever eliminate 

that final line from ‘September 1, 1939’?— 

We must all love one another or die.” 

 

“That was easy. We gon die anyway no matter 

how much we love, but the best thing I like 

that you done was the way you buck them eyes 

& make out like you runnin sked all the time. 

Now, that’s the bottom line of the black 

experience where you be in charge of the scene. 

For the same reason you probly stopped shufflin.” 

 

 

The Sound of Dreams Remembered is divided into three sections arranged in reverse chronological order. The opening section, which is also the longest, is “The Sound of Dreams Remembered”; it has the newest poems in the book. Both the second and third sections, “Conjugal Visits” and “Straight No Chaser,” appeared earlier as chapbooks. 

 

The opening and closing poems of the “Sound of Dreams Remembered” section are both titled after songs by composer Vernon Duke. Young notes that the lyrics to the first song, “April in Paris,” are by E.Y. (Yip) Harburg and the lyrics to the second, “I Can’t Get Started,” are by Ira Gershwin. In both poems the presence of the song is an extremely important element in understanding the poem and in both cases the songs were written by white, Jewish writers. The concluding lines of Young’s “I Can’t Get Started” are a kind of paraphrase of Gershwin’s lyric: 

 

 


In my bourgeois house, by my brand new pool,  

my late-life Ph.D thesis about to be a book, 

my savvy stock portfolio healthy and trim 

like this new body to which you get 

my initial public offering, and Oprah 

just left me some choice voicemail. 

Tell me, sweet thing, please--how come 

I find myself blessed with everything 

this system provides, and still I can’t get you? 

 


 

Similarly, phrases from the song “April in Paris”--sometimes slightly disguised--find their way into Young’s poem of the same title: “Whom could we run to,” “holiday tables,” “chestnuts in bloom” (rather than “blossom”). In both cases, however, there is also a “double consciousness” at work. Young’s status as an African-American literally “colors” the implications of words originally written by white, Jewish Americans. One wonders what O.O. Gabugah would say about the speaker’s “bourgeois house” and his “brand new pool.” (In “Tango” Young refers bitterly to “squalid, unwashed bourgeois minds.”) African-Americans may well have “everything”--and still not have what they want, may well feel that, despite material possessions, “they can’t get started.” In “April in Paris,” the speaker asserts, 

 

 


Back home we knew what it was like to be the other--  

displaced, despised, imprisonable. We watched and fought. 

The colors of loss deepened. 

 


 

The question of the role of music in Al Young’s work is an exceptionally important one. The “Statement on Poetics” at the conclusion of “Conjugal Visits” begins, “Music--with which poetry remains eternally intimate--seems a dead ringer, as it were, for life itself.” The statement ends with still another quotation from Vernon Duke and E.Y. Harburg: “After 60 years of listening, I still feel as though I can’t get started...” (my italics). 

 

The speakers of the poems “April in Paris” and “I Can’t Get Started” are both African American and they are both haunted by the songs “April in Paris” and “I Can’t Get Started”--songs which, despite their origin in the largely white world of musical comedy, were often recorded by African American musicians. In a way, Young here is like a jazz musician riffing on songs by white composers--"claiming" them, making them "their own" to some degree. But there is more to it than that: Young is also suggesting that the speakers' conception of the world is like something out of a popular song, that their "reality" is the reality of being in a world postulated by the lyrics of a popular song. What exactly does that mean? Is that the "real" world? Popular songs are simultaneously expressions of feeling and ritualized evasions of the complexity of feeling: they are deliberate sentimentalizations, simplifications; “sophisticated” but often fueled by intense self-pity. Ira Gershwin--perhaps thinking of his achieving brother, George--wrote: 

 

 


I’ve been around the world in a plane  

I’ve settled revolutions in Spain 

But lately I’m so downhearted 

Cause I can’t get started 

With you. 

 


 

Popular songs--"standards"--can be a kind of joyous, demotic poetry, but they are also a kind of evasiveness. A person seeing himself in terms of popular songs is constantly generating sentiment but also constantly generating blindness. 

 

The great example of the self as popular song in this book is Billie Holiday--a great artist whose tragedy was to merge almost entirely with the material she so magnificently and subtly expressed. Popular songs are all about our need for illusion--and Holiday becomes a kind of emblem of that need. At the same time, she is also, as the narrator of “On the Road with Billie” insists, precisely “the sound of dreams remembered”--an emblem of what Young calls in the Auden/Moreland poem “the bottom line of the black / experience.” Young’s poem to Holiday is shot through with references to popular songs--songs Holiday sang: "Stars Fell on Alabama," "I Cover the Waterfront," "God Bless the Child," "I’ve Got My Love to Keep Me Warm" (parodied, since "Sex didn’t fix": "You had your songs to keep you warm”), "Do Nothing Till You Hear from Me," "Up Jumped You with Love," "You Go to My Head," "I Get a Kick Out of You," "Autumn in New York," "April in Paris," "Nice Work if You Can Get It," "Small Hotel," "Cheek to Cheek," probably among others. Yet 

 

 


When the war broke out and opium split town,  

up jumped smack, and you and all your hophead 

pals went down and copped. “You go to my head,” 

you groaned. Where did it all go? Where did you go? 

 


 

As “I Get a Kick Out of You” suggests, songs, sex and drugs all move towards one another--become versions of the same thing. They are all to some extent subversive and liberating, yet they are also dangerously destructive. Yet what is a person--particularly an African-American person--to do? The poem’s narrator remarks, “The War on Poverty, it bombed, but War on Drugs, / it’s on a roll.” 

 

Young’s poem is a brilliant commentary on the complexity of Holiday’s world--a world we still inhabit, though the songs have changed. In that world, "success" and "failure" are almost interchangeable. The very "dreams" we pursue annihilate us. At the conclusion of the poem, the "singer" can hardly make a sound: "your heart beat so that you could hardly speak." The reference is to Irving Berlin's song, "Cheek to Cheek": 

 

 


And my heart beat so that I could hardly speak  

And I seem to find the happiness I seek 

When we’re out together dancing cheek to cheek. 

 


 

Yet Holiday is hardly finding "happiness." "Remembered," she is an emblem of both triumph and disaster. As Young puts it in "Depression, Blues, Flamenco, Wine, Despair," "You understand the hoodoo stab of hurt": 

 

 


Black night  

is falling all around you in the rain. 

Dark times, dark times can fix you in the light 

of reason, recognition, lasers, pain. 

 


 

These remarks hardly exhaust the role of music in Al Young’s poetry. In Heaven Young writes about “our natural yearning / for heaven,” and music plays a role there as well. “There are ways to go to heaven undercover,” Young asserts in one poem, and the speaker of another, a “one hundred-year-old jazz head,” says, “We music-makers, we time zappers.” Light--ever present in this book--is also relevant here. (At one point Young refers to “sounded light.”) Young’s considerable use of rhyme is also a musical element (there are a number of formal poems, particularly sonnets, in the book) as are his fascinating attempts to sonically mime piano solos. “Snowy Morning Blues,” a tribute to James P. Johnson and Langston Hughes, ends 

 

Let the blues roll on. Let snow fall right on time this time 

blue, blank, blackening the city-within-a-city christened 

in Dutch: Harlem, Haarlem, 

Haaaarrrrrlem. 

Vermeer, beware. 

 

And “Five,” in memory of pianist Bill Evans, has “Roll me in the dirty boogie-woogie of your light”; it concludes, 

 

 


The smile, the wave  

the lake makes feels hipper too. Some gig! 

Sweet sleep, slide slowly, gently, cleanly 

through this bubbling blood of ours. 

 


 

There are also passages of sheer delight in sound, slightly reminiscent of the early work of the "language poet," Clark Coolidge: 

 

 


Stopped cold by night, excitement slows. Zigzag,  

the jazz of cactus fuzz & insect buzz & lizards whizzing 

every which way nowhere & buzzards minding their own 

lazy business zooms, the horizon a shining rim-shot. 

 


 

In short, The Sound of Dreams Remembered has much to tell us about ourselves, whatever our ethnic persuasion. “The loveliness of poems is that they keep,” Young writes: “the loveliness of lives is that they don’t.” There is a good deal of surface dazzle, but the poems also stay in the mind and repay re-reading. The book has many provocative observations (“It wasn’t the French invented surrealism; it was Americans”). Among its “speakers” are a tomato and a lizard. If you want to know “How the Flower Flourishes,” this book can tell you. As O.O. Gabugah says, rightly, “We got to get the brothers and sisters to reading more. Of course, having the pictures in there and the short poems in big type helps.” 

 

And he adds, 

 

Since I don’t have time for these silly-ass games—plus I don’t read or write poetry, in the first place, to prove how deep and heavy and intellectual I am—just give me somebody that’s hitting on the main subject, which is life. And it’s a double treat when that somebody also happens to be full of life while they’re talking about life. That’s Al Young. And the brother is upbeat; about as upbeat as you can get and still be living in North America in, you might as well say, the 21st Century. That’s what I read poetry for: I wanna know what you love, what you’re crazy about; whether it’s a certain hangup or fixation or just being alive or wanting your freedom from something that’s been holding you down. What I’ve noticed about too many well-meaning professional poets is that they’re See No Evil, Hear No Evil, and Evil. 

 

Behind Gabugah's street rhetoric--informing it--one can feel the presence of the tender, 

brilliant, scholarly, educated, sophisticated, street-wise, vastly amused consciousness that 

was Al Young: "just give me somebody that's hitting on the main subject, which is life." 

 

One final thing on music. When one reads The Waste Land, one is sometimes daunted by the range of references that extends throughout the poem. Someone remarked that you think you're reading Eliot and then you find out you're reading Baudelaire or Dante--or even Wagner. Eliot feels free to refer to almost anything that inhabits what we might call Western or Classical consciousness. Though Al Young was certainly aware of the meaning of such references, in The Sound of Dreams Remembered he chooses not to refer to Eliot's Western--and largely white-created--books, music, etc. Instead, he refers to that body of marvelous work created in the 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s, to what we call "The Great American Songbook," work which has in fact been explored extensively by African American musicians. Young's work is as dense and profound as Eliot's or Pound's in terms of his references, but the references are different. It is part of the extraordinary originality of his consciousness. He expected his audience to recognize what "Straight No Chaser" is or who Bill Evans was. The problem here is that the next few generations of poets may not share that knowledge--knowledge that might be called "Al's dream." For them, Thelonious Monk or "Fats" may turn out to be as unfamiliar figures as Eliot's Baudelaire or Dante. This thought occurred to me because I've been reading a fascinating book, What Kind of Man, poems by the New York poet, Tony Gloeggler. Though definitely an intelligent, sophisticated poet, Gloeggler does not refer to Baudelaire or Dante either; nor does he refer to T.S. Eliot or Ezra Pound. Instead, he refers to The Beach Boys, to Bruce Springsteen, to The Shirelles--to rock n roll. Like Al's, his consciousness is inhabited, even formed by music, but it is a different kind of music. For such poets--and despite the range of their reading--Bob Dylan is perhaps as much a "great poet" as T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, Pablo Neruda, Langston Hughes, Emily Dickinson. Where is our common culture? What stories do we share? As Al puts it wonderfully, "light is hard." 


Opinion

Public Comment

Native American Indians

Jagjit Singh
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 03:31:00 PM

Failed government policies, sheer neglect and cruelty continue to haunt native American Indians. Driven off their land by early European invaders, corralled into barren, unfertile reservation lands, native Indians are now facing the devastating impact of climate change. In parts of Alaska the coastal waters and high tide are getting dangerously close to many schools. Storms are increasing in intensity posing danger to many Indian tribes.

Reservations from Alaska to Florida are threatened by climate change. These unlivable reservation communities must be relocated to higher ground. This should be front and center of federal infrastructure plans. This would also be a perfect time to pay reparations for past sins for the welfare and survival of native Indians. Massive cutback in military spending could easily pay for the relocation costs.

It is time to halt failed military adventures (Iraq, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan) squandering $trillion ending up in monumental failures bringing untold misery to millions of people around the world. The Israeli occupation of Palestinian land follows a close parallel to the historical genocide of Native Indians. An additional cost saving of $3B annually would accrue by halting military aid to apartheid Israel (designated by Human Rights Watch) and which many governments in the world regard as excessively cruel.


An Activist's Diary, Week Ending July 3, 2021

Kelly Hammargren
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 03:33:00 PM

Last Monday night June 28, I tuned into the interview by Chris Hayes with Governor Jay Insleefrom the State of Washington and heard Inslee say, in regard to the heat wave in the Northwest and the drought: “This is the beginning of a permanent emergency.”

I know the permafrost is thawing, releasing methane, the melting of glaciers is accelerating, Siberia has heat waves, the warnings of a heating planet come with increasing intensity… and yet, despite all this the fact that a little town in Canada, far to our north, could be hotter than Palm Springs in the California desert is still a shock. That is exactly what happened when Lytton, Canada hit 121.3°F on Tuesday before it burned to the ground on Wednesday. The cause of that fire is still unknown.

The big event of City Council for the week was passing the budget on Tuesday evening for FY2022 (July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2022). It was weeks of budget meetings that felt like they went nowhere with endless piles of documents and presentations to weed through, including the 484 page budget booklet. In the end, thanks to the unrelenting work of Councilmember Harrison, climate finally got a seat at the table. Without Harrison’s persistence at the budget meetings in the morning and at council Tuesday evening, the funding requested by Public Works to begin EV (electric vehicle) charging station infrastructure work would not have been allocated. The final was $300,000 now with the remaining $850,000 to be allocated in November. 

One has to wonder where our City Manager, Dee Williams-Ridley is on responding to climate. For a city that claimed to care about climate with the declaration of a climate emergency in June 2018 and a goal to transition from fossil fuel vehicles to an electric fleet by 2030, it didn’t feel like there was recognition of a climate emergency when the initial allocation to climate in the budget presented by the City Manager started as $20,000 for BESO (Building Energy Saving Ordinance https://www.cityofberkeley.info/BESO/). Everything else was deferred. 

The transition of the Berkeley city fleet from fossil fuels to an EV fleet can’t happen without the infrastructure of charging stations to support it. San Diego looks to be way ahead of Berkeley with transitioning to an electric fleet. San Diego purchased an EV Streetsweeper last year, according to the Parade magazine that comes with the Sunday paper. I’m not sure if this is the brand, but the Globalsweeper https://globalsweeper.com/ looks pretty impressive. 

There’s another piece to Public Works that I started noticing. I’ve been reviewing the council agendas for more than six years, and what I see in requests from Liam Garland, the new Director of Public Works, looks like a lot of “catch up.” All of us experience the poor condition of our streets, and that raises another question of just what was the practice of maintaining the infrastructure of the city, including the city buildings, prior to July 13, 2020, when Garland was hired. I would suggest we look up the chain of responsibility to see how the city is managed. 

The effort to cut the budget allocation to policing by transferring responsibilities to other services like the Special Care Unit (SCU - Mental Health – Crisis Intervention) and BerkDOT (Berkeley Department of Transportation) ended up more as a holding pattern. Both of these programs are still in the development stage. The argument advanced for maintaining the same police budget is that reimagining public safety is still in transition. 

The main event at the Wednesday evening Reimagining Public Safety Task Force meeting was the Police Department Overview. There was information that was new, at least to me, like that the probationary period for a new hire is two years, and that training by the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office Basic Police Academy is accepted for new hires by the Berkeley Police Department. Task Force member and former Oakland City Manager Dan Lindheim noted that the City of Oakland does not hire from the Alameda County Sheriff’s Academy. I was hoping for more detail in what training was provided in the two year probationary period, especially after reading Tangled Up in Blue: Policing the American City by Rosa Brooks. What we got was the presentation posted on the Task F website. https://www.cityofberkeley.info/RIPST.aspx 

I can’t think about Alameda County Sheriff Ahern without associating him with the photos I saw of the Oathkeepers booth with an Alameda County Sheriff’s Office canopy over it at the Urban Shield exercises [terrorist response training] https://www.facebook.com/StopUrbanShield/

I was part of the community that asked council to end Berkeley Police participation in Urban Shield. We lost 5 to 4 on July 24, 2018 with the mayor holding the deciding vote, along with councilmembers Maio, Hahn, Droste, and Wengraf, in favor of Urban Shield. Councilmembers Bartlett, Davila, Harrison, and Worthington voted in opposition. The Alameda County Supervisors ended Urban Shield in 2019, but the memory still lingers, especially after the Oathkeepers’ role in the January 6 insurrection. 

The point is, there was a divide on policing long before the killing of George Floyd, the formation of the Fair and Impartial Policing Task Force and now the Reimagining Public Safety Task Force. And trust is not likely to form when Deputy City Manager David White says, as he did at the Wednesday task force meeting, that the City Manager, a Deputy City Manager, the City Attorney, the Fire Chief, and the Health, Housing & Community Services (HHCS) Director have been meeting every week about the proposed Special Care Unit. 

When I was allowed to speak on Wednesday as a member of the public, I said I thought this kind of planning was supposed to come from the Task Force. Why then was there an administrative group meeting separately? White replied that these meetings were just coordination planning. 

But the Task Force meetings always feel orchestrated to a predetermined end. 

In closing, even before reading Dry Spring by Chris Wood I added the drought map https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/ to my Thursday task list. The book, the map and the news are all pretty grim when it comes to water. Dry Spring was published in 2008 and Chris Wood was far more optimistic about the future response to drought than what has actually happened. We still use clean drinkable water to flush our toilets. 

Bill Maher asked in his New Rules monologue if we are asking coal miners to stop mining coal, why are we not asking almond farmers to stop growing almonds? 81% of the world’s almonds are grown in California. To grow one almond requires 1.1 gallons of water and to grow a pound takes 1,900 gallons of water. a


Columns

ON MENTAL ILLNESS: Expectations of Mentally Ill Completely Different vs. Non-Disabled

Jack Bragen
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 02:48:00 PM

The mental health treatment system, composed of the people being treated for a psychiatric condition and those treating us, could be seen as a sub-society; it would be a small segment of society that can be distinguished from the mainstream of those who work at professional and/or union jobs, as well as the affluent, as well as undocumented workers. 

Within this sub-society of mentally ill people and their practitioners, the often-unspoken rules of behavior and the expectations are substantially different from the rules and expectations in other areas of life. 

Mentally ill people are taught helplessness. Psychotherapists have a great deal of verbal agility, and they use it to steer the thinking of the consumer toward beliefs of generalized impotence. Medication plays a role in this. Psych meds do a lot to make clients' minds malleable. Many mentally ill people do not have the same level of psychological defenses as the average person. The therapists know how to take advantage of gaps in our defenses, whether they are produced by being medicated, or whether they arise from other causes. 

When we are taught helplessness, we become easier to supervise, easier to keep corralled, and less a potential source of problems for the greater society. Most of us are not potentially a threat to people. Yet people do not want us showing up at Starbuck's during the morning busy hours and dancing shirtless. (This scenario is not intended to ostracize mentally ill people. I have heard of a man who got into trouble for doing just that, at a business.) 

If more mentally ill people believed in our potential empowerment, we might do something crazy such as registering a fictitious business name statement and starting a company. People in the mainstream don't want to deal with that. 

It is not so much that we normally can't handle the responsibilities. It is more like, if we went off medication while running a company, it could cause a lot of social and legal fallout. Those who would need to clean up the mess created would not enjoy doing that. People become concerned when a mentally ill person approaches a position of power. 

Mentally ill people are taught to be open about our feelings. This is not done in society at large. In the mainstream, we are expected to lie about our feelings, conceal them, or otherwise hide them. People are not normally expected to tell the truth about their feelings. Among other things, it leaves them more vulnerable to an attack from an unscrupulous person--and many people are unscrupulous. 

We are taught that someone will be there to take care of us when we cannot take care of ourselves. We are taught to have meagre expectations of our future. We are pacified with pizza and cupcakes. 

When mentally ill people within one's local group, die before their time, and this happens all too often, it seems as though we are expected to shrug it off or otherwise trivialize it. 

Counselors and other mental health professionals impart to us that we should have extremely limited expectations of our lives. This can end up becoming a core belief. We should strive to dispel the stinking thinking promulgated by treatment professionals. 

Most mentally ill people have most of the same abilities as most other people. When the treatment system tells us that we are limited, it is yet another barrier to having a fulfilling life. 

It takes a lot of effort to maintain an internal belief that mental health professionals are wrong about us, yet to still cooperate with most of the treatment--the treatment being a thing we are essentially forced to do. Circumstances force us to cooperate with treatment, and so does a mental illness. We must cooperate or get extremely sick. However, we don't have to buy the whole produce stand about us being incapable of doing anything.  


Blast off into orbit with "Revised Short Science Fiction Collection of Jack Bragen." If you have difficulty finding a copy, click here.


THE PUBLIC EYE: Biden's Infrastructure Strategy

Bob Burnett
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 03:39:00 PM

On March 31st, President Joe Biden introduced his infrastructure plan, "The American Jobs Plan" (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/ ) This is an omnibus $2 trillion plan to repair the major holes in America's infrastructure, and to create jobs. After three months of negotiation, it appears that Congress will pass at least a $1 trillion bipartisan plan. (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/24/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-support-for-the-bipartisan-infrastructure-framework/

The bipartisan infrastructure plan polls well. A recent Yahoo/YouGov poll (https://news.yahoo.com/poll-6-in-10-gop-voters-favor-new-12-trillion-infrastructure-plan-boosting-bidens-hopes-of-a-big-bipartisan-win-201833741.html) found that only 17 percent of respondents disapproved of this plan. "The survey of 1,592 U.S. adults, which was conducted from June 22 to 24, found that a full 60 percent of self-identified Republicans approve of the compromise infrastructure plan recently put forward by Republican and Democratic senators that would “rebuild roads, bridges and other traditional infrastructure and cost $1.2 trillion." 

What's in and What's out: The first cut of the Biden Infrastructure/Jobs plan had $2.15 billion in projects. The compromise plan has $1.2 billion in projects. 

1.Transportation Infrastructure: (Original plan $621 Billion; bipartisan plan approximately $500 Billion) In essence the compromise plan kept the traditional infrastructure projects and reduced three varieties of investments: construction of an electric-vehicle infrastructure, funds for climate-related disasters ("infrastructure resiliency"), and projects for "underserved neighborhoods" -- "a new program that will reconnect neighborhoods cut off by historic investments and ensure new projects increase opportunity, advance racial equity and environmental justice, and promote affordable access." 

2. "Quality of Life at Home": (Original plan $650 Billion; bipartisan plan approximately $400 billion) In essence this is the original Biden proposal less an allocation of $213B to "build, preserve, and retrofit more than 2 million affordable homes and commercial buildings." 

3. Caregivers for elderly and disabled. (Original plan $400 Billion; bipartisan plan $0) Biden's original plan would have expanded Medicaid to provide affordable, quality care for everyone who needs it. 

4. Research, Development, and Manufacturing: (Original plan $480 Billion; bipartisan plan approximately $100 billion.) 

The Biden Infrastructure/Jobs plan collected many of the elements of previous plans and linked them together. There were standard infrastructure improvements, such as roads, bridges, ports, and trains, and non-standard items such as home-improvement, removal of lead water pipes, and provision of a high-speed broadband network. The bipartisan plan retains most of the traditional infrastructure elements. 

Playing the bipartisanship card: President Biden lauded the bipartisan plan: "Democracy requires compromise. The historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework will make life better for millions of Americans, create a generation of good-paying union jobs and economic growth, and position the United States to win the 21st century, including on many of the key technologies needed to combat the climate crisis." 

Clearly, Biden relishes the idea of Congress passing a significant bipartisan piece of legislation. Writing in a June 28th editorial (https://news.yahoo.com/biden-americans-can-be-proud-of-the-infrastructure-deal-214533346.html) Biden observed: "The deal... is a signal to ourselves, and to the world, that American democracy can work and deliver for the people. Neither Democrats nor Republicans got everything they wanted in this agreement. But that’s what it means to compromise and reach consensus — the very heart of democracy. When we negotiate in good faith, and come together to get big things done, we begin to break the ice that too often has kept us frozen in place and prevented us from solving the real problems Americans face." 

Nonetheless, Biden hasn't given up on the other components of his original infrastructure proposal. In his editorial, Biden noted: "I will continue working with Congress to pass the remainder of my economic and clean energy agenda. We have an urgent need to invest in housing, clean energy deployment and the care economy. And we need to make equally critical investments in our human infrastructure: in childcare and paid leave, universal pre-K and free community college, and tax cuts for working families with children. They are inextricably intertwined with physical infrastructure." 

BB prediction: The bipartisan infrastructure plan will pass this summer. The remainder of Biden "Jobs Plan" will pass in the fourth quarter by means of reconciliation. 

Bob Burnett is a Bay Area writer and activist. He can be reached at bburnett@sonic.net 


ECLECTIC RANT: For the People Act: Senate Democrats Lose Procedural Vote

Ralph E. Stone
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 02:51:00 PM

In a Senate procedural vote on whether to start debate on Senator Joe Manchins compromise For the People Act, which would add a nationwide voter ID requirement or other alternative like providing a utility bill receipt to prove identity; make Election Day a public holiday; along with an outline of about 24 other proposals that incorporate some of the original bill, including tighter campaign finance and ethics rules. The For the People Act ended as expected in a 50-50 vote along party lines. Sixty votes had been required to overcome Republicansuse of the filibuster.  

The most viable option for passing the Act is to remove the filibuster rule by invoking the so-called nuclear option which would then require only a simple majority vote in the Senate to pass legislation. However, the filibuster need not be eliminated entirely but could instead be lowered from 60 to a lower number or changed. For example, in 2013 Democrats removed the 60-vote threshold and moved to majority votes for most federal court nominees, except to the Supreme Court. In 2017, Republicans used the nuclear option for Supreme Court nominees as well.  

Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), however, are opposed to ending the filibuster to enact federal voting rights legislation. It is unclear whether they would vote to even change the filibuster rule. Meanwhile, 14 states have enacted 22 laws to make it harder to vote and other Republican-controlled states are considering similar legislation.  

On June 25, 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state of Georgia over their recently-passed restrictive voting law. Hopefully this is just one of many such lawsuits. 

Senate Republicansrefusal to even debate the Act and their previous refusal to vote for an independent commission on the January 6 Capitol riot should be enough evidence for Senate Democrats that bipartisanship is not possible with their Republican colleagues. Why, because Democrats try to govern through policy, while Republicans focus their energy on ideological interests and growing and preserving their political power.  

In a bit of satire, Andy Borowitz put it nicely: "Blasting the For the People Act, Senator Mitch McConnell claimed that the bills passage would bring the United States to the brink of democracy. The Democrats can dress this bill up any way they want, but their real agenda couldnt be clearer, the Senate Minority Leader said. They want to turn the United States of America that we love and cherish into a democracy. Noting that the word 'democracy' originated in ancient Greece, he vowed, I will not sit idly by and watch a foreign form of government sneak across our border. McConnell rallied his fellow Republican senators by reminding them that were the only thing standing between this country and democracy. The people who voted for us did not vote for us so that other people could vote for other people,” he said.” Sometimes, as here, using exaggeration and hyperbole to get to a truth that the real news often cannot. 

Unless the For the People Act is passed, these state voter suppression laws could cost the Democrats majorities in both the House and Senate in the midterm elections. If the Democrats lose a majority in either body, nothing will pass in Congress the last two years of Joe Bidens presidency, opening the door for the unthinkable — the return of Donald Trump to the White House.


SMITHEREENS: Reflections on Bits & Pieces

Gar Smith
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 02:55:00 PM

High-Caliber Christians

I just saw a fellow on the news proclaiming his undying fealty to Donald Trump. He was wearing a blood-red cap that read: "God Guns Trump."

Apparently the Fifth Commandment ("Thou Shalt Not Kill") is trumped by the Second Amendment ("Thou Shalt Bear Arms").

Meanwhile, Trump's First Commandment continues to be: "I am the Lord, thy God! Thou shalt have no other Gods but me!"

Nicknames for T****

In November 2020, Late Show host and recent Peabody Award-winner Stephen Colbert took an oath to no longer allow Donald Trump's name to be heard or seen on his late-night broadcast. But that presented a challenge: How do you refer to DJT without uttering his name? Answer: create some utterly ridiculous nicknames.

Here are a few that Colbert, his writers, and his audience have come up with: The Former Guy. Eric's Dad. Douche Nozzle. Orange Shrek. Mango Unchained. Traffic Cone of Treason. Girth Vader. Previous Occupant of the Oval Office (POOO). And Penis Pumpkinhead. 

Penis Perils Grab the Spotlight 

Speaking of penises: On his July 1 Late Show, Stephen Colbert interrupted his opening monologue with a "Breaking Meanwhile" report on the status of an unidentified man who had suffered a "vertical fracture of his penis" during a rowdy bout of sex. 

"Horizontal fractures" are known to occur, according to medical professionals who report that they are usually accompanied by a loud "popping sound." But this unprecedented "vertical fracture" was described as a "medical first." 

Colbert assured the audience that the victim has fully recovered but noted "it was a bit awkward when he asked his friends to sign the cast." 

In the course of this coarse discourse, Colbert accomplished a rare "media first": he managed to utter the word "penis" nine times within a single minute of public airtime. That could qualify him for a second broadcasting prize: the Peebody Award. 

Doxxed by President Iván Duque 

Back in mid-June, I emailed embattled Colombian President Iván Duque Márquez to express concern over the government's violent attacks on young street protestors. I had written such letters in the past and typically received polite letters in return. This time, however, I received a message with the following subject line: Re: OFI21-00086955 / IDM: Respuesta sobre apreciaciones relacionadas con el Derecho a la Reunión y a la Manifestación Pública y Pacífica en Colombia. But it didn't end there. Within hours, I found my email box inundated with multiple copies of the same letter. No other emails could get through as Duque's decoy deluge continued to fire off the same message every 4 to 7 minutes. 

The message (addressed to: "Señor(a) GAR SMITH") contained codes and passwords linking to other documents from El Presidente and ended with an invitation to fill out a "survey." I couldn't unlock the codes and the passwords didn't work. That may have been a good thing. I checked with a family member who spent several years living in Colombia who told me he had also been targeted by Duque's e-mailstorm. 

"Duque has a petty and deplorable way of responding to criticism—and discouraging future complaints. The public release of individual letters—along with names and other contact information—should be illegal. It's especially troublesome given the government's history of targeting critics. 

"I’ve gotten over 200 [copies of the same email]. They’re just spamming us intentionally. The 'documents' are just copies of all the letters that people sent in with their names, phone numbers and addresses available for all to see. Doxxing on a governmental level. I had to block them." 

Castigated by Kos 

In a June 27 interview in The Atlantic, former US Attorney General William Barr attempted to distance himself from the lies and crimes of the former US President. And, once again, the Oakland-based Daily Kos showed its talent for spicy, insult-peppered journalism (aka "scornalism") in an article titled: "William Barr dishes on McConnell's cowardice, Trump as 'madman' in self-serving version of events." 

If scornalism has become a "thing," at least the Daily Kos does it better than almost anyone. Here's a single sentence from an article on Barr's mea non culpa, authored by a commentator who opines under the pen-name "Hunter": 

"So again we have a situation in which everyone around Trump was pretty damn certain he had gone off the rails, jumped the trolley, sprung a brain-leak, and had become devoid of marbles but nobody in government, from Secret Service on down, was willing to toss him in a burlap sack, tie it shut, and declare that Mike Pence was taking charge because the sitting president had developed a serious case of bananapants." 

Kos Facing Costs 

The Kos crew, like the rest of the non-commercial media, is stressed by the "astronomical growth of Big Tech like Google, Amazon, and Facebook that have dominated digital advertising, the migration of people getting their news from social media and the buying and selling of news media companies to the highest bidder followed by downsizing for maximum profit." 

The Daily Kos prides itself on its role as "the country's first and only participatory, grassroots-funded, news and activism hub" and provides this short-list of everyday accomplishments: 

"We never promote a false balance; we actively take sides and give you ways to take action on the news you are reading. So far in 2021, Daily Kos readers and activists have taken over 18 million actions—signing petitions, making donations to progressive causes and Democratic candidates, attending rallies, volunteering to turn out voters in special elections, making phone calls and sending letters to elected officials." 

Karmic Strips  

The June 27 edition of Stephan Pastis' Chronicle comic strip, Pearls Before Swine, presents Pastis' cartoon alter ego sharing memories of his happy days as a UC Berkeley student with a recent Berkeley grad name Julia. 

"I loved my last year at Cal," Pastis recounts. "The campus activities… Drinking at 'Henry's'… The football games with Aaron Rodgers… Basketball games with Jason Kidd… going to 'Top Dog' for late night hot dogs… and just getting to know all the other students, like at the Daily Cal meetings and the protests where we occupied Sproul Hall. And, of course, graduation at Zellerbach Hall. My whole family was there." 

And then Pastis asked Julia: "How about you? How'd you enjoy the experience?" 

Julia, looking bleak and on the verge of tears, replies: "I sat in my bedroom and stared at a computer screen." 

Karmic Strips 2 

Ray Billingsley's strip Curtis features a number of running gags: Curtis tormenting his little brother Barry; Curtis getting stiffed by his couldn't-care-less, would-be-girl-friend Michelle; and Curtis making fun of the Church ladies' flamboyant hats during Sunday services. Another running joke involves Curtis' visits to "Soul Scissors," a local barbershop whose owner—a bald barber named Gunther—makes a habit of greeting Curtis by the wrong name (in the June 27 strip, it was "Carmine" and "Quavon"). Another running gag is the "service notes" pinned to the walls of Gunther's salon. 

Last week's collection included the following: "Seniors Free—100 and Up," "Whiny Children Triple the Price," "Hair Curled, Glued-on, Stapled," "Hair Tattoos for Insecure Baldies," and "No Manscaping Below the Neck." 

Karmic Strips 3 

Darren Bell's June 27 Candorville strip contained what may be a cartoon first. In the last panel of the Sunday strip, two characters are speaking at the same time and the "word balloons" that hover over their heads appear to intersect—overlapping like a Venn diagram. They are literally "speaking over each other." 

China Gets It's Mojo On  

China's been taking a lot of heat lately, with some progressive Democrats complaining that the militant swipes at Beijing inserted in the White House's Infrastructure Plan amount to Sinophobia and China-bashing. 

America's Corporate-Political Complex (which some would argue constitutes the country's real "Deep State") seems ready to go to war—not because China is sending naval vessels to patrol the Gulf of Mexico but simply because China has become a major competitor in the contest over control of global resources and markets. 

In 2020, nearly three-fourths of the worlds leading commercial entities were based in the US. Some 56 major brands constitute 74% of leading global commerce, representing earnings of $7.1 trillion. Why, then, is Wall Street/Washington so POed at the Chinese? Because China now accounts for 14% of world commerce (nearly twice that of Europe's, which controls over 8% of the planetary marketplace). US capitalists are smarting at the earnings of Chinese companies like tech giant Pinduoduo ($9.5 billion), Tiktok ($16.9 billion), and the liquor giant Moutai ($53.8 billion), which has doubled in value over the past year. 

Meanwhile, China is endearing itself with the world's environmental activists. According to the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization, over the past two decades (1990-2020) China has expanded its global "leaf area" by 25%, a government-backed "greening" that has transformed deserts and farmland into grasslands and forests. 

Since 1950s, 93.24% of Maowusu, one of China's largest deserts, has been covered with carbon-absorbing vegetation. According to Asia Times, China has ordered more than 60,000 soldiers in the Peoples Liberation Army to plant trees instead of flags, making China a world leader in restoring and creating new forests to mitigate climate change. (Imagine US Marines called back from overseas bases to fight wildfires and replant scored forests here at home!) 

China really knows how to kick Washington's rear. Mere days after the US landed a rover on Mars, China parked its own rover on the same planet. Here's the view from China's rover. (Look for the strange apparitions in the Martian sky beginning at 1:18 minutes.): 

 

And here's the view from NASA's Perserverance rover: 

 

On the competition front: After the US refused to include Chinese taikonauts to join the astronauts aboard the International Space Station (ISS), China responded by building its own exclusive space station—Tiangong ("Heavenly Palace)—and announcing it would be opening its doors to space explorers from "developing countries." In another stride for inclusivity, China announced that all three of its taikonauts have come from "peasant backgrounds." And, in a final dig at DC, China notes that it's Heavenly Palace will likely be the only space station remaining in earth orbit after the ISS is retired in 2018. 

"We Plotted. We Lied": Exxon-Mobil Pranked by Greenpeace 

Greenpeace UK pulled off an incredible media stunt that captured top executives of Exxon-Mobil admitting—on video!—that they intentionally misled the public, conspired to finance bogus science, and supported "shadow organizations" that tried to debunk evidence of climate change. 

British Greenpeacers working with an "investigative unit" called Unearthed, masqueraded as corporate "head-hunters" during their filmed interviews. In one online chat, top Exxon lobbyist Keith McCoy confided that Big Oil was only pretending to support a "carbon tax" because the oil barons believe "It is a non-starter. Nobody is going to propose a [carbon] tax." In the meantime, McCoy grinned, it gives Exxon a useful "talking point" to quiet critics. 

McCoy (who appears to be based in San Francisco) added a bonus. He openly named the 11 key US senators that Big Oil quietly relies on to work its will in Washington. The list of McCoy's decoys starts with West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin. In the interview, McCoy calls Manchin a "kingmaker" because he chairs the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Other senators on board with Big Oil include: John Barrasso (R-WY), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), John Tester (D-MT), Chris Coons (D-DE), John Cornyn (R-TX), Steve Daines (R-MT), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Maggie Hassan (D-NH) and Mark Kelley (D-AZ). 

Here is a BBC Channel 4 news video featuring Greenpeace's reporting coup: 

 

Ex-NRA Head Spoofed Over Pro-Gun Speech at Faked Graduation  

Last month, David Keene, a former president of the National Rifle Association, eagerly flew to Las Vegas to deliver a commencement speech to the students at the James Madison Academy. But instead of a crowd of young students, Keene found himself facing a huge field filled with 3,044 empty chairs—each one representing a young American killed by gun violence. 

It turned out that the event was an elaborate hoax conceived by Manuel and Patricia Oliver, the parents of a student gunned down in the 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High. Keene believed he was giving a "rehearsal speech" for graduating students at the nonexistent Las Vegas academy. 

“There are some who will continue to fight to gut the Second Amendment," Keene told absolutely no one. "But I’d be willing to bet that many of you will be among those who stand up and prevent them from succeeding.” 

No one applauded. 

 

"He's Indicted and It Feels So Good" 

Founders Sing 

 


Arts & Events

The Berkeley Activist's Calendar

Kelly Hammargren
Sunday July 04, 2021 - 02:59:00 PM

Worth Noting:

No City meetings until Wednesday. The Police Accountability Board is noticed as meeting on Wednesday at 7 pm, but no agenda is posted. Thursday Bayer Healthcare will present a Community Benefits Proposal at the 7 pm ZAB meeting. Friday is the return of movies in the park at 8:45 pm. Saturday is the first Independent Redistricting Commission public hearing at 10 am. And, the July 13 City Council regular meeting agenda is available for comment.



Sunday, July 4, 2021 - Holiday

Grizzly Peak is closed all day on July 4 and until 6 am July 5, Proof of residency will be required between Centennial Drive and Skyline Blvd. Lawrence Hall of Science and Botanical Gardens will be closed. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/CABERKE/bulletins/2e5eb94 

 

Monday, July 5, 2021 – Berkeley City Holiday – City Offices Closed 

 

Tuesday, July 6, 2021 – no city meetings or events found 

 

Wednesday, July 7, 2021 

Facilities, Infrastructure, Transportation, Environment & Sustainability Committee (FITES) at 2:30 pm 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89176068316 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 or 1-877-853-5257 (toll free) Meeting ID: 891 7606 8316 

AGENDA: 2. Harrison and Hahn - Adopt Ordinance to Regulate Plastic Bags at Retail and Food Service Establishments. 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Clerk/Home/Policy_Committee__Facilities,_Infrastructure,_Transportation,_Environment,___Sustainability.aspx 

 

Board of Library Trustees at 6:30 pm 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86042306505 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 Meeting ID: 860 4230 6505 

AGENDA: II.Consent: E. Amend Contract total $90,000 extend to 9/30/2024 with Sentry Alarm systems for all 5 libraries, III.A. Action: Recommendation to City Council on appointment to serve 4 yr term. 

https://www.berkeleypubliclibrary.org/about/board-library-trustees 

 

Homeless Services Panel of Experts at 7 pm 

Videoconference: https://zoom.us/j/92491365323 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 924 9136 5323 

AGENDA: 5. Chair Update Measure P recommendations and commission consolidation, 6. Discussion site visit to Horizon Transitional Village, 7. Discussion future plans, annual report, site visits, funding recommendations, 8. Staff Presentation on all Berkeley homeless outreach teams. 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Clerk/Commissions/Commissions__Homeless_Services_Panel_of_Experts.aspx 

 

Police Accountability Board at 7 pm 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81172623383 

Teleconference: 1-669-9006833 Meeting ID: 811 7262 3383 

AGENDA: No posted agenda 

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/CABERKE/bulletins/2e6a482 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/CalendarEventMain.aspx?calendarEventID=17442 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Clerk/Commissions/Police_Accountability_Board.aspx 

 

Demonstration – Support For the People Act at 6 – 7 pm  

https://deadlinefordemocracy.org/ 

Oscar Grant / Frank H Ogawa Plaza 

Register at https://secure.everyaction.com/yXLjVmke5Ue3DTWYsr8zBQ2 

 

Planning Commission cancelled – rescheduled to meet on July 14, 2021 

 

Thursday, July 8, 2021 

Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board Budget and Personnel Committee at 5 pm 

Videoconference: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/98859118276?pwd=T3JhSWcySStKaXBQMXV2MStLejlDQT09 

Teleconference: 1-408-638-0968 Meeting ID: 988 5911 8276 Passcode: 974146 

AGENDA: 5. Revenue Collections Update, 6. Recommendation to full Board to establish a COVID-19 related waiver process for late payment FY21-22 Registration fee, 7. Recommendation to full Board to acquire Employment Practices Liability Insurance 

http://www.cityofberkeley.info/rent/ 

 

Zoning Adjustment Board (ZAB) at 7 pm 

Videoconference: https://zoom.us/j/96282456552 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 962 8245 6552 

AGENDA: 2. 1630 Carleton – on consent – demolish existing single family dwelling and construct new 1487 sq ft 2-story singlefamily dwelling with average height 20 ft 1in and new 633 sq ft accessory building on 5302 sq ft lot, 

3. 800 Dwight – Bayer Healthcare LLC regarding proposed Community Benefits Package for Bayer Healthcare Development Agreement (DA), a. extend agreement by 30 years to February 2052, b. Include South Properties (2700 Seventh Street) c. Accommodate development manufacturing facilities allowing buildout of 1,178,000 sq ft (148,000 sq ft less than currently entitled). 

http://www.cityofberkeley.info/zoningadjustmentsboard/ 

 

Friday, July 9, 2021 

Outdoor Movie at Codornices Park: Trolls at 8:45 – 10:30 pm 

Movie shown on 20’ x 12’ inflatable screen, please arrive 30 minutes before start of film, bring blankets, sleeping bags or low-back beach chairs max 9” off ground, this is an alcohol free event. 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/CalendarEventMain.aspx?calendarEventID=17435 

 

Saturday, July 10, 2021 

Independent Redistricting Commission at 10 am 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82055634140 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 or 1-877-853-5257 (toll free) Meeting ID: 820 5563 4140 

AGENDA: Public Hearing #1 1.a. Introduction of Commissioners, b. Presentation: Overview of Berkeley City Council Redistricting, c. Public Participation and Community Interest Forums. 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/redistricting/ 

 

Sunday, July 11, 2021 - No City meetings or events found 

____________________ 

 

Regular Council Meeting, July 13, 2021, at 6 pm, email comments to council@cityofberkeley.info 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Clerk/City_Council/City_Council__Agenda_Index.aspx 

Videoconference: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82181611485 

Teleconference: 1-669-900-9128 or 1-877-853-5257 (toll free) Meeting ID: 821 8161 1485 

CONSENT: 1. 2nd reading FY2022 Tax rate Measure E for emergency services for severely disabled $0.01796 per sq ft improvements, 2. 2nd reading FY2022 Annual appropriations $673,601,287 gross ($552,265,708 net), 3. Formal Bid Solicitations $663,976, 4. Contract $1,200,000 (includes 7.3% contingency $82,000) with ERA Construction, Inc. for the O&K Docks Electrical Upgrade Project at the Berkeley Marina, 5. Amend Contract add $50,000 total $2,144,056 with Suarez and Munoz Construction for San Pablo Park Playground and Tennis Court Renovation Project, 6. Authorize City Manager (CM) to accept Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) grants of $75,000 (competitive), $83,506 (non-competitive) and Priority Development Area (PDA) Grant $750,000 for San Pablo Ave, 7. Accept Grant $135,462 from CA Highway Patrol (CHP) Cannabis Tax Fund to reduce impaired driving detection/investigation training for officers, community education in Berkeley, 8. Resolution approving adjusted fees for 2018 Clean Stormwater Fee, 9. Contract $702,384 (includes $117,064 contingency) for Central Library Waterproofing & Restoration Project, 10. Amend Contract add $150,000 total $200,000 and extend by 2 yr to 11/30/2023 with New Image Landscape Co. for on-call landscaping services, 11. Resolution supporting ending Qualified Immunity Act, ACTION: 12. . Arreguin co-sponsors Hahn, Wengraf – Endorse All Home CA Regional Action Plan on Homelessness, 13. CM – Zoning Map Amendment of Parcels at 1709 Alcatraz, 3404 King 3244 Ellis, 1717 Alcatraz and 2024 Ashby rezone to Commercial – Adeline Corridor District (C-AC) and revise boundaries of the Adeline Corridor Specific Plan Area to include the 5 parcels, 14. CM – Conduct a public hearing and adopt the first reading of local Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance, 15. Harrison, co-sponsors Bartlett, Taplin – Adopt Resolution Updating City of Berkeley (CoB) Street Maintenance and Rehabilitation Policy and Refer to Facilities, Infrastructure, Transportation, Environment and Sustainability (FITES) potential bonding and funding opportunities for improving the Paving Condition Index (PCI), 16. CM – Housing Element Annual Progress Report, 17. Taplin – Amend BMC Section 14.56.070 for 3-Ton Commercial Truck Weight Limit between University and Dwight on Tenth Street, Ninth Street, Eighth Street and Seventh Street, 18. Police Accountability Board – Appointment of Members, INFORMATION REPORTS: Work Plans, 19. Animal Care Commission 2021/2022, 20. Commission on Disability, 21. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Product Panel of Experts. 

_______________________ 

 

Public Hearings Scheduled – Land Use Appeals 

2943 Pine (construct a 2nd story) 9/28/2021 

1205 Peralta (conversion of garage) 10/12/2021 

770 Page (demolish existing unit and construct 4 detached) 7/27/2021 

1634 & 1640 San Pablo (Acme Bread Co) 6/29/2021 

Notice of Decision (NOD) and Use Permits with End of Appeal Period 

1131 Hillview 7/13/2021 

1201 Hopkins 7/6/2021 

2526 MLK Jr Way 7/6/2021 

2326 Roosevelt 7/13/2021 

1527 Sacramento 7/6/2021 

1634 San Pablo 6/29/2021 

3015 San Pablo 7/13/2021 

2768 Shasta 7/13/2021 

2000 University 7/13/2021 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Planning_and_Development/Land_Use_Division/Current_Zoning_Applications_in_Appeal_Period.aspx 

 

LINK to Current Zoning Applications https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Planning_and_Development/Land_Use_Division/Current_Zoning_Applications.aspx 

___________________ 

WORKSESSIONS 

July 20 – 1. Bayer Development Agreement (tentative), 2. Measure FF/Fire Prevention 

September 21 – 1. Housing Element (RHNA) 

October 19 – 1. Update Zero Waste Rates and Priorities, 2. Berkeley Police Department Hiring Practices (referred by Public Safety Committee), 3. Crime Report 

December 7 – 1. Review and Update on City’s COVID-19 Response, 2. WETA/Ferry Service at the Marina, 3. Presentation by Bay Restoration Authority 

 

Unscheduled Workshops/Presentations 

Cannabis Health Considerations 

Civic Arts Grantmaking Process & Capital Grant Program 

 

If you have a meeting you would like included in the summary of meetings, please send a notice to kellyhammargren@gmail.com by noon on the Friday of the preceding week. 

 

This meeting list is also posted on the Sustainable Berkeley Coalition website. 

http://www.sustainableberkeleycoalition.com/whats-ahead.html and in the Berkeley Daily Planet under activist’s calendar http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com 

 

If you or someone you know wishes to receive the weekly summary as soon as it is completed, email kellyhammargren@gmail.com to be added to the early email list. 

 

If you wish to stop receiving the Weekly Summary of City Meetings please 

forward the weekly summary you received to kellyhammargren@gmail.com