Full Text

Two undercover police officers, one, white, pointing his gun at the crowd, the other, black, holding down an African-American demonstrator.
ERIN BALDASSARI
Two undercover police officers, one, white, pointing his gun at the crowd, the other, black, holding down an African-American demonstrator.
 

News

New: Three charged with Grizzly Peak Kidnapping

Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Wednesday December 17, 2014 - 10:05:00 PM

Three teenage suspects have been charged as adults for the armed robbery, carjacking and kidnapping of a couple sitting in a car at an overlook in the Berkeley hills early on Thanksgiving morning, University of California at Berkeley police said today. 

Police said the victims, a 26-year-old woman and a 23-year-old male, were parked at a dirt turn-out on Grizzly Peak Boulevard around 2 a.m. on Nov. 27, sitting in their vehicle looking out toward the Bay, when three suspects approached them. 

The suspects, two of whom were armed with guns and one with a baseball bat, demanded money, campus police said. 

The victims didn't have any money, so one suspect got into their vehicle and ordered them to drive to an ATM while the other suspects drove behind them in a second vehicle, according to police. 

The victims took money out at an ATM and gave it to the suspects, who then left the area. 

The victims, who are not affiliated with UC Berkeley, were not injured. 

UC Berkeley police Lt. Eric Tejada said the suspects have also been charged for a similar crime with another victim in the same area shortly before the incident at 2 a.m. on Nov. 27. 

Police released the names of two of the suspects: Jose Avila and Brenton Holtzclaw, both 18-year-old men from Concord. 

Police said the third suspect is a 17-year-old male from Concord but didn't release his name because he's still a juvenile. However, the youth is also being prosecuted as an adult. 

Avila and Holtzclaw are being held at the Berkeley City Jail in lieu of $635,000 bail each. All three suspects are scheduled to be arraigned in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland on Thursday afternoon. 

Tejada said two of the suspects initially were arrested by Oakland police for similar crimes in their city but he's not sure if they've been charged for those cases at this time. 

A spokeswoman for the Alameda County District Attorney's Office wasn't immediately available for comment. 

Tejada said police are still investigating the possibility that the three suspects committed similar crimes in the Berkeley and Oakland hills. Tejada said UC Berkeley police had help from the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office and police in Oakland, Concord and Pleasant Hill in solving the case and arresting the suspects.


New: Hackers get personal data for 1600 from UC Berkeley's Real Estate Divison

Sara Gaiser (BCN)
Tuesday December 16, 2014 - 09:14:00 PM

University of California at Berkeley officials notified 1,600 people this week that their personal data might have been hacked. 

The information, accessed on the campus' Real Estate Division, includes around 1,300 Social Security numbers and around 300 credit card numbers belonging to current and former campus employees and some individuals who have done business with the division, according to university officials. 

The data covers a period between the early 1990s and May 2014. 

There is no evidence the data has actually been downloaded and used, but the university is notifying potential victims in compliance with state law. The university is offering free credit monitoring to everyone affected, according to a statement from Paul Rivers, the university's interim chief information security officer. 

"We understand that it's disturbing to learn that your Social Security number or credit card number may have been exposed to hackers, and we truly regret that this has occurred," the statement said.  

The university learned of the breach in September and conducted a review determining what personally identifiable information was affected. That review concluded Nov. 17 and the process of notifying affected individuals began Friday.  

The Real Estate Division has taken steps since the breach was discovered to improve security, officials said.


New: Mayor Bates expects large crowds at tonight's Berkeley City Council meeting

Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Tuesday December 16, 2014 - 03:38:00 PM

Large crowds are expected to attend two Berkeley City Council meetings tonight to speak out about recent anti-police protests and the city's response to them.

The meetings are scheduled for 5:30 p.m. and 7 p.m. at the Longfellow Middle School Auditorium at 1500 Derby St. in Berkeley.

The 5:30 p.m. session is a special meeting and the 7 p.m. session is a regular meeting.

Public comments on non-agenda items, such as the protests and the police response to them, will be allowed at both meetings. 

There have been a series of protests in Berkeley and other cities across the country, notably Oakland, over grand jury decisions in Missouri and New York not to charge police officers in the deaths of two unarmed black men. 

Protesters had planned to pack the Berkeley City Council meeting last Tuesday night but the council postponed the meeting, alleging that protesters were planning to disrupt the meeting. 

In addition, Mayor Tom Bates said the council wanted to move the meeting to a bigger facility because the council chambers at 2134 Martin Luther King Jr. Way can only hold about 125 people and there were estimates that as many as 1,500 people planned to attend the meeting. 

In announcing that last week's meeting was being postponed, Bates said, "In the wake of the protests, some citizens have voiced strong support and sympathy for police, while others have criticized police for using tear gas and allegedly excessive force." 

Bates said, "As for allegations of excessive force, I believe we have one of the best police departments in the nation, but I recognize that under great stress abuses can occur in even the best departments. I support a full review of our response to investigate any improper use of force and also to learn lessons we can apply in the future."


New: Clergy, students lead Berkeley march against police violence

Erin Baldassari (BCN)
Sunday December 14, 2014 - 08:29:00 AM

A coalition of clergy leaders staged a die-in and marched with university students through Berkeley today to respond to the deaths of unarmed black men at the hands of white police officers. 

The march, organized by the Way Christian Center in collaboration with more than a dozen other clergy organizations and houses of worship, corresponded with "Solidarity Sunday," a national call to action by clergy members to remember the lives of black residents who died from police violence, said Church Without Walls member Wendy Hu-Au.  

The Way Christian Center Pastor Michael McBride said the atmosphere today was sometimes festive and sometimes somber as several hundred people walked through the streets and listened to black students at the University of California at Berkeley.  

"We marched using the voices of Cal students," McBride said. "We used some of the chants from Ferguson and sang civil rights and church hymns."  

The demonstration started with an orientation for the community leaders at the Way Christian Center at 12:30 p.m., when participants were briefed on how to engage in non-violent civil disobedience. 

Church Without Walls administrator Kim Winkleman said McBride briefed the group on what to do if confronted by police and told them not to resist officers if arrested. 

McBride decried actions by anarchists and others who have infiltrated demonstrations against police brutality in the Bay Area and have smashed windows, lit fires, and vandalized businesses in the name of black lives. 

"If they're not willing to follow black leadership then they should find another cause," McBride said. "We will get our liberation and freedom by our own means and decisions and we ask them to respect that." 

The group met up with a march that was already planned at the First Congregational Church in Berkeley and then walked back towards the Way Christian Center on University Avenue at West Street. 

McBride said the group held a moment of silence for four and a half minutes to commemorate the four and a half hours that Michael Brown was laying in the street after being shot by Ferguson, Missouri, police Officer Darren Wilson. 

Then, the crowd staged a "die-in" for 11 minutes to represent the 11 times Eric Garner said "I can't breathe" as a New York police officer used a chokehold to restrain, and ultimately, kill him. 

The deaths of Brown and Garner, as well as two grand juries' decisions to not indict the officers who killed them, have been used as a rallying cry across the country for demonstrations against police brutality in recent weeks.  

McBride said it was important for clergy leaders to stand in solidarity with the young people who have been protesting in Ferguson, at Berkeley, and throughout the nation.  

"We all owe these young people a deep gratitude. They have 425 days plus of organized non-violence and peaceful resistance to the armored tanks and a militaristic police response," McBride said. 

McBride said he wanted to make sure young people felt supported by the institutions in their community and to also use the clergy leaders' collective voices to amplify their message. 

Rabbi Menachem Creditor of the Congregation Netivot Shalom in Berkeley said the demonstration coincides with the mission of many synagogues, churches or mosques. 

"People of faith have a lot to say about human dignity," Creditor said. "Both as an American citizen and a Jew, the image of God is one I'm compelled to protect." 

Winkleman said there was a tradition and history of clergy leading the civil rights movement. 

"Our black brothers and sisters, their lives are being treated as less than others and it breaks the heart of God and breaks our heart as well," Winkleman said.  

Creditor said the demonstration was very much led by black voices and UC Berkeley students in particular. 

"It felt really beautiful because on one hand, it fit into the pattern of demonstrations throughout the Bay Area but the voices leading it were black voices," Creditor said. "Those who were not were there to be supportive and to be allies but not to be out front." 

The action was specifically targeted at changing the culture of law enforcement in Berkeley, the state and the country and McBride said the demonstrators issued several specific demands.  

They want Berkeley and Alameda County to immediately put cameras on all police officers working in the community or schools, McBride said. 

They also want the government at local and federal levels to publish the number of officer-involved shootings in cases of excessive force. McBride said the group is asking that the list be made public as a form of accountability. 

The group wants to end the militarization of police agencies and do not want officers in Berkeley to ever use teargas as a means of dispersing crowds engaged in exercising their First Amendment rights, McBride said.  

The group wants the federal government to withhold grants to police departments that have a history of racial profiling or officer-involved shootings as another form of accountability. 

Lastly, McBride said they want to do away with grand juries or to appoint special prosecutors in all instances of officer-involved shootings.  

"We need law enforcement to deliver policing and public services that are not biased or fueled by irrational fear or irrational hatred of black men in our communities," McBride said. "We don't presume to say that every police officer has an irrational fear or irrational anger but there are a number of officers who are involved in a structure that does not reel them in."


New: Anonymous group of artists claims responsibilty for effigies on UC Berkeley campus

Erin Baldassari (BCN)
Sunday December 14, 2014 - 10:48:00 PM

A group of anonymous artists claimed responsibility for effigies of two black men and a woman hanging from nooses on the University of California at Berkeley campus on Saturday. 

Dr. Pablo Gonzalez, a visiting research fellow at UC Berkeley, posted a statement by the artists on Twitter today that he said had been placed on a campus bulletin board. 

The statement identified a "Bay Area collective of queer black and PoC artists" as responsible for the images of historic lynchings, which they said were displayed in both Berkeley and Oakland. "PoC" is commonly used to refer to "people (or person) of color." 

"These images connect past events to present ones -- referencing endemic faultlines of hatred and persecution that are and should be deeply unsettling to the American consciousness," the statement reads.  

UC Berkeley police initially responded to a report at 9:10 a.m. on Saturday of two effigies hanging from Sather Gate and quickly removed them.  

The department received a report of a third effigy on the campanile, the large tower on UC Berkeley's campus, but it was already gone by the time police arrived, said UC Berkeley police spokeswoman Claire Holmes. 

Each effigy had the words "can't breathe" written over life-sized photographs of black Americans hanging from nooses. Demonstrations against police brutality in the Bay Area and across the nation have used the last words of Eric Garner, "I can't breathe," as a rallying cry in recent weeks. 

Garner was killed in Staten Island in July when a police officer used a chokehold to restrain him. A New York grand jury declined in December to indict the officer involved in Garner's death. 

The anonymous group of artists said they "respectfully disagree" with people who think the images are no longer relevant to the reality of life for black Americans today. 

"Garner, Brown, and others are victims of systemic racism," the statement said, referencing Michael Brown, an unarmed black man killed by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, earlier this year.  

UC Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas Dirks and Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Claude Steele issued a statement today describing the effigies as "deeply disturbing" and urged those responsible to come forward and explain their intent. 

"The African American community has historically faced the terrorism of lynchings used in an attempt to suppress and control," the statement said. "While we do not know the intent of the effigies, the impact that it has had on our campus community is undeniable." 

The artists apologized to black Americans who may have felt attacked by the work and said they shared their pain and their history. They also urged viewers to research the lives and deaths of the individuals portrayed in the effigies. 

"For those under the mistaken assumption that the images themselves were intended as an act of racism -- we vehemently disagree and intended only the confrontation of historical context," the statement read.  

The statement said Laura Nelson, George Meadows, Michael Donald, Charlie Hale, Garfield Burley and Curtis Brown were each represented in the work. The artists declined to identify themselves because they said, "this is not about us as artists, but about the growing movement to address these pervasive wrongs."


New: Protesters go from Berkeley to Oakland for Millions March

Bay City News
Saturday December 13, 2014 - 04:21:00 PM

Hundreds of protesters have made their way from Berkeley to a "Millions March" in Oakland this afternoon in which the group says they are calling attention to violence against communities of color. 

Oakland police said there were about 300 people who planned to take BART from Berkeley to the Rockridge BART station in Oakland as of around 1:45 p.m. 

As of about 2:15 p.m., 300 protesters were at 14th Street and Broadway in Oakland, police said. 

A "Million March" was scheduled at 2 p.m. at Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, according to a Facebook event page. 

In Berkeley around 1:50 p.m., there was a large demonstration traveling south on Ashby Avenue to Berkeley's College Avenue corridor and people have been advised to avoid the area, Berkeley police said. 

There was a "Ferguson2Cal" rally scheduled at noon today in Berkeley at Bancroft Way and Telegraph Avenue near the University of California at Berkeley campus, according to community organizers.  

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit lines 49 and 51A have been rerouted due to the Berkeley protests, transit officials said.


Police investigating three hanged effigies on UC Berkeley Campus

Erin Baldassari (BCN)
Saturday December 13, 2014 - 09:26:00 PM

Police are investigating three cutout effigies of two black men and a woman hanging from nooses this morning on the University of California at Berkeley campus, police said. 

UC Berkeley police spokeswoman Claire Holmes said UC police got a call around 9:10 a.m. about two effigies hanging from Sather Gate and quickly removed them.  

The department also received a report of a third effigy on the campanile, the large tower on UC Berkeley's campus, but it was already gone by the time police arrived, Holmes said. 

Holmes said the intent of the effigies is not clear. At least two effigies had the words, "I can't breathe," according to Holmes and photos shared through Twitter. 

"Clearly those are words that are being used as part of the protest today against police violence," Holmes said. "But this could also potentially have been racially motivated." 

Hundreds of demonstrators met this afternoon in Berkeley and marched to Oakland to join the "Million March," part of a series of protests across the nation denouncing police brutality.  

There was also a "Ferguson2Cal" rally scheduled for noon today in Berkeley at Bancroft Way and Telegraph Avenue near the UC Berkeley campus, according to community organizers. 

Holmes said the police are trying to find out who put the effigies on campus and why. If the effigies were racially motivated, Holmes said the police would seek criminal charges. 

"We are in dialogue with students who are upset and want to have a climate on the campus where everybody feels safe and are able to be part of the community," Holmes said. "If it was racially motivated, this is not tolerable." 

The vice chancellor of student affairs will be working with students over the coming week to create opportunities to process the incident, Holmes said. 

"We are encouraging anyone with information about this to come forward to the UC police department," Holmes said.


Two Berkeley protesters charged with felonies

Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Saturday December 13, 2014 - 04:01:00 PM

Two men have been charged with felonies for allegedly attacking police officers in Berkeley during separate protests on Wednesday, the Alameda County District Attorney's Office said today. 

The protests were in response to grand jury decisions in New York and Missouri not to charge police officers in the deaths of two unarmed men. 

Justin Lee Moe, 22, of Laramie, Wyo., was charged with assault on a peace officer and resisting an officer for allegedly trying to hit Berkeley police Officer Matthew Valle with a van at 54th Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Way at about 12:30 a.m. on Wednesday. 

Valle said in a probable cause statement that he was conducting a traffic break at that intersection to keep all eastbound traffic on 54th Street from entering Martin Luther King Jr. Way so other Berkeley officers could set up a crowd control skirmish line. 

Valle said a green Chevy van with Washington state license plates approached the traffic break with two occupants sitting on the roof, which he said is unlawful riding on a vehicle under the California vehicle code. 

Valle wrote that he shined his flashlight toward the driver, who police identified as Moe, to try to get the vehicle to slow down and then signaled for the van to stop when "all of a sudden I heard the vehicle quickly accelerate toward my position." 

The officer said, "I had to physically jump out of the way to avoid being hit by the vehicle, however the vehicle still swerved in my direction but came to an abrupt stop as both of my hands became placed on top of the vehicle hood." 

Valle said he contacted Moe and several other passengers and a records check disclosed that Moe had nine warrants outside of Alameda County for various traffic violations. 

Moe was arraigned in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland this afternoon and as of earlier today he was being held at the Berkeley City Jail in lieu of $20,000 bail. 

The Alameda County District Attorney's Office said it also charged Christopher Edwards, a 27-year-old Petaluma man, with attempted-second degree robbery, two counts of battery on an officer and other felonies for allegedly attacking an officer during a protest at the University of California at Berkeley campus on Wednesday night. 

The other charges against Edwards are resisting an officer and threatening an officer. 

UC Berkeley police Officer Roderick Roe wrote in a probable cause statement that he was on a bicycle to monitor a protest by about 80 to 100 people in front of the on-campus home of Chancellor Nicholas Dirks at about 7:40 p.m. on Wednesday. 

Roe said he placed his bicycle between himself and the crowd when Edwards "spat upon my face and tried to pull my patrol bicycle from my grasp." 

He said, "I believe Edwards used the hostility of the crowd, which was directed from the chancellor's residence toward me, as an instrument of fear." 

Roe said, "Since I was in fear for my personal safety, and he had already physically assaulted me with no repercussion, I believe Edwards thought he could wrestle my bicycle from me and flee under cover of the hostile crowd." 

The officer said once the protest had progressed to another part of the campus he directed other officers to Edwards' location and he was then arrested. 

Edwards, who also was arraigned in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland this afternoon, was being held in lieu of $70,000 bail at the Santa Rita Jail in Dublin as of earlier today.


Two Berkeley protesters charged with felonies

Jeff Shuttleworth (BCN)
Saturday December 13, 2014 - 04:01:00 PM

Two men have been charged with felonies for allegedly attacking police officers in Berkeley during separate protests on Wednesday, the Alameda County District Attorney's Office said today. 

The protests were in response to grand jury decisions in New York and Missouri not to charge police officers in the deaths of two unarmed men. 

Justin Lee Moe, 22, of Laramie, Wyo., was charged with assault on a peace officer and resisting an officer for allegedly trying to hit Berkeley police Officer Matthew Valle with a van at 54th Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Way at about 12:30 a.m. on Wednesday. 

Valle said in a probable cause statement that he was conducting a traffic break at that intersection to keep all eastbound traffic on 54th Street from entering Martin Luther King Jr. Way so other Berkeley officers could set up a crowd control skirmish line. 

Valle said a green Chevy van with Washington state license plates approached the traffic break with two occupants sitting on the roof, which he said is unlawful riding on a vehicle under the California vehicle code. 

Valle wrote that he shined his flashlight toward the driver, who police identified as Moe, to try to get the vehicle to slow down and then signaled for the van to stop when "all of a sudden I heard the vehicle quickly accelerate toward my position." 

The officer said, "I had to physically jump out of the way to avoid being hit by the vehicle, however the vehicle still swerved in my direction but came to an abrupt stop as both of my hands became placed on top of the vehicle hood." 

Valle said he contacted Moe and several other passengers and a records check disclosed that Moe had nine warrants outside of Alameda County for various traffic violations. 

Moe was arraigned in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland this afternoon and as of earlier today he was being held at the Berkeley City Jail in lieu of $20,000 bail. 

The Alameda County District Attorney's Office said it also charged Christopher Edwards, a 27-year-old Petaluma man, with attempted-second degree robbery, two counts of battery on an officer and other felonies for allegedly attacking an officer during a protest at the University of California at Berkeley campus on Wednesday night. 

The other charges against Edwards are resisting an officer and threatening an officer. 

UC Berkeley police Officer Roderick Roe wrote in a probable cause statement that he was on a bicycle to monitor a protest by about 80 to 100 people in front of the on-campus home of Chancellor Nicholas Dirks at about 7:40 p.m. on Wednesday. 

Roe said he placed his bicycle between himself and the crowd when Edwards "spat upon my face and tried to pull my patrol bicycle from my grasp." 

He said, "I believe Edwards used the hostility of the crowd, which was directed from the chancellor's residence toward me, as an instrument of fear." 

Roe said, "Since I was in fear for my personal safety, and he had already physically assaulted me with no repercussion, I believe Edwards thought he could wrestle my bicycle from me and flee under cover of the hostile crowd." 

The officer said once the protest had progressed to another part of the campus he directed other officers to Edwards' location and he was then arrested. 

Edwards, who also was arraigned in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland this afternoon, was being held in lieu of $70,000 bail at the Santa Rita Jail in Dublin as of earlier today.


Flash: College/Ashby intersection in Berkeley blocked by demonstration

Saturday December 13, 2014 - 02:31:00 PM

There is a march moving south in Berkeley near the Oakland border. It was on College where it crosses Ashby about 2 p.m. The Ashby-College intersection was blocked, forcing autos to detour around it. The Berkeley Police Department has issued this message via the Nixle applicantion: 

"The Berkeley Police Department is advising people to avoid the College Avenue corridor due to large public demonstration walking southbound from Ashby Avenue. The public demonstration is causing major traffic congestion/delays in the area."


California Highway Patrol responds to criticism of officer's gun display in protest

Erin Baldassari (BCN)
Friday December 12, 2014 - 07:33:00 AM

- A plain clothes California Highway Patrol officer who drew his gun and pointed it at protesters in Oakland on Wednesday is still on active duty and his supervisor said today there is no indication that he did anything wrong. 

CHP Golden Gate division Chief Avery Browne said the officer, who was dressed as a demonstrator with a bandana over his face, felt his life was in danger when he drew his weapon on the crowd. 

"(The officer) told me he didn't know if he was going to make it out alive," Browne said. "They were outnumbered, they were assaulted, and at that point, two officers were not going to be able to arrest 30 or 40 or 50 individuals." 

The officer, a detective in the agency's auto theft division, was walking with his partner in the crowd when several protesters began pointing and yelling, "Hey, they're undercover. They're cops!" 

The demonstrators began pushing the officers and knocking their hats off their heads.  

Witnesses said it appeared the officer pushed the protester, who responded by ramming his body into the officer. Browne said one of the demonstrators pulled the hood off one of the officers and punched him in the head.  

The officer tackled the man to the ground and handcuffed him. The crowd, incensed, began to gather around them. One woman ran up and kicked the arresting officer in the head as he was handcuffing the demonstrator, Browne said. 

A second officer pulled out his baton and then his gun and pointed it at the crowd. Oakland police officers quickly arrived and dispersed the crowd, forcibly pushing them away from the scene. 

Browne said the officer displayed his badge after the two plain-clothes patrolmen first started to leave the crowd, but witness accounts contest that claim. 

One demonstrator at the scene, Dylan, who declined to give his last name, said he pulled off one of the officer's bandanas. At no time did the officers identify themselves as police, Dylan said.  

Browne said it is department policy for officers to identify themselves before taking any law enforcement action.  

"We're looking into the use of force," Browne said, adding the report that the officers prepared about the incident will go to the district attorney. "We understand that it's upsetting, it's disturbing any time a weapon is displayed, so we look into those situations very carefully." 

Browne said the officers had been following the protesters for some time in an unmarked police car to gather intelligence on whether the group planned to take the highways as they have in previous nights, or whether they were carrying weapons or planning to vandalize property.  

The officers were joined by plain-clothes police from other agencies as well, Browne said. 

"We put plain-clothes officers in the crowd to listen and gather information," Browne said. "We have discovered that individuals who want to commit criminal acts are texting, they're tweeting, and communicating to other people in the crowd, trying to incite the protest." 

The CHP helicopter was also unable to maintain a steady course Wednesday night due to high winds speeds and inclement weather conditions, further necessitating the need for on-ground intelligence, Browne said. 

CHP has used the same tactic at other demonstrations in recent days and Browne said it helped CHP block protesters from entering state Highway 24 and Interstate Highway 80 on Wednesday night.  

The two officers in Wednesday's altercation parked their car and joined on foot at the intersection of 9th and Harrison streets after receiving reports that people marching alongside or infiltrating the demonstration vandalized a T-Mobile store and an ATM, Browne said.  

Some people infiltrating the group of demonstrators indicated they had weapons, Browne said.  

Despite the reports of weapons, Browne said the CHP officers did not arrest anyone on weapons charges Wednesday night. CHP officers arrested one man for public intoxication and another for felony assault on a police officer, he said. 

Questions about CHP's use of plain-clothes officers come at a time when the law enforcement agency is also under scrutiny for firing less-than-lethal projectiles at demonstrators Tuesday night. 

Browne defended the department's use of the weapons and said the officers were "very discrete as to who they were firing on." 

"The officers were firing on people who were taking rocks out of backpacks...who were firing projectiles on the (CHP) helicopter," Browne said. "The officers fired at specific individuals who were arming themselves and throwing those projectiles at the officers." 

Browne said the officers were "careful about what they were doing." 

Protestors complained on Tuesday that police had been targeting individuals' heads. Brown said the CHP did not do that.  

"That's a very dangerous place to hit someone. We don't target the head and on Tuesday, we didn't target a person's head."  

Browne also said the department has set up false Twitter accounts to engage with people on social media. CHP was able to infiltrate and disrupt a massive sideshow at the port of Oakland in November based on tweets, Browne said.  

On Wednesday, some protesters were throwing rocks at windows, and at least one person threw a glass bottle at a line of police officers, who were roughly 50 feet from where the glass hit the street. 

At other demonstrations, some people at the have used rocks, bottles, fecal material and urine in bottles, and explosives devices as projectiles, Browne said.  

The officers at the scene were specially trained as plain-clothed detectives, in serving dangerous search warrants and have received crowd control training at the police academy and special protest or demonstration training, Browne said.  

But, Browne said they also feared for their lives Wednesday night when the crowd turned on them. 

"I am very much sensitive to how disturbing it is when a weapon is drawn, and I don't take these matters lightly at all," Browne said. "At the same time, we have to understand these officers were under attack." 

ErinBaldassari0702p12/11/14 

CONTACT: CHP Officer Daniel Hill (510) 957-8247 or 30media@chp.ca.gov  

Copyright © 2014 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited. 

/www/bcn/general/12/newsclip.14.12.11.19.03.00.1.txt


Updated: Undercover cop disguised as Black Bloc pulls gun on protest in Oakland which started in Berkeley

Erin Baldassari (BCN)and Planet
Thursday December 11, 2014 - 10:02:00 AM
Demonstrators began yelling and pointing at two men they 
              believed were undercover cops infiltrating a protest in Oakland.
ERIN BALDASSARI
Demonstrators began yelling and pointing at two men they believed were undercover cops infiltrating a protest in Oakland.
A man, who protesters believed was an undercover cop, pulled 
              out his gun at protesters as another man dressed as a protester handcuffs a 
              demonstrator in Oakland.
ERIN BALDASSARI
A man, who protesters believed was an undercover cop, pulled out his gun at protesters as another man dressed as a protester handcuffs a demonstrator in Oakland.
A protester is pinned by an officer.
ERIN BALDASSARI
A protester is pinned by an officer.
Two undercover police officers, one, white, pointing his gun at the crowd, the other, black, holding down an African-American demonstrator.
ERIN BALDASSARI
Two undercover police officers, one, white, pointing his gun at the crowd, the other, black, holding down an African-American demonstrator.
Christian Djalali tried to speak to police officers who were 
              forcing protesters off of the street.
ERIN BALDASSARI
Christian Djalali tried to speak to police officers who were forcing protesters off of the street.

A demonstration that started in Berkeley ended abruptly in Oakland Wednesday night when an undercover law enforcement officer pulled out a gun and pointed it at the crowd.

Only a few dozen protesters remained from a mass of between 150 and 200 people. Two officers, both dressed as civilians and wearing bandanas over their faces, were walking with the group when the demonstrators started pointing at them yelling, "Hey, they're undercover, they're cops!"

Oakland police Lt. Chris Bolton wrote on Twitter this morning that the officer was not an Oakland police officer. Bolton said Oakland police were the first to respond to the scene on a report from another agency.

Bolton wrote, "That outside agency has been notified to provide details and address concerns" regarding the officers' behavior at the protest.

[Update: Bolton indicated on Twitter this morning that the two undercover officers involved in this incident were from the CHP:

"Last night #OaklandPolice responded to a request for help during a California Highway Patrol arrest at Bay & Harrison St. (1/2)— Lt. Chris Bolton (@OPDChris) December 11, 2014"]

One Berkeley resident, Dylan, who declined to give his last name, said he pulled off the officer's bandana.

The two policemen started to walk away, but the protesters persisted, screaming at the two undercover cops. One of the officers pushed a protester aside. The man responded by pushing back and then the officer tackled him to the ground, handcuffing him.

The crowd, incensed, began to gather around them. The second officer pulled out his gun and pointed it at the crowd. More officers quickly arrived and dispersed the crowd.

"I'm a white man, and I pulled off (the [African-American] officer's) mask, but they punched a black man," Dylan said. "He got arrested." 

The march started on the University of California at Berkeley's campus, near the heart of the Free Speech Movement memorial. A group of roughly 100 to 150 people marched through campus, at one point entering a talk at Wheeler Hall, where PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel was speaking. 

The demonstrators were initially barred from entering the auditorium, but they forced their way through with at least two people climbing over the crowd to make it past the doors. After several minutes of pushing, the protesters took over the stage and ended the discussion with chants of "black lives matter." They were met with an audience that booed them and told them to "go home." 

Manpreet Syal, a fourth-year business student at UC Berkeley, was among the audience at the talk. She said Thiel had just finished speaking about the effectiveness of the nationwide demonstrations. 

Across the country, and in the Bay Area for several straight nights, people have taken to the streets to protest decisions by grand juries in Ferguson, Missouri, and New York to not indict white police officers in the deaths of unarmed black men. 

"I do support their cause and their right to protest, but I think coming into the talk tonight was a little misguided," Syal said. "I don't think that's the definition of a peaceful protest." 

The demonstration left campus, but not before at least one man was detained by police outside Wheeler Hall. The march was largely led by organizers of the activist group By Any Means Necessary (BAMN). 

Tania Kappner, a BAMN organizer and Berkeley alumna, said the organization will continue to call for demonstrations until former Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson is jailed for killing Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old. 

Kappner said BAMN wants to see all "killer cops jailed" and for charges to be dropped against demonstrators who had been arrested during the marches. 

The group walked to downtown Oakland, growing slightly in size, without incident. Once downtown, some people in the crowd picked up rocks and threw it at several businesses, shattering a glass door at a T-Mobile store.


New: When words cost lives

Carol Polsgrove
Friday December 12, 2014 - 10:25:00 AM

I came across El Sonar de las Mujeres de la Tierra y el Mar in San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, in a store featuring memorabilia of the Zapatista rebellion: tee-shirts, posters, cards but also books, among them this one, pointed out to me by the man behind the counter, Tim Russo. 

At first glance, the book seemed lit by sunshine – a slim colorful paperback with butterflies swirling around a smiling woman –beautifully designed and full of pictures and poems. Then there was the dedication: 

“Dedicado a la memoria” …..dedicated to the memory of three community radio women assassinated by paramilitaries in Oaxaca: Felicitas Martínez, Teresa Bautista, and Bety Cariño. 

Here I have to confess that what I knew at this point about community radio in Mexico and Central America could fit into one sentence: Yo sabía nada. I knew nothing. I was interested in the book because I was interested in Latin American writers, and here, in this book, apparently, were writers ­– and they were writers who were not accustomed to being writers. I wanted to know more. 

I asked Tim if I might meet someone who worked on this book, and a couple of mornings later, while children marched down the street outside in celebration of the Day of Revolution and political crisis gripped Mexico, I sat down in a cafe with Luz Aída Ruíz, who had been on the book’s production team, and a second woman, Medhin (Med) Tewolde Serrano, who had worked on a second book – a manual for women in community radio. 

Med arrived in the cafe first, and, putting up with my uncertain Spanish, told me the start of the story of how these books came to be. Tim and Luz (Tim’s partner in life and in work) were covering social movements as journalists when they saw the need for pueblos to have their own media. Some stations and networks of stations already existed, and other communities wanted to start their own stations to defend their land and their human rights and inform their communities about what was happening. 

And so Luz and Tim started Comunicadores y Comunicadoras Populares por la Autonomía (COMPPA) to “accompany” organizations that needed help communicating through radio, video, and the Internet. 

The accompanying process has been “very slow,” Luz said, laughing, as she picked up the story in a mix of English and Spanish when she arrived and joined us for “slow coffee” (the slogan, proclaimed in a sign in English, of our cafe). 

“Usually the type of work we do is very slow, because it takes time to sit together and talk about what their needs are, what they’re thinking, what they’re dreaming of, what we can do, what we can’t do. 

“So it all began very very slowly, but we usually have that process of first meeting with the people and working to see what tool would be the most appropriate, because a lot of the communities want their own radio station, but sometimes it may not be the best tool for them because of what their particular needs are or because of what their geography’s like or because of also the – amenazas —(she looked to Med for the English word) — the threats.” 

She was not being melodramatic. The website for Reporters without Borders offers a litany of deaths of community radio journalists in the countries represented in El Sonar de Las Mujeres: Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras. 

For many of the eighty women involved in the two-year series of radio workshops that led to the book, the very act of traveling to the place of meeting took courage, even though (because crossing borders can be difficult) they were traveling within their own countries. “Many of the women who were participating in the workshops hadn’t been able to travel,” said Luz. It was, she said, “a very rich experience for all of us.” 

The women emerged from the workshops with hours of programming for their stations – and, now, too, with this book, which includes short essays and interviews as well as the poems, which are sometimes in both Spanish and one of the indigenous languages spoken by women in the workshops. 

Poetry was made part of the mix, Tim had told me, to increase the women’s self-confidence, but I could see from the poems that it did more than that: it created a space for reflection on what it means now to be women, in these times, in these places – and what it could mean in the future. 

 

No quedó otro camino…. 

There remained no other road to walk 

leaving behind the ashes and destruction the smoke and the dust of evil 

 

But our bare feet always 

knew where to go 

because the heart was always guiding them….” 

(El Dolor del Alma by Francis. Radio Durugubuti Beibel, OFRANEH, Honduras) 

 

Yo lucho por mi comunidad… 

I fight for my community 

so that we may stop being 

like candles at the altar 

that give light and then die. 

But that we may be like stars 

brilliant in the sky. 

Without letting ourselves 

be put out by nothing or nobody. 

(Luchar Es Poder by Esperanza Palma, Comunidad Úrsulo Galván, Veracruz, Mexico) 

 

Accustomed to thinking of poetry as something written by men “rich, cultured, and white,” the women made it their own. Younger women worked with older women who could not read or write or maybe even speak Spanish, helping them write down or record their poems. “It was very beautiful,” Luz said, “a group and community effort, and intergenerational.” 

The young woman who ran the poetry sessions, Emma Shaw Crane, had been a student poet-teacher in Poetry for the People workshops at UC-Berkeley; in Guatemala and Honduras and Mexico she found herself (as she wrote in her report to her funders) “working alongside people living in devastating poverty and multiple levels of intense and ceaseless violence,” which erupted dramatically during the course of the workshops when a coup overturned the elected president of Honduras. 

Not surprisingly, behind the sunny facade of the smiling woman, El Sonar de Las Mujeres is full of shadows. Lines of affirmation turn into memories of horror, then circle back to determination: 

 

Sueño para mi gente… 

I dream for my people 

we go on developing 

we learn new things 

we listen to the past and we remember 

they raped many women 

they killed men 

let this not happen again 

let the government respect us 

 

let women keep on moving forward 

let men respect their women 

that they let them go out 

 

we reclaimed our rights and 

they began to rape us and kill us 

we lived on the mountain with hunger 

but well organized 

(Palabras de Doña María, Radio Union, CPR-Sierra, Guatemala) 

 

Although there is a hope that El Sonar de las Mujeres will find a larger audience, it was published with the support of foreign funders primarily as a gift for the women themselves. Its status as a gift is reflected in the beauty of the design. White paper would have been easier, but the color they chose ­– cream – went better with the tint of the photographs and illustrations: a soft brown, the color of the earth where we came from, the color of the women whose words appear on these pages—including, eerily, Bety Cariño, interviewed the year before her death. 

“In the moment of the assassination of our compañeras,” she said, parents were saying, “Why are you going, my daughter? They are going to kill you.” 

She herself, along with a human rights observer from Finland, died in a paramilitary attack not long after the workshops ended. Her killers, like the killers of the two other women to whom the book is dedicated, have never been brought to justice. – December 2014 

Translations by Carol Polsgrove. 

For information on acquiring El Sonar de Las Mujeres: Voces de Mujeres Indígenas, Garífunas y Campesinas de Mexico, Guatemala y Honduras or other COMPPA publications (including the new manual for women in radio—La Voz Que Vuela) contact COMPPA.


Berkeley City Council will meet December 16 at Longfellow School

Erin Baldassari (BCN)
Thursday December 11, 2014 - 04:15:00 PM

Next week's Berkeley City Council meeting has been relocated to a larger venue after the mayor canceled Tuesday's meeting due to large anticipated crowds. 

The regular City Council meeting is scheduled for Dec. 16 at 7 p.m. in the Longfellow Middle School Auditorium at 1500 Derby St. in Berkeley, and a special City Council meeting is scheduled for 5:30 p.m. in the same location, according to a meeting agenda posted on the city's website.  

Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates said on Twitter that Tuesday's canceled meeting has yet to be rescheduled. Bates postponed the meeting because "the council chambers, which hold about 125 people, could not accommodate the large turnout expected to attend," he said. 

On Tuesday, hundreds of people rallied outside City Hall in Berkeley, where council members Kriss Worthington and Jesse Arreguin addressed the crowd.  

It was the fourth night of demonstrations in as many days protesting recent grand jury decisions to not indict white police officers in the deaths of unarmed black men.  

On Saturday, Bates said police assisted the demonstrators by diverting traffic but dispersed the crowd after it became violent. 

Bates said some protesters decried the officers' use of tear gas on demonstrators and said police used excessive force on the crowd. 

"It was at the Public Safety Building, when some individuals began throwing dangerous objects at police -- including fist-sized rocks, bricks, an ice pick and metal bars -- that the police took action and began to disperse the crowd," Bates said in a statement. "In the wake of the protests, some citizens have voiced strong support and sympathy for police, while others have criticized police for using tear gas and allegedly excessive force." 

The California Highway Patrol arrested more than 150 demonstrators on Monday after they blocked Interstate Highway 80 in Emeryville and Berkeley police said they have arrested a total of 27 more, including 21 men, four women and two juveniles.  

Of those arrested by Berkeley police, 19 were from cities outside of Berkeley, including Oakland, San Francisco and Richmond, police said.  

The most common charges have been resisting arrest or failure to disperse, but three were charged with assault with a deadly weapon, three with battery against an officer and two with weapons charges, police said. 

On Wednesday, a much smaller crowd of 100 to 150 people gathered at the University of California at Berkeley and continued to march into Oakland.  

The demonstration ended abruptly after an undercover law enforcement officer pulled out his gun and pointed it at protesters after the demonstrators outed him and his partner.


Richmond Police Chief: Why I Joined a Protest Against Police Brutality (New America Media)

Chris Magnus, interviewed by Malcolm Marshall (Richmond Pulse)
Thursday December 11, 2014 - 12:36:00 PM

NAM Editor’s Note: In Richmond, Calif., a city long equated with high rates of crime and poverty, the local police have taken steps in recent years to improve relations with the communities they serve. Highlighting those efforts, Richmond Chief of Police Chris Magnus turned out at a recent local rally against police brutality. The rally was one of many protests being staged in cities across the country in the wake of grand jury acquittals of white police officers in the killings of unarmed black men. He was interviewed by Richmond Pulse editor Malcolm Marshall.

It’s interesting to see a police chief in the middle of a protest against police brutality. What is your reason for being here today?

The police and the community share a common goal. We want peaceful protests to be something that people feel comfortable participating in and to understand that the police are guardians, because we should be protecting people’s constitutional rights.

But we also want to send a message that we care about everyone in the community. This needs to be a partnership between police and persons of color, black, brown, whatever. We need to be working together. 

Does the department have a history of being a part of protests in Richmond?

We’ve been stewards of public safety, when there’ve been protests related to Chevron, protests around environmental issues, protests about political issues. It’s our job to make sure that everyone’s voice can be heard and that people feel safe exercising their First Amendment rights.

A few weeks ago, you spoke at the peace rally in honor of Rodney Frazier, the 16-year-old who was murdered in front of his home in unincorporated North Richmond, which isn’t technically in your jurisdiction. Why did you choose to lend your presence and words to the community at that event?

He was a young man who was very much tied into our greater Richmond community. This was less about jurisdictional lines and more about finding common ground and working together to prevent future homicides, whether they’re in unincorporated Richmond or in the City of Richmond. We need to be joining together, and I think that was an important opportunity to do that.

Your department first tried out using body cameras on four officers out on patrol in October 2013 and now has a plan to have all officers wearing body cameras by the end of January. What got you interested in the idea of body cameras?

I think the cameras provide an opportunity to show the community that we really are committed to professional policing, that we're transparent in what we do, that we understand the importance of accountability, and I think they're going to protect not only the public but police officers as well because sometimes there are complaints against officers that really are baseless. But if there are actually issues and times where officers do behave inappropriately, we want a record of that as well, so we can address it and make things better.

What are some of the challenges of having police use cameras?

The challenges involve privacy. People are concerned about how long we keep that kind of video evidence, especially if we're wearing it into their homes, on calls for service or circumstances like that. So that’s one issue. I think police officers are concerned about how and when they're used. They don't want every private conversation that they have recorded, and I can understand that.

The other challenge, of course, as we've seen even in the news lately, is even when you're wearing a camera, it may not show everything. It doesn't necessarily show the totality of the circumstance.

So these are all things we're going to have to work through, but I think there's still a net benefit, and I think that's one of the reasons why even police unions in most places have come around to support body cameras. Because they see that this is going to be a net benefit for not only the police department but the community as well. 


Police action in Berkeley on Saturday night: a video

Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 09:54:00 PM

Below is a video of the Berkeley Police beating and teargassing protesters on Telegraph on Saturday night. Following is the BPD's account of what they've been doing. 


Press Release: Media Update, Berkeley Demonstrations

Officer Jennifer Coats, Public Information Officer, Berkeley Police Department
Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 09:32:00 PM
Photographs of injuries officers received from items thrown at them during the recent demonstrations
Berkeley Police Department
Photographs of injuries officers received from items thrown at them during the recent demonstrations

Over the past few days, a series of demonstrations have happened in the City of Berkeley in response to recent incidents in Missouri and New York. With its rich history in the Free Speech movement, the City of Berkeley is and remains committed to ensuring the public’s right to peacefully assemble and protest. 

On Tuesday night the police department facilitated peaceful protest throughout the City, helping block traffic and escorting marchers with officers on bicycles. 

As a mid-sized city, the size and scope of these demonstrations have presented unique challenges and the Berkeley Police Department has required assistance from agencies throughout Alameda County, Solano County, and San Mateo County. 

In previous peaceful demonstrations, demonstration organizers often worked with the Berkeley Police Department develop pre-planned routes or points of assembly which has allowed BPD personnel to redirect traffic to increase the safety of protesters. The Berkeley Police Department welcomes contact with organizers and will continue to try to make constructive contact. 

Over the past few days, the Berkeley Police Department has made several arrests. Below is a list of arrested persons over the past few days. As some of the arrested persons were not booked at the Berkeley City Jail, the list is only preliminary. 

 

Here is a summary of arrests thus far: 

· 27 arrest total 

· 21 men, 4 women, and 2 juvenile 

· 19 of 27 arrests are from outside of Berkeley 

 

Name 

City of Residence 

Age 

Sex 

Charge 

December 6, 2014 

McCoy, Kyle 

Oakland 

25 

PC 245(a)(1)—Assault with a Deadly Weapon 

Mead, Nicholas 

Davis 

20 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 243(b)—Battery against Police Officer 

Schrager, Antonio 

Berkeley 

21 

PC 243(b)—Battery against a Police Officer 

Watkins, Joseph 

Berkeley 

22 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 409—Failure to disperse at Unlawful assembly 

Power, Emily 

Berkeley 

20 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 409—Failure to disperse at Unlawful assembly 

December 7, 2014 

Soules, Hudson 

San Francisco 

31 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 409-Failure to disperse at Unlawful assembly 

Johnson, Dominique Tyrese 

Richmond 

27 

PC 245(a)(1)—Assault with a Deadly Weapon 

PC 243(c)(1)—Battery against an officer 

PC 459—Burglary 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 496(a)—Possession of Stolen Property 

Martin, Jack Elliot 

Oakland 

20 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 409-Failure to disperse at Unlawful assembly 

Murray, Wayne Daniel 

Unknown 

20 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 594(a)(1)—Vandalism 

CVC 23110—Throwing objects at vehicles 

Banks, Keith Arnell 

Berkeley 

18 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

Strazdas, Shannon Marie 

Berkeley 

31 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 409-Failure to disperse at Unlawful assembly 

December 8, 2014 

Rosenbloom, Jesse 

Oakland 

21 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

Davis, Jamal 

Oakland 

26 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

Rochell, Maurice 

Oakland 

25 

PC 653k-Possession of Switchblade 

Barton, Lawrence 

Oakland 

40 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 1203.2-Violation of Probation 

Davis, Demonte 

Unknown 

21 

PC 409-Failure to disperse at Unlawful assembly 

Dang, Nisa 

Unknown 

20 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

Burchenal, Anjelica 

Unknown 

25 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

Pringle, Morgan 

Berkeley 

18 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

Mathieu, Christopher 

Berkeley 

21 

PC 148(a)(1)—Resisting Arrest 

PC 409-Failure to disperse at Unlawful assembly 

PC 21310-Carrying a concealed dirk or dagger 

December 9, 2014 

Moe, Justin 

Laramie, Wy 

22 

PC 245(a)(1)-Assault with a Deadly Weapon 

Putansu, Keenan 

San Francisco 

22 

Warrant Arrest 

Colyer, Aaron 

Unknown 

35 

CVC 23103-Reckless Driving 

CVC 21712(a)-Unlawful riding or towing 

CVC 22350-Speed Unsafe for Conditions 

Jenkins, Kevin 

Oakland 

27 

PC 647(f)-Intoxicated in Public 

Naughton, Conner 

Prospect Heights, IL 

23 

PC 148(a)(1)-Resisting Arrest 

PC 647(f)-Intoxicated in Public 

 

We have had more than 13 officers injured over the course of the past four days. Three required treatment in a hospital. A small number of protesters have thrown rocks, bottles, a crowbar, a bag of gravel and other debris at our officers. Here are a couple of photographs of injuries officers received from items thrown at them during the recent demonstrations: 

 

 

 


 

 


Updated: Protesters continue marching around Berkeley

Bay City News and Planet
Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 06:19:00 PM

The Ashby BART station has been closed due to a protest march in Berkeley tonight, according to BART officials.  

A group of around 150 protestors marched from Bancroft Street and Telegraph Avenue in Berkeley this evening around 7 p.m. at that time on the University of California at Berkeley campus. At 8:35 Berkeley Police reported 150 marchers going west on Dwight from Benvenue, the south side of People's Park. At 9:02 they were spotted going south on Shattuck from Russell, a few blocks from the Ashby BART station.  

Social media reports indicate the marchers entered Wheeler Hall on campus, where a talk by entrepreneur and venture capitalist Peter Thiel is in progress.  

Tonight's march is the fifth in as many days, and follows on a well-organized and peaceful protest in Berkeley earlier this afternoon led by Berkeley High School students.


Flash: Schools closed tomorrow in Berkeley, most of Northern California for expected storm

Scott Morris (BCN)
Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 05:54:00 PM

Numerous Bay Area schools are closing Thursday because of a potentially dangerous wind and rainstorm moving into the area. 

All San Francisco Unified School District schools and school districts in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin and Sonoma counties have canceled school for Thursday. 

In Alameda County, public school districts in the cities of Alameda, Berkeley, Oakland and Hayward have announced closures. The West Contra Costa and New Haven school districts have also announced closures. 

Most schools in Marin County are closed. A full list of closures is available at www.marinschools.org/SafeSchools/Pages/EmergencyServices/school-status.aspx 

Several schools in Sonoma County are closed as well. A list of Sonoma County closures is available at www.scoe.org/pub/htdocs/storm-update.html 

In addition the Novato Unified School District has already announced schools will be closed Friday.  

Most school districts anticipate being open on Friday, though San Francisco Unified officials said a final decision will be made before 5 p.m. Thursday. 

Oakland district officials said in a statement, "This is not a decision we make lightly, but given the severe weather predictions and the safety implications for students and staff, we want to take every precaution in order to safeguard our community." 

District officials said that what the National Weather Service refers to as a "powerful Pacific storm" with heavy rain and wind gusts "poses a significant safety risk for our students and staff." 

It will be a workday for Oakland schools central office staff but they will work from home, district officials said. 

SFUSD Superintendent Richard Carranza said in a statement, "We don't want to risk having our students injured or seriously delayed transporting to and from school. In addition to student absences, the storm could result in large numbers of staff absences, which could then lead to inadequate supervision of our students." 

ScottMorris0525p12/10/14 

CONTACT: Oakland schools spokesman Troy Flint (510) 473-5832 SFUSD (415) 241-6565 Novato Unified School District, Leslie Benjamin (415) 897-4259 

 

Copyright © 2014 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited. 

/www/bcn/general/12/newsclip.14.12.10.17.26.00.1.txt


March in Berkeley leads to confrontation on Oakland highway, looting in Emeryville

Scott Morris (BCN)
Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 06:02:00 PM

A protest march through three East Bay cities devolved into a burglary and robbery spree in Emeryville Tuesday night after Berkeley police arrested six people and the California Highway Patrol arrested 13 people blocking a highway in Oakland, law enforcement officials said today. 

CHP officers used less-lethal munitions to clear crowds who blocked state Highway 24 after crossing into Oakland at about 9:30 p.m. The CHP has not confirmed what munitions were used but numerous reports indicated the use of pepper spray, rubber bullets and beanbag rounds on crowds of protesters and journalists. 

Some protesters on the highway hurled rocks, incendiary devices and other projectiles at officers, CHP officials said. 

After marching through Oakland, protesters went up San Pablo Avenue into Emeryville, where police said businesses including a Pak N Save, 7-Eleven and CVS were vandalized and looted. Emeryville police made no arrests. 

The protests are the latest in weeks of near-daily protests nationwide over police killings of unarmed black men, including the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and the death of Eric Garner in New York from a police chokehold. 

Berkeley's march Tuesday was the fourth in as many days. Protests Saturday quickly grew out of hand, with police deploying tear gas early in the evening and protesters hurling objects at officers. 

On Monday, the CHP arrested more than 150 demonstrators after they blocked Interstate Highway 80 in Emeryville. 

Tuesday's march began peacefully in Berkeley. Protesters had initially planned to attend a Berkeley City Council meeting scheduled for that evening but the meeting was canceled due to the large anticipated crowds. The protesters then gathered outside of Berkeley City Hall, where they were joined by City Councilmen Kriss Worthington and Jesse Arreguin, who briefly addressed the crowd. While in Berkeley, six protesters were arrested, according to the CHP. Protesters then marched into Oakland via Martin Luther King Jr. Way and Telegraph Avenue, taking over Highway 24 near the MacArthur BART station for 23 minutes at 9:17 p.m. CHP officials said that protesters were hurling rocks, incendiary devices and other projectiles at officers and the officers responded with the less-lethal munitions. The majority of the group on the highway dispersed, but CHP officials said "several aggressive protesters" remained on the freeway. Thirteen people were arrested on suspicion of charges including obstruction, creating a public nuisance and battery on a peace officer, CHP officials said. "The motoring public can expect the CHP to use whatever force necessary to clear the roadway and keep people safe," CHP Golden Gate Division Assistant Chief Ernie Sanchez said in a statement. "Our fear, and what we are trying to prevent, is someone getting seriously injured or killed by choosing to march onto the freeway." 

The protests moved into downtown Oakland, then west and up San Pablo Avenue into Emeryville. Police estimated there were about 300 demonstrators marching into Emeryville at about 11:30 p.m. when about 100 rushed the Pak N Save at 3889 San Pablo Ave., broke windows and looted the store. 

Between 30 and 40 people stole liquor bottles, cash from the register and a coin dispenser. Police tried to stop them but they rejoined the crowd, continuing north on San Pablo Avenue. 

Protesters also smashed windows at the nearby 7-Eleven, threatening the clerk with chunks of concrete and bottles, Emeryville police spokesman Brian Head said. Cartons of cigarettes and other items were stolen from the store. 

The protesters threw "softball-sized" chunks of concrete and beer bottles at officers who moved in to stop them, Head said. 

Further up San Pablo, the Bank of America had all of its windows smashed but it appears that protesters did not enter the bank. A CVS store's windows were smashed and the vandals entered the store, stealing more liquor bottles and other items, Head said. 

The protesters then marched back to Oakland on 47th Street, smashing parked car windows along the way. Mutual aid officers advanced on the protesters, who mostly dispersed, Head said. 

Emeryville police were not injured and made no arrests during the demonstrations. 

Head said investigators are looking at video surveillance footage in the area to identify any possible suspects. They are investigating the incidents at the Pak N Save and the CVS as burglaries and the 7-Eleven as a robbery. 

Surveillance footage may be released to the public later today, Head said. 

Oakland police reported few problems as the protesters moved through that city, saying in a statement today that only one window was broken and scattered trash containers were set on fire.


Insurance Review Urged in Storm Alert

Erin Baldassari (BCN)
Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 06:00:00 PM

With heavy rains and strong winds expected to hit the Bay Area Thursday and Friday, the Department of Insurance is urging residents to review their insurance policies today. 

"Today as Northern Californians prepare for extreme wet weather conditions, it's important that they remember to make sure their financial affairs are in order," Commissioner Dave Jones said in a statement. "Taking the time to update your home inventory, and understanding your insurance policy are just as important in preparing for this storm as having an emergency go kit and securing outdoor items." 

Department of Insurance officials urged resident to update their home inventory and store pictures or videos of clothing and personal belongings on a digital cloud server.  

Homeowners and renters should understand their policy and what is covered or excluded before the storm hits, insurance officials said.  

Officials cautioned that flood damage is not covered in most policies, but roof damage caused by wind or falling trees may be covered.  

For help filing an insurance claim or interpreting an insurance policy, residents can call the Department of Insurance's consumer services branch at (800) 927-4357.


Updated: Protesters reach Oakland City Hall after starting in Berkeley

Jamey Padojino (BCN)
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 11:00:00 PM

Hundreds of people have made their way into Oakland after walking through city streets in downtown Berkeley tonight to protest decisions to not indict white police officers in the deaths of unarmed black men. 

The protests started around 6:20 p.m. when police said about 100 people were marching through the University of California at Berkeley's South Campus area.  

About an hour later, the group grew to a larger crowd at Center Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Way, near Civic Center Park, in Berkeley, police said. 

They gathered at the front of City Hall where they heard remarks by City Councilmen Kriss Worthington and Jesse Arreguin. 

The Berkeley City Council had a meeting scheduled for 7 p.m. today but it was canceled this afternoon due to protesters who had planned to disrupt the meeting. 

"We have postponed tonight's City Council meeting because the Council chambers, which hold about 125 people, could not accommodate the large turnout expected to attend. One estimate placed the number as high as 1,500 people," Mayor Tom Bates said in a statement. 

Shortly before 8 p.m., the protesters left City Hall and were marching south on Martin Luther King Jr. Way from Allston Way, police said. They then went south on Telegraph Avenue to Oakland. 

The Downtown Berkeley BART station was closed at about 7:10 p.m. due to the protests but reopened about an hour later, according to a BART dispatcher. 

Trains were only be running through the station located at 2160 Shattuck Ave. during the closure, BART officials said. 

Shortly after 9 p.m., the MacArthur BART station at 555 40th St. was closed due to the protests but reopened as of 10:20 p.m., the dispatcher said. 

California Highway Patrol officers in riot gear were seen blocking state Highway 24 ramps at Telegraph Avenue in Oakland around 8:45 p.m. 

At about 9:15 p.m., protesters were seen on Highway 24 near the MacArthur BART station blocking traffic in both directions, CHP officials said. 

CHP officers were able to clear people from the freeway and lanes were reopened to traffic about 30 minutes later and have reopened the ramps. 

The transition from Highway 24 to Interstate Highway 980 was closed but reopened around 10:45 p.m., while officers continue to guard ramps from Highway 980 to downtown Oakland, CHP officials said. 

The protesters made their way into downtown Oakland where they were gathered outside Oakland City Hall around 10:30 p.m. 

Amtrak train service has been suspended on the Capitol Corridor line between the Oakland Coliseum stop and Richmond due to the protests, transit officials said. 

Trains serving the San Joaquin and Coast Starlight routes will also experience delays, Amtrak officials said. 

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit buses have been detoured from their regular routes due to the protests in Berkeley and may reroute other lines in the area if needed, AC Transit officials said. 

Some protesters were heard yelling "Indict, convict, send those killer cops to jail," while others were seen playing drums and holding signs while in the crowd on Berkeley city streets.  

On Nov. 24, a grand jury's decision was announced to not indict then-Officer Darren White in the fatal shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. 

Last Wednesday, New York City police Officer Daniel Pantaleo was not charged in the chokehold death of 43-year-old Eric Garner in Staten Island. 

Protesters took to downtown Berkeley on Saturday, Sunday and Monday nights that resulted in vandalized businesses and multiple arrests, police said. 

On Saturday, police tear gassed demonstrators, who also threw bottles and rocks at officers. 

Portions of the freeway were also closed on Sunday and Monday nights.


Flash: Schools closed tomorrow in Berkeley, most of Northern California for expected storm

Scott Morris (BCN)
Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 05:54:00 PM

Numerous Bay Area schools are closing Thursday because of a potentially dangerous wind and rainstorm moving into the area. 

All San Francisco Unified School District schools and school districts in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin and Sonoma counties have canceled school for Thursday. 

In Alameda County, public school districts in the cities of Alameda, Berkeley, Oakland and Hayward have announced closures. The West Contra Costa and New Haven school districts have also announced closures. 

Most schools in Marin County are closed. A full list of closures is available at www.marinschools.org/SafeSchools/Pages/EmergencyServices/school-status.aspx 

Several schools in Sonoma County are closed as well. A list of Sonoma County closures is available at www.scoe.org/pub/htdocs/storm-update.html 

In addition the Novato Unified School District has already announced schools will be closed Friday.  

Most school districts anticipate being open on Friday, though San Francisco Unified officials said a final decision will be made before 5 p.m. Thursday. 

Oakland district officials said in a statement, "This is not a decision we make lightly, but given the severe weather predictions and the safety implications for students and staff, we want to take every precaution in order to safeguard our community." 

District officials said that what the National Weather Service refers to as a "powerful Pacific storm" with heavy rain and wind gusts "poses a significant safety risk for our students and staff." 

It will be a workday for Oakland schools central office staff but they will work from home, district officials said. 

SFUSD Superintendent Richard Carranza said in a statement, "We don't want to risk having our students injured or seriously delayed transporting to and from school. In addition to student absences, the storm could result in large numbers of staff absences, which could then lead to inadequate supervision of our students." 

ScottMorris0525p12/10/14 

CONTACT: Oakland schools spokesman Troy Flint (510) 473-5832 SFUSD (415) 241-6565 Novato Unified School District, Leslie Benjamin (415) 897-4259 

 

Copyright © 2014 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited. 

/www/bcn/general/12/newsclip.14.12.10.17.26.00.1.txt


New: Richmond police join demonstration against brutality

Laura Dixon (BCN)
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 09:55:00 PM

Richmond police Chief Chris Magnus and other police department brass stood shoulder to shoulder with other community members during a peaceful protest against police brutality in the East Bay city today. 

The last-minute demonstration organized by the RYSE Youth Center drew more than 100 people, including city council members and police officials, along MacDonald Avenue near 41st Street today protesting deadly police force against unarmed "black and brown men," said RYSE Executive Director Kimberly Aceves.  

While other Bay Area cities have erupted into sometimes violent or disruptive protests following the recent grand jury decisions not to indict the police officers who killed 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and 43-year-old Eric Garner in Staten Island, New York, today's demonstration was the first in Richmond and was free of any damage, traffic disruption or arrests, according to police and organizers. 

Aceves said her organization decided to hold the protest to give community members a "space to grieve and have a conversation" about the recent events. 

"For us, it was building on a national momentum," she said. 

The protest was also notable for the direct, non-confrontational involvement of police officers, including the city's police chief, who stood for several hours alongside protesters holding signs and chanting, according to Aceves. 

Richmond police Capt. Mark Gagan said police wanted to attend the demonstration not only to keep the peace, but also to show solidarity with the demonstrators. 

"People have a real need to have their voices heard, and when that is stifled, it magnifies the problems," said Gagan, who was among the officers who took part in today's demonstration. 

Aceves said seeing some of the department's top brass participating in today's protest came as a surprise but that she believes their sentiments were genuine. 

"I think symbolically, when there's some much division between communities and police departments, to have the highest ranking members of the department hold signs for 4.5 hours...I felt like it was definitely legitimate," she said. 

The police even ordered pizza for some protesters, including many who stood for nearly five hours to symbolize the length of time Michael Brown's body lay on the sidewalk following his fatal shooting, Aceves said. 

While she credited Magnus's progressive approach to policing and his commitment to building a positive relationship between the city's youth and police, she cautioned that there is still work to be done. 

"This is a good symbolic step, but we have to continue to roll up our sleeves and figure out how young people can stay safe in our communities and feel like RPD is there to protect them as well," Aceves said. 

She said the RYSE Center plans to hold future actions regarding police brutality against people of color


New: Councilmembers Arreguin and Worthington will meet the public tonight at 7 on the steps of the Old Berkeley City Hall despite cancellation of council meeting; Arreguin's statement

Berkeley Councilmember Jesse Arreguin
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 03:47:00 PM

Thank you all for reaching out to me regarding the recent protests of the killings of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and police brutality in general.

I am personally outraged over these killings and strongly support overall goal of these protests which is to raise awareness of the inequities in our criminal justice system and to make it clear that black lives matter. I have participated in these protests over the last two days to show my solidarity for this movement. However, as the Councilmember for the Downtown, I am concerned over incidents of vandalism and violence by a small fringe segment of these protests whose goal is confrontation and damage not advancing the broader movement.

I understand that these protests have elicited a wide range of feelings on all sides, which is why even though the Mayor has cancelled tonight’s City Council meeting, Councilmember Kriss Worthington and I will be on the steps of Old City Hall (2134 MLK) tonight at 7 pm to hear from the protestors and from residents about their views. 

Hopefully through non-violent action and through dialogue we can heal as a community and a country, and make positive change to prevent these incidents of police brutality from happening in the future. 

- Jesse Arreguin, Berkeley City Councilmember, District 4 

Below is my official statement in regards to the recent events: 

First, it is important that the message that black lives matter does not get lost in the unfortunate events of the last 48 hours. 

I strongly support the overwhelming majority of protesters who are peacefully opposing the racial inequities in our criminal justice system. Unfortunately, there is very small and antagonistic fringe engaging in senseless destruction and violence that undermines the legitimate demands to reform our justice system. This fringe cares about mayhem, not the message. 

I also support our officers to the extent that they have been working to keep our community safe and apprehending violent agitators. However, their indiscriminate reaction in such a stressful situation has not been perfect and may have added fuel to the fire by targeting both peaceful and non-peaceful protesters alike with tear gas and rubber bullets. Witnessing firsthand the protest at its early stages last night, it is unfortunate that many innocent participants and members of the media have been literally caught in the middle of a cycle of violence. 

My heart goes out to those peaceful protesters who were injured by both aggressors and the police, and to the many businesses who were vandalized and whose property has been damaged. I hope going forward that the police will partner with peaceful protesters to proactively identify, isolate, and arrest those who have no respect for our community by committing violence and destruction


Press Release: Mayor Bates' office's statement about why he cancelled tonight's Berkeley City Council meeting

From Charles Burress
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 02:00:00 PM

The Mayor’s office has just released this statement:

Dear members of the news media,

The regular Berkeley City Council meeting scheduled for 7 p.m. tonight, December 9, has been postponed, as well as the special Work Session scheduled for 5:30 p.m. this evening. The Council Chambers can hold about 125 people, and we understand substantially more people are interested in attending the meeting due to recent events in Berkeley. We want to ensure that the community has as much access as possible to public meetings. The Agenda for the December 9 meeting will be rescheduled for a future date and public notice will be given prior to that meeting. A notice of meeting cancellation will be issued by the City Clerk and publicly posted. We apologize for any inconvenience.


Bates' Office Officially Announces Cancellation of Berkeley City Council

Scott Morris (BCN)
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 01:05:00 PM

The Berkeley City Council has postponed its scheduled meeting for this evening because of planned disruptions by protesters, Mayor Tom Bates' office announced this afternoon. 

A protest announcement posted online had called on demonstrators to shut down the meeting and demand Bates' resignation over the police response to protests in Berkeley on Saturday, Sunday and Monday. 

The protests were the latest in a series over the police shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and the death of Eric Garner, 43, by a New York police officer's chokehold. 

While demonstrations in Oakland last week had been largely peaceful, protests in Berkeley Saturday quickly led to police tear-gassing protesters, who vandalized various businesses and hurled rocks and bottles at police officers. 

Sunday night's protests saw more vandalism before protesters marched to Oakland and blocked a freeway, where they were tear-gassed by the California Highway Patrol and eight were arrested. 

There was little vandalism in protests Monday night, but protesters again blocked a highway and Amtrak trains. Eventually the CHP arrested more than 150 demonstrators. 

With as many as 2,000 people attending Monday night's demonstrations and the call-out for protesters to attend this evening's City Council meeting, this evening's meeting was postponed. 

"The Council Chambers can hold about 125 people, and we understand substantially more people are interested in attending the meeting due to recent events in Berkeley," the mayor's office said in a statement. 

"We want to ensure that the community has as much access as possible to public meetings. The agenda for the December 9 meeting will be rescheduled for a future date and public notice will be given prior to that meeting," Bates' office said.


Flash: Berkeley Mayor Cancels Tonight's Council Meeting: Afraid Protesters Will Attend.

Becky O'Malley
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 11:35:00 AM

James Chang, aide to Berkeley Councilmember Jesse Arreguin, confirmed today that Mayor Tom Bates informed him that tonight's City Council meeting is being cancelled because there might be protesters in attendance, and the council chambers would be too small to hold them all. Chang said that Bates as the council's presiding officer under the city charter, has the power to cancel meetings at his sole discretion. Councilmember Kriss Worthington told the Planet that his aide, Alejandro Soto-Vigil, had been told the same thing, but he pointed out that the city of Berkeley could use some larger meeting rooms in buildings owned by the Berkeley Unified School District or Berkeley City College if the size of the council chambers in Berkeley's Maudelle Shirek Building (Old City Hall) is really the problem which Bates fears. A call to the Mayor's press aide, Charles Burress (who used to cover Berkeley for the San Francisco Chronicle) has not been returned.


The Night They Stopped the Trains to Show Solidarity with ... um...We'll Get Back to You on That (Opinion)

Carol Denney
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 10:24:00 AM

2000 protesters surged onto the freeway and stopped traffic in both directions for hours in my neighborhood. They drove a vehicle onto the train tracks and stopped all the north-south train traffic. We figured they hated cars, but who knew they hated trains, one of my neighborhood's best features. 

My neighbors and I at University and San Pablo formed a perimeter line around our building making sure nobody stopped near our doors or windows. They apparently hate our co-tenant Wells Fargo, whose door they smashed in and tried to burn Saturday night, but they sure love its bank machine; dozens of protesters with their faces obscured in typical Berkeley protester fashion stopped for cash. I asked one of them to take the kerchief off of her face and she immediately did, claiming she was "peaceful." When I asked her why she was obscuring her face she said, "the police..." and that's all she had. 

The protesters were almost all on the phone, staring into lighted screens in the darkness, walking like zombies past the drunks and stoners on the corner while getting instructions, according to one, from some Twitter feed. So much for "organic" community rage. I'm not sure little hand-held gadgets make modern-day mobs any different than mobs of old, but they sure make them funnier to watch. It's clearly hard to walk in the dark while staring at them and gosh, texting must be a nightmare. 

I've worked on police accountability issues for over twenty years, and went to a meeting earlier in the evening hoping to enlist some support in dialing back the gratuitous vandalism, clarifying the message, channeling energy into more productive and creative expression, but there were no takers. People were bent on disrupting the next city council meeting to present a list of demands. Oh, and one young white student wanted to trash "the mall." 

Where's the mall? I didn't even know we had a mall. I excused myself and left. The only thing locally that resembles a mall are the beleaguered businesses under the Sather Gate parking structure which include Revolution Books. 

So don't say I didn't warn you when the protesters come for Revolution Books. Expect them to claim they were "provoked" by some title or other. Just sweep up the glass and imagine living next door to Wells Fargo


Berkeley police arrest nine in relatively peaceful protest

Keith Burbank (BCN)
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 10:32:00 AM

Berkeley police have announced this morning they arrested nine people in a "relatively peaceful" protest Monday night.  

Of the nine individuals, one is a juvenile. 

Monday's event marks another day in which people in the Bay Area have demonstrated to protest the treatment of unarmed African American men by white policemen.  

Berkeley police spokeswoman Jennifer Coats said demonstrators were relatively peaceful throughout the event. She is unaware of any looting or damage to property in the city. 

Also, Coats said there are no reports of injuries to Berkeley police officers or community members.


Berkeley: CHP arrests more than 150 people during highway protests

Keith Burbank (BCN)
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 10:29:00 AM

The California Highway Patrol has announced that it arrested more than 150 protesters in Monday's standoff that blocked traffic in both directions on Interstate Highway 80 in Berkeley for about 90 minutes. 

At about 8:30 p.m., a group of protesters broke through the perimeter fencing on the south side of the highway at Aquatic Park, officials said, and flooded onto the highway.  

Traffic stopped and the protesters began walking west in the eastbound lanes of traffic. CHP officers attempted to clear the highway of demonstrators and were met with violence, including assaults on officers with rocks and other objects, CHP officials said.  

Officers were able to stop the westward movement of protesters on I-80 at Powell Street and CHP officials report that the freeway reopened about 10 p.m. 

The law enforcement agency says it took the more than 150 individuals into custody for a variety of offenses including resisting/delaying/obstructing a peace officer. Officers booked the individuals into the Santa Rita Jail in Dublin without incident.  

The protest started before 8 p.m. in Berkeley and drew upwards of 1,500 people who marched on University Avenue before entering the highway. The CHP says it respects the right of people to peacefully assemble and demonstrate, but "the freeway is not the place to express one's opinions."  

Officials say a collision with a car at freeway speeds has the same effect on a person as if they fell from a five-story building.


An open letter to the City Council of Berkeley in response to Linda Maio’s Dec. 8 statement about the protests (Opinion)

Steve Martinot
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 10:27:00 AM

When I first read Linda Maio’s statement about the protests, what I wanted to say was this. If you don’t want violence to occur on these demostrations, all you have to do is send the police home. There will be peacefulness. But then someone convinced me that that wouldn’t be enough. What you, Linda, and the rest of the city council need to do is get out there with the demonstrators, make yourselves known, march with them, and offer some solidarity with their cry for justice. You do believe in justice, don’t you?

Do you know the difference between a police department and an occupying army? The role of a police department is to protect people's rights, especially their right to call for justice from their own government. The role of an army of occupation is to insure that people obey the rule of power, and that any disobedience be squelched. And that inherently implies violence.

But after the people took over interstate 80 and shut down the Bay Bridge I realized that you have a bigger job. In fact, the job you have is so big I don’t think you can even see it. It is, as they say, too big to see. 

And that job is, to sit down with the demonstrators, and negotiate with them. And by negotiating with them, show that the city of Berkeley can do something that no other governmental entity in the entire US is up to doing. That is, being responsive to the demands made by the people. 

Can you dig the difference between being responsible (to whom?) and being responsive (to the people)? 

To negotiate will mean going among the demonstrators, calling them to a meeting right where they stand (or sit, or walk), and through discussions, figure out how Berkeley as a city can play a role in getting justice for the many victims of police violence (including our brother Oscar Grant, our own Kayla Moore, the young Michael Brown, the distressed Eric Garner, and the some 20 odd others that have been shot and killed by police since Aug. 7, 2014. 

The demonstrators are calling for justice for all these victims of police violence. These victims were all shot by members of the same Fraternal Order of Police to which the Berkeley police also belong . Your cops are members of the same organization as those that murder people all across the country. That is a place to start. Get the FOP to take a stand against murder. Get the FOP to declare murder a crime, no matter who commits it.


On the Berkeley protests (opinion)

Councilmember Linda Maio Vice Mayor of the City of Berkeley
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 10:25:00 AM

Dear residents,

This message follows the City Manager’s statement I forwarded to you yesterday. This one is from me.

The injustice that came to national attention in Ferguson and then Staten Island has deep roots, characterized by racism and fear, and it is widespread. It cannot, must not, be tolerated any longer. The police from these communities report they are feared and hated. They have the weaponry, authority, and power. Like apartheid in South Africa, there are two different realities, one far more powerful than the other. The question before all of us, as a community and as a nation, is where do we go from here to advance meaningful change.

I respect and support the demonstrations’ intent, but the violence and vandalism cannot be tolerated. I am extremely dismayed by the level of destruction and loss visited upon our city and its merchants. A small group of people have wreaked havoc on our Downtown, the Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center, and businesses in other areas of our city. It is cowardly and senseless, accomplishing nothing but enmity toward the legitimate and peaceful protests, and their intent, which I support. 

Berkeley has an exemplary police force that is here to protect us. They have had to request mutual aid given the potential for violence. That means other police jurisdictions respond alongside our force. The mood was tense last night at the public safety building, where I was observing the protest, yet there was no violence at the early evening march. The late evening march was another matter. 

Some people have written about police abuses on Saturday and late last night. You have my word that we will look into every one. I trust our police will act in concert with Berkeley’s values. That does not mean that we will tolerate violence and looting in any form, and those participating in such acts will be arrested. 

Berkeley has a strong history of citizen protest coupled with nonviolence. We have heard there will be another demonstration tonight. Our goal is to support peaceful expressions of solidarity. 

--


Flash: Berkeley: Protesters continue to block city streets, cleared from freeway, arrested

Jamey Padojino (BCN) and Planet
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 12:11:00 PM
Dennis Culver
Dennis Culver
Dennis Culver
Dennis Culver
Dennis Culver

Protesters continue to snarl traffic in Berkeley tonight on city streets, the freeway, public transit and train tracks.

They have blocked both directions of the Eastshore Highway near University Avenue twice tonight within an hour.

About a hundred protesters were seen entering eastbound lanes of the Eastshore Highway near University Avenue and some jumped over the center divide to westbound lanes around 8 p.m. CHP officers were able to quickly take the protesters off the freeway.

The off-ramps to University Avenue from the freeway where Interstate Highway 80 and Interstate Highway 580 intersect have been closed.

At about 8:45 p.m., protesters were seen walking on eastbound and westbound lanes of the freeway near University Avenue bringing cars to a halt.

The approaches to eastbound Highway 80 from Highway 580, Interstate Highway 880 and the Bay Bridge have been closed due to the protests, CHP officials said. 

Motorists have been advised to take state Highway 24 and Interstate Highway 680 as an alternate route, according to the CHP. 

Around 10:15 p.m., protesters were being cleared from both directions of the freeway but traffic was still backed up, CHP officials said.  

Near midnight, Ali Winston reported on Twitter that protesters were being arrested behind the Ross for Less store in the Emeryville shopping center adjacent to Powell Street, near the Powell freeway exit. He said that he himself had been detained for several hours by police who he said wouldn't look at his press credential, which was a message from a local editor on his phone. 

Demonstrators were also seen walking on a pedestrian overcrossing above the freeway south of University Avenue and were blocked by police. 

Berkeley firefighters have responded to a report of a woman in labor while stuck on the freeway shortly before 10 p.m., a fire dispatcher said. She has since been removed from the freeway and transported a hospital, according to a dispatcher. 

The large group has gathered in the city's downtown area against decisions made by grand juries to not indict white police officers in the deaths of unarmed black men Missouri and New York. 

Ferguson, Missouri police Officer Darren Wilson fatally shot Michael Brown, 18, in August and last month a grand jury did not indict Wilson, who has since resigned from his position. 

Garner, 43, was held in a chokehold by New York City police Officer Daniel Pantaleo and died in July. The grand jury's decision to not indict Pantaleo was announced last week. 

The march started around 5 p.m. at Bancroft Way and Telegraph Avenue near the University of California at Berkeley campus. The group then walked to Shattuck Avenue and reached the city's Police Department headquarters at 2100 Martin Luther King Jr. Way around 6:30 p.m. They then continued marching west to University Avenue, according to police. Police said the demonstrators have been peaceful, though some threw objects while at police headquarters. 

The Downtown Berkeley BART station at 2160 Shattuck Ave. was closed shortly before 6:30 p.m. due to the protests and trains were not stopping at the station, a BART dispatcher said. 

The station reopened at about 8:25 p.m., the dispatcher said. 

A line of police officers in riot gear attempted to block protesters from reaching Interstate Highway 580 in Berkeley this evening. 

The protesters were heard chanting "Hands up, don't shoot," as officers were assembled on Sixth Street at University Avenue at about 7:30 p.m. to prevent hundreds of protesters from entering the freeway. 

There were also demonstrators at San Pablo Avenue and Addison Street as of about 8 p.m., police said. Traffic is heavy in the downtown area including University Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Way, according to police. 

Around 8:30 p.m., protesters were seen blocking an Amtrak train near Addison and Second streets and remained there at about 10:15 p.m., police said. 

Protesters have also made their way to Emeryville near the Powell Street Plaza shopping center. 

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit officials said some buses have been detoured due to the protests and there may be delays on its Transbay lines such as the F and LC lines. 

Protests on Saturday and Sunday nights turned violent resulting in multiple arrests, vandalized businesses and injured police officers, according to police.


Repairs are underway in Downtown Berkeley after Sunday night's destruction (photo essay)

Rob Wrenn
Monday December 08, 2014 - 11:34:00 AM
Windows at Walgreen's store between Shattuck and Adeline at Russell are under repair.
Rob Wrenn
Windows at Walgreen's store between Shattuck and Adeline at Russell are under repair.
The front door of the Martin Luther King Civic Center (Berkeley's City Hall) was smashed by protesters.
Rob Wrenn
The front door of the Martin Luther King Civic Center (Berkeley's City Hall) was smashed by protesters.
City Bank doors are being fixed.
Rob Wrenn
City Bank doors are being fixed.
Screens on the ATMs at the Wells Fargo bank on Shattuck were damaged.
Rob Wrenn
Screens on the ATMs at the Wells Fargo bank on Shattuck were damaged.


Violent Berkeley Protest Ends in Early Morning

Keith Burbank (BCN)
Monday December 08, 2014 - 08:56:00 AM

Berkeley police are reporting this morning that the protest Sunday night and earlier this morning over the failure of a New York grand jury to indict a white officer in the death of an unarmed black man has ended.  

Police officers made five arrests for various charges, said spokeswoman and Berkeley police Officer Jennifer Coats.  

One of the protestors arrested is allegedly responsible for the damage to Trader's Joes that occurred in Saturday night's protests. Police said the protestor used his skateboard to do the damage to the grocery store. 

Police said they arrested another person for throwing a heavy object that injured an officer in Saturday's protests. Both were arrested for those individual offenses as well as alleged offenses during the demonstrations Sunday night through this morning. 

Police did not say what those offenses are. 

Two officers suffered minor, non-life threatening injuries Sunday night, police said. 

A protestor was injured when he was assaulted with a hammer as he tried to stop other protestors from looting a Radio Shack on Shattuck Avenue. The injured protestor was taken to the hospital with injuries that were not considered life threatening, according to the police.  

Demonstrators smashed windows and looted stores, mainly along Shattuck Avenue and Telegraph Avenue in Berkeley, police said. The City of Berkeley's Department of Public Works is helping businesses affected by Sunday night's protests board up their windows to secure their property.  

Protests in the Bay Area have been frequent during the past week, and have occurred in Berkeley, Oakland, San Francisco and other locations.


Press Release: Berkeley Demonstrations End

Officer Jennifer Coats, Public Information Officer, Berkeley Police Department
Monday December 08, 2014 - 03:37:00 AM

It appears the demonstration has concluded. We are sending our officers home. We would like to thank the many agencies that assisted us this. I wanted to provide you with a brief update, before I head home this morning. I will be in late tomorrow.

We made five arrests connected with the demonstration for various charges (I don’t have a specific list of charges at this time). One of the arrested individuals was also the responsible who damaged Trader Joes the previous night using his skateboard. Another individual was arrested, was responsible for throwing a heavy object on Saturday, injury one of our officers. They were arrested for those offenses as well as additional charges for last night’s demonstration.  

We had two officers injured during last night’s demonstrations, both suffered minor non-life threatening injuries. 

We are aware of one protester who was injured when he was assaulted with a hammer when he attempted to keep other protestors from looting a Radio Shack on Shattuck Avenue. He was transported to a local hospital for his injuries, which were consider non-life threatening.  

There was significant damage cause to several business in Berkeley. The main focus of the damage appears to be along Telegraph Avenue as well as Shattuck Avenue. The City of Berkeley Public Works Department is in the process of helping secure, by boarding up windows for the business effected by last night’s demonstrations. Many of the businesses had windows smashed out and several stores were looted.  

Not sure when the next update will occur. I will be in later this afternoon.


Updates on Berkeley Demonstrations, Riots, Looting

Sunday December 07, 2014 - 11:55:00 PM

Follow on Twitter for live updates #Berkeleyprotests,

12:20 a. m. Demonstrators have continued to march south on Shattuck Avenue near Oregon Street.Vandalism reported at Any Mountain and Walgreens. (BPD via Nixle). For full details, view this message on the web.

12:31 a.m. Demonstrators are now in the area of Telegraph Avenue and Ashby Avenue. Receiving reports of vandalism and looting at Whole Foods Market on Telegraph. (BPD via Nixle).



Related Searches: #oaklandprotest, berkeleyside, berkeley, #berkeleyprotests tonight, #berkeleyprotests livestream


Press Release: Demonstrators in Downtown Berkeley

Berkeley Police via Nixle.com
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 11:36:00 PM

Entered 4 minutes ago: Demonstrators now at Allston and MLK. Berkeley Police Department 

Entered 13 minutes ago: Demonstrators in the area of City Hall, 2180 Milvia Street


Press Release: Mayor Issues Press Release Re Protests

From Charles Burress
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 12:22:00 AM

Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates this afternoon released the following statement about the recent protests in Berkeley:  

“I believe Berkeley citizens share in the nationwide concern over the events in Ferguson and New York City and recognize the need to address problems in police-community relations. I fully support the right of citizens to peacefully protest and exercise their First Amendment rights, but the violence we’ve seen the past two nights in Berkeley is unacceptable. 

“While the overwhelming majority of the demonstrators were non-violent, we have had numerous reports of masked demonstrators as the main perpetrators of the damage and destruction. We don’t know who they are, but they are not welcome in Berkeley. 

“We have also received accusations of police use of unnecessary force. Berkeley has one of the best police departments in the nation with an exemplary record of conduct. It’s possible that one or more officers may have exceeded what was required under the circumstances and could face discipline, but that determination requires an impartial review that we have not had an opportunity to complete yet. 

“Free speech and public dialogue are the cornerstone of Berkeley history. I urge protest organizers to communicate with City officials, as we have successfully done in the past, so that police can play a supportive role in diverting traffic from the protest route and helping to avoid possible confrontations with peaceful demonstrators. I hope tonight’s protest will follow in this tradition of Berkeley and be non-violent.”


Helicoppers: How Police Tactics Fuel Confrontation

Gar Smith
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 11:35:00 PM

(Saturday, December 6, 2014) -- It has just turned 10 o'clock. The sound of helicopters continues to rattle the night sky over North Berkeley. It's been like this for hours. 

What began as a rally on the UC Berkeley campus has morphed into a roving protest against police murders of unarmed civilians. It seems to be open season on young men of color from coast-to-coast in the Land of the Free. 

According to a recent posting on The Daily Kos, "Every 28 hours a black man, woman, or child is murdered by police or vigilante law enforcement." 

The public response to such an outrage was predictable: marches in the streets. The police response also followed a long tradition: form a police-line that blocks the path of the public march and invites a confrontation. 

But there is a modern addition to the decades-old bully-boy tactics of urban policing. Helicopters. 

On one hand, a police helicopter circling overhead during daylight hours can be seen as providing a public service—i.e., identifying, at a safe distance, a section of the city where holiday shopping might be temporarily inconvenienced or rendered inaccessible. 

At night, however, the rumble of circling choppers becomes an endless annoyance. But when cop-choppers are scrambled into the nighttime sky, this produces something more than an irritant. Though the police community would be loath to admit it, the presence of these helicopters actually helps fuel public anger and escalates the potential for community protests. 

What Good to Police Choppers Do? 

There is little strategic advantage to be gained by filling the evening air with the noise of spinning rotors and the din of hydrocarbon-spewing engines. The advantage is mainly psychological. Police helicopters are iconic: They are akin to flying cudgels. Helicopter sorties are designed to remind the people on the ground that they are less significant than the powerful few who control the weapons of civil repression. Pistols, rifles, batons, tear gas and helicopters all magnify the message: "We are as gods; We are all-powerful; We look down on you; We control your fate at our whim." 

Police choppers mainly serve as a high-flying show-of-force but they are self-defeating. Why? Because the very presence of these aircraft is a provocation—a bullying challenge that promotes anxiety and anger from below. 

One of the two helicopters droning overhead is equipped with a searchlight powerful enough to illuminate the proceedings on the ground. The brilliant spotlight cuts through the night sky accusingly, like God's index finger, pointing to the scene of any potential riot. 

A band of protesters walking down a city street has no way of announcing its presence to the broader community. Police helicopters do that work for the protesters. It's like having a tax-supported flying billboard constantly assaulting the eardrums and directing attention to small isolated acts of protest that would otherwise remain largely invisible. The racket—which is impossible to ignore—inevitably draws the curious and the rebellious alike toward the officially "forbidden" activity. 

Flying Billboards of Provocation? 

Do police helicopters really act as a beacon, attracting mobs and feeding rebellion? Are they, in legal parlance, an "attractive nuisance"? 

I decided to put my theory to the test. 

I put on my walking shoes and set out in the direction of the circling choppers. I assumed a delegation of protesters might have descended on the North Berkeley BART station and blocked train traffic. When I arrived at the station, however, there were no shouting crowds. But there were no trains to board, either. 

Berkeley police had shut the station down. A police officer on the other side of a locked metal grate explained that there were no protesters inside; the station had been locked down as a preventative measure. In short, the police had shut down the station to prevent the protesters from shutting down the station. 

Turning my eyes to the sky, I could see a helicopter armed with a searchlight zeroing into a location that appeared to be in the vicinity of University Avenue. Walking toward University, I found Acton closed off by police. The intersection at Berkeley Way was filled with a dozen motorcycle officers straddling their parked Harleys. 

As I passed, I gazed at them with curiosity. They glared back with suspicion. 

Approaching University Avenue, I could see lines of helmeted police officers decked out in riot gear. A tall BPD officer spun around, faced me and demanded to know where I was going. I was told that I would be allowed to pass through the police line only if I was not going to linger in the area and he made it very clear that I had no right to wander about behind the police line. 

Impasse at University and Acton 

As I passed through the BPD's Black Picket Fence, I was surprised to see a number of officers who were really quite small physically. Although it was difficult to tell (given the uniformity of their bulky black outfits), I concluded the smaller officers – a few barely topping 5 feet -- must have been women. 

Once through the police line, I could see another line of Berkeley police blocking all four lanes of University from one curb to the next. They were standing shoulder-to-shoulder with facemasks down and truncheons at the ready. Scores of additional riot-equipped officers lined both sides of the street. 

A small number of local residents and students (some of whom had stopped on their bicycles to observe the proceedings and snap photos) looked on. There appeared to be more police on the scene than there were protesters. Nonetheless, a police officer picked up a loudspeaker, identified himself, and began to warn the crowd that "under the laws of the State of California" their presence constituted an "illegal assembly." 

Unfortunately, his comments were difficult to hear because the loudspeaker interrupted his remarks with shrieks of feedback. At other times it cut out all together. Even the words that did manage to make it out of the bullhorn were rendered inaudible every time a helicopter passed overhead. 

The officer's half-delivered warning did not explain why the small crowd's Constitutional First Amendment rights had been rescinded. (It may have been because protesters had earlier blocked traffic on University Avenue. However, at that moment it was not protesters but the police who had made it impossible for traffic to move in either direction on University. Moreover, a wall of three motorcycle officers had taken up a position at University and Sacramento to block any cars from entering the area.) 

After a period of time, the officer made a second attempt to address the crowd. This time he had a new, more powerful bullhorn. But, ance again he failed to get the message out. He repeated that the gathering had been deemed an "illegal assembly" and had reached the point where he was supposed to spell out the consequences for "failure to disburse." If people failed to leave peacefully, he announced, "You will be subject to arrest and other consequences of police response, which may include the use of less-than-lethal…." 

At this point, the bullhorn's battery apparently gave out. The sentence remained unfinished and, as far as I could tell, no further warnings were issued. 

Repositioning 

I decided to leave the area. As I walked east toward the UC campus, I was passed by a half-dozen college-aged students who were laughing among themselves about the fact that the police gathered at the intersection apparently did not realize that "Everyone has already left the area!" and protesters were already headed to a new protest site. 

About 10 minutes later, this development apparently reached the "higher-ups" and the helicopters abruptly left the airspace over Ledgers Liquors and headed east to towards Telegraph Avenue. 

While it is a simple matter to redeploy a helicopter, it was clear that it would be a much more cumbersome chore to gather all the riot-helmeted and motorcycle-straddling police assembled in and around the University-Acton intersection and ship them across town to a new theater of operations. And, of course, if the protesters continued to be nimble (instead of confrontational), they could play this scenario endlessly, forcing the police to break camp time and time again. 

It is now nearly 11 o'clock and the monotonous drumming of the helicopters has finally left the skies. It looks like we will finally be allowed to get a good night's rest. 

Here's hoping that no tear gas canisters will be launched, no heads will be banged in by truncheons, no storefront glass will be shattered and everyone will be able to head home without breaking a sweat.


New: Society of Professional Journalists Raps Berkeley Assault on Members of Media (Open Letter)

Monday December 08, 2014 - 01:02:00 AM

From: Northern California Society of Professional Journalists Freedom of Information Committee Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 04:50 PM To: Berkeley Mayor's Office; Meehan, Michael Subject: Urgent - Police assault journalists in Berkeley

Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates

Berkeley Police Chief Michael K. Meehan

By Email

Dear Mayor Bates and Chief Meehan:

The Northern California chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists condemns, in the strongest terms possible, the outrageous conduct of law enforcement officers who assaulted members of the media during last night’s (Saturday, Dec. 6, 2014) demonstrations in Berkeley, California. You have an obligation to ensure that all officers, including those providing mutual aid, respect the constitutional rights of the press.

SPJ has been in touch with a number of working journalists who say they were struck with police batons while working and clearly displaying press credentials. In one incident, a journalist who was on assignment tells SPJ that he was holding out press credentials and telling an officer he was a news photographer when struck. This same journalist also reported seeing a colleague take “serious blows” from police who “hit him with impunity,” despite the fact that the colleague was “obviously press.” Other reporters also described witnessing or experiencing similar assaults. 

Even more disturbing, several journalists confirm that an officer struck a news photographer in the head with a baton. As you know, this can constitute deadly force and is only justifiable under extremely limited circumstances.[1] (As the California Court of Appeal noted in an unpublished 2010 opinion, even when using a baton as deadly force, “officers should avoid striking a suspect's head because of the potential for serious injury or death.”)[2] 

We are sure that you agree attacks on journalists are entirely unacceptable. Reporters are on scene to report the news as it happens. They are not participants in the protests. Under no circumstances should members of the press be subject to such gratuitous and potentially deadly police violence. 

Word is being spread of plans for another protest to begin in Berkeley at 5 p.m. today, Sunday Dec. 7, 2014. We implore you to ensure that all law enforcement officials working tonight’s protest, including those providing mutual aid, adhere to their constitutional obligations and respect the freedom of the press. We also call for a thorough investigation into inappropriate uses of force by officers against members of the news media. 

We look forward to your response. 

Lila Lahood 

President, SPJ Nothern California Chapter 

Geoffrey W. King 

Thomas Peele 

Co-Chairs, SPJ Norcal Freedom of Information Committee


Press Release: Demonstrators Damaging and Looting Businesses on Shattuck Avenue, Avoid the Area

From the Berkeley Police Department via Nixle
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 11:22:00 PM

Currently, the demonstrators are in the area of Shattuck Avenue and Center Street. Several businesses are being damaged and looted. As a safety precaution please avoid the area.


Helicoppers: How Police Tactics Fuel Confrontation (News Analysis)

Gar Smith
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 11:24:00 PM

(Saturday, December 6, 2014) -- It has just turned 10 o'clock. The sound of helicopters continues to rattle the night sky over North Berkeley. It's been like this for hours. 

What began as a rally on the UC Berkeley campus has morphed into a roving protest against police murders of unarmed civilians. It seems to be open season on young men of color from coast-to-coast in the Land of the Free. 

According to a recent posting on The Daily Kos, "Every 28 hours a black man, woman, or child is murdered by police or vigilante law enforcement." 

The public response to such an outrage was predictable: marches in the streets. The police response also followed a long tradition: form a police-line that blocks the path of the public march and invites a confrontation. 

But there is a modern addition to the decades-old bully-boy tactics of urban policing. Helicopters. 

On one hand, a police helicopter circling overhead during daylight hours can be seen as providing a public service—i.e., identifying, at a safe distance, a section of the city where holiday shopping might be temporarily inconvenienced or rendered inaccessible. 

At night, however, the rumble of circling choppers becomes an endless annoyance. But when cop-choppers are scrambled into the nighttime sky, this produces something more than an irritant. Though the police community would be loath to admit it, the presence of these helicopters actually helps fuel public anger and escalates the potential for community protests. 

What Good to Police Choppers Do? 

There is little strategic advantage to be gained by filling the evening air with the noise of spinning rotors and the din of hydrocarbon-spewing engines. The advantage is mainly psychological. Police helicopters are iconic: They are akin to flying cudgels. Helicopter sorties are designed to remind the people on the ground that they are less significant than the powerful few who control the weapons of civil repression. Pistols, rifles, batons, tear gas and helicopters all magnify the message: "We are as gods; We are all-powerful; We look down on you; We control your fate at our whim." 

Police choppers mainly serve as a high-flying show-of-force but they are self-defeating. Why? Because the very presence of these aircraft is a provocation—a bullying challenge that promotes anxiety and anger from below. 

One of the two helicopters droning overhead is equipped with a searchlight powerful enough to illuminate the proceedings on the ground. The brilliant spotlight cuts through the night sky accusingly, like God's index finger, pointing to the scene of any potential riot. 

A band of protesters walking down a city street has no way of announcing its presence to the broader community. Police helicopters do that work for the protesters. It's like having a tax-supported flying billboard constantly assaulting the eardrums and directing attention to small isolated acts of protest that would otherwise remain largely invisible. The racket—which is impossible to ignore—inevitably draws the curious and the rebellious alike toward the officially "forbidden" activity. 

Flying Billboards of Provocation? 

Do police helicopters really act as a beacon, attracting mobs and feeding rebellion? Are they, in legal parlance, an "attractive nuisance"? 

I decided to put my theory to the test. 

I put on my walking shoes and set out in the direction of the circling choppers. I assumed a delegation of protesters might have descended on the North Berkeley BART station and blocked train traffic. When I arrived at the station, however, there were no shouting crowds. But there were no trains to board, either. 

Berkeley police had shut the station down. A police officer on the other side of a locked metal grate explained that there were no protesters inside; the station had been locked down as a preventative measure. In short, the police had shut down the station to prevent the protesters from shutting down the station. 

Turning my eyes to the sky, I could see a helicopter armed with a searchlight zeroing into a location that appeared to be in the vicinity of University Avenue. Walking toward University, I found Acton closed off by police. The intersection at Berkeley Way was filled with a dozen motorcycle officers straddling their parked Harleys. 

As I passed, I gazed at them with curiosity. They glared back with suspicion. 

Approaching University Avenue, I could see lines of helmeted police officers decked out in riot gear. A tall BPD officer spun around, faced me and demanded to know where I was going. I was told that I would be allowed to pass through the police line only if I was not going to linger in the area and he made it very clear that I had no right to wander about behind the police line. 

Impasse at University and Acton 

As I passed through the BPD's Black Picket Fence, I was surprised to see a number of officers who were really quite small physically. Although it was difficult to tell (given the uniformity of their bulky black outfits), I concluded the smaller officers – a few barely topping 5 feet -- must have been women. 

Once through the police line, I could see another line of Berkeley police blocking all four lanes of University from one curb to the next. They were standing shoulder-to-shoulder with facemasks down and truncheons at the ready. Scores of additional riot-equipped officers lined both sides of the street. 

A small number of local residents and students (some of whom had stopped on their bicycles to observe the proceedings and snap photos) looked on. There appeared to be more police on the scene than there were protesters. Nonetheless, a police officer picked up a loudspeaker, identified himself, and began to warn the crowd that "under the laws of the State of California" their presence constituted an "illegal assembly." 

Unfortunately, his comments were difficult to hear because the loudspeaker interrupted his remarks with shrieks of feedback. At other times it cut out all together. Even the words that did manage to make it out of the bullhorn were rendered inaudible every time a helicopter passed overhead. 

The officer's half-delivered warning did not explain why the small crowd's Constitutional First Amendment rights had been rescinded. (It may have been because protesters had earlier blocked traffic on University Avenue. However, at that moment it was not protesters but the police who had made it impossible for traffic to move in either direction on University. Moreover, a wall of three motorcycle officers had taken up a position at University and Sacramento to block any cars from entering the area.) 

After a period of time, the officer made a second attempt to address the crowd. This time he had a new, more powerful bullhorn. But, ance again he failed to get the message out. He repeated that the gathering had been deemed an "illegal assembly" and had reached the point where he was supposed to spell out the consequences for "failure to disburse." If people failed to leave peacefully, he announced, "You will be subject to arrest and other consequences of police response, which may include the use of less-than-lethal…." 

At this point, the bullhorn's battery apparently gave out. The sentence remained unfinished and, as far as I could tell, no further warnings were issued. 

Repositioning 

I decided to leave the area. As I walked east toward the UC campus, I was passed by a half-dozen college-aged students who were laughing among themselves about the fact that the police gathered at the intersection apparently did not realize that "Everyone has already left the area!" and protesters were already headed to a new protest site. 

About 10 minutes later, this development apparently reached the "higher-ups" and the helicopters abruptly left the airspace over Ledgers Liquors and headed east to towards Telegraph Avenue. 

While it is a simple matter to redeploy a helicopter, it was clear that it would be a much more cumbersome chore to gather all the riot-helmeted and motorcycle-straddling police assembled in and around the University-Acton intersection and ship them across town to a new theater of operations. And, of course, if the protesters continued to be nimble (instead of confrontational), they could play this scenario endlessly, forcing the police to break camp time and time again. 

It is now nearly 11 o'clock and the monotonous drumming of the helicopters has finally left the skies. It looks like we will finally be allowed to get a good night's rest. 

Here's hoping that no tear gas canisters will be launched, no heads will be banged in by truncheons, no storefront glass will be shattered and everyone will be able to head home without breaking a sweat.


Demonstrators march from Berkeley, block Highway 24 near 51st, Claremont

Erin Baldassari (BCN)
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 09:24:00 PM

Demonstrations in Berkeley against police brutality have moved into Oakland this evening and breached state Highway 24 at 51 Street, according to police and protesters.

A California Highway Patrol officer said eastbound Highway 24 was closed due to police activity. Reports and photos on Twitter showed protestors on the freeway blocking traffic.

Demonstrator Alessandro Tiberio said the protest began at Bancroft and Telegraph avenues around 5 p.m. with only 50 people. Soon, the crowd swelled to 500 or more, according to Tiberio and police.

Tiberio said the march started with "very positive energy." He came to the demonstration to support black people who are protesting, he said.

"I'm an ally," Tiberio said. "It's important to stay focused on the fact that black lives matter. It's not that all lives don't matter but I'm here to support especially the black people who are most often the ones victimized by the police."

Berkeley police Officer Jennifer Coats said at least one demonstrator sustained minor injuries when he tried to prevent a business's windows from being broken by someone at the demonstration. 

"One protester was trying to stop another protester from looting and he was struck with a hammer," Coats said, adding the man was transported to the hospital with injuries not considered life threatening. No Berkeley police officers were injured tonight, Coats said. 

The demonstrators left Berkeley and marched into Oakland around 8:30 p.m. Coats said the group splintered into two groups and accounts on Twitter indicated they met up again near the freeway entrance to Highway 24. 

Six people were arrested Saturday night during demonstrations in Berkeley, which coincided with dozens of protests in the Bay Area and across the country this week against police brutality.  

Demonstrators have taken to the streets every day in Oakland since a Wednesday grand jury's decision not to indict a white New York police officer in the chokehold death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man.  

The demonstrations this week follow similar protests the week prior stemming from a Nov. 24 grand jury decision not to indict Ferguson, Missouri, police Officer Darren Wilson in the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown.


Berkeley Police Tear Gas Harms Residents (Public Comment)

Marcia Poole
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 05:11:00 PM

We live on Regent St. and were at home when we started having burning eyes, skin and lungs. It seems that the police had started firing tear gas at the demonstrators on Telegraph Avenue. This is the most densely populated area in the city and the result of this police action had a direct impact on the residents living up here. When I called the 911 number and reported the problem and asked them to stop the tear gassing, the dispatcher said it was the protestors who had used tear gas and missiles against the police. They did not seem to care that the police action of gassing Telegraph Avenue was harming residents. Shades of the 1960s and James Rector.


Reflections On Broken Windows (Opinion)

Carol Denney
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 09:20:00 AM

Protesters tried to set fire to my apartment building last night, white people in masks who were stopped by my young Latino neighbors. The protesters brought a tank of gas with them to the march. We had to rescue a recycling bin, which they wanted to use as a barricade or perhaps burn. All this does is hemorrhage overtime pay into police pockets and frighten people away from joining marches.

We have children in this building. We have dozens of residents who stood in front of our apartments astonished at being targeted, watching the circling helicopters in the moonlit sky. We have everything in common with people who oppose police brutality and support police accountability. We are old and young, we are black, white, latino, asian, and pacific islanders. We are a rainbow community with stories of our own about police misconduct.

What do you masked protesters prove with broken windows? What message do you send by smashing into a grocery store, a yarn store, or even the local Wells Fargo branch, which is right under my neighbors' apartment homes?

I'm not someone who has not marched, sat in, gone to jail. But I will not provide cover for cowards who exploit a peaceful effort to join the national voice against police corruption at a crucial moment. Broken windows might catch a photographer's or reporter's attention momentarily, but whatever ambiguous message vandalism sends is not nearly as powerful as numbers, which masked vandals never seem to master. Peaceful, nonviolent tactics don't just sound nice; they are the practical path to change.


Updated: Six Arrested in Berkeley Protest

Dennis Culver (BCN)
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 09:17:00 AM

Police this morning said six people were arrested during an overnight protest that turned violent in Berkeley. 

Berkeley police spokeswoman Jennifer Coats said five adults and 1 juvenile were arrested. Police did not immediately release information on what the people were arrested for. 

The protest started peacefully Saturday but turned violent and lasted well into the morning hours. 

Police said a small group of protestors started hurling bricks, pipes, smoke grenades and other items at officers. 

The protest, one of several in the Bay Area over the past few nights, was in response to a New York grand jury's decision on Wednesday to not indict a white police officer in the chokehold death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man. 

The protest mostly followed the along the Telegraph Avenue area and on nearby streets. 

Coats said at least one police officer was transported to the hospital after suffering a dislocated shoulder after being hit with a large sandbag. Several officers reportedly were hit with projectiles thrown by protestors. 

Some protestors made their way through several Berkeley neighborhoods and vandalized cars, broke windows and looted businesses. 

Coats said police ended up using smoke and tear gas to disperse crowds as protestors continued to vandalize businesses. 

Several police vehicles were also vandalized during the protests. 

 


Anarchists Attack Berkeley Apartment Building During Protest

Planet
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 01:14:00 AM
Protesters smashed the doors of a Wells Fargo office in a commercial/residential building at San Pablo and University.
Carol Denney
Protesters smashed the doors of a Wells Fargo office in a commercial/residential building at San Pablo and University.
Anarchist protesters tagged the commercial/residential building at the corner of San Pablo and University with their traditional symbol.
Carol Denney
Anarchist protesters tagged the commercial/residential building at the corner of San Pablo and University with their traditional symbol.

Hundreds of protesters marched from the UC campus down to west Berkeley and stopped traffic briefly at the corner of University and San Pablo Avenue Friday night. Protesters smashed glass and vandalized property at the intersection's largest building which has several commercial properties as well as 26 residential apartment units, some housing families with children, which are part of a low-income housing co-op. They tagged the front wall of the building with the traditional anarchist symbol of the letter A in a circle. The protesters attempted to set the building on fire until two young Latino tenants of the building, physically stopped them. 

One of the other tenants encountered a protester she described as a middle-aged long-haired white man as he was rolling their recycling bin away from the building. When she remonstrated with him, he told her it belonged to Wells Fargo and he was taking it to block the freeway. She told him it belonged to the apartments, and insisted that he put it back in place, which he did reluctantly. 

One observer said that most of the protesters she saw at this location were white and probably at least 40 years old. 

The police were absent during the vandalism and arson attempt, arriving fifteen minutes later in full riot gear when the protestors had moved north on San Pablo, and took no reports from witnesses.


Arrests in Berkeley Demonstrations Seem Likely

Becky O'Malley
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 12:52:00 AM

In Berkeley about midnight tonight a line of unmarked white vans, SUVs and large sedan equipped with flashing red and blue lights moved across Bowditch adjacent to the First Church of Christ Scientist and People's Park, turning down Channing to park in the block between Bowditch and Telegraph.

At about 12:30 a group of demonstrators was contained on Telegraph at Channing between two lines of police in riot gear, with additional police lines a block away in either direction.

It seems very likely that mass arrests are imminent, and these vehicles have been assembled to transport arrested persons. 

A live stream that appeared to be coming from outside the line of police at Dwight showed a crowd of observers who looked like most of them were young, student-age white people. Some were taunting the police, with occasional chants of "Hands up, don't shoot" accompanied by upraised hands.


Berkeley Protest Takes Violent Turn

Dennis Culver (BCN)
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 01:07:00 AM

A protest in Berkeley turned violent Saturday night when a small group of protestors began hurling bricks, pipes, smoke grenades and missiles at officers, police said. 

The protest, one of several in the Bay Area over the past few nights, is in response to a New York grand jury's decision on Wednesday to not indict a white police officer in the chokehold death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man. 

Police spokeswoman Jennifer Coats said the protests began peacefully, moved from Telegraph Avenue into the downtown area and then to the front of the Police and Fire Public Safety Building. 

Coats said small splinter groups then broke from the peaceful demonstrators and began throwing rocks, pipes and bottles at officers. 

The projectiles struck numerous officers, and one officer hit with a large sandbag was treated at a local hospital for a dislocated shoulder. 

Coats said the groups went through several Berkeley neighborhoods and vandalized cars, broke windows and looted businesses. 

The crowd continued marching to Martin Luther King Jr. Way and University Avenue, where protestors vandalized businesses on University Avenue, including Trader Joe's, Radio Shack and a Wells Fargo Bank. 

The crowd moved west, splintered and regrouped several times as it moved to University Avenue and then to east of San Pablo Avenue and nearby streets. 

Coats said Berkeley police used smoke and tear gas after crowds refused to disperse and protestors continued to vandalize local businesses and pelt officers with rocks, bottles and pipes. Several police vehicles were vandalized as the crowd moved through the south campus area. 

Police were still working to disperse the crowds just before midnight. 

More than a hundred officers from the Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Oakland Police Department, Pleasanton Police Department, Hayward Police Department, Alameda Police Department, California Highway Patrol and BART Police Department responded to support Berkeley police. 

The exact number of arrests and injuries during the protest was not immediately available. 

 

Copyright © 2014 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited. 

/www/bcn/general/12/newsclip.14.12.07.01.04.00.1.txt


Berkeley Protests End in Tear Gas, Arrests

ErinBaldassari/KeithBurbank (BCN)
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 01:02:00 AM

A standoff with police and protesters in Berkeley Saturday evening continued with police firing teargas and smoke at protesters to disperse them, police said.  

Berkeley police officer Jennifer Coats said the group is a smaller splinter group from the protests, and members of that splinter group are being violent. Members are throwing rocks and bricks at officers, Coats said.  

Officers have given several orders for the crowd to disperse, but without effect, forcing officers to use the tear gas. Two officers have reported being injured in the protests, with one officer requiring treatment at a hospital for a shoulder injury.  

A police van has been vandalized.  

As of about 11 p.m., protesters were marching in the vicinity of 66th Street and Telegraph Avenue. 

The protests in Berkeley began peacefully around 5 p.m. as roughly 400 people marched down Shattuck Avenue towards downtown Berkeley.  

The group turned violent in the area of University Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Way, with some people smashing windows and vandalizing businesses, Coats said. 

Some of the demonstrators fought and argued with the vandals, putting themselves in front of store windows, according to accounts and photos on Twitter. 

Coats said at least one officer sustained minor injuries after demonstrators threw rocks and other projectiles at police. Berkeley police Officer Byron White said on Twitter that the demonstrators also released gas into the crowd.  

"So far, protesters have thrown sandbags, pipes, bricks, sideview mirrors, and smoke grenades at officers," White said on Twitter at 9:39 p.m. 

Multiple reports on Twitter showed pictures of windows broken at the Trader Joe's grocery store on University Avenue along with produce crates strewn in the street and wine bottles smashed on the ground. 

There were also reports on Twitter of protesters marching near the University Avenue entrance to Interstate Highway 80 in an effort to breach the freeway. A California Highway Patrol officer said protesters did not make it onto the freeway and only caused temporary delays. 

The downtown and North Berkeley BART stations were both shut down due to the protests but were open as of 11:15 p.m. BART officials said there are no delays in the system. 

After shutting down the BART station, protesters were eventually blocked in by police at the intersection of Durant and Telegraph avenues, according to Twitter accounts.  

The protesters refused to leave and police fired tear gas to disperse the crowd, which police had declared an unlawful assembly.  

Photos and accounts on Twitter showed garbage cans pulled out into the street and set on fire on Telegraph Avenue.  

The demonstration started around 5 p.m. in response to a New York grand jury's decision on Wednesday to not indict a white police officer in the chokehold death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man.  

The protest is one of dozens that have taken place across the Bay Area and the country in the past two weeks, including protests Saturday afternoon in Oakland and San Francisco, against police brutality.  

The demonstrations in Oakland were very peaceful and police said they did not even respond to the crowd, which moved through businesses in the retail corridors of the Rockridge neighborhood.  

An Oakland police watch commander said there were no reports of arrests Friday night after demonstrations shut down Interstate Highway 880 and the West Oakland BART station before returning to downtown Oakland, where it dissipated.  

In San Francisco, demonstrators marched down Market Street and staged a "die-in" at Powell Street, according to accounts and photos on Twitter. Eventually, police arrested protesters on Market Street, but Officer Gordon Shyy said he would not be able to say how many people were arrested until Monday. 

San Francisco police responded to a report of a person who threw a large firecracker near a construction site in the unit block of Fifth Street during the demonstrations, Shyy said. 

The firecracker detonated but no one was injured, Shyy said. 

Police stopped the suspect vehicle, where officers found a second firecracker. Shyy said the department's bomb squad responded and handled the explosive at the scene.


Flash: Berkeley Protest Turns Violent (PRESS RELEASE from Berkeley Police)

BPC Officer Jenn Coates
Saturday December 06, 2014 - 11:43:00 PM

FERKELEY-- This evening, a peaceful protest turned violent when several splinter groups broke off and began hurling bricks, pipe, smoke grenades, and other missiles at officers. 

The protest began peacefully, and moved from Telegraph Avenue into the downtown area, and then to in front of the Police and Fire Public Safety Building. There, a small portion of the group splintered from the peaceful demonstrators and started throwing rocks, pipes and bottles at officers. Numerous officers were struck, and one officer was struck with a large sandbag, and treated at a local hospital for a dislocated shoulder. These splinter groups also ran through several Berkeley neighborhoods vandalizing cars and breaking windows and looting businesses. 

The crowd continued marching, arriving on Martin Luther King Jr. Way and University Avenue. Members of the crowd began vandalizing businesses on University Avenue, including Trader Joe’s Radio Shack, and Wells Fargo Bank. 

The crowd moved west, splintered and regrouped several times, as they moved to 6th/University, then back east to San Pablo Avenue and nearby streets, and eventually east up University Avenue, through the downtown area, and up Bancroft Way to Telegraph Ave. 

Berkeley Police used smoke and tear gas after crowds refused to disperse and continued to vandalize local businesses and pelt officers with rocks, bottles, and pipes. 

Numerous police vehicles were vandalized as the crowd moved through the south campus area. 

This event is ongoing at this time.  

The Berkeley Police Department is being supported by over a hundred officers from the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Oakland Police Department, Pleasanton Police Department, Hayward Police Department, Alameda Police Department, California Highway Patrol and the BART Police Department. 

The total number of arrests and injuries is not known at this time.


Berkeley Blocks a train, says "Hands up! Don't shoot!" (PHOTO ESSAY)

David Bacon
Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 11:47:00 AM
David Bacon

Protestors in Berkeley block an Amtrak train and then face off against police in a demonstration to protest the murders of Black men by police around the country, and the impunity of police who commit these crimes.


Opinion

Editorials

Even in Berkeley, Police Bully Citizens of Color

Becky O'Malley
Friday December 05, 2014 - 09:40:00 AM

In the news in the last few weeks: multiple incidents where citizens have been killed by police officers for reasons that seem trivial or non-existent. They range in gravity from a policeman shooting a guy in Missouri who might or might not have pinched a few cigars all the way down to a twelve-year-old kid in Cleveland gunned down for flashing a toy gun in the wrong place at the wrong time. The common thread: all were African-Americans, and all had done nothing to merit summary execution. And none of the uniformed killers have been held to account.  

This week, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder spoke out about the latest outrage, the failure of a New York Grand Jury to indict a police officer for homicide (“human killing”) inflicted on Eric Garner, accused of selling single cigarettes.  

“…we seek to restore trust, to rebuild understanding and to foster cooperation between law enforcement and the communities they serve,” he said.  

Congresswoman Barbara Lee noted that “These tragedies have been happening for many years. But the recent high profile cases of injustice for the families of Eric Garner and Michael Brown have and should spark a national debate and long overdue action to address the structural and institutional racial biases in our nation.”  

There’s been a lot of outrage expressed over the failure to prosecute police officers for their role in these deaths. But what also needs to be examined is the continuing accumulation of seemingly trivial incidents where African-Americans and other citizens of color are needlessly harassed by the very law officers who are supposed to be protecting them.  

Holder, whose brother is a retired officer, said that “the vast majority of our law enforcement officers perform their duties honorably and are committed to respecting their fellow citizens' civil rights as they carry out their very challenging work.”  

Well, maybe. But a recent incident I’ve learned about, right here in supposedly liberal Berkeley California, makes me wonder.  

Bobby G’s Pizzeria on University is a very typical neighborhood pizza- and-sports-screens joint a few blocks from the U.C. Berkeley campus. Bobby, the boss, is a former tech executive who thought owning his own business would be more fun. It turns out—no surprise—to be a lot of hard work, but he prides himself on maintaining a convivial atmosphere. The food is great—the place has been a big favorite of my visiting granddaughters and my sports-fan son-in-law since it opened eight years ago.  

But on a Sunday afternoon in late September (September 28, to be exact) the customary gathering to eat pizza and watch a 49ers’ game was disrupted by multiple police officers arriving in force in several cars with lights flashing. They stayed for almost an hour.  

The Planet has gotten a copy of a letter (now a matter of public record) which the proprietor wrote that night to the Berkeley Police, with a copy to his councilmember Jesse Arreguin. Here’s just the beginning of what he said in an eloquent two-page single-spaced letter:  

“I would like to request a meeting with internal affairs, and the officers who came to my restaurant at 2072 University on Sunday afternoon (around 4:30pm), September 28 and used my hallway as an interrogation room to question a man who, with his wife and child, was minding his own business while watching the 49ers game. I was not in the restaurant at the time but the officers did not seek my permission to use my hallway for what seems to amount to nothing but harassment. My manager tried to speak with the officers about the incident and she was completely ignored.  

“While I am a big supporter of the Berkeley Police Department, and always will be, I do not under any circumstances appreciate or condone what went down in my restaurant on Sunday. From what I understand some customer in my restaurant called the police and alleged that this mixed race couple, who are good customers of Bobby G's Pizzeria and who have never once created any problems, were abusing their child by drinking beer and wine in front of the kid.” 

The owner’s letter went on to recount what a witness had told him, that one officer even lectured the parents for taking their son to a “bar”. He pointed out that Bobby G’s is a family friendly restaurant which has the kind of alcohol license that allows children to come in for meals and their parents may order beer and wine—it’s not just “a bar”.  

His letter was accompanied by a list of signatures and phone numbers which Sarah Danley, the manager on duty, had collected from 18 restaurant patrons who were outraged by what they witnessed, including one family therapist. Sarah happens to be trained as a lawyer, so she understood the implications of the scene she was watching. 

“There were at least eight cops,” one witness told me. “It was pretty tense.” 

I learned that the family in question comes in often on weekend afternoons to eat pizza and watch games on the big screens, and the regulars like them a lot. A patron who signed the list of witnesses describes the scene when the boy, who looks to be about 5 or 6, watched his dad being interrogated for the better part of an hour by multiple officers as “heartbreaking”. 

One of the witnesses I spoke to, Jacob Woods, told me he thought the fact that one of the parents is African-American had a lot to do with the disrespectful way the police treated them, and others agreed. Even if some racist busybody had called in a complaint, Jacob said that a two-minute conversation with the manager or anyone in the restaurant should have been enough to show the cops that no child abuse had taken place. 

Instead, according to witnesses, the parents and everyone else in the place (most of whom were white) were essentially held hostage for close to an hour while a pair of police officers exhaustively (and arrogantly) quizzed the African-American father, in the process blocking the hall leading to the restrooms and making it impossible for anyone else to get past. 

This is Berkeley, to be sure, and both the restaurant owner and his patrons were quick to condemn the abuse of authority which they witnessed. But if the officers involved have not been reprimanded, if what appears to be their standing operating procedure, the pattern and practice of their response to complaints against citizens, does not change, it will happen again and again, with eventually tragic consequences.  

The letter I saw concluded this way: 

“I'm not filing a formal complaint against the officers but I think they need to show a lot more respect for people when investigating a complaint that was basically nothing…I am a big supporter of the Berkeley Police Department but that doesn't mean I support this kind of boorish behavior. Nobody should, and Berkeley Police should be above the nonsense of treating everybody like criminals.” 

After I was given a copy of his letter, I asked Bobby what had happened since he wrote it in September. He told me he’d had an inconclusive conversation with someone in the Berkeley Police Department who asked him to supply a copy of his surveillance video. It turned out that wasn’t possible because the recorder had malfunctioned—and he never heard from the BPD again. As far as he knew, none of the 18 witnesses had been contacted either, and that’s where it stands. 

Small businesses like Bobby G’s depend on the services provided by police officers, so the owner has understandably been reluctant to press his complaint any further. It took a good deal of courage to write this letter in the first place. The last thing a struggling local enterprise like his needs is enmity from the police. 

This story might seem like small potatoes when compared with recent incidents where people died, but it’s hostile encounters like this that eventually destroy what Holder describes as “the sense of trust that must exist between law enforcement and the communities they are charged to serve and protect.”  

Why on earth should that little boy who watched his father being bullied trust the police when he’s older? 

And here’s the thing: this happens all the time, everywhere, even—god forbid—in liberal Berkeley. I’ve heard dozens of similar stories from African-American friends and family members, each more or less outrageous than this one. That watching African-American child whose father was harassed by a posse of Berkeley police officers on the basis of a bogus complaint could have been my own mixed-race granddaughter. And nobody, regardless of race, should be treated like that. 

Worse cases, cases where people have been killed by police, seem to be on the news every night, it’s true. But many, many smaller indignities like those visited on that family at Bobby G’s on a September afternoon are daily occurrences. 

What are we, in Berkeley and in the rest of the country, going to do about it, and about all the rest of the situations where persons of color are unjustly accused on a regular basis? I’d be interested in getting comments from Berkeley’s police chief, city manager, mayor and city council on this topic, but I’m not holding my breath waiting for them to call. I didn’t contact the family in question—they’ve been annoyed enough—and I’m not using their name to protect what remains of their privacy, but if they asked me for advice, I might just give them John Burris’s phone number.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Editor's Back Fence

Read this

Monday December 15, 2014 - 11:17:00 AM


New Issue Today

Thursday December 11, 2014 - 12:29:00 PM

Because so much happened this week, we've started the new issue a day early. But if you'd like to follow the action from earlier in the week, just click the "Previous Issue" button above to see it all. There will be a new editorial eventually--just keep checking.


New Issue Tomorrow

Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 10:33:00 PM

We've gotten so much news and opinion that our columns have gotten too long. We're starting this week's issue tomorrow, a day early. You can see it as it's posted by clicking on "Next Issue", and when that issue is complete it will be "published" so that it's the first thing you see when you go to berkeleydailyplanet.com. You can always go back to the "Previous Issue" if you've missed anything,


Don't Miss This

Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 06:06:00 PM

Winston's Diary , from "a young American who has been independently reporting from the very front-lines of the Berkeley/Oakland protests for the last week. "


Mayor Bates Insults Berkeley's Press

Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 04:34:00 PM

We've just learned from our colleagues at berkeleyside.com that Mayor Bates has dissed us all again:

Breaking: City of Berkeley calls ‘invite-only’ press conference just for TV news



An Alternative Location

Tuesday December 09, 2014 - 01:21:00 PM

Since the council meeting has been called off, perhaps the Martin Luther King Civic Center Building (New City Hall) would be a good place to exercise "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." It's open during the day most days.


Cartoons

Odd Bodkins: Free the San Francisco Earthquake (Cartoon)

By Dan O'Neill
Friday December 05, 2014 - 11:43:00 AM

 

Dan O'Neill

 


Public Comment

New: An open letter to City Council on the proposed Energy Report Ordinance

Steve Martinot
Monday December 15, 2014 - 08:50:00 AM

The proposed ordinance, called the Building Energy Saving Ordinance, is unconstitutional

I would like to suggest and argue that the Building Energy Saving Ordinance (#7,387 – NS) is unconstitutional on three grounds. It is a violation of due process. It levies a tax mistakenly named a fee in the ordinance. And it subjects each property owner to a requirement that is too general and overly broad. 

The procedure contained in this ordinance is that each building owner must hire an agency, possibly an arm of PG&E, to do an energy audit, and provide a report of that procedure and the condition of the building to the city (Planning and Development) by a certain specified date. Failure to do so is a misdemeanor – that is, it is a crime. 

The act that the ordinance requires of each building owner is the hiring of a third party (not the city) to do the audit, for the cost of which the owner will be responsible. That is, the ordinance gives the city the power to require a commercial relationship between a citizen of this state and a third party providing the service required by the ordinance. 

1- Because the ordinance requires each building owner to hire a service (energy audit), failure of which will be a crime (misdemeanor), the ordinance establishes a condition of enforceable obedience on each property owner. And the act of obedience required by the ordinance is that the property owner hire a service and pay the service provider money. That is, the ordinance requires that each property owner be deprived of the money paid the service provider, under penalty of law. This money is not a tax to the city, which is legislatable. And it is not a fee to the city for a service the use of which is voluntary. It is an absolute requirement that each property owner be deprived of money, under penalty of law. This is a deprivation of property in the form of money by the city without due process. Deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process is prohibited by both the California constitution and the US constitution. 

In order for this ordinance to be constitutional on these grounds, the city would have to hire the agency that performs the service, and pay all charges to that agency in the performance of that service for the city. 

2- The ordinance requires every property owner to provide an Energy Report which includes an Energy Score by dates established in the ordinance. These reports constitute the full compliance with the requirements of the Chapter. Administering the Chapter will be the duty of an Administrator, which involves accepting the reports and publishing the energy scores. For this purpose, the ordinance establishes that fees can be levied by resolution of the city council. But these fees are not levied on the owner, but on the compliance status of the real property. A deferral of compliance attaches to theowner, and not the property. It is the responsibility of the owner to comply with the ordinance. But the fees attach to the property, and not to the owner. As the paragraph on "responsibilities" states, a seller must inform a buyer concerning the “compliance status of the real property.” If the fees attach to the property and not to the act of submitting a report, then they are in reality a tax. 

As a tax, what is called a fee can be instituted only by a vote of the citizens effected. And since the recipient of the funds collected in fees is specified, the tax would require a two-thirds majority to pass. 

3- The ordinance is overly broad and thus in violation of the US constitution by neglecting to establish the rates to be paid by building owners for reporting the compliance status of their property. This absence gives the city a blank check to set rates at whatever level it desires at some future time, whether through the Adminsitrator of the program or by future resolution. Since failure to obey the terms of the ordinance is criminalized by the ordinance, the ordinance has to be specific about what is being violated by such a failure, and the ordinance does not do that. Therefore, it is in violation of the US constitution on those grounds


New: The Taiwan Restaurant in Berkeley Closes

Sheila Goldmacher
Saturday December 13, 2014 - 09:54:00 PM

It seems the whole city is under attack by the likes of Bates and his team of developers. As I walk around town I notice more and more businesses gone like the smog place on Addison I used to use—one day there—next day just a large empty space as well as several other businesses that used to call that area home. Then the corner of Shattuck and Dwight Way—one day a furniture store on the corner—next time I looked half the block demolished. Slow Restaurant on University near Milvia—great food, gone—as well as other shops, service centers and on and on. And I have not even addressed the possible loss of our 10 Landmark Shattuck theaters upon whom we depend for our fix of films that feed our minds, hearts and souls as well as being accessible to all kinds of people like me and others. We are losing what we called Berkeley for the likes of rotten tall expensive structures for the upper classes all at the expense of our commons and our sense of place. Wake up folks—it will all be gone before you know it. Plutocracy in all its ugliness.


An open letter to the black bloc poseur who sucker-punched me at the anti-police march on Telegraph Avenue Tuesday, December 9, 2014.

Hank Chapot
Thursday December 11, 2014 - 09:19:00 PM

You, in your skinny black jeans, designer black hoodie and face hidden behind a fashionably folded scarf probably thought it's real cool to drag those construction barricades from the 39th street BART project into Telegraph avenue with your little clique and STICK IT TO THE MAN.

Me, I thought you were fucking with the purpose of the marching, so I blocked your path with my bicycle. You sucker punched me in the face. WTF?

I know you're tough guy, dressed for anarchy, testosterone streaming, girls watching and all that, your black bloc fashion show allows you to sucker punch an old guy, a veteran of the struggle. But if you really have some cajones, go assault a cop one on one and see how you come out of that. 

Now I'm an old guy, but as a 14-year old, I marched against the Viet Nam war in Golden Gate Park. I mopped up oil in the San Francisco bay oil tanker spill in 1970. I'm a Critical Mass veteran, arrested protesting gulf war one, arrested for my union actions, founder of the Green Party. 

But I'm not resting on my laurels; I'm not posing about how great the sixties were. I hate that shit. I'm marching in 2014 against police brutality, and I'm marching in the tradition you seem to have missed. 

I was a juvenile delinquent once, until, on the eve of my eighteenth birthday, I got my ass kicked by two plains-clothes San Francisco cops and spent the night in juvenile hall. I learned that politics requires respect, discipline and non-violence. 

And guess what. People behind you in the march dragged the barricades, trash and recycling bins back to the sidewalk, so your petty little efforts at rebellion were less than powerful, your childish destructive acting-out only fucks up the cause of the protests and give fodder to the mainstream media. 

I didn't plan to interfere with your fun, I'm just sick and tired of your kind of mostly white prics taking over the very serious activism against police murder for you own juvenile smash-up. I watched your kind smash window and light fires on Sunday the seventh, all well-dressed white boys, and asked myself is this vanguard of the revolution, or are they infiltrators, or the quislings we should shoot first when the revolution triumphs? 

After you sucker-punched me, I was a bit in shock a bit concussed. Two people apologized, one asked if I needed medical attention, the other said I didn't deserve it and should just move on, I was lucky I was wearing a bike helmet or you might have killed me. 

As I walked along further down Telegraph, I followed you, I took your picture. I had a Leatherman multi-tool on my belt and in my punched-up state, I seriously considered opening the blade and giving you two or three fast jabs in the liver. I might have killed you. 

But the story is this; violence, even simple property destruction like yours, has no place in any street movement. Violence against a fellow protester is the worst kind of internecine conflict that will destroy our movement before it is born.


Understanding Dissent

Thomas Lord
Wednesday December 10, 2014 - 10:22:00 PM

There is a popular set of expectations regarding protest that goes something like this:

1. Protesters must share a common political aim.

2. The political aim must be reducible to a few simple "talking points".

3. The purpose of the protest must be to build popular support for the political aim.

4. Achieving popular support requires that protests must respect property and not be significantly disruptive.

5. Protests must have leaders and organizers who plot the conduct of the protest.

Public discussion in the Berkeley Daily Planet and on Berkeleyside has largely concerned the ways in which recent protests in Berkeley fail to live up to these expectations. Many Berkeleyans have expressed anger, rhetorically stamping their feet over violations of these expectations of protest.

Others try to minimize the thwarted expectations by attributing transgressions to "splinter groups" and "small minorities" who supposedly "hijack" otherwise legitimate protests.

Such self-congratulatory expressions of indignation and anger are as powerless as they are detached from reality.

Let's examine protest without such preconceptions: 



1. Protest does not require a common aim other than the aim to protest.

A protest requires a certain kind of "group identity" among protesters. This is only tautological. If protesters do not have the common aim to protest then no protest occurs. If protesters are deliberately acting as a group then they have, minimally, some common aim to do so.

No further common aim is necessary.

Protesters need have in common nothing more than their individual dissatisfactions with a general state of affairs and a general idea how to stand up to this state of affairs.

Recent protests in Berkeley have been unified by dissatisfactions with the police -- with the state of policing in the U.S. Nothing more specific is needed for individuals to come together in protest.

Thus, for example, recent Berkeley protests have included slogans as diverse as "Black Lives Matter"; "The Police State Must Fall -- They Can't Arrest Us All"; "Justice for Mike Brown"; "End Police Brutality"; and "Shut It Down".



2. Protest does not require "talking points".

Protests consist of individuals, acting as a group. Each individual and the group are standing up to a state of affairs.

People have never needed articulable "talking points" before standing up to a state of affairs.

People show resistance all the time, in all aspects of their lives, without necessarily being able to give some reason, in a few words, for their effort to change things.

To insist that protesters must agree to talking points is nothing, more or less, than insistence upon the commodification of protest. Talking points are a unit of exchange in commodified news reporting, commodified electioneering, and commodified human relations.

If we recognize that people and their protests are not a commodity, then we should expect protests to be ambiguous, contradictory, and ultimately inarticulable.

The only certainty of protest is that a group of individuals has stood up collectively against a general state of affairs.



3. "Grass roots support" is not at stake.

A passive "approval" or "disapproval" by the supposed masses is normally of no consequence to protests. Popular sentiment is passive, inert. Protesters object to some state of affairs, but rarely (if ever) are they objecting to a deficit of popular sentiment.

People do not take to the streets to change approval ratings, except in the false narratives of people who are trying to "prove" a protest is bad.

Some have criticized recent protests in Berkeley for offending residents by damaging businesses and for offending commuters by interrupting their travel. Yet the protests appear to express individual dissatisfactions with the police. Attitudes of approval (or disapproval) from some residents and some commuters have little relevance to the state of policing locally or nationally. Little if anything of the state of policing is changed by popular opinion.

Perhaps it is a difficult pill to swallow for the self-appointed spokespeople of "the masses", but their feelings as they watch and read the news are relatively unimportant to anyone but themselves.



4. Disruption and threatened further disruption is the form protest takes.

If a group of people object to a state of affairs and they themselves have the direct ability to alter that state of affairs then the people do not protest; they simply take matters into their own hands and change the state of affairs.

Protest, in comparison, necessarily has the form of individuals standing up as a group to a state of affairs which is not within their direct control. Protest can only ever operate indirectly.

Moreover, if people object to an impersonal and agentless state of affairs, they do not protest. People do not protest the weather or the time of day.

Protest, instead, always has the form of standing up by trying to alter the behavior of certain others.

Moreover, protest seeks to overwhelm and overcome the will of others not to change their behavior.

Even the protests led by Dr. King did not operate by winning over the hearts and minds of white racists. They operated as a threat aimed squarely at the continued operation of society. Again and again the civil rights protesters demonstrated their ability and willingness to "shut it down".

It is always so:

If people do not need to use one form or another of force to alter the behavior of certain others, they have no need to protest; they can ask, or persuade, or rally, or petition, or otherwise forcelessly bring about the desired change.

Protest arises when no forceless change is possible; it always seeks to forcibly disrupt the state of affairs required by those whose behavior must change. Protest takes the form of a threat: disruption will recur until behavior is changed.

Protests in Berkeley are standing up for individual and diverse objections to the general state of policing. What, then, must these protests disrupt? What can the protests disrupt to influence a target as big as policing in the U.S.?

Empirically, policing functions to protect and facilitate an economic order. That includes the role of policing in order to protect the operation of governments that fund and establish policing.

It is that very broad state of affairs -- the dominant political and economic order -- that those who control policing demand.

The Berkeley protesters are not unified against any one officer or group of officers. Their dissent is not unified around a single targeted department. The individual dissatisfactions with the state of policing are wide-reaching and varied.

Accordingly, the protest has the form of a wide-reaching, varied attempt to disrupt the economic and political order as a whole.

Protesters have been using the slogan "Shut it Down" to name that broad target. And: "The whole damn system is guilty as hell." Protesters have acted simply and directly in keeping with such slogans. They have, with little effort from each individual, imposed millions of dollars in direct and indirect costs on the state. They have, for several nights running, prevented regional police from operating normally. On December 9, they prevented the City Council from functioning.


5. Organizers are superfluous.

A protest becomes organized as soon as the people who will protest share a common idea of where to participate, when, and how. Without these essentials, protesters cannot act as a group. With those shared ideas, nothing more is needed.

A half century ago and earlier it was the precise function of protest organizers -- of protest leadership -- to establish the idea of a common plan among protesters. It took hefty organizations with considerable participation in society to create, for example, the actions of Freedom Summer.

Yet if a protest can establish a common plan without organizers, then organizers are not needed at all.

Organizations and individuals have stood in front of the Berkeley crowds but none can take credit for organizing them. The methodology needed to "shut it down", today, is increasingly common knowledge. It is as much the shared idea of society as "The Wave" at a sporting event or the sea of lighters and smartphones held up at a rock concert.

Choices of time and place, today, are easy to infer from circumstance and for groups to agree upon in a leaderless fashion. Protesters just pass along the idea to one another.



Taking it All In

On the one hand we have romantic myths of protests organized by strong leaders, winning over the hearts and minds of popular support, championing the cause of political reform. No actual protests in history appear to embody this romantic mythology, though people sometimes talk as if it were otherwise.

On the other hand we have the simple reality that thousands of people have converged on Berkeley to stand up against an intolerable state of policing in the U.S. In response they have been acting in unison, simply, to disrupt the functioning of the dominant political and economic order as broadly as possible. These events have occurred, and succeeded in their disruption, without the need for strong leadership or organizing.

The growing capacity of the people to "Shut It Down" has been on display in the form of a demonstration.

The radical and militant disruption of society -- the simple bodily blocking of its continued "business as usual" -- has suddenly become not only a popular idea with many, but a practicable one.

There are no talking points for these protests and that only makes them stronger, not weaker, for they rely on no refutable theory.

To succeed, the protests do not need to win over the masses, only to disrupt business as usual and Shut It Down.

The disruption of the dominant economic and political order is perhaps the most direct attack on the general state of policing that can be imagined.

Much more than legislative reform or any other political shift, this form of protest directly interferes with the operation of the policing to which people are standing up.

However uncomfortable the protests may be for residents of the region, there is scarcely any point in criticizing the protests for not living up to a romantic, mythological ideal.

Perhaps instead it is time for more people to examine the current state of policing in the U.S. and ask what it is that has created this level of radical dissent: how we got here and what can be done to address the ills that motivate these protests.

Perhaps it is time to stop pretending our politicians can rein in the militarization of the police.

Perhaps it is time to recognize there is more at stake than deploying "body cameras" and raising rates of indictment of uniformed officers who shoot civilians.

As the police have become more akin to a standing army and as we have learned more and more about the mass surveillance of all people by our government, society has seemed barely to blink. Our obscene and racially skewed rate of incarceration has seemed more an abstract topic for idle discussion than a present political crisis.

Our ordinary political process is paralyzed by powerlessness in the face of the police state.

A militant minority has begun taking to the streets in opposition to this state of affairs.


New Berkeley Building Energy Saving Ordinance (BESO) doesn't respect citizens

Vivian Warkentin
Thursday December 11, 2014 - 09:36:00 AM

A new replacement energy saving ordinance is about to be enacted in our city of Berkeley, Building Energy Saving Ordinance (BESO). The current system requires upgrades only when buildings are remodeled or resold. If passed, all homeowners and building owners in Berkeley will be mandated to have an outside auditor inspect their home or building every 5 to 10 years. The law would require all building owners to hire a private firm from a city approved list to conduct the assessments. Audits will cost from $200 to $600 for a single family home, up to $10,000 for a large commercial building. A filing fee of $79 -$240, depending on building size will go to the city of Berkeley. 

City staff maintain that they have done community outreach via three workshops, implying that they have adequately informed so-called “stakeholders”, but the public has been left out of the process. If workshops are held and no one knows about them, it is not informing the citizens. 

The attitude of our city officials and staff is undemocratic and disrespectful of environmentally conscious Berkeley citizens. Are homeowners who have worked an honest living to buy a home in Berkeley to be treated as delinquents before the fact? What if a homeowner wants to live a simple life without subscribing to new technology and costly improvements and would prefer to keep their old fashioned windows and wear extra sweaters with no monitoring by a smart meter.? Why does the cure for climate change always involve increased fees, taxes and charges on the citizens, not to mention unhealthy, privacy-invading technology? 

I have been told by a Berkeley official that these audits will not require people to purchase chipped appliances and lights. The staff presenter of the ordinance, when asked at the November 18th special 6:00 session of council, what types of recommendations might be made in an audit, referred to “smart” lights and Energy Star programs. It may not be mandated now, but the final component of the smart grid is for everyone to have smart appliances that will communicate with their smart meter. These technologies are equipped with wireless transmitters. 

This new ordinance is a slippery slope of government intrusion and surveillance in our lives. There needs to be more critique of climate change mitigation measures being fed to the Council by outside corporate interests who stand to gain at the expense of the citizens of Berkeley. 

If you are concerned about our eroding democracy and citizen input in Berkeley city government, be at the City Council on Tuesday, December 16, 7:00pm, when the council will vote on the ordinance.


New Berkeley Building Energy Saving Ordinance (BESO) doesn't respect citizens

Vivian Warkentin
Thursday December 11, 2014 - 09:33:00 AM

A new replacement energy saving ordinance is about to be enacted in our city of Berkeley, Building Energy Saving Ordinance (BESO). The current system requires upgrades only when buildings are remodeled or resold. If passed, all homeowners and building owners in Berkeley will be mandated to have an outside auditor inspect their home or building every 5 to 10 years. The law would require all building owners to hire a private firm from a city approved list to conduct the assessments. Audits will cost from $200 to $600 for a single family home, up to $10,000 for a large commercial building. A filing fee of $79 -$240, depending on building size will go to the city of Berkeley. 

City staff maintain that they have done community outreach via three workshops, implying that they have adequately informed so-called “stakeholders”, but the public has been left out of the process. If workshops are held and no one knows about them, it is not informing the citizens. 

The attitude of our city officials and staff is undemocratic and disrespectful of environmentally conscious Berkeley citizens. Are homeowners who have worked an honest living to buy a home in Berkeley to be treated as delinquents before the fact? What if a homeowner wants to live a simple life without subscribing to new technology and costly improvements and would prefer to keep their old fashioned windows and wear extra sweaters with no monitoring by a smart meter.? Why does the cure for climate change always involve increased fees, taxes and charges on the citizens, not to mention unhealthy, privacy-invading technology? 

I have been told by a Berkeley official that these audits will not require people to purchase chipped appliances and lights. The staff presenter of the ordinance, when asked at the November 18th special 6:00 session of council, what types of recommendations might be made in an audit, referred to “smart” lights and Energy Star programs. It may not be mandated now, but the final component of the smart grid is for everyone to have smart appliances that will communicate with their smart meter. These technologies are equipped with wireless transmitters. 

This new ordinance is a slippery slope of government intrusion and surveillance in our lives. There needs to be more critique of climate change mitigation measures being fed to the Council by outside corporate interests who stand to gain at the expense of the citizens of Berkeley. 

If you are concerned about our eroding democracy and citizen input in Berkeley city government, be at the City Council on Tuesday, December 16, 7:00pm, when the council will vote on the ordinance.


New: The Brown/Garner Killings are about a Larger State of Official Terror

Harvey Wasserman
Friday December 05, 2014 - 11:14:00 PM

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.


Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me

Pastor Martin Niemoller, speaking about Nazi Germany

First, they’ve come for the people of color.

America’s police forces increasingly serve as a a private corporate army, beyond the reach of the law.

But our nation is distracted by race. And millions of white Americans are under the illusion that what was done to Michael Brown and Eric Garner can’t happen to them. 

These un-prosecuted killings of African-American men go way beyond racial prejudice. 

They are the calling card of an Orwellian state: 

America’s founders established grand juries to protect citizens from frivolous prosecution. But today’s corporate state has twisted the system to protect killer police from public scrutiny, putting them above the law. 

The ultimate message is clear: police can kill American citizens without cause and face no public trial. (Steven Rosenfeld lays out the details at Alternet http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/10-ways-system-rigged-protect-cops-who-kill

The current focus is on skin color. Thankfully, Americans throughout the US have risen up in protest, demanding social justice and an end to racism. 

But the larger issue is a police apparatus now inflicting random terror in service of a corporate state that has mutated far beyond public control. 

We are still being assaulted by a cynical 40-year drug war used to disenfranchise and violate the basic rights of millions of Americans with no real recourse. 

In the name of that drug war, and the one on terror, police randomly confiscate (steal) billions in cash from citizens of all races, in direct violation of the Bill of Rights and any sense of a real legal system. Police departments use these officially sanctioned armed robberies to help fund heavy war-time weaponry also coming to them as “surplus” from the federal military. 

Citizens of color, the young, the poor and the elderly are being systematically stripped of the right to vote by a modern electronic Jim Crow. The dominance of a corporate one-party system is furthered by the use of privately-owed, easily-rigged electronic voting machines. . 

The NSA and other official agencies are spying on us without restraint. 

Our ability to communicate through an open, neutral internet is also under attack. Meanwhile a San Diego rapper with no record of violence has been charged with multiple “crimes” based on his lyrics. As anger with America’s billionaire elite spreads, we can certainly expect the counter-attacks on open speech to escalate. 

That the victims of these latest police killings are most often men of color is tragic. It also gives the corporate media the perfect distraction behind which to hide the root problem. 

Throughout our history, race has been the reliably lethal facade for all sorts of political repression. It’s the hate-filled poison perfectly designed to divide and distract us. 

The sickness is real enough. But the ultimate cancer we face is the rise of an all-powerful corporate state and its iron grip on a violent, unaccountable private army licensed to kill---no matter what the race or cause---while knowing that the once-sacred right to a public trial does not apply to them. Should the attacks on the internet succeed, we’ll also be hearing less and less about them. 

Thus we are all in the shoes of Michael Brown and Eric Garner. Those who think themselves somehow above it all by virtue of race or class are simply not paying attention. 

Unless we rise up to secure social justice and our basic legal rights, we’re all just a single cop away from being as dead as the very latest victim of official violence... at any time, for no reason, with no recourse. 

 


HARVEY WASSERMAN’S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES is at www.solartopia.org along with SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH. His upcoming book is THE SPIRAL OF US HISTORY. 

 


A Muslim’s Thank You Letter to Pope Francis

Khalida Jamilah
Friday December 05, 2014 - 10:09:00 AM

Dear Pope Francis,

As a Muslim I thank you for your message of compassion and peace delivered during your recent visit to Turkey. This visit and your address symbolize the need for a stronger interfaith relation between Christians and Muslims to promote world peace. I thank you for disassociating Islam from violence and that particular statement was parallel to the teaching in the Quran which states “Surely, Allah loves not the transgressors" (2:190). And when you said ISIS is persecuting the Christian in the Middle East, the Quran also condemned this barbaric action as it states, "And if Allah did not repel some men by means of others, there would surely have destroyed cloisters and churches and synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is oft commemorated" (22:41). 

I know that we cannot eradicate all evils in this world but the fact that you visited a mosque in a Muslim majority country where Christians are a minority symbolizes your endeavor in removing misconceptions between Muslims and Christians. 


Khalida Jamilah pursues Peace and Conflict Studies at UC Berkeley and is a member of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Women Writers Association.


December Pepper Spray Times

By Grace Underpressure
Friday December 05, 2014 - 11:49:00 AM

Editor's Note: The latest issue of the Pepper Spray Times is now available.

You can view it absolutely free of charge by clicking here . You can print it out to give to your friends.

Grace Underpressure has been producing it for many years now, even before the Berkeley Daily Planet started distributing it, most of the time without being paid, and now we'd like you to show your appreciation by using the button below to send her money.  

This is a Very Good Deal. Go for it! 


New: Berkeley Rep Audience Should Look Smarter

Lori Lorge
Sunday December 07, 2014 - 05:13:00 PM

Call me sentimental that I wanted Kathleen Turner to look the way she did back in the day last night when I went to see the play Red Hot Patriot at the Berkeley Rep (read Body Heat). My disbelief was not suspended this time - but that she is a forceful talent cannot be denied. What struck me the most however, was the bad manners of the intellectual yet sartorially sloppy audience. In the first few minutes of the play there was hissing when a picture of George W. Bush was displayed onscreen. When crass comments were made about other politicians there was whooping. Note to Berkeley audience - it's ok to be smart - AND - pretty - inside and out. Do not be afraid my fellow theatre enthusiasts. I ask you to consider the perfect storm if the care and pride of intellect is also applied to good manners and perhaps a stylish outfit. And maybe some blush. Studied unstudiedness is not a look. Cat calling is déclassé. Do better. Be better. Just sayin.


Other Ways to Express Support

Romila Khanna
Friday December 05, 2014 - 10:12:00 AM

I don't like the way protesters are showing support for Michael Brown. The right to speak out and show disapproval of the grand jury's verdict is fine. But what connection is there between the grand jury's bad judgment and destruction of public buildings?  

What connection is there between the grand jury's bad judgment and destruction of commercial buildings? If people have a problem with the grand jury's unjust decision, why hurt those who are not directly involved and who did not harm the murdered teenaged boy? I don't understand the rationale for destroying property and hurting innocent citizens.


Columns

THE PUBLIC EYE: Who Runs the Democratic Party?

Bob Burnett
Friday December 12, 2014 - 07:40:00 AM

It’s convenient to blame Democratic leaders for the Party’s disastrous 2014 midterm elections. But which leaders? Who runs the Democratic Party? 

Not President Obama. He may be the commander-in-chief, but other than as a symbol he’s not the leader of the Democratic Party. 

In 2008 and 2012, Obama insiders, such as David Axelrod and David Plouffe, ran Barack’s presidential campaign. However, they weren’t involved in the midterm elections in 2010 and 2014. Furthermore, in 2014, the President was left out of the campaigns for many Senate and House seats because of his weak poll numbers. 

There’s a significant organizational difference between Democrats and Republicans. When George W. Bush was President it was generally accepted that Karl Rove – Bush’s campaign manager and White House deputy chief of staff – was the leader of the Republican Party and the architect of both the presidential and midterm GOP campaigns. Bush is gone but Rove continues to be in charge. 

In the last decade, the closest Democrats have come to the Republican hierarchical organization was from 2005-2009 when Howard Dean was chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Dean sponsored the “fifty state strategy” that produced a sweeping Democratic victory in the 2006-midterm elections: Dems achieved a 233-202 advantage in the House of Representatives, a 51-49 plurality in the Senate, and a 28-22 governorship advantage. 

Since Dean retired, the Democratic Party hasn’t had a leader comparable to Rove. 

It’s not that the Democratic Party lacks smart people. The Dems claim politicians such as Barack Obama and Elizabeth Warren, message mavens such as George Lakoff and Mike Lux, policy wonks such as Paul Krugman and Katrina vanden Heuvel, and moneyed supporters such as Paul Soros and Tom Steyer. 

Nonetheless, the Democrats lack focus. They don’t have a strategy comparable to that of the GOP. In between presidential elections, Democrats collapse into factions. When Dems compete in the midterm elections the operating philosophy has been good luck, candidate; you’re on your own

Democratic candidates compete against Republicans who are cogs in a well-oiled machine. The results reflect this reality. In 2010, the Dems lost 63 House seats to the Republicans (who gained a 242-193 majority). They also lost six Senate seats. The biggest loss was in the states where Republicans controlled 29 governorships and 26 state legislatures (they gained a record 680 seats). This put the GOP in charge of the redistricting process – which happens every 10 years – and many congressional districts were gerrymandered to benefit the GOP. 

After 2010, Republicans revealed their grand plan to retake Congress and hold it. Rolling Stone observed: 

This tilting of the electoral playing field was the result of a sophisticated campaign coordinated at the highest levels of Republican politics through a group called the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC) – a Super-PAC-like entity chaired by Bush-era RNC chairman Ed Gillespie and backed by Karl Rove. Shortly after President Obama's first election, the RSLC launched the Redistricting Majority Project (REDMAP) with an explicit strategy to "keep or win Republican control of state legislatures with the largest impact on congressional redistricting."
 

In 2012, riding on the backs of the successful Obama campaign, Democrats retained control of the Senate (55-45) but did not retake the house even though they had the aggregate majority of votes. Mother Jones reported that in 2012, as a result of Republican gerrymandering, “Most Americans voted for Democratic representation in the House but Republicans [retained] a 234-201 seat majority.” 

In 2014, the Republican strategy produced more gains. Republicans now have a 54 to 46 advantage in the Senate, a 246-188 advantage in the House (with one race still being determined), and a 31 to 19 advantage in governorships. And, according to Real Clear Politics, Republicans “now control 68 of 98 partisan state legislatures – the highest number in the history of the party.” 

Democrats Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DNC), Michael Bennet (DSCC), and Steve Israel (DCCC) oversaw the Dems 2014 midterm campaigns. Like most national Dems they are tactical but not strategic. Karl Rove and associates defeated them. 

Since 2008, the Republican Party has systematically executed a broad political strategy: raising millions, gerrymandering districts, restricting the voting rights of traditional Democratic constituencies, depressing likely Dem voters, firing up the Republican base, and controlling the message. It’s working. 

In 2016, when Hillary Clinton is the Democratic presidential candidate, team Clinton will drive the national Democratic message. That may be enough to retain the White House but it’s unlikely to produce the strategy required to reverse the Republican accomplishments of seizing the House and Senate as well as control of most state legislatures. 

There must be a national Democratic strategy comparable to that developed by Karl Rove for the GOP. This is more than a compelling populist message. The strategy has to reach throughout the party to recruit viable candidates, raise money, establish a modern get-out-the-vote infrastructure, and, most of all, re energize the Democratic base. There has to be a strategy with a message that involves and excites the 99 percent. 

Who will lead this effort? Who will become the next Howard Dean? 


Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. He can be reached at bburnett@sonic.net 


ON MENTAL ILLNESS: When Is It Time to Cut Down on Meds, and How?

Jack Bragen
Friday December 12, 2014 - 07:51:00 AM

A trap that some psychiatrists might get us into, really an unintentional error, is to try to relieve our suffering from side effects by reducing our dosage of antipsychotic or other medication. I call it a trap because it can be a "slippery slope," to reduce medication, one in which the slippage could cause a relapse.  

For someone suffering from medication side effects and additionally suffering due to large areas of consciousness being suppressed, there needs to be some kind of hope of things being better in the future. Thus, many of the most compassionate psychiatrists will try not to medicate excessively, and may try to reduce the suffering caused by excessive medication when we reach the point where we show signs of recovery.  

Taking medication should not be perceived as punishment. Ideally, medication is there to help a patient recover and to thus have a chance at building a life. When caregivers use medication in a context of punishment, something is wrong. When patients perceive that they are not being cared for and helped by use of medication, it becomes an impetus for noncompliance. Thus, excessive medication with no end in sight can ruin a person's chances at a meaningful recovery.  

On the other hand, the medication that I personally have needed, to be maintained in relative clarity as well as stability, has gradually increased over a thirty year period. Most psychiatrists would think of my dosages as "whopping." Yet, those high dosages seem to be what I need in order to do well.  

I'm kind of an unusual creature because in some respects, I am a glutton for punishment. Most people could probably not be happy on the dosages that I voluntarily take. I have sacrificed physical comfort in order to more aggressively treat my psychosis.  

Medication to treat psychosis is a balancing act. The dosage that might be needed in order to get and stay stabilized could cause some amount of physical suffering and other side effects. Medication can have side effects that adversely affect health, or other side effects, such as Tardive Dyskinesia, that create disfigurement and suffering. I've been lucky that I have been spared the worst of possible side effects.  

However, I have had side effects that have caused me to suffer physically--side effects such as muscle stiffness, dry mouth, a nasty drugged feeling, blockage of consciousness, and weight gain. These are things I have tolerated so that I could maintain some amount of reprieve from psychosis.  

The problem with reducing medication by too much is that a patient can slip into a partial relapse, and this can lead to worse consequences. When medication is lowered, it can produce a loss of insight into one's condition. In my past when I tried to lower my dosage of medication, I reached a point where I was partially delusional and believed I didn't need to keep taking medication.  

None of this is easy. If I had a viable alternative to taking medication, I would choose such an option.  

I recall a therapist talking of the "revolving door"--of chronically mentally ill people having repeated relapses, going in and out of the hospital repeatedly, and not having a good outcome.  

I had a friend who would go into a mental hospital under involuntary circumstances, would get stabilized and then would be released, and would immediately dispose of all his medication. He was a very good man when stabilized. But when he experienced a manic episode he was quite dangerous. He is not around any longer.  

Mental illnesses are serious diseases that can lead to a horrible level of suffering and possible death. The risk of treatment must be weighed against the risk of no treatment.  

I do not have the authority to tell the readers that they should or should not take medication or that they should lower or raise their dosages. When someone gets a mental health diagnosis, it is a life altering event, and there is no single solution that works for everyone.  

However, please be aware that there are risks to going too low or off of medication, and there are also risks of being on medication.


ON MENTAL ILLNESS: Wrongful Deaths

Jack Bragen
Friday December 05, 2014 - 10:00:00 AM

We are dealing with a nationwide crisis in the misuse of power by police officers and by a corrupt court system. I can in no way belittle the crime that was perpetrated upon Michael Brown. It was one of a series of wrongful deaths in which non-Caucasian people have been killed by police and in which there has been little or no retribution by the courts. My sympathy goes to Michael Brown's family, and I believe that any reasonable person should be outraged by this corruption and by this tragedy.  

However, for me this brings up the wrongful deaths that have been perpetrated upon persons with mental illness, as well.  

Persons with mental illness are often treated brutally by police. Persons with mental illness are often wrongfully shot to death or die while in custody due to excessive restraint or due to the hard conditions of incarceration, such as high temperatures or dehydration. Temperatures in transport vans in the summer may go beyond 110 degrees, and there is no water available. Mentally ill people in custody are targeted for abuse by other inmates. Police often shoot mentally ill people because they believe incorrectly (most of the time) that we are a threat.  

I would take a step further than the protest of unfair treatment of African American people, and I would say that we need a complete revision of law enforcement and of the court system.  

In no way to belittle the injustice perpetrated upon Michael Brown--I also see that when someone with mental illness is wrongfully killed by police, there is no uproar by the public whatsoever. When a mentally ill person (which is also another minority) is killed, why aren't there mobs of fellow psychiatric patients wrecking a town? Perhaps this is largely due to the fact that most mentally ill people are medicated and controlled, and thus to not have the energy or the liberty to get out and demonstrate.  

Secondly, when someone with mental illness wrongfully loses his or her life at the hands of police or while in custody, the mass media often doesn't report it. If you want me to name some names, I'll start by saying potentially me. While I don't have the specific statistics handy, it is very clear that a lot of people with mental health problems are unnecessarily killed by police. A piece that I looked at in KQED News stated that more than half of those killed by San Francisco Police were persons with mental illness.  

Beyond wrongful death, persons with mental illness are dealt with through the court system, and this from the get-go is the wrong way of doing things. Persons with mental illness need help and not handcuffs.  


THE PUBLIC EYE: What Democrats Stand For: Four Messages for 2016

Bob Burnett
Friday December 05, 2014 - 10:06:00 AM

In the aftermath of the disastrous 2014 midterm election, former Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean observed, “You’ve got to stand for something if you want to win.” Before 2016, Democrats must figure out what they stand for and develop coherent messages. Here are four suggestions. 

1. Fight for the Middle Class. 

In 2016, Democrats need to follow the lead of Senator Elizabeth Warren who acknowledges that while the US economy has grown, “the system is rigged” and, therefore, the plight of the middle class hasn’t improved over the past six years. “The stock market and gross domestic product keep going up, while families are getting squeezed hard by an economy that isn’t working for them.” Democrats have to reestablish their identity as the Party that is fighting for the middle class. 

Most political observers believe the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate will be Hillary Clinton (although there are a substantial number of progressives pushing for either Senator Elizabeth Warren or Senator Bernie Sanders to run). If Hillary is the Dems choice, the challenge for liberals will be to get her to adopt a strong populist stance, to convince Hillary to advocate for change that jaded voters will believe in, and to establish Hillary as a champion of the middle class. 

A recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll indicated strong national support for specific populist proposals: a. 82 percent of poll respondents supported, “Providing access to lower cost student loans and providing more time to those who are paying off their student loan debt.” b. 75 percent of respondents supported: “Increasing spending on infrastructure projects for our roads and highways.” c. And, 65 percent of respondents supported: “Raising the minimum wage.” 

It’s hard to imagine that Hillary would oppose any of these measures. 

This common-sense populism differentiates Democrats from Republicans. It’s unlikely that any Republican presidential candidate would embrace the slogan “fighting for the middle class” or support measures to lower student loan costs, increase spending on infrastructure, or raise the minimum wage. (In 2012, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s slogan was “Believe in America” and his basic message was a reprise of classic Reaganomics: cut taxes and reduce government regulation and spending.) 

2. Fix the Broken Immigration System 

President Obama’s November 20th speech on immigration ensured that it will be an important issue in the 2016 presidential election. The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, conducted just before the President’s remarks, indicated that only 39 percent of respondents supported: “Creating legal status for some immigrants who are here illegally.” Nonetheless, Hillary Clinton said, “I support the President’s decision to begin fixing our broken immigration system.” 

Subsequent polls indicate that nine out of ten Latino voters supported the President’s action. Immigration reform may not resonate with older white Republican voters, but it does with the Democratic base. 

In 2016, immigration is likely to be a critical differentiator between the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. It’s unlikely that any Republican candidate who is sympathetic to immigration reform – such as former Florida Governor Jeb Bush – can make it out of the no-holds-barred Republican primaries. 

3. Address Global Climate Change 

The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll indicated strong national support for tackling climate change. 59 percent of respondents supported, “Addressing climate change and global warming by setting specific targets to limit carbon emissions.” (A November Hart Research Associates poll of “Battleground State Voters” found a similar result. In states such as Colorado, Iowa, and New Hampshire, two-thirds of respondents favored candidates who supported the EPA plan to reduce carbon emissions.) 

In a recent speech Hillary Clinton called climate change, “the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face as a nation and a world.” 

In 2016, climate change is likely to be a critical differentiator between the Democratic and Republican Candidates. It’s hard to imagine any Republican candidate making it out of the primaries based upon his support for tackling climate change. 

4. Defend Affordable Healthcare 

The Affordable Healthcare law, “Obamacare,” remains controversial. The same NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that 41 percent of respondents supported, “Cutting funding for the new health care law so that parts of it would not be put into effect or enforced,” while 43 percent opposed such an action. 

While America continues to be divided over the new healthcare system, Hillary Clinton supports Obamacare. In a June interview Hillary said, 

We're going to learn more about how it's working, and if there are adjustments that need to be made as we go forward, wouldn't you rather have somebody who wants to keep the good, and fix what's not working, than somebody who wants to undermine it, and maybe throw it out?
In 2016, attitudes about Obamacare are likely to be critical differentiators between the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. 

It shouldn’t be difficult for Democrats to remember what they stand for. These four messages support populist values. They also serve to differentiate the likely Democratic presidential candidate from any Republican. 


Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. He can be reached at bburnett@sonic.net


SENIOR POWER: HenPower

Helen Rippier Wheeler, pen136@dslextreme.com
Wednesday December 03, 2014 - 01:31:00 PM

A while back, my eye was caught by the title of a small volume on the library’s New Books shelves — The Chicken Chronicles. Turkeys have been much in recent news. Dogs, cats, lambs all appeal, but chickens!? I’m not now referring to the sometimes vernacular chicks or hens … Keeping Up Appearances’s Onslow refers to a broody woman. Perish forbid. 

The Chicken Chronicles: Sitting with the angels who have returned with my memories: Glorious, Rufus, Gertrude Stein, Splendor, Hortensia, Agnes of God, The Gladyses, & Babe; A Memoir was published by New Press in 2011. I’m not especially interested in chickens, but The Chicken Chronicles was written by Pulitzer Prize-winning Alice Walker, so into my book bag it went. At the time, I didn’t have in mind a possible Senior Power column connection, other than Walker’s age (70). 

The Chicken Chronicles is about human-animal relationships. Rural northern California too. Walker is Mommy. She reflects on compassion, bullying, death, friendship, meditation, and more in 37 essays about her Girls as they free-range or not. Here are a few titles: What do chickens like to do? — The old fox — St. Michael, lover of animals and children — The song behind the world: the nuns of Dharamsala — From: poems for my girls — Grandfather Gandhi-and mommy’s experiments with reality — A few kind words about stupidity — In the night mommy hears mangoes falling — Mommy writes about Hortensia — Mommy is so thankful to have you appear — The first day — Day two — Even bullies are missed and loved… 

Free-range — not to be confused with open range – is a method of farming in which at least part of the day, chickens in this case, can roam freely outdoors, rather than being confined in an enclosure around the clock. Free range systems usually offer the opportunity for extensive locomotion and sunlight prevented by indoor housing systems. The term may apply to dairy farming, eggs, meat, etc. . 

xxxx 

I wondered about chickens and old people elsewhere. It appears that in England senior men are really into chicks and hens. Jessica Salter reports on a scheme to introduce “hen keeping” to elderly men in particular that is turning out to have a miraculous effect on their wellbeing by reducing isolation and depression. (“Chickens helping the elderly tackle loneliness.” Daily Telegraph [London], October 31, 2014) 

The idea came about in 2012, when a man at a dementia care center kept telling staff he missed his girls, meaning his hens. Equal Arts, a charity providing creative projects for older people, contacted the Environment Agency and purchased six hens and a secondhand hen house. 

There’s a photo of Owen Turnbull, 84, giving a five-day-old chick a bath in the sink of a communal launderette. The chick, chirping away as he talks to it, is one of four orphans. ‘Their mam died three days ago,’ he says. ‘I found her when I went to feed them. I was sad about losing her – I do get attached to them.’ For the past 9 years Turnbull has lived in Wood Green, sheltered-accommodation bungalows in Gateshead, Newcastle, with his 82-year-old wife, for whom he is the main carer. There are also 70 other residents, 13 hens and 15 chicks. The chickens are all named after women who live at Wood Green. The eggs are sold (£1.25 for six) in the central common room. 

Equal Arts set up the HenPower project in eight pilot sites, ranging from care homes to assisted-living schemes like Wood Green. In addition to practical poultry keeping, there are hen-based activities that include art, dance and singing. 

Although open to women, the project was aimed at men. Equal Arts and HenPower contend that men tend not to have such broad social networks as women and to have very different hobbies, and hen keeping appeals to certain groups of men, who are vulnerable to depression in care homes. Having kept hens before, Thomas ‘Ossie’ Cresswell agreed to get involved, although he didn’t like the idea of keeping them as pets. But he became one of the most vocal supporters. A core group out of the 23 at Wood Green embraced HenPower. They purchased an incubator and went to auction to buy fertilized eggs. 

An important part of HenPower is interacting in the community, so they take the chickens on roadshow trips to schools and retirement homes. ‘You go in and they’re all looking at the wall. We go in with three hens and start chatting and you’d think a bomb had dropped, the place comes alive.’ The project has made a big difference in 87-year-old Cresswell’s life, too. Twice widowed, he has lived in his bungalow at Wood Green for 16 years. Since joining HenPower he has ‘made a lot of friends’ and says, ‘It gives you a purpose for life.’ 

The U.K. Campaign To End Loneliness (“Connections in Older Age”) estimates isolation increases the risk of Alzheimer’s disease by 50%. A study by the University of Northumbria found that male participants all reported improved wellbeing and reduced depression and loneliness. In one dementia care home since the hens arrived, violent incidents by residents were down by 50%, and the use of antipsychotic drugs was so reduced that they were no longer issued routinely. 

The Hen Men is a “Vimeo” documentary from meerkatfilms. Alan, Owen and Ozzy are old men grappling with the challenges of growing old in a modern world. They expose the seldom explored issues of loneliness, depression and dementia but find comfort and company in the new hens at their quirky supported living scheme. 

Clearly, in England, HenPower is manpower. 

xxxx 

NEWS 

In a move that brings the people of New Jersey one step closer to having the medical option of aid in dying, the New Jersey State Assembly voted 41-31 in a bipartisan fashion to pass the Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill Act (A2270). “Compassion & Choices’ Death with Dignity Option Wins in Watershed Assembly Vote. Aid in Dying Law Now More Likely for People of New Jersey” November 13, 2014 (Trenton, N.J.)  

CALIFORNIA NEWS 

California’s experiment aimed at moving almost 500,000 low-income seniors and disabled people automatically into managed care has been rife with problems in its first 6 months, leading to widespread confusion, frustration and resistance. "California’s Managed Care Project For Poor Seniors Faces Backlash," by Anna Gorman (Kaiser Health News via WebMD, November 19, 2014). 

The California project stems from the Affordable Care Act, which does not mandate managed care but promotes better integration of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Managed care is nothing new to California, which already has extensive experience in both the public and private sectors. 

The Los Angeles County Medical Association, concerned that the project is ill-conceived, ill-designed and will jeopardize the health of many of the state’s most vulnerable population – the poor, the elderly and the disabled — filed a lawsuit to block the project. 

There is a lot riding on the pilot — the largest of its kind in the nation. The patients involved are among the most expensive to treat – so-called “dual eligibles,” who receive both Medicare, the health insurance program for the elderly and disabled, and Medicaid, which provides coverage for the poor who are able to locate a physician who accepts Medi-Medi. Over the 3 years of the demonstration project, California is focusing on 456,000 of the state’s 1.1 million dual eligibles. 

Many beneficiaries have received stacks of paperwork they don’t understand. Some have been mistakenly shifted to the new insurance coverage or are unaware they were enrolled. Forty-four of those targeted for enrollment through Oct. 1 opted out. One rejected the managed care program because his doctor said he wouldn’t see him anymore if he was enrolled. Doctors have been among the most vocal critics of the switch, and the state is having trouble getting some to participate. The state has been besieged with questions. In September alone, there were nearly 50,000 calls to the state’s health care services department about the project. 

State officials acknowledge some transition problems but contend the project will provide consumers with more coordinated care that improves their health, reduces their costs and helps keep them in their homes. In addition, officials estimate the program could save the state more than $300 million in fiscal year 2014-2015. Until now, many of these patients have had to maneuver through two massive government bureaucracies, each with separate rules. Medicare pays for most doctor visits and hospitalizations, and Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid) covers nursing and other long-term care. The patients are more vulnerable than most Medicare beneficiaries, more likely to have Alzheimer’s, diabetes and mental health problems. Many see multiple doctors in different practices, sometimes receiving unnecessary medications or duplicative tests. Old people are typically afflicted with 3 diseases. 

In most — but not all– counties, patients have a choice of plans. The pilot program’s enrollment is occurring on a rolling basis and now includes five counties – San Mateo, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, San Diego and Riverside. The program will begin in Santa Clara County in January 2015 and then Orange County but will not move forward in Alameda County as originally planned. 

I continue to wonder what goes on under the guise of managed care and case managers in what was once the West Berkeley Senior Center building. 

 


Arts & Events

Zero Motivation: Israel's Women Soldiers + Base Behavior

Review by Gar Smith
Saturday December 13, 2014 - 08:56:00 AM

Opens December 12 at the Landmark in Berkeley

Director Talya Lavie's "dark comedy," Zero Motivation (in Hebrew with English subtitles), has racked up a half-dozen Ophir Awards (Israel's Oscar) for best director, screenplay and actress. The film (with screenplay by Lavie) follows the misadventures of Zohar (Dana Ivgy) and Daffi (Nelly Tagar), two forlorn young women assigned to perform their mandatory two-year stretch of national service in an isolated military base in the Negev Desert. It's a tale of slackers, hackers and attackers surrounded by an emotional desert of Negevtivity. 

 

 

We know Zohar and Daffi are the best of friends because we see them sharing ear-buds. Their lives are a shared play-list of dashed hopes and unlikely daydreams. 

In the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), the plight of female soldiers—aka "the girls"—is decidedly retrograde. On one hand, they are trained to shoulder powerful rifles and stand guard duty. The rest of the time, they are expected to be on hand to schlep coffee and for the male-dominated staff meetings. 

Zohar and Daffi are a pair of complainers (not that they don't have cause to kvetch). While other members of the all-female office crew are somewhat adjusted to their fate, our reluctant "sheroes" spend their office hours as surly, sulking slouchers. (Is it really the case that most female recruits in the IDF routinely greet each other with hugs and kisses and break into Israeli pop songs while working at their desks? Perhaps this is an indication of the lack of discipline that prevails under the lax oversight of Lieutenant Rama (Shani Klein), the lack-luster administrative officer.) 

Lavie based her screenplay on her own experience. "During my mandatory military service as a secretary," she recalls, "I dreamed of making an army movie with the pathos and epic proportions of classic war films." Instead, she opted to fashion a tale about "the gray, mundane experiences that my office mates and I had—hardly ever getting up from our chairs. Like most girls during their two years of service, we didn't risk our lives. But we were definitely in danger of dying of boredom." 

Daffi and Zohar are clearly members of the bored. Daffi is deemed such a non-performer that the only job she can be entrusted with is operating the office paper shredder. "Being a paper shredding NCO is what you make of it," she philosophizes. 

Poor Zohar. While she is known as the office's "Postal NCO," everyone seems to know that she also is the only virgin in the camp. She prays that she can be made "normal, like everyone else." Is she lez? (She does seem to be overly protective of the wimpish Daffi and, when she spies a smiling Daffi walking past her office window sharing her earbuds with a tall, handsome soldier, Zohar is crushed.) 

Meanwhile, Rama, the administrative office's overbearing commander, jockeys for a promotion but is constantly undercut by her two young slackers who would rather be playing "Minesweeper" on the office computers than keeping the administrative paperwork from falling into chaos. (Computerize automation has yet to reach this paper-clogged outpost, raising questions about the time period being depicted. Sometime after 1990, at least, since that was the year Minesweeper debuted.) 

In the early scenes, much is made of the fact that the office boasts two formidable staple-guns—"the only thing that works to hang posters!" one of the women notes. We soon see posters being stapled into the cement walls of the base, one after another. The posters are reminders of the IDF's history: The War of Independence: Sinai War, Six-day War, War of Attrition, Yom Kippur War, Lebanon War, Gulf War—the Gulf War? (Note: We'll be seeing those staple guns in a new light later on.) 

About halfway through, the film rises above the snarky fusillades of snide bitching and starts to become more engaging, with sharp bursts of ribald, cutting female humor. But just when it seems the film is starting to hit its mark as a feminist comedy, it turns dark. 

There is a hideous betrayal by a despicable male soldier that leads to a bloody shock and some strange personality changes that turn one side character into a psycho ghost and/or ghostly psycho, you decide. 

When Daffi's fantasy of winning a transfer to Tel Aviv (on the basis of a letter-writing campaign) falls apart, she decides to turn her life around. Bolstered by improbable visions of strutting through the streets of Tel Aviv in full uniform, makeup and stiletto heels, Daffi morphs from a whining nerd into hard-working officer-candidate. Alas, the payoff of her promotion will consign her dreams to the shredder and send her into another sob-fest. 

Ultimately, the bonds of Zohar's and Daffi's friendship are broken by competing dreams. The showdown comes when the estranged former BFFs find themselves alone in the disheveled office. Computers go crashing to the floor and soon both ladies are targeting one another with those military-grade staple guns. (If you've ever hankered to see a wild, shrieking shootout with flying staples, this is your movie.) 

Sent to detention following another major act of "creative insubordination," Zohar offers a sacrifice to save her one-time friend from losing her commission. Zohar winds up in psychiatric confinement. Which leads to a threat of physical assault. Which turns into something else entirely. 

The only joy for these two non-Army brats seems to lie outside the Army. And so the film ends with Daffi in an air-conditioned high-rise far from the Negev and Zohar running through the desert sand to catch a bus that will take her to Tel Aviv. 

And what about their commander Rama? In a deft but wrenching scene at a ceremony called to honor her years of service, Rama stands before her workmates and attempts to offer something from her heart—only to have her effort quietly stymied, leaving her wordless and humiliated. 

There may be more OMG pangs than LOL zingers in Zero Motivation but it's still worth the visit if you are curious about the IDF's FUBAR lifestyle.


Updated: Takács Quartet Plays Beethoven and Mozart

Reviewed by James Roy MacBean
Sunday December 14, 2014 - 03:34:00 PM

On Sunday, December 7, I attended a concert at Zellerbach Hall by the Takács Quartet, a Hungarian-English-American string quartet. This concert was mistakenly listed in the Datebook section of the San Francisco Chronicle as taking place in Zellerbach Playhouse, which struck me as an appropriately intimate venue for a concert of chamber music t. However, when Cal Performances Press Information office confirmed my request for a press ticket, they informed me that this event would take place in Zellerbach Hall. This was my first disappointment with this concert. 

My second disappointment came when I asked for my ticket at Will Call. There was nothing set aside in my name. I assured the box office people I had received email confirmation from Rusty Barnes that a press ticket would be held for me at Will Call. They eventually came up with a ticket, and I went to my seat, only to find that I was seated far back at the rear of cavernous Zellerbach Hall. This was my third disappointment. Not wanting to make a fuss, I decided to remain in my ticketed seat. This was a mistake 

My fourth disappointment came when, checking the program, I found that the Takács Quartet would not be playing the original finale to Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 13 in B-flat major, the Grosse Fugue, but would play the more conventional finale Beethoven later wrote at the urging of publishers. My fifth dis-appointment came as soon as the Takács Quartet began playing, for I noted with consternation that from where I was sitting the overall sound was thin and the timbre of the first violin seemed dry. Moreover, the playing of the Takács Quartet in the first movement seemed to me too fluid, too tame, lacking in rhythmic bite, and lacking as well any hint of the tragic element that underlies this work. Only the brief Presto movement pleased me with its lively scherzo treatment, but this tended to weight the emotional pitch of this work on the light and affirmative side rather than on the darker side. Likewise, the Andante movement, followed by the buoyant Danza tedesca, weighted the emotions still further on the bright side. In fact, only the somber Cavatina movement evoked the sadness underlying this work.  

Karl Holz reported that Beethoven “wrote the Cavatina (‘short aria’) amid sorrow and tears; never did his music breathe so heartfelt an inspiration, and even the memory of this movement brought tears to his eyes.” However, with only this Cavatina movement weighing in on the dark side, it struck me as no wonder the Takács Quartet chose not to play Beethoven’s original finale, the Grosse Fugue. The all too lighthearted way the Takács Quartet played the earlier movements would simply not support anything as tragic and demanding as the Grosse Fugue. So they settled for the more modest, affirmative Allegro finale. I found myself disappointed with the Takács Quartet’s playing of this quartet, which is one of my favorites. 

At intermission, I abandoned my ticketed seat at the rear of Zellerbach and found an empty seat in the third row front and center. As soon as the Takács Quartet began playing Mozart’s Quintet for Two Violins, Two Violas, and Cello in G-minor, K. 516, I realized with a sigh of relief how much better was the sound. The first violin of Edward Dusinberre no longer seemed dry but rich and full, and guest violist Erica Eckert’s timbre was darkly burnished. Second violinist Károly Schranz, cellist András Fejér, and violist Geraldine Walther all sounded great from my new seat up close. 

Mozart’s G-minor Quintet, written in 1787, begins with an unsettling main theme of broken phrases, sighing chromaticisms, and the violins playing unsupported by a bass foundation. Then the darker instruments develop the theme in chromatic modifications before a second subject, a sad, plaintive theme, is introduced; and the movement maintains its disturbingly overwrought demeanor to the end. The second movement, a menuetto, has been called the least dancelike of minuets, for it proceeds with dramatic bursts from all five musicians in unison, violent changes of dynamics, a halting rhythmic motion, and a generally grim ex-pression. The third movement, marked Adagio ma non troppo, opens with ensemble playing, then offers the violin and cello trading phrases in a poignant statement of the opening theme in this most deeply expressive of Mozart’s slow movements.  

The fourth and final movement begins with a mournful Adagio cavatina by the first violin but soon gives way to a lively, affirmative Rondo in G-major, marked Allegro, which features pizzicato plucking by the cello. This Rondo, which some critics have deemed too trivial after the gloom of the earlier movements, has always seemed to me truly expressive of Mozart’s ability to transcend the darker side of life and find hope after the torment and struggle. Thus I found myself as utterly pleased with the interpretation of the Takács Quartet plus violist Erica Eckert in this Mozart Quintet in G-minor, as I was earlier thoroughly displeased with the Takács Quartet’s interpretation of Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 13 in B-flat major.


New: Theater Review: 'Old Times' at the City Club

Ken Bullock
Friday December 05, 2014 - 11:21:00 PM

"But I think I know what you mean. There are some things you remember that never happened."

Nothing much out of the ordinary ... A visit to a couple living in the country from the old roommate of the wife, someone out of the past, not seen in years ... But even before the visit itself, in the first words of Harold Pinter's 'Old Times,' the implications, the allusions of everything and anything that may--or may not--be said loom out of the shadows quite casually in the most banal speech:

"Was she your best friend?"

"What does that mean?"

--and by the end of the play, there's been something of a catharsis for the three "Old-Timers," whether seen as lost in uncertain memories, manipulators of those memories in themselves and each other, or strangers to each other and themselves, run aground on memory and speech ... 

A great deal of that catharsis is through laughter. The absurd humor of snatches of overheard conversations, of catching yourself or someone close saying something out of character, out of tune, is almost a form of punctuation in Pinter's dialogue. And self-contradiction's rampant, giving the play a sense of a faceted crystalline ornament revolved in your hand, revealing different obscure vistas inside. 

But the sense of danger blends in with chagrin, with humor that turns on itself, with one-upsmanship and put-down, unexpected sympathies, something almost like a joke form of elective affinities. Just who are these people? What they tell others? What they seem to believe themselves? 

Robert Estes, who's directed for Actors Ensemble and other theaters roundabouts, has long loved this dark gem of Pinter's, and is producing a short, midweek-only run for it at the Berkeley City Club at the perfect time of year, just as the year's ending, but in the kind of interregnum that falls between Thanksgiving and the social heat of Christmas/New Years, a particularly good moment for both the humor and pause for reflection that 'Old Times' occasions. 

Estes also assembled a team of "the ones I love to work with"--and it shows. Onstage, the three actors are completely different types who complement each other well in this little merry-go-round: acerbic Richard Aiello as Deeley, the husband constantly inserting himself between the women; Jody Christian as his reticent wife Kate; Mary Jo Price as ebullient Anna, now married to a wealthy man in Sicily. ("Do you go barefoot on your marble floors?") 

The three endlessly triangulate, but it's all brought to a head after a bath Kate takes, vanishing from the stage, during which time alone with Anna, Deeley reveals, to Anna's deadpan disagreement, surprise--or distaste--that they met years before at a party he's just recalled. And not long after Kate returns, demure in a robe, she drops her guise of quietude and launches into what can only be described as a tirade, those speeches, usually by leading ladies, from Racine or Corneille, apocalyptic affairs, almost prophecies or reportage of doom and despair, in this case telling how she went from roomie to wedded woman.  

Jody Christian performs Kate's tirade brilliantly, dropping at the end into sphinx-like repose, face like a mask, smile like a rictus, eyes shining under her fixed expression--with the others around her, a truly theatrical tableau. 

(It's good to see her back onstage, after a long hiatus. Jody Christian was always a bright face, a fine physical performer, one with depth, in Actors Ensemble productions of just a few years ago.) 

The shows are just Tuesdays and Wednesdays through December 17--8 p. m. at the City Club, 2315 Durant near Dana. $15-$30; advance tickets through brownpaperticket.com/event/975821


Bernstein’s CANDIDE A Hit in Hayward

Reviewed by James Roy MacBean
Friday December 05, 2014 - 10:13:00 AM

On Sunday, November 30, I journeyed to Hayward’s Douglas Morrisson Theatre for a performance of Leonard Bernstein’s opera Candide. Somehow, this 1956 opera had thus far eluded me, so I jumped at the chance to hear it. My effort was rewarded by a robust performance of Candide featuring a huge cast of soloists, chorus members, and a 14-piece orchestra conducted by David Möschler.  

Bernstein, who had earlier seen his first opera, Trouble in Tahiti, premiered at Brandeis University in 1952, and had not yet completed his score for West Side Story, began work on Candide by persuading Lillian Hellman to write an adaptation of Voltaire’s 1759 novella of the same title. Poet Richard Wilbur was engaged to write the lyrics, and, as the work took shape, additional lyrics were supplied by Stephen Sondheim, John LaTouche, Lillian Hellman, Dorothy Parker, and Bernstein himself. The final libretto for Candide offers a condensed yet faithful adaptation of Voltaire’s original Candide.  

Voltaire, perhaps the most famous of the 18th century French philosophes, intended Candide as a scathing satire of the “All is for the best“ worldview of German philosopher G.W. Leibnitz. Voltaire put his naive principal character, Candide, through a picaresque series of misadventures in many lands on multiple continents. Bernstein’s opera does likewise. In Hayward, the Douglas Morrisson Theatre used the Royal National Theatre Version of Bernstein’s Candide from London in a new version by John Caird, directed by Michael Mohammed. 

After a jazzy overture, Voltaire himself appears onstage, played here by Tom Reilly. His is largely a speaking role, though in Act II he does get a few chances to sing. In this production, his major function is as narrator. Voltaire introduces the character Candide as a young fellow of “unaffected simplicity.“ Candide, sung by tenor Andres Ramirez, offers a brief aria expressing his optimistic view of life. (Voltaire’s title was actually, Candide, ou L’Optimisme/Candide, or Optimism.) Then Candide is joined by his mentor, Pangloss, sung by baritone Geoffrey Colton, who 

leads Candide, his girlfriend Cunegonde, and various other characters in a chorus asserting that “This is the best of all possible worlds.“ (Pangloss is a stand-in for Leibnitz.)  

Among the principals, Andres Ramirez stood out as Candide, singing with a lilting lyricism and vibrant timbre. As Pangloss, baritone Geoffrey Colton gave a vocally assured performance; and, as Cunegonde, soprano Angela Jarosz offered a mixed bag of vocal acrobatics, sometimes reaching great hights of coloratura yet sounding shrill and squeaky in lower passages. One never knew what to expect from Jarosz; and this gave a certain air of mystery and tension to what otherwise might have been devoid of drama. Among secondary characters, soprano Anna Joham was excellent as Paquette, a peasant maid of easy virtue; tenor Johnny Villar gave an arch performance as Maximilian, the gay brother of Cunegonde; and mezzo soprano Tina Marzell was a vibrant Old Woman. Tenor Carlo Olmos ably sang the role of Cacambo, a loyal friend to Candide; and baritone Kenneth Keel sang several roles, most notably the Governor of Montevideo as well as Martin, a misanthropist who tries in vain to disabuse Candide of his optimism.  

Leonard Bernstein, ever the polyglot composer, filched or parodied music of all sorts in this opera. To Cunegonde he gave musical passages right out of Viennese operetta, then inserted Handelian coloratura passages, and even parodied Spanish fandango rhythms, also offering ditties right out of Broadway musicals. Bernstein as a composer is both glib and somehow beguiling. 

The plot begins when Candide is conscripted into the Westphalian army. In battle, Candide is horrified to see his comrades in arms slaughter entire villages of innocent civilians. Candide also learns that the enemy has slaughtered his own village and that Cunegonde was killed. Candide deserts the army and makes his way to Spain. Meanwhile, Cunegonde has survived and is taken to Spain by a soldier who sells her into sex-slavery to two religious clerics of different faiths, a Catholic and a Jew. In true ecumenical fashion, these worthy clerics agree to share Mademoiselle Cunegonde’s sexual favors in strict rotation, They compete with one another by lavishing precious jewelry on Cunegonde. When Candide discovers that Cunegonde is alive but mired in sex-slavery, he tries to rescue her and is violently attacked by both clerics, whom he kills in self-defense. Candide and Cunegonde flee Spain as fugitives, with Cunegonde bitterly lamenting all the precious jewels she left behind, gifts from her rival clerics. Arriving in Lisbon, Candide and Cunegonde are nearly buried alive in the disastrous earthquake of 1756.  

From Lisbon the plot takes Candide’s entourage to South America. In Montevideo, Cunegonde allows herself to be seduced by the governor, with whom she runs off, leaving Candide broken-hearted. Perhaps the musical highlight of this opera was the Governor of Montevideo’s seduction aria, so beautifully and fervently sung by baritone Kennethn Keel that one almost forgave Cunegonde this betrayal of Candide. Wandering broken-hearted in the mountains of Paraguay, Candide encounters a utopian society called El Dorado, where all citizens share equally in the wealth of the community. Candide and his friend Cacambo are treated as welcome guests and given great wealth in diamonds. It’s not clear, even in Voltaire’s novella, if this is an homage to his friend Rousseau’s notion of the “noble savage“ or if this is yet another satire on optimistic utopian visions. Suffice it to say that things end badly for Candide and Cacambo once they depart El Dorado.  

After more sea voyages, including attacks by Barbary pirates and a stop in Morocco, Candide returns again to Europe, eventually making his way to Venice, where his friend Cacambo has promised to meet him with Cunegonde in tow. In Venice, Candide does in fact meet up with Cunegonde, but in the meantime she has grown old and ugly. Candide bitterly reproaches Cunegonde for her many betrayals, and he stalks off saying he wants nothing to do with her. But a sudden epiphany occurs when Candide espies six former kings now reduced to poverty. Realizing how fickle is fate, Candide rouses his friends and leads them into the mountains, where they settle on a plot of land and vow to “cultivate their garden.“ Work on the soil, Candide realizes, is the best man can do in this otherwise sordid world. Candide marries Cunegonde in spite of her now less than beautiful appearance, and he leads his friends in a final chorus, “Make our garden grow.“ Thus ends Leonard Bernstein’s pastiche opera, Candide. It may not be great music; but in a fine pro-duction such as this one in Hayward, it’s good fun and a rollicking journey. In fact, it’s quite a trip.